대한두개안면성형외과학회지 (Archives of Craniofacial Surgery)

  • 제16권3호
  • /
  • Pages.125-130
  • /
  • 2015
  • /
  • 2287-1152(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2287-5603(eISSN)
대한두개안면성형외과학회 (Korean Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Association)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Medial Wall Orbital Reconstruction using Unsintered Hydroxyapatite Particles/Poly L-Lactide Composite Implants

  • Park, Hojin (Department of Plastic Surgery, Korea University Anam Hospital, Korea University College of Medicine) ;
  • Kim, Hyon-Surk (Department of Plastic Surgery, Korea University Anam Hospital, Korea University College of Medicine) ;
  • Lee, Byung-Il (Department of Plastic Surgery, Korea University Anam Hospital, Korea University College of Medicine)
  • 투고 : 2015.06.23
  • 심사 : 2015.08.23
  • 발행 : 2015.12.09
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

Background: Poly-L-lactide materials combined with hydroxyapatite (u-HA /PLLA) have been developed to overcome the drawbacks of absorbable materials, such as radiolucency and comparably less implant strength. This study was designed to evaluate the usefulness of u-HA/PLLA material in the repair of orbital medial wall defects. Methods: This study included 10 patients with pure medial wall blow-out fractures. The plain radiographs were taken preoperatively, immediately after, and 2 months after surgery. The computed tomography scans were performed preoperatively and 2 months after surgery. Patients were evaluated for ease of manipulation, implant immobility, rigidity and complications with radiologic studies. Results: None of the patients had postoperative complications, such as infection or enophthalmos. The u-HA/PLLA implants had adequate rigidity, durability, and stable position on follow-up radiographic studies. On average, implants were thawed 3.4 times and required 14 minutes of handling time. Conclusion: The u-HA/PLLA implants are safe and reliable for reconstruction of orbital medial wall in terms of rigidity, immobility, radiopacity, and cost-effectiveness. These thin yet rigid implants can be useful where wide periosteal dissection is difficult due to defect location or size. Since the u-HA/PLLA material is difficult to manipulate, these implants are not suitable for use in complex 3-dimensional defects.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Potter JK, Ellis E. Biomaterials for reconstruction of the internal orbit. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2004;62:1280-97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2004.04.018
  2. You JP, Kim DW, Jeon BJ, Jeong SH, Han SK, Dhong ES, et al. Twoyear follow-up on the use of absorbable mesh plates in the treatment of medial orbital wall fractures. Arch Plast Surg 2013;40:728-34. https://doi.org/10.5999/aps.2013.40.6.728
  3. Gunarajah DR, Samman N. Biomaterials for repair of orbital floor blowout fractures: a systematic review. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2013;71: 550-70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2012.10.029
  4. Han DH, Chi M. Comparison of the outcomes of blowout fracture repair according to the orbital implant. J Craniofac Surg 2011;22:1422-5. https://doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0b013e31821cc2b5
  5. Hayashi M, Muramatsu H, Sato M, Tomizuka Y, Inoue M, Yoshimoto S. Surgical treatment of facial fracture by using unsintered hydroxyapatite particles/poly l-lactide composite device (OSTEOTRANS MX((R))): a clinical study on 17 cases. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 2013;41:783-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcms.2013.01.026
  6. Yasunaga T, Matsusue Y, Furukawa T, Shikinami Y, Okuno M, Nakamura T. Bonding behavior of ultrahigh strength unsintered hydroxyapatite particles/poly(L-lactide) composites to surface of tibial cortex in rabbits. J Biomed Mater Res 1999;47:412-9. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-4636(19991205)47:3<412::AID-JBM17>3.0.CO;2-B
  7. Shikinami Y, Matsusue Y, Nakamura T. The complete process of bioresorption and bone replacement using devices made of forged composites of raw hydroxyapatite particles/poly l-lactide (F-u-HA/ PLLA). Biomaterials 2005;26:5542-51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2005.02.016
  8. Miyasaka M, Tanaka R, Hanai U, Yamazaki A, Iida M, Akamatsu T. A case of chronic infection 28 years after silicone orbital implant. Tokai J Exp Clin Med 2008;33:35-8.
  9. Morrison AD, Sanderson RC, Moos KF. The use of silastic as an orbital implant for reconstruction of orbital wall defects: review of 311 cases treated over 20 years. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1995;53:412-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/0278-2391(95)90714-9
  10. Shikinami Y, Okuno M. Bioresorbable devices made of forged composites of hydroxyapatite (HA) particles and poly-L-lactide (PLLA): Part I. Basic characteristics. Biomaterials 1999;20:859-77. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0142-9612(98)00241-5
  11. Baek WI, Kim HK, Kim WS, Bae TH. Comparison of absorbable mesh plate versus titanium-dynamic mesh plate in reconstruction of blow-out fracture: an analysis of long-term outcomes. Arch Plast Surg 2014;41:355-61. https://doi.org/10.5999/aps.2014.41.4.355

피인용 문헌

  1. Analysis of Orbital Volume Measurements Following Reduction and Internal Fixation Using Absorbable Mesh Plates and Screws for Patients With Orbital Floor Blowout Fractures vol.28, pp.7, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1097/scs.0000000000003730
  2. Navigation-Assisted Orbital Trauma Reconstruction Using a Bioactive Osteoconductive/Bioresorbable u-HA/PLLA System vol.18, pp.3, 2019, https://doi.org/10.1007/s12663-019-01207-y
  3. Navigation-Assisted Isolated Medial Orbital Wall Fracture Reconstruction Using an U-HA/PLLA Sheet via a Transcaruncular Approach vol.33, pp.7, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1080/08941939.2018.1546353
  4. A Narrative Review of u-HA/PLLA, a Bioactive Resorbable Reconstruction Material: Applications in Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery vol.15, pp.1, 2022, https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15010150