The Journal of Advanced Prosthodontics

The Korean Academy of Prosthodonitics (대한치과보철학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A survey of the satisfaction of patients who have undergone implant surgery with and without employing a computer-guided implant surgical template

  • Youk, Shin-Young (Department of Prosthodontics, Ewha Womans University) ;
  • Lee, Jee-Ho (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Asan Medical Center) ;
  • Park, Ji-Man (Department of Prosthodontics, Ewha Womans University) ;
  • Heo, Seong-Joo (Department of Prosthodontics & Dental Research Institute, Seoul National University) ;
  • Roh, Hyun-Ki (Department of Prosthodontics, S-PLANT Dental Hospital) ;
  • Park, Eun-Jin (Department of Prosthodontics, Ewha Womans University) ;
  • Shin, Im Hee (Department of Medical Statistics, Catholic University of Daegu School of Medicine)
  • Received : 2014.02.12
  • Accepted : 2014.07.28
  • Published : 2014.10.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

PURPOSE. This study aims to investigate the degree of subjective pain and the satisfaction of patients who have undergone an implant treatment using a computer-guided template. MATERIALS AND METHODS. A survey was conducted for 135 patients who have undergone implant surgery with and without the use of the computerguided template during the period of 2012 and 2013 in university hospitals, dental hospitals and dental clinics that practiced implant surgery using the computer-guided template. Likert scale and VAS score were used in the survey questions, and the independent t-test and One-Way ANOVA were performed (${\alpha}=.05$). RESULTS. The route that the subjects were introduced to the computer-guided implant surgery using a surgical template was mostly advices by dentists, and the most common reason for which they chose to undergo such surgery was that it was accurate and safe. Most of them gave an answer that they were willing to recommend it to others. The patients who have undergone the computer-guided implant surgery felt less pain during the operation and showed higher satisfaction than those who have undergone conventional implant surgery. Among the patients who have undergone computer-guided implant surgery, those who also had prior experience of surgery without a computer-guided template expressed higher satisfaction with the former (P<.05). CONCLUSION. In this study, it could be seen that the patients who have undergone computer-guided implant surgery employing a surgical template felt less pain and had higher satisfaction than those with the conventional one, and the dentist's description could provide the confidence about the safety of surgery.

Keywords

References

  1. Hong SJ, Paik JW, Kim CS, Choi SH, Lee KW, Chai JK, Kim CK, Cho KS. The Study of Implant Patient's Type and Implant Distribution. J Korean Acad Periodontol 2002;32: 539-54. https://doi.org/10.5051/jkape.2002.32.3.539
  2. Baek JW. Dental Implant. Korean society for Engineering Education 2002;1:87-90.
  3. Branemark PI, Hansson BO, Adell R, Breine U, Lindstrom J, Hallen O, Ohman A. Osseointegrated implants in the treatment of the edentulous jaw. Experience from a 10-year period. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Suppl 1977;16:1-132.
  4. Rahman AU, Rehman TU, Qureshi I, Hashim M, Warris N, Mateen S. Pre surgical perception of pain, post surgical pain and its management for patients undergoing dental implant therapy. J Pak Dent Assoc 2012;21:5-11.
  5. Jaffin RA, Kumar A, Berman CL. Immediate loading of implants in partially and fully edentulous jaws: a series of 27 case reports. J Periodontol 2000;71:833-8. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.2000.71.5.833
  6. Canullo L, Fedele GR, Iannello G, Jepsen S. Platform switching and marginal bone-level alterations: the results of a randomized- controlled trial. Clin Oral Impl Res 2010;21:115-21. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2009.01867.x
  7. Cannizzaro G, Leone M, Consolo U, Ferri V, Esposito M. Immediate functional loading of implants placed with flapless surgery versus conventional implants in partially edentulous patients: a 3-year randomized controlled clinical trial. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2008;23:867-75.
  8. Van der Zee E, Oosterveld P, Van Waas MA. Effect of GBR and fixture installation on gingiva and bone levels at adjacent teeth. Clin Oral Implants Res 2004;15:62-5. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2004.01005.x
  9. Brodala N. Flapless surgery and its effect on dental implant outcomes. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2009;24:118-25.
  10. Jeong SM, Choi BH, Kim J, Xuan F, Lee DH, Mo DY, Lee CU. A 1-year prospective clinical study of soft tissue conditions and marginal bone changes around dental implants after flapless implant surgery. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2011;111:41-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tripleo.2010.03.037
  11. Becker W, Wikesjo UM, Sennerby L, Qahash M, Hujoel P, Goldstein M, Turkyilmaz I. Histologic evaluation of implants following flapless and flapped surgery: a study in canines. J Periodontol 2006;77:1717-22. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.2006.060090
  12. Azari A, Nikzad S. Flapless implant surgery: review of the literature and report of 2 cases with computer-guided surgical approach. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2008;66:1015-21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2007.12.010
  13. Sudbrink SD. Computer-guided implant placement with immediate provisionalization: a case report. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2005;63:771-4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2005.02.011
  14. Lee JH, Park JM, Kim SM, Kim MJ, Lee JH, Kim MJ. An assessment of template-guided implant surgery in terms of accuracy and related factors. J Adv Prosthodont 2013;5:440-7. https://doi.org/10.4047/jap.2013.5.4.440
  15. Park JM, Yi TK, Jung JK, Kim Y, Park EJ, Han CH, Koak JY, Kim SK, Heo SJ. Accuracy of 5-axis precision milling for guided surgical template. J Korean Acad Prosthodont 2010; 48:294-300. https://doi.org/10.4047/jkap.2010.48.4.294
  16. Valente F, Schiroli G, Sbrenna A. Accuracy of computer-aided oral implant surgery: a clinical and radiographic study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2009;24:234-42.
  17. Fortin T, Bosson JL, Coudert JL, Isidori M. Reliability of preoperative planning of an image-guided system for oral implant placement based on 3-dimensional images: an in vivo study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2003;18:886-93.
  18. Misir AF, Sumer M, Yenisey M, Ergioglu E. Effect of surgical drill guide on heat generated from implant drilling. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2009;67:2663-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2009.07.056
  19. Markovic A, Misic T, Milicic B, Calvo-Guirado JL, Aleksic Z, Dinic A. Heat generation during implant placement in lowdensity bone: effect of surgical technique, insertion torque and implant macro design. Clin Oral Implants Res 2013;24: 798-805. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2012.02460.x
  20. Jeong SM, Yoo JH, Fang Y, Choi BH, Son JS, Oh JH1. The effect of guided flapless implant procedure on heat generation from implant drilling. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 2013; S1010-5182(13).
  21. Kim KW, Lee KS, Kang PS, Kim WS, Lee HK. Comparison of chewing ability and quality of life before and after the dental implantation. J Korean Acad Prosthodont 2009;47: 215-21. https://doi.org/10.4047/jkap.2009.47.2.215
  22. Attard NJ, Zarb GA. Implant prosthodontic management of partially edentulous patients missing posterior teeth: the Toronto experience. J Prosthet Dent 2003;89:352-9. https://doi.org/10.1067/mpr.2003.91
  23. Zarb GA, Albrektsson T. Consensus report: towards optimized treatment outcomes for dental implants. J Prosthet Dent 1998;80:641. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(98)70048-4
  24. McGrath C, Lam O, Lang N. An evidence-based review of patient-reported outcome measures in dental implant research among dentate subjects. J Clin Periodontol 2012;39: 193-201. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-051X.2011.01841.x
  25. Erkapers M, Ekstrand K, Baer RA, Toljanic JA, Thor A. Patient satisfaction following dental implant treatment with immediate loading in the edentulous atrophic maxilla. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2011;26:356-64.
  26. Gonzalez-Lemonnier S, Bovaira-Forner M, Penarrocha- Diago M, Penarrocha-Oltra D. Relationship between preoperative anxiety and postoperative satisfaction in dental implant surgery with intravenous conscious sedation. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal 2010;15:e379-82.
  27. Han JH, Kim KE. Comparison of Expectation and Satisfaction of Implant Patients in Pre-post Implant Therapy. J Dent Hyg Sci 2011;11:121-7.
  28. Heo YY, Heo SJ, Chang MW, Park JM. The patients› satisfaction following implant treatment. J Korean Acad Prosthodont 2008;46:569-76. https://doi.org/10.4047/jkap.2008.46.6.569
  29. Choi BH, Jeong SM, Kim J, Engelke W. Flapless implantology. 1st ed. London; Quintessence Publishing Co; 2010. p. 66-71.
  30. Van Assche N, van Steenberghe D, Guerrero ME, Hirsch E, Schutyser F, Quirynen M, Jacobs R. Accuracy of implant placement based on pre-surgical planning of three-dimensional cone-beam images: a pilot study. J Clin Periodontol 2007;34:816-21. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-051X.2007.01110.x
  31. Horwitz J, Zuabi O, Machtei EE. Accuracy of a computerized tomography-guided template-assisted implant placement system: an in vitro study. Clin Oral Implants Res 2009;20: 1156-62. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2009.01748.x
  32. Huskisson EC. Measurement of pain. Lancet. 1974;2:1127-31.
  33. Meskin LH, Brown LJ. Prevalence and patterns of tooth loss in U.S. employed adult and senior populations, 1985-86. J Dent Educ 1988;52:686-91.
  34. Kim GU, Cho SM. A Study on the Factors Giving Effects to Patient's Satisfaction in the Selection of Implant Operation. J Korea Acad-Ind Coop Soc 2010;11:4354-9.
  35. Shin HC, Choi HS. The Impact of Physician Behaviors on Patient Satisfaction. Korean J Fam Med 1994;15:1157-70.
  36. Kvale G, Berg E, Nilsen CM, Raadal M, Nielsen GH, Johnsen TB, Wormnes B. Validation of the Dental Fear Scale and the Dental Belief Survey in a Norwegian sample. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 1997;25:160-4. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0528.1997.tb00915.x
  37. Han SH. Anxiety and fear of dental patient. J Korean Dent Assoc 1993;31:1-8.
  38. Kim KW, Nam CH. A Study of Students' Knowledge Level of Dental Health Care. J Korean Soc School Health 2000;13: 295-317.
  39. Ganzberg S, Pape RA, Beck FM. Remifentanil for use during conscious sedation in outpatient oral surgery. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2002;60:244-50. https://doi.org/10.1053/joms.2002.30565
  40. Garip H, Gurkan Y, Toker K, Goker K. A comparison of midazolam and midazolam with remifentanil for patient-controlled sedation during operations on third molars. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2007;45:212-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjoms.2006.06.002

Cited by

  1. A case report of a surgical guide fabricated via intraoral scanning-based implant planning and wax-based rapid prototyping vol.53, pp.3, 2015, https://doi.org/10.4047/jkap.2015.53.3.244
  2. Computer assisted surgery and dental cone-beam CT vol.62, pp.12, 2016, https://doi.org/10.5794/jjoms.62.602
  3. Accuracy of a direct drill-guiding system with minimal tolerance of surgical instruments used for implant surgery: a prospective clinical study vol.8, pp.3, 2016, https://doi.org/10.4047/jap.2016.8.3.207
  4. Static computer-aided implant surgery (s-CAIS) analysing patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), economics and surgical complications: A systematic review vol.29, pp.09057161, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.13136
  5. Flapless dental implant surgery and use of cone beam computer tomography guided surgery vol.224, pp.8, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.2018.268
  6. Computer-aided flapless implant surgery and immediate loading. A technical note vol.20, pp.3, 2014, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10006-016-0554-5
  7. The Relationship between Implant Size and Success Rate in Computer Guided Implant Surgery vol.13, pp.12, 2014, https://doi.org/10.4236/jbise.2020.1312024
  8. The Relationship between Implant Size and Success Rate in Computer Guided Implant Surgery vol.13, pp.12, 2014, https://doi.org/10.4236/jbise.2020.1312024
  9. The Effects of Distribution of Image Matched Fiducial Markers on Accuracy of Computer‐Guided Implant Surgery vol.29, pp.5, 2020, https://doi.org/10.1111/jopr.13171
  10. Analysis of Digital Workflow in Implantology vol.2021, pp.None, 2014, https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/6655908
  11. Analog‐digital hybrid impression technique in an elderly patient: A case report vol.9, pp.4, 2014, https://doi.org/10.1002/ccr3.3975
  12. Patient‐reported outcome measures (PROMs) of implant‐supported reconstructions using digital workflows: A systematic review and meta‐analysis vol.32, pp.suppl, 2021, https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.13846
  13. Aesthetic Outcomes of Early Occlusal Loaded SLA Dental Implants with Hydroxyl Ion Modified Surface-A 12 Months Prospective Study vol.14, pp.21, 2014, https://doi.org/10.3390/ma14216353