DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Effect of Collection Seasons on the Oocyte Quality and Developmental Competence of Oocytes Derived from Korean Native Cows (Hanwoo) by Ovum Pick-Up

OPU 채란계절이 한우의 난자 품질 및 발달 능력에 미치는 영향

  • Kim, Seong-Su (Department of Animal Science, Division of Applied Life Science (BK21Plus)) ;
  • Choi, Byung Hyun (Department of Animal Science, Division of Applied Life Science (BK21Plus)) ;
  • Jo, Hyun-Tae (Department of Animal Science, Division of Applied Life Science (BK21Plus)) ;
  • Jin, Jong-In (Department of Animal Science, Division of Applied Life Science (BK21Plus)) ;
  • Ha, A-Na (Department of Animal Science, Division of Applied Life Science (BK21Plus)) ;
  • Min, Chan-Sik (Gyeongsangnam-do Agricultural Research and Extension Services) ;
  • Cho, Gyu-Wan (Colleage of Veterinary Medicine, Gyeongsang National University) ;
  • Kong, Il-Keun (Department of Animal Science, Division of Applied Life Science (BK21Plus))
  • 김성수 (경상대학교 응용생명과학부 축산학전공) ;
  • 최병현 (경상대학교 응용생명과학부 축산학전공) ;
  • 조현태 (경상대학교 응용생명과학부 축산학전공) ;
  • 진종인 (경상대학교 응용생명과학부 축산학전공) ;
  • 하아나 (경상대학교 응용생명과학부 축산학전공) ;
  • 민찬식 (경상남도 농업기술원) ;
  • 조규완 (경상대학교 수의과대학) ;
  • 공일근 (경상대학교 응용생명과학부 축산학전공)
  • Received : 2014.09.05
  • Accepted : 2014.09.23
  • Published : 2014.09.30

Abstract

Implementation of smart embryo technologies in cattle e.g. ovum pick-up followed by in vitro embryo production (OPU-IVP). Seasonal variation is important factor for follicular growth, oocytes quality, quantity and developmental competence. Therefore the aim of present study was carried out to investigated whether the seasons (hot and cool) effect on follicular development, oocyte recovery and subsequent embryo development. Follicular oocytes were aspirated from Korean native cows (Hanwoo) by the ovum pick-up (OPU) method, which was performed 24 times during two different seasons, the hot (July to September) and cool (October to December), from OPU donors. The recovered oocytes were classified according to morphological categories and used for in vitro embryo production (IVEP). The mean number of total follicles was significantly higher (p<0.05) during the hot season ($18.32{\pm}2.26$) compared to cool season ($15.41{\pm}3.34$). Furthermore, seasons did not significantly effect on the number of oocytes recovered (hot season: 41.16% vs. cool season: 46.14%). However, the average number of Grade A oocytes was significantly greater during hot ($1.75{\pm}1.86$) season compared to the cool season ($1.00{\pm}1.46$), but there was no significant difference of other grades oocytes. The cleavage rate (hot: 66.67% vs. cool: 63.3%) and embryo development (hot: 58.95% vs. cool: 56.97%) did not differ significantly between the seasons. In conclusion, the results of present study suggest that the season (hot and cool) does not have effects on the oocyte recovery and embryo developmental competence of in vitro cultured embryos.

본 연구에서 한우를 공란우로 사용하여 OPU 방법으로 가장 더운 계절의 hot season과 선선한 cool season의 두 계절의 차이에 따른 생성된 난포의 수, 난자 회수율, 난자 등급율, 수정율 및 배반포 발달 능력을 분석하여, 두 계절이 공란우의 번식 능력에 미치는 영향에 관하여 조사하였다. 1. 계절의 영향이 OPU 공란우의 난포 생성 수에 미치는 결과는 난포 생성 개수는 1154개($18.32{\pm}2.26$), 971개($15.41{\pm}3.34$)로 hot season 그룹이 유의적으로 높은 것을 알 수 있었다(p<0.05). 2. 계절에 따른 난자 수 및 난자 회수율은 hot season 그룹의 475개($7.54{\pm}3.14$), 41.16%로 cool season 그룹 448개($7.11{\pm}3.42$), 46.14%와 비교하여 유의적인 차이가 없었다(p<0.05). 3. OPU를 통하여 회수된 두 계절별 난자 등급은 Grade A는 Hot season 그룹 110개($1.75{\pm}1.86$), Cool season 그룹 63개($1.00{\pm}1.46$)로 hot season 그룹이 cool season 그룹과 비교하여 유의적으로 높았다(p<0.05). 하지만 다른 등급인 Grade B는 87개($1.38{\pm}1.60$) vs. 97개($1.54{\pm}1.39$), Grade C는 166개($2.63{\pm}2.43$) vs. 170개($2.70{\pm}2.04$), Grade D는 112개($1.78{\pm}2.65$) vs. 118개($1.87{\pm}1.86$)로 hot season과 cool season 간의 유의적인 차이를 보이지 않았다(p<0.05). 4. 계절에 따른 체외 수정 후의 수정률은 hot season과 cool season 각각 242(66.67%)와 209(63.3%), 배반포 발달율 214(58.95%) vs. 188(56.97%)로 수정률과 배반포 발달율은 유의적인 차이가 없었다(p<0.05). 본 연구의 결과로 계절에 따른 영향에 의해 공란우의 난포생성수와 A등급의 난자 출현율에서 유의적인 차이를 보였다. 하지만 나머지 등급의 난자 출현율, 수정률 및 배반포 발달율은 차이가 없는 것으로 보아, 계절의 차이로 인한 한우 공란우의 번식 능력에 미치는 영향은 미비하다고 판단된다.

Keywords

References

  1. Al-Katanani Y, Paula-Lopes F and Hansen PJ. 2002. Effect of season and exposure to heat stress on oocyte competence in Holstein cows. J. Dairy Sci. 85:390-396. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(02)74086-1
  2. Badinga L, Collier R, Thatcher W and Wilcox C. 1985. Effects of climatic and management factors on conception rate of dairy cattle in subtropical environment. J. Dairy Sci. 68:78- 85. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(85)80800-6
  3. Boni R, Roelofsen M, Pieterse M, Kogut J and Kruip T. 1997. Follicular dynamics, repeatability and predictability of follicular recruitment in cows undergoing repeated follicular puncture. Theriogenology 48:277-289. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0093-691X(97)84075-7
  4. Bruno RG, Rutigliano H, Cerri RL, Robinson PH and Santos JE. 2009. Effect of feeding yeast culture on reproduction and lameness in dairy cows under heat stress. J. Dairy Sci. 113:11-21.
  5. Deb GK, Dey SR, Bang JI, Cho SJ, Park HC, Lee JG and Kong IK. 2011. 9-cis retinoic acid improves developmental competence and embryo quality during in vitro maturation of bovine oocytes through the inhibition of oocyte tumor necrosis factor-alpha gene expression. J. Anim. Sci. 89:2759-2767. https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2011-3848
  6. Fuquay JW. 1981. Heat stress it affects animal production. J. Anim. Sci. 52:164-174. https://doi.org/10.2527/jas1981.521164x
  7. Hansen PJ. 2007. Exploitation of genetic and physiological determinants of embryonic resistance to elevated temperature to improve embryonic survival in dairy cattle during heat stress. Theriogenology 68:S242-S249. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2007.04.008
  8. Hernandez-Ceron J, Chase CC Jr and Hansen PJ. 2004. Differences in heat tolerance between preimplantation embryos from Brahman, Romosinuano, and Angus breeds. J. Dairy Sci. 87:53-58. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(04)73141-0
  9. Kendrick KW, Bailey TL, Garst AS, Pryor AW, Ahmadzadeh A, Akers RM, Eyestone WE, Pearson RE and Gwazdauskas FC. 1999. Effects of energy balance of hormones, ovarian activity, and recovered oocytes in lactating Holstein cows using transvaginal follicular aspiration. J. Dairy Sci. 82: 1731-1741. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(99)75403-2
  10. Mapletoft R and Hasler J. 2005. Assisted reproductive technologies in cattle:a review. Revue Scientifique et Technique- Office International des Epizooties 24:393-403.
  11. McNatty KP, Hudson N, Gibb M, Henderson KM, Lun S, Heath D and Montgomery GW. 1984. Seasonal differences in ovarian activity in cows. J. Endocrinol. 102:189-198. https://doi.org/10.1677/joe.0.1020189
  12. Meintjes M, Bellow M, Broussard J, Paul J and Godke R. 1993. Transvaginal aspiration of bovine oocytes from hormonetreated pregnant beef cattle for IVF. Theriogenology 39: 266(abstr.). https://doi.org/10.1016/0093-691X(93)90121-K
  13. Merton J, De Roos A, Mullaart E, De Ruigh L, Kaal L, Vos P and Dieleman S. 2003. Factors affecting oocyte quality and quantity in commercial application of embryo technologies in the cattle breeding industry. Theriogenology 59: 651-674. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0093-691X(02)01246-3
  14. Monty Jr D and Racowsky C. 1987. In vitro evaluation of early embryo viability and development in summer heat-stressed, superovulated dairy cows. Theriogenology 28:451-465. https://doi.org/10.1016/0093-691X(87)90250-0
  15. Payton RR, Romar R, Coy P, Saxton AM, Lawrence JL and Edwards JL. 2004. Susceptibility of bovine germinal vesiclestage oocytes from antral follicles to direct effects of heat stress in vitro. Biol. Reprod. 71:1303-1308. https://doi.org/10.1095/biolreprod.104.029892
  16. Petyim S, Bage R, Hallap T, Bergqvist A, Rodriiguez-Martinez H and Larsson B. 2003. Two different schemes of twiceweekly ovum pick-up in dairy heifers:effect on oocyte recovery and ovarian function. Theriogenology 60:175-188. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0093-691X(02)01363-8
  17. Rensis FD and Scaramuzzi RJ. 2003. Heat stress and seasonal effects on reproduction in the dairy cow - a review. Theriogenology 60:1139-1151. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0093-691X(03)00126-2
  18. Rocha A, Randel R, Broussard J, Lim J, Blair R, Roussel J, Godke R and Hansel W. 1998. High environmental temperature and humidity decrease oocyte quality in Bostaurus but not in Bostaurus cows. Theriogenology 49:657-665. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0093-691X(98)00016-8
  19. Rosenkrans CF Jr, Zeng GQ, McNamara GT, Schoff PK and First NL. 1993. Development of bovine embryos in vitro as affected by energy substrates. Biol. Reprod. 49:459-462. https://doi.org/10.1095/biolreprod49.3.459
  20. Roth Z. 2008. Heat stress, the follicle, and its enclosed oocyte: mechanisms and potential strategies to improve fertility in dairy cows. Reproduction in Domestic Animals 43:238-244. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0531.2008.01168.x
  21. Roth Z and Hansen PJ. 2004. Involvement of apoptosis in disruption of developmental competence of bovine oocytes by heat shock during maturation. Biol. Reprod. 71:1898-1906. https://doi.org/10.1095/biolreprod.104.031690
  22. Torres-Junior JdS, Pires M, De Sa W, Ferreira AdM, Viana JHM, Camargo Luiz Sergio de Almeida Ramos AdA, Folhadella I, Polisseni J and De Freitas C. 2008. Effect of maternal heat-stress on follicular growth and oocyte competence in Bos indicus cattle. Theriogenology 69:155-166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2007.06.023
  23. Van Wagtendonk-de Leeuw A. 2006. Ovum pick up and in vitro production in the bovine after use in several generations: a 2005 status. Theriogenology 65:914-925. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2005.09.007
  24. 손귀동, 송상현, 정우재, 박충생, 이정규, 공일근. 2008. 한우체내 수정란 이식후 수태율에 미치는 요인. 한국수정란이식학회지 23:37-42.
  25. 진종인, 권태현, 최병현, 김성수, 조현태, 공일근. 2010. OPU (Ovum Pick-up) 채란기간이 난자 및 수정란 생산에 미치는 영향. 한국수정란이식학회지 25:15-20.
  26. 최병현, 진종인, 권태현, 김성수, 조현태, 공일근. 2011. 한우와 젖소 대리모가 OPU 유래 한우 송아지의 체중과 임신 기간에 미치는 영향. 한국수정란이식학회지 26:27-32.