Childhood Kidney Diseases

  • 제18권2호
  • /
  • Pages.77-84
  • /
  • 2014
  • /
  • 2384-0242(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2384-0250(eISSN)
대한소아신장학회 (Korean Society of Pediatric Nephrology)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

선천성 수신증을 위한 Onen 등급 분류법의 임상적인 타당성

Validation of Onen's Alternative Grading System for Congenital Hydronephrosis

  • 우다은 (영남대학교 의과대학 소아청소년과학교실) ;
  • 임명희 (영남대학교 의과대학 소아청소년과학교실) ;
  • 김명욱 (영남대학교 의과대학 소아청소년과학교실) ;
  • 김세윤 (영남대학교 의과대학 소아청소년과학교실) ;
  • 박용훈 (영남대학교 의과대학 소아청소년과학교실)
  • Woo, Da Eun (Department of Pediatrics, Yeungnam University Hospital, Yeungnam University College of Medicine) ;
  • Lim, Myung Hee (Department of Pediatrics, Yeungnam University Hospital, Yeungnam University College of Medicine) ;
  • Kim, Myung Uk (Department of Pediatrics, Yeungnam University Hospital, Yeungnam University College of Medicine) ;
  • Kim, Sae Yoon (Department of Pediatrics, Yeungnam University Hospital, Yeungnam University College of Medicine) ;
  • Park, Yong Hoon (Department of Pediatrics, Yeungnam University Hospital, Yeungnam University College of Medicine)
  • 투고 : 2014.09.21
  • 심사 : 2014.10.12
  • 발행 : 2014.10.31
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

목적: 선천성 수신증은 신장 초음파 검사를 통해 조기 진단이 가능하며 초음파 소견과 질환의 예후가 연관성을 가진다. 기존 수신증의 분류법이 예후나 치료 방법 결정의 기준이 될 수 있는지에 대한 논란이 있어 Onen 분류법이 새로 제시되었다. 이에 선천성 수신증을 APDRP, SFU 및 Onen 분류법으로 비교하였을 때 Onen 분류법이 단일 수신증뿐만 아니라 복합 수신증에서도 타당한지 알아보고자 하였다. 방법: 2002년 1월부터 2011년 12월까지 선천성 수신증으로 진단받은 203명의 환자 중 추적 관찰이 가능했던 153명(204신단위)의 의무 기록을 후향적으로 검토하였다. 이들의 신장 초음파 영상을 분석하여 APDRP를 측정하고 SFU 및 Onen 분류법으로 수신증의 등급을 나누었다. 단일 또는 복합 수신증인지 조사하고, 만 2세경의 수신증의 임상 경과를 조사하여 자연 소실, 신기능 저하, 요로 폐쇄, 요로 감염 및 수술적 치료 여부를 조사하였다. 결과: 선천성 수신증에서 SFU-1등급과 Onen-1등급의 경우 단일 수신증이, SFU-4등급과 Onen-3등급의 경우는 복합 수신증이 많았다. 단일 수신증 군에서 만 2세까지 경과를 보면, 세 분류법 모두 수신증이 경미한 경우 자연 소실 빈도가 높았고 복합 수신증에서도 같은 결과를 보였다. 신기능 저하의 빈도는 단일 수신증은 Onen 분류법에 의한 등급 사이에 유의한 차이가 없었으나, 복합 수신증에서는 유의한 차이가 있었다. 요로 폐쇄와 수술적 치료의 빈도는 단일 수신증일 때 세 분류법 모두 고등급 수신증에서 유의하게 높았다. Onen 분류법의 고등급 수신증은 다른 분류법에 의한 것들과 비교하여 임상적 경과에 유의한 차이가 없었다. 결론: Onen 분류법은 APDRP 또는 SFU 분류법과 마찬가지로 단일 선천성 수신증의 임상 경과를 반영하며 복합 수신증에서 다른 분류법과 달리 신기능의 예후와 연관성이 있었으나, 고등급 수신증에서는 각 분류법 사이에 유의한 차이가 없어서 Onen 분류법의 장점을 확인할 수 없었다.

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to compare the validity of Onen's alternative grading system (AGS) with that of the APDRP and SFU grading systems in patients with isolated and complicated congenital hydronephrosis. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 153 patients (204 renal units) diagnosed with congenital hydronephrosis between January 2002 and December 2011. We classified patients into 2 groups; isolated or complicated hydronephrosis. All renal units were graded according to anterior-posterior diameter of renal pelvis (APDRP), Society for Fetus Urology (SFU) and Onen's grading systems. We analyzed the prognosis of hydronephrosis, according to each grading system, at 2 years of age. Results: There were 152 renal units with isolated hydronephrosis and 52 renal units with complicated hydronephrosis. The isolated hydronephrosis group had a lower grade according to Onen's AGS, and showed more frequent spontaneous remission by 2 years of age. There was more frequent obstruction (P =0.000) and surgical treatment (P =0.000) of units with high-grade hydronephrosis according to Onen's AGS. In the complicated hydronephrosis group the frequencies of spontaneous remission (P =0.015) and renal dysfunction (P =0.013) were significantly higher than those in high-grade hydronephrosis, as indicated by Onen's AGS. There were no significant differences in clinical outcomes among the highest grade groups, according to the 3 systems, in either isolated or complicated hydronephrosis. Conclusion: Onen's AGS reflects the prognosis of hydronephrosis as well as other grading systems in those with isolated hydronephrosis. It was better predictor of renal dysfunction in those with complicated hydronephrosis. However, Onen's AGS was not superior to the other grading systems in terms of predicting prognosis, especially in high-grade hydronephrosis.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Gramellini D, Fieni S, Caforio E, Benassi G, Bedocchi L, Beseghi U, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of fetal renal pelvis anteroposterior diameter as a predictor of significant postnatal nephrouropathy: second versus third trimester of pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2006;194:167-73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2005.06.071
  2. Tripp BM, Homsy YL. Neonatal hydronephrosis-- the controversy and the management. Pediatr Nephrol 1995;9:503-9. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00866741
  3. Yamacake KG, Nguyen HT. Current management of antenatal hydronephrosis. Pediatr Nephrol 2013;28:237-43. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00467-012-2240-7
  4. Bouzada MC, Oliveira EA, Pereira AK, Leite HV, Rodrigues AM, Fagundes LA, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of fetal renal pelvis anteroposterior diameter as a predictor of uropathy: a prospective study. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2004;24:745-9. https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.1764
  5. Dremsek PA, Gindl K, Voitl P, Strobl R, Hafner E, Geissler W, et al. Renal pyelectasis in fetuses and neonates: diagnostic value of renal pelvis diameter in pre- and postnatal sonographic screening. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1997;168:1017-9. https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.168.4.9124107
  6. Corteville JE, Gray DL, Crane JP. Congenital hydronephrosis: correlation of fetal ultrasonographic findings with infant outcome. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1991;165:384-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9378(91)90099-D
  7. Fernbach SK, Maizels M, Conway JJ. Ultrasound grading of hydronephrosis: introduction to the system used by the Society for Fetal Urology. Pediatr Radiol 1993;23:478-80. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02012459
  8. Lim DJ, Park JY, Kim JH, Paick SH, Oh SJ, Choi H. Clinical characteristics and outcome of hydronephrosis detected by prenatal ultrasonography. J Korean Med Sci 2003;18:859-62. https://doi.org/10.3346/jkms.2003.18.6.859
  9. Keays MA, Guerra LA, Mihill J, Raju G, Al-Asheeri N, Geier P, et al. Reliability assessment of Society for Fetal Urology ultrasound grading system for hydronephrosis. J Urol 2008;180:1680-2; discussion2-3. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2008.03.107
  10. Ulman I, Jayanthi VR, Koff SA. The long-term followup of newborns with severe unilateral hydronephrosis initially treated nonoperatively. J Urol 2000;164:1101-5. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5347(05)67262-X
  11. Onen A. An alternative grading system to refine the criteria for severity of hydronephrosis and optimal treatment guidelines in neonates with primary UPJ-type hydronephrosis. J Pediatr Urol 2007;3:200-5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpurol.2006.08.002
  12. Sinha A, Bagga A, Krishna A, Bajpai M, Srinivas M, Uppal R, et al. Revised guidelines on management of antenatal hydronephrosis. Indian J Nephrol 2013;23:83-97. https://doi.org/10.4103/0971-4065.109403
  13. Nguyen HT, Herndon CD, Cooper C, Gatti J, Kirsch A, Kokorowski P, et al. The Society for Fetal Urology consensus statement on the evaluation and management of antenatal hydronephrosis. J Pediatr Urol 2010;6:212-31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpurol.2010.02.205
  14. O'Reilly PH, Testa HJ, Lawson RS, Farrar DJ, Charlton Edwards E. Diuresis renography in equivocal urinary tract obstruction. Br J Urol 1984;56:84. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-410X.1984.tb07170.x
  15. Gordon I, Piepsz A, Sixt R. Guidelines for standard and diuretic renogram in children. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2011;38:1175-88. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-011-1811-3
  16. Grisoni ER, Gauderer MW, Wolfson RN, Izant RJ, Jr. Antenatal ultrasonography: the experience in a high risk perinatal center. J Pediatr Surg 1986;21:358-61. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3468(86)80204-4
  17. Dudley JA, Haworth JM, McGraw ME, Frank JD, Tizard EJ. Clinical relevance and implications of antenatal hydronephrosis. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 1997;76:F31-4. https://doi.org/10.1136/fn.76.1.F31
  18. Woodward M, Frank D. Postnatal management of antenatal hydronephrosis. BJU Int 2002;89:149-56. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1464-4096.2001.woodward.2578.x
  19. Sidhu G, Beyene J, Rosenblum ND. Outcome of isolated antenatal hydronephrosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Pediatr Nephrol 2006;21:218-24. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00467-005-2100-9
  20. Lee RS, Cendron M, Kinnamon DD, Nguyen HT. Antenatal hydronephrosis as a predictor of postnatal outcome: a meta-analysis. Pediatrics 2006;118:586-93. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2006-0120
  21. Onen A, Jayanthi VR, Koff SA. Long-term followup of prenatally detected severe bilateral newborn hydronephrosis initially managed nonoperatively. J Urol 2002;168:1118-20. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5347(05)64604-6
  22. Riccabona M. Assessment and management of newborn hydronephrosis. World J Urol 2004;22:73-8.
  23. Grignon A, Filion R, Filiatrault D, Robitaille P, Homsy Y, Boutin H, et al. Urinary tract dilatation in utero: classification and clinical applications. Radiology 1986;160:645-7. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiology.160.3.3526402
  24. Passerotti CC, Kalish LA, Chow J, Passerotti AM, Recabal P, Cendron M, et al. The predictive value of the first postnatal ultrasound in children with antenatal hydronephrosis. J Pediatr Urol 2011;7:128-36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpurol.2010.09.007
  25. Grazioli S, Parvex P, Merlini L, Combescure C, Girardin E. Antenatal and postnatal ultrasound in the evaluation of the risk of vesicoureteral reflux. Pediatr Nephrol 2010;25:1687-92. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00467-010-1543-9
  26. Alconcher LF, Tombesi MM. Natural history of bilateral mild isolated antenatal hydronephrosis conservatively managed. Pediatr Nephrol 2012;27:1119-23. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00467-012-2113-0
  27. Madden-Fuentes RJ, McNamara ER, Nseyo U, Wiener JS, Routh JC, Ross SS. Resolution rate of isolated low-grade hydronephrosis diagnosed within the first year of life. J Pediatr Urol 2014;10:639-44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpurol.2014.07.004
  28. Zareba P, Lorenzo AJ, Braga LH. Risk factors for febrile urinary tract infection in infants with prenatal hydronephrosis: comprehensive single center analysis. J Urol 2014;191:1614-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2013.10.035
  29. Coelho GM, Bouzada MC, Pereira AK, Figueiredo BF, Leite MR, Oliveira DS, et al. Outcome of isolated antenatal hydronephrosis: a prospective cohort study. Pediatr Nephrol 2007;22:1727-34. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00467-007-0539-6
  30. Lee JH, Choi HS, Kim JK, Won HS, Kim KS, Moon DH, et al. Nonrefluxing neonatal hydronephrosis and the risk of urinary tract infection. J Urol 2008;179:1524-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2007.11.090