DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Simple Parametric Analysis of the Response of Buried Pipelines to Micro-Tunneling-Induced Ground Settlements

  • Son, Moorak (Department of Civil Engineering, Daegu University)
  • Received : 2014.07.21
  • Accepted : 2014.09.05
  • Published : 2014.11.01

Abstract

This paper investigates the effects of micro-tunneling on buried pipelines parametrically. A simplified numerical approach was developed and various parametric studies have been conducted to evaluate the effects of ground settlements on the response of buried pipelines. The controlled parameters included the pipe stiffness, ground loss magnitude, and pipe location with respect to a micro-tunnel. Maximum settlement and curvature along a pipeline have been investigated and compared among others for different conditions. In addition, the numerical results have been compared with a theoretical method by Attewell et al. (1986), which is based on a Winkler type linear-elastic solution. The comparison indicated that the response of buried pipes to micro-tunneling-induced ground settlements highly depends on the soil-pipe interaction including the separation and slippage of pipe from soil with the effects of the investigated parameters. Therefore, rather than using the theoretical method directly, it would be a better assessment of the response of buried pipelines to consider the soil-pipe interaction in more realistic conditions.

Keywords

References

  1. Attewell, P. B., Yeates, J., and Selby, A. R. (1986), Soil movements induced by tunnelling and their effects on pipelines and structures, Blackie and Son Ltd., Glasgow and London, pp. 1-317.
  2. Bennett, D. (1998), Jacking forces and ground deformation associated with microtunneling, Ph.D. thesis, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Dept. of Civil and Env. Eng, pp. 1-485.
  3. Bracegirdle, A., Mair, R. J., Nyren, R. J. and Taylor, R. N. (1996). A methodology for evaluating potential damage to cast iron pipes induced by tunneling, Proceedings of the International Symposium on the Geotechnical Aspects of Underground Construction in Soft Ground, London, pp. 650-664.
  4. Cording, E. J. and Hansmire, W. H. (1975), Displacements around soft ground tunnels, Proc., 5th Pan American congress on Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering, Buenos Aires, pp. 1-63.
  5. O'Rourke, T. D. and Trautmann, C. H. (1982), Buried pipeline response to tunnel ground movements, Europipe 82 Conf., Basel, Switzerland, paper 1. pp. 9-15.
  6. Groth, N. N. and Chapman, C. R. (1969), Computer evaluation of deformations due to subsurface loads in a semi-infinite elastic medium, B.E. Thesis, Univ. of Sydney, Australia, pp. 1-350.
  7. Klar, A., Vorster, T. E. B., Soga, K. and Mair, R. J. (2005), Soil-pipetunnel interaction: comparison between Winkler and elastic continuum solutions, Geotechnique, Vol. 55, No. 6, pp. 461-466. https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.2005.55.6.461
  8. Peck, R. B. (1969), Deep excavation and tunneling in soft ground. Proc. 7th Int. conf. Soil Mech. And Found. Eng, State of the Art Volume, pp. 259-284.
  9. Schmidt, B. (1969), "Settlements and ground movements associated with tunneling in soil." Ph.D. Thesis, University of Illinois, Urbana, Illinois, USA, pp. 1-224.
  10. UDEC 3.1 Theory and Manual (2000). Itasca Consulting Group, Inc, MN.
  11. Vorster, T. E. B., Klar, A., Soga, K. and Mair, R. J. (2005), Estimating the effects of tunneling on existing pipelines, Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, Vol. 131, No. 11, pp. 1399-1410. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2005)131:11(1399)

Cited by

  1. An Investigation into the Tunnel-Soil-Pipeline Interaction by In Situ Measured Settlements of the Pipelines vol.2020, pp.None, 2020, https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/8850380