Journal of The Korean Association of Information Education (정보교육학회논문지)

Korea Association of Information Education (한국정보교육학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Study on Contents of Robot Education Curriculum

로봇 교육과정 단계별 학습내용에 관한 연구

  • Kim, Chul (Dept. of Computer Education, Gwangju National University of Education)
  • 김철 (광주교육대학교 컴퓨터교육과)
  • Received : 2014.09.01
  • Accepted : 2014.09.24
  • Published : 2014.09.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

In this study, robot curriculum was developed to fulfill systematic robot education in elementary and middle schools. For literature research, robot curriculum cases in the UK, the US, and Korea were surveyed to choose and organize robot education contents. The robot curriculum developed is categorized into five areas-robot basic course, sensor, structure/motion, control, and problem-solving-and consist of four step-robot experience, robot creation, robot exploration, and robot control. Stepwise learning contents reflected difficulty and sequence to let students experience intensive repetitive activity. This study will lay the foundation for applying systematic robot education to elementary and middle school students. In the future, it is expected to study the development and application of various programs on the basis of the developed robot curriculum.

본 연구는 초 중학교에 체계적인 로봇교육을 정착시키기 위해 로봇교육과정을 개발하였다. 문헌연구로 영국, 미국 그리고 우리나라의 로봇교육과정 관련 사례를 조사한 후 로봇교육내용 선정 및 조직에 고려하였다. 개발된 로봇 교육과정은 로봇기초, 센서, 구조/운동, 제어, 문제해결의 5가지 영역으로 구성되었으며 로봇체험, 로봇창작, 로봇탐구, 로봇제어의 4단계로 이루어졌다. 단계별 학습내용은 난이도와 계열성을 고려하여 심화반복 활동을 경험할 수 있도록 하였다. 본 연구는 초 중학생들에게 체계적으로 로봇교육을 실시할 수 있는 기반을 마련할 것이다. 향후 개발된 로봇교육과정을 기초로 현장 적용이 가능한 다양한 프로그램의 개발 및 적용에 대한 후속 연구가 기대된다.

Keywords

References

  1. Bers, U., Ponte, I., Juelich, C., Viera, A., and Schenker, J., Teachers as Designers: Integrating Robotics in Early Childhood Education. In: Information Technology in Childhood Education Annual, AACE, VA. 123-145, 2002.
  2. Bradley S. Baker, Gwen Nugent, Neal Gradgenett & Viacheslav I. Adamchuk(2012). Robotics in K-12 Education: a new technology for learning.
  3. CSTA(2011). CSTA Computer Science Standards Revised 2011, The CSTA Standards Task Force. https://csta.acm.org/Curriculum/sub/K12Standards.html
  4. Department for Education(2014). The national curric ulum in England. Retrieved from: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/national-curriculum-in-england-primary-curriculum
  5. Disessa, A.(2000). Changing Minds: Computers, Learning, and Literacy. MIT Press: Cambridge, MA.
  6. Etnews. Enhance the Creativity with Educational Ro bots. http://www. ebuzz.co.kr/content/buzz_view.html?uid=79467.
  7. Kay, A.(1991). Computers, Networks and Education. issue of Scientific American Magazine, September, 138-148.
  8. LEGO(2014). Science through LEGO Engineering, http://www.legoengineering.com/science-throughlego-engineering
  9. Merriam-Webster's Dictionary(2014). Robot. Retriev ed from: http://www.learnersdictionary.com/search
  10. Miller, D. P., Nourbakhsh, I. R., & Sigwart, R.(2008). Robots for education. In Siciliano, B., & Khatib, O.(Eds.), Springer handbook of robotics(pp. 1283-1301). New York, NY: Springer-Verlag.
  11. Mitnik, R., Nussbaum, M., & Soto, A.(2008). An autonomous educational mobile robot mediator. Autonomous Robots, 25(4), 367-382. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10514-008-9101-z
  12. Moon, W. S.(2007). A Programming Language Learning Model Using Educational Robot. Journal of The Korean Association of Information Education, 11(2), 231-241.
  13. Papert, S., Harel, I.(1991). Constructionism. Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing Corporation.
  14. Park, E.S., Moon, S. H.(2009). Development and Application of a Robot Education Program for Logical Thinking Ability in Elementary Students, Journal of Korean Practical Arts Education, 22(1), 175-198.
  15. Park, J. H., Kim, C(2010). The Effects of Robot Based Mathematics Learning on Learners' Attitude and Problem Solving Skills. Korean Association of Computer Education, 13(5), 71-80.
  16. Park, J. H., Kim, C(2014). A Study on the Curriculum for Elementary and Middle School in Robot and Convergence Activity. Journal of The Korean Association of Information Education, 18(2), 285-294. https://doi.org/10.14352/jkaie.2014.18.2.285
  17. Resnick, M.(2007). Sowing for a More Seeds the Creative Society. Learning & Leading with Technology, 18-22.
  18. Ringwood, J. V., Monaghan, K., Maloco, J.(2005). Teaching engineering design through Lego Mindstorms. European Journal of Engineering Education, 30(1), 91-104. https://doi.org/10.1080/03043790310001658587
  19. Wing, J. M.(2006). Computational thinking. Communications of the ACM, 49(3), 33-35.

Cited by

  1. 초등학생을 위한 융합활동-로봇분야 교육과정 모델 개발 vol.19, pp.4, 2014, https://doi.org/10.14352/jkaie.2015.19.4.481
  2. 개념이해와 학습활동을 고려한 네트워크 및 디지털 창작도구 교육과정 모델 개발 vol.20, pp.6, 2014, https://doi.org/10.14352/jkaie.2016.20.6.563
  3. 개념이해와 학습활동을 고려한 초등학교 로봇 교육과정 모델 개발에 관한 연구 vol.20, pp.6, 2016, https://doi.org/10.14352/jkaie.2016.20.6.645
  4. 초등학교 로봇컴퓨팅교육을 위한 교육내용체계의 성취기준에 관한 연구 vol.21, pp.1, 2014, https://doi.org/10.14352/jkaie.2017.21.1.97
  5. 교육대학교 로봇 활용 소프트웨어 교육 과정 개발을 위한 예비 교사의 인식 조사 연구 vol.21, pp.3, 2014, https://doi.org/10.14352/jkaie.2017.21.3.277
  6. 로봇 활용 SW 교육에서 활동 및 학습 내용에 따른 학습자 흥미: 햄스터 로봇을 중심으로 vol.23, pp.1, 2019, https://doi.org/10.14352/jkaie.2019.23.1.85