Journal of Animal Science and Technology

Korean Society of Animal Sciences and Technology (한국축산학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Effect of different soybean meal type on ileal digestibility of amino acid in weaning pigs

  • Kim, Dong Hyuk (College of Agriculture and Life Science, Seoul National University) ;
  • Heo, Pil Seung (College of Agriculture and Life Science, Seoul National University) ;
  • Jang, Jae Cheol (College of Agriculture and Life Science, Seoul National University) ;
  • Jin, Song Shan (College of Agriculture and Life Science, Seoul National University) ;
  • Hong, Jin Su (College of Agriculture and Life Science, Seoul National University) ;
  • Kim, Yoo Yong (College of Agriculture and Life Science, Seoul National University)
  • Received : 2014.12.05
  • Accepted : 2015.01.13
  • Published : 2015.03.31
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

An experiment was conducted to evaluate apparent (AID) and standardized (SID) ileal digestibilities of crude protein (CP) and amino acids (AA) with 6 soybean products in weaning pigs. A total of 14 weaning barrows with an initial body weight of $6.54{\pm}0.34kg$ were fitted with T-cannula at the distal ileum and allotted to 7 diets containing various soybean products. The soybean products used in the experiment were conventional soybean meal (CSBM), SBM fermented by Aspergillus oryzae GB-107 (FSBMA), SBM fermented by Bacillus subtilis PP6 (FSBMB), UV sterilized SBM fermented by Bacillus subtilis PP6 (UVFSBMB), SBM containing Bacillus subtilis PP6 (PSBM), and soy protein concentrate (SPC). Six corn-based diets were used and each of soybean products was added. All diets contained 5.0 g/kg of chromic oxide as an indigestible indicator and an N-free diet was used to measure basal endogenous losses of CP and AAs. Ileal CP digestibility did not differ by different soybean products. However, SIDs of Ile, Phe and Val were improved in pigs fed the FSBMB, UVFSBMB and SPC diets and the pigs fed the FSBMA diet showed higher SIDs of Phe and Val compared with those fed the CSBM diet (P < 0.05). The FSBMB diet had higher SIDs in most AAs compared with the FSBMA diet (P < 0.05), and higher SIDs of Lys, Ala, Pro, Ser, and Tyr compared with PSBM diet (P < 0.05). However, there was no response of UV-sterilization on the FSBMB in the SIDs of AAs. These results suggest that SIDs of AAs could be improved by the supplementation of fermented soybean products in the diet for weaning pigs but fermentation with Bacillus subtilis is more efficient in improving ileal AA digestibility than that with Aspergillus oryzae. Furthermore, probiotics supplementation in the CSBM and UV-sterilization of the FSBMB had no effects on chemical composition and ileal AA digestibility.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

Supported by : Ministry for Food, Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries

References

  1. Liener IE. Factors affecting the nutritional quality of soya product. J Am Oil Chem Soc. 1981;58:406-15. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02582390
  2. Hong KJ, Lee CH, Kim SW. Aspergillus oryzae GB-107 fermentation improves nutritional quality of food soybeans and feed soybean meals. J Med Food. 2004;7:430-5. https://doi.org/10.1089/jmf.2004.7.430
  3. Zamora RG, Veum TL. Nutritive value of whole soybeans fermented with Aspergillus oryzae or Rhizopus oligosporus as evaluated by neonatal pigs. J Nutr. 1988;118:438-44. https://doi.org/10.1093/jn/118.4.438
  4. Visessanguan W, Benjakul S, Potachareon W, Panya A, Riebroy S. Accelerated proteolysis of soy protein during fermentation of thua-nao inoculated with Bacillus subtilis. J Food Biochem. 2005;29:349-66. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-4514.2005.00012.x
  5. Feng J, Liu X, Xu ZR, Lu YP, Liu YY. The effects of Aspergillus oryzae fermented soybean meal on growth performance, digestibility of dietary components and activities of intestinal enzymes in weaned piglets. Anim Feed Sci Technol. 2006;134:235-42.
  6. Stein HH, Seve B, Fuller MF, Moughan PJ, de Lange CFM. Invited review: amino acid bioavailability and digestibility in pig feed ingredients: terminology and application. J Anim Sci. 2007;85:172-80. https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2005-742
  7. National Research Council. Nutrient Requirement of Swine. 10th ed. Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 1998.
  8. Jorgensen H, Sauer WC, Thacker PA. Amino acid availabilities in soybean meal, sunflower meal, fish meal, and meat and bone meal fed to growing pigs. J Anim Sci. 1984;58:926-33. https://doi.org/10.2527/jas1984.584926x
  9. AOAC: Official Methods of Analysis of the Association of Official Analytical Chemists International. 16thedition. Arlington, VA, USA: 1995
  10. Fenton TW, Fenton M. An improved procedure for the determination of chromic oxide in feed and feces. Can J Anim Sci. 1979;59:631-4. https://doi.org/10.4141/cjas79-081
  11. Baker KM, Stein HH. Amino acid digestibility and concentration of digestible and metabolizable energy in soybean meal produced from conventional, high-protein, or low-oligosaccharide varieties of soybeans and fed to growing pigs. J Anim Sci. 2009;87:2282-90. https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2008-1414
  12. Cervantes-Pham SK, Stein HH. Ileal digestibility of amino acids in conventional, fermented, and enzyme-treated soybean meal and in soy protein isolate, fish meal, and casein fed to weanling pigs. J Anim Sci. 2010;88:2674-83. https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2009-2677
  13. Lenehan NA, DeRouchey JM, Goodband RD, Tokach MD, Dritz SS, Nelssen JL, et al. Evaluation of soy protein concentrates in nursery pig diets. J Anim Sci. 2007;85:3013-21. https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2007-0071
  14. Jones CK, DeRouchey JM, Nelssen JL, Tokach MD, Dritz SS, Goodband RD. Effects of fermented soybean meal and specialty animal protein sources on nursery pig performance. J Anim Sci. 2010;88:1725-32. https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2009-2110
  15. Kim SW, van Heugten E, Ji F, Lee CH, Mateo RD. Fermented soybean meal as a vegetable protein source for nursery pigs: I. Effects on growth performance of nursery pigs. J Anim Sci. 2010;88:214-24. https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2009-1993
  16. Feng J, Liu X, Xu ZR, Lu YP, Liu YY. Effect of fermented soybean meal on intestinal morphology and digestive enzyme activities in weaned piglets. Dig Dis Sci. 2007;52:1845-50. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10620-006-9705-0
  17. Bachelor MA, Bowden GT. UVA-mediated activation of signaling pathways involved in skin tumor promotion and progression. Semin Cancer Biol. 2004;14:131-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.semcancer.2003.09.017
  18. Verbeek CJR, Hicks T, Longdon A. Degradation as a result of UV radiation of bloodmeal-based thermoplastics. Polym Degrad Stab. 2011;96:515-22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2011.01.003
  19. Yao L, Wang Z, Zhao H, Cheng C, Fu X, Liu J, et al. Protective effects of polysaccharides from soybean meal against X-ray radiation induced damage in mouse spleen lymphocytes. Int J Mol Sci. 2011;12:8096-104. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms12118096
  20. Htoo JK, Araiza BA, Sauer WC, Rademacher M, Zhang Y, Cervantes M, et al. Effect of dietary protein content on ileal amino acid digestibility, growth performance, and formation of microbial metabolites in ileal and cecal digesta of early-weaned pigs. J Anim Sci. 2007;85:3303-12. https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2007-0105
  21. Moter V, Stein HH. Effect of feed intake on endogenous losses and amino acid and energy digestibility by growing pigs. J Anim Sci. 2004;82:3518-25. https://doi.org/10.2527/2004.82123518x
  22. Diebold G, Mosenthin R, Sauer WC, Dugan MER, Lien KA. Supplementation of xylanase and phospholipase to wheat-based diets for weaner pigs. J Anim Physiol Anim Nutr. 2005;89:316-25. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0396.2005.00514.x
  23. Dunsford BR, Knabe DA, Haensly WE. Effect of dietary soybean meal on the microscopic anatomy of the small intestine in the early-weaned pig. J Anim Sci. 1989;67:1855-64. https://doi.org/10.2527/jas1989.6771855x
  24. Teng D, Gao M, Yang Y, Liu B, Tian Z, Wang J. Bio-modification of soybean meal with Bacillus subtilis or Aspergillus oryzae. Biocatal Agric Biotechnol. 2011;1:32-8.
  25. Herkelman KL, Cromwell GL, Stahly TS, Pfeiffer TW, Knabe DA. Apparent digestibility of amino acids in raw and heated conventional and low-trypsin-inhibitor soybeans for pigs. J Anim Sci. 1992;70:818-26. https://doi.org/10.2527/1992.703818x
  26. Oyeleke SB, Oyewole OA, Egwim EC. Production of protease and amylase from Bacillus subtilis and Aspergillu niger using Parkia biglobossa (Africa locust beans) as substrate in solid state fermentation. Adv Life Sci. 2011;1:49-53.
  27. Eldridge AC, Black LT, Wolf WJ. Carbohydrate composition of soybean flours, protein concentrates, and isolates. J Agric Food Chem. 1979;24:799-802.
  28. Cervantes-Pahm SK, Stein HH. Effect of dietary soybean oil and soybean protein concentrate on the concentration of digestible amino acids in soybean products fed to growing pigs. J Anim Sci. 2008;86:1841-9. https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2007-0721
  29. Spriet SM, Decuypere JA, Henderickx HK. Effect of Bacillus toyoi (Toyocerin) on the gastrointestinal microflora, concentration of some bacterial metabolites, digestibility of the nutrients and the small intestinal mean retention time in pigs. Meded Fac Landbouwkd Rijksuniv Gent. 1987;52:1673.
  30. Giang HH, Viet TQ, Ogle B, Lindberg JE. Growth performance, digestibility, gut environment and health status in weaned piglets fed a diet supplemented with a complex of lactic acid bacteria alone or in combination with Bacillus subtilis and Saccharomyces boulardii. Livest Sci. 2012;143:132-41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2011.09.003

Cited by

  1. The influence of narrow-leafed lupin seed fermentation on their chemical composition and ileal digestibility and microbiota in growing pigs vol.71, pp.4, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1080/1745039x.2017.1329130
  2. Effect of Bacillus subtilis and Bacillus licheniformis supplementation in diets with low- and high-protein content on ileal crude protein and amino acid digestibility and intestinal microbiota com vol.8, pp.1, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1186/s40104-017-0168-2
  3. Growth performance of nursery pigs fed diets containing increasing levels of a novel high-protein corn distillers dried grains with solubles 1 vol.3, pp.1, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1093/tas/txy101
  4. Production performances and antioxidant activities of laying hens fed Aspergillus oryzae and phytase co-fermented wheat bran vol.34, pp.3, 2015, https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.20.0116
  5. The Effect of Yeast Fermentation of Two Lupine Species on the Digestibility of Protein and Amino Acids, Microflora Composition and Metabolites Production in the Ileum of Growing Pigs vol.11, pp.10, 2015, https://doi.org/10.3390/ani11102894