DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Effect of Organic Content on Anaerobic Biodegradability by Agricultural Waste Biomass

  • Received : 2014.03.04
  • Accepted : 2014.05.23
  • Published : 2014.06.30

Abstract

Recently interest on production of biogas from biomass resources has increased because of climate change in worldwide. In this study, anaerobic digestion efficiency of 17 different types of agricultural waste was evaluated using biochemical methane production potential estimated from the International biochemical methane potential standard method (Germany VDI4630). As a result, theoretical biochemical methane potential ($B_{th}$) of agricultural waste biomass ranged from 0.266 to $0.488Nm^3kg^{-1}$-Volatile Solid $(VS)_{added}$. Ultimate biochemical methane potential ($B_u$) of agricultural waste biomass ranged between 0.176 and $0.417Nm^3kg^{-1}-VS_{added}$. The agricultural waste biomass anaerobic biodegradability with $B_u/B_{th}$ and VDI4630 determined by VS contents was 36.0~95.9% and 30.8~91.1%, respectively. Ultimate methane potential and anaerobic biodegradability given by the VS term showed more reasonable results.

Keywords

References

  1. Angelidaki, I., M. Alves, D. Bolzonella, L. Borzacconi, J.L. Campos, A.J. Guwt, S. Kalyuzhnyi, P. Jenicek, and J.B. vanLier. 2009. Defining the biomethane potential(BMP) of solid organic wastes and energy crops: a proposed protocol for batch assays. Water Sci. Technol. 59(5):927-934. https://doi.org/10.2166/wst.2009.040
  2. APHA. 1998. Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater, 20th ed.
  3. ASTM. 2008. E2170-01 Standard test method for determining the anaerobic biodegradation potential of organic chemicals. American Society for Testing and Materials. West Conshohocken, PA.
  4. Beuvink, J.M., S.F. Spoelstra, and R.J. Hogendrop. 1992. An automated method for measuring the time course of gas production of feedstuffs incubated with buffered rumen fluid. Neth. J. Agri. Sci. 40:401-407.
  5. Boyle, W.C. 1976. Energy recovery from sanitary landfills-a review. In: Schlegel, H.G., and, J., Barnea (Eds.), Microbial Energy Conversion. Pergamon Press Oxford, 119-138.
  6. Buffiere, P., D. Loisel, N. Bernet, and J.P. Delgenes. 2006. Towards new indicators for the prediction of solid waste anaerobic digestion properties. Water Science & Technology. Vol. 53, No. 8:233-241. https://doi.org/10.2166/wst.2006.254
  7. Gunaseelan, V.N. 1997. Anaerobic digestion of biomass for methane production: A review. Biomass and Bioenergy. Vol. 13. No. 1/2:83-114. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0961-9534(97)00020-2
  8. Kim, S.H., H. Kim, S.Y. Oh, C.H. Kim, and Y.M. Yoon. 2012. Effect of substrate to inoculum ratio on biochemical methane potential in the thermal pretreatment of piggery sludge. Korean J. soil Sci. Fert. 45(4):532-539. https://doi.org/10.7745/KJSSF.2012.45.4.532
  9. Kim, S.H., H.C. Kim, C.H. Kim, and Y.M. Yoon. 2010. The measurement of biochemical methane potential in the several organic waste resources. Korean J. soil Sci. Fert. 43(3): 356-362.
  10. Li, Y.Y. and T. Noike. 1992. Upgrading of anaerobic digestion of waste activated sludge by thermal pretreatment. Water Sci. Technol. 26:857-866.
  11. Owen, W.F., D.C. Stuckey, J.B. Healy, L.Y. Young, and P.L. MaCarty. 1979. Bioassay for monitoring biochemical methane potential and anaerobic toxicity. Water Res. 12:485-492.
  12. Shelton, D.R. and J.M. Tiedje. 1984. General method for determining anaerobic biodegradation potential. Appl. & Environ. Microbiol. 47:850-857.
  13. Shin, K.S., C.H. Kim, S.E. Lee, and Y.M. Yoon. 2011. Biochemical Methane Potential of Agricultural Waste Biomass. Korean J. soil Sci. Fert. 44(5):903-915. https://doi.org/10.7745/KJSSF.2011.44.5.903
  14. Sorensen, A.H., M. Winther-Nielsen, and B.K. Ahring. 1991. Kinetics of lactate, acetate and propionate in unadapted and lactate-adapted thermophilic, anaerobic sewage sludge: the influence of sludge adaptation for start-up of thermophilic UASB-reactors. Micro biol. biotechnol. 34:823-827.
  15. VDI 4630. 2006. Fermentation of organic materials, characterisation of the substrates, sampling, collection of material data, fementation test. VDI-Handbuch Energietechnik.
  16. Williams, A., M. Amat-Marco, and M.D. Collins. 1996. Pylogenetic analysis of Butyrivibrio strains reveals three distinct groups of species within the Clostridium subphylm of gram-positive bacteria. Int. J. Syst. Bacterol. 46:195-199. https://doi.org/10.1099/00207713-46-1-195