DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A study on the Effects of Ties and Trust Relationship between the Clients and Consultants on the Consulting Performance

고객과 컨설턴트 간의 유대관계 및 신뢰관계가 컨설팅성과에 미치는 영향에 관한 연구

  • Choi, Chang-Ho (Dept. of Knowledge Service & Consulting, Hansung University) ;
  • You, Yen-Yoo (Dept. of Knowledge Service & Consulting, Hansung University)
  • Received : 2014.07.08
  • Accepted : 2014.10.20
  • Published : 2014.10.28

Abstract

The first, this study analyzed empirically the effects of the ties(structural) and the trust(relational) between the clients(small and medium sized enterprises) and consultants on the consulting performance, the second, verified the moderating effects of the consultant's competence and the client's participation in the effect of the ties and the trust on the consulting performance. The result of empirical analysis was as follows. The ties and the competence based trust had a positive effects on the consulting performance. Meanwhile, the client's participation had no moderating effect, the consultant's competence moderated the effect of the ties and the trust on the consulting performance. From the above empirical analysis, we appreciated that the building of the strong ties and the trust between the client and consultant is very important to promote consulting performance with the enhancing the consultant's competence.

본 연구는 먼저 중소기업인 고객과 컨설턴트 간의 구조적 및 관계적 속성인 유대관계 및 신뢰관계가 컨설팅성과에 미치는 영향관계를 알아보고, 다음으로 중소기업인 고객의 컨설팅참여도 및 컨설턴트의 역량이 유대관계 및 신뢰관계가 컨설팅성과에 미치는 영향관계를 각각 조절하는지에 대하여 실증분석을 실시하였다. 실증분석결과, 유대관계 및 역량기반신뢰는 컨설팅성과에 유의미한 정(+)의 영향관계를 나타냈으며, 고객의 컨설팅참여도는 조절효과가 없는 반면, 컨설턴트의 역량은 유대관계 및 역량기반신뢰가 컨설팅성과에 미치는 영향관계를 조절하고 있는 것으로 나타났다. 결국, 컨설팅성과를 극대화하기 위해서는 중소기업인 고객과 컨설턴트 간의 강한 유대관계 및 신뢰관계 구축과 함께 컨설턴트의 역량 함양이 매우 중요함을 시사하고 있다.

Keywords

References

  1. Gluckler, J & Armbruster, T.,Bridging Uncertainty in Management Consulting: The Mechanisms of Tust and Networked Reputation, Organization Studies, Vol. 24, No. 2, pp. 269-297, 2003. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840603242004
  2. D. J. Shin, Y. Y. You, A study on the Impact of Consultant's Competencies on Service Quality and Performance Consulting, The Journal of Digital Policy and Management, Vol. 10, No. 4, pp. 63-78, 2012.
  3. D. I. Jang, Research on How Consultant's Capability and Competency influence on upgraded Service Quality and Consumer Satisfaction: study centered on moderating effect from supportive middle and small cooperations, Master dissertation, Kyunghee University. 2001.
  4. Y. I. Cho, A Study on Service Quality of SEMs Consulting and Satisfaction: Focused on SEMs Cooperation Consulting, Master dissertation, Hansung University. 2011.
  5. S. H. Yoon, A Study on the Impact of Consultant's and Project Manager's Competencies on Performance of Business Consulting, Master dissertation, Soongsil University. 2008.
  6. C. H. Choi, Y. Y. You, A Study on the Effects of Ties between Clients and Cultancts on Consulting Project Performance through Mediated Effect of Trust, Productivity Review, Vol. 26, No. 3, pp. 401-422, 2012.
  7. Granovetter, M., The Strenght of Weak Ties, American Journal of Sociology, Vol. 78, pp. 1360-1380, 1973. https://doi.org/10.1086/225469
  8. Hansen, M. T., The search-transfer problem: The role of weak ties in sharing knowledge across organization submits, Adminstrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 44, pp. 82-111, 1999. https://doi.org/10.2307/2667032
  9. Marsden, P., & Campbell, K., Measuring tie strength, Social Forces, Vol. 63, pp, 482-501, 1994.
  10. Sarker, S., & Ahuja, M., and Kirkeby, S., The Role of Communication and Trust in Global Virtual Teams: A Social Network Perspective, Journal of Management Information System, Vol. 28, No. 1, pp. 273-309, 2011. https://doi.org/10.2753/MIS0742-1222280109
  11. Levin, D. Z., and Cross, R., The Strength of Week Ties You can Trust: The Mediating Role of Trust in Effective Knowledge Transfer, Management Science, Vol. 50, No. 11, pp. 1477-1491, 2004. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1030.0136
  12. Burt, R., The social structure of competition, In R. Cross, A. Parker, and L. Sasson(eds.), Networks in the Knowledge Economy. New York: Oxford University Press, Vol. 14, pp. 13-56, 2003.
  13. Ibarra, H., Network centrality, power, and innovation involvement: Determinants of technical and adminstrative roles, Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 36, No. 3, pp. 471-502, 1993. https://doi.org/10.2307/256589
  14. Balthazard, P., Potter, R. E., & Warren, J., Expertise, extraversion and group interaction styles as performance indicators in virtual teams, Data Base for Advances in Information System, Vol. 35, No. 1, pp. 41-64, 2004. https://doi.org/10.1145/968464.968469
  15. Uzzi, B., The sources and consequences of embeddedness for the economic performance of organization: The network effect, American Sociological Review, Vol. 61, pp. 674-698, 1996. https://doi.org/10.2307/2096399
  16. Roberts, K. H., and C. A. O'Reilly.,Some correlations of communication roles in organization, Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 22, pp. 42-57, 1979. https://doi.org/10.2307/255477
  17. Mayer, R. C., Davis, J. H., and Schoorman, D. F., An intergrative model of organizational trust, Academy of Management Review, Vol. 2, No. 3, pp. 709-730, 1995.
  18. McAllister, D. J., Affect-and cognition-based trust as foundations for interpersonal cooperation in organization, Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 38, pp. 24-59, 1995. https://doi.org/10.2307/256727
  19. Tsai, W., and Ghoshal, S., Social capital and value creation: The role of intrafirm networks, Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 41, No. 4, pp. 464-476, 1999.
  20. Levin, D. Z., Transferring knowledge within the organization in the R&D arena, Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Northwestern University. 1999.
  21. Jarvenpaa, S. L., Shaw, T. R., and Staples, D. S., Toward contextualized theories of trust: The role of trust in global virtual team, Information Systems Research, Vol. 15, No. 3, pp. 250-267, 2004. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.1040.0028
  22. Jarvenpaa, S. L., and Leidner, D., Comunication and Trust in global virtual team, Organization Science Vol. 10, No. 6, pp. 791-815, 1999. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.10.6.791
  23. Dirks, K. T., & Ferrin, D. L.,The roles of trust in organization setting, Organization Science Vol. 12, pp. 450-467, 2001. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.12.4.450.10640
  24. Becerra, M.,and Gupta, A. K.,Perceived trustworthiness within the organization: The moderating impact of communication frequency on trustor and trustee effects, Organization Science Vol. 14, No 1, pp.32-44., 2003. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.14.1.32.12815
  25. Shapiro, E. C., Eccles, R. G, & Soske, T.L. Consulting: Has the solutiom become part of the problem?, Sloan Management Review, Summer, pp. 89-95, 1993.
  26. Appelbaum, S. H, and Steed, A. J., The critical success factors in the client-consulting relationship, Journal of Management Development, Vol.. 24, No. 1, pp. 68-93, 2005. https://doi.org/10.1108/02621710510572362
  27. Rynning, M., Successful consulting with small and medium-sized vs large clients: meeting the needs of the client?, International Business Journal, Vol.11, No. 1, pp. 47-60, 1992.
  28. Baron, R.M., and Kenny, D.A., The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol. 51,. No. 6, pp. 1173-1182, 1986. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.51.6.1173
  29. Ciampi, F., Exploring Knowledge Creation Pathways in Advanced Management Consulting, Information Age Publishing, Vol.9, pp.3-39, 2009.