Journal of Periodontal and Implant Science

Korean Academy of Periodontology (대한치주과학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Comparative study of two collagen membranes for guided tissue regeneration therapy in periodontal intrabony defects: a randomized clinical trial

  • Chung, Young-Mi (Department of Periodontology, Wonkwang University Daejeon Dental Hospital, Wonkwang University School of Dentistry) ;
  • Lee, Jue-Yeon (Research Institute, NIBEC) ;
  • Jeong, Seong-Nyum (Department of Periodontology, Wonkwang University Daejeon Dental Hospital, Wonkwang University School of Dentistry)
  • Received : 2014.06.10
  • Accepted : 2014.08.02
  • Published : 2014.08.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to assess and compare the clinical and radiographic outcomes of guided tissue regeneration therapy for human periodontal intrabony defects using two different collagen membranes: a porous nonchemical cross-linking collagen membrane (NC) and a bilayer collagen membrane (BC). Methods: Thirty subjects were randomly assigned and divided into the following 3 groups: a test group (NC+BM), in which a NC was used with xenograft bone mineral (BM), a positive control group (BC+BM), in which a BC was used with xenograft BM, and a negative control group (BM), in which only xenograft BM was used. The following clinical measurements were taken at baseline and 3 months after surgery: plaque index, gingival index, probing pocket depth, gingival recession, and clinical attachment level. Radiographic analysis was performed at baseline, 1 week and 3 months after surgery. Results: Membrane exposure was not observed in any cases. Significant probing depth reduction, attachment-level gain and bone fill were observed for both test and control groups compared to baseline at 3 months after surgery (P<0.05). However, there were no statistically significant differences in clinical improvement and radiographic bone fill between treatment protocols (P>0.05). Conclusions: Within the limitations of this study, the results suggest that both NC and BC were comparable in terms of clinical and radiographic outcomes for the treatment of periodontal intrabony defects in human subjects.

Keywords

References

  1. Caton J, Nyman S, Zander H. Histometric evaluation of periodontal surgery. II. Connective tissue attachment levels after four regenerative procedures. J Clin Periodontol 1980;7:224-31. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-051X.1980.tb01965.x
  2. Zucchelli G, Bernardi F, Montebugnoli L, De SM. Enamel matrix proteins and guided tissue regeneration with titanium-reinforced expanded polytetrafluoroethylene membranes in the treatment of infrabony defects: a comparative controlled clinical trial. J Periodontol 2002;73:3-12. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.2002.73.1.3
  3. Melcher AH. On the repair potential of periodontal tissues. J Periodontol 1976;47:256-60. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.1976.47.5.256
  4. Karring T, Nyman S, Gottlow J, Laurell L. Development of the biological concept of guided tissue regeneration: animal and human studies. Periodontol 2000 1993;1:26-35. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0757.1993.tb00204.x
  5. Cortellini P, Clauser C, Prato GP. Histologic assessment of new attachment following the treatment of a human buccal recession by means of a guided tissue regeneration procedure. J Periodontol 1993;64:387-91. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.1993.64.5.387
  6. Nyman S, Lindhe J, Karring T, Rylander H. New attachment following surgical treatment of human periodontal disease. J Clin Periodontol 1982;9:290-6. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-051X.1982.tb02095.x
  7. Stahl SS, Froum S, Tarnow D. Human histologic responses to guided tissue regenerative techniques in intrabony lesions. Case reports on 9 sites. J Clin Periodontol 1990;17:191-8. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-051X.1990.tb01085.x
  8. Hardwick R, Scantlebury TV, Sanchez R, Whitley N, Ambruster J. Membrane design criteria for guided bone regeneration of the alveolar ridge. In: Buser D, Dahlin C, Schenk RK. Guided bone regeneration in implant dentistry. Chicago: Quintessence; 1994. p.101-36.
  9. Haney JM, Nilveus RE, McMillan PJ, Wikesjo UM. Periodontal repair in dogs: expanded polytetrafluoroethylene barrier membranes support wound stabilization and enhance bone regeneration. J Periodontol 1993;64:883-90. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.1993.64.9.883
  10. Black BS, Gher ME, Sandifer JB, Fucini SE, Richardson AC. Comparative study of collagen and expanded polytetrafluoroethylene membranes in the treatment of human class II furcation defects. J Periodontol 1994;65:598-604. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.1994.65.6.598
  11. Robert PM, Frank RM. Periodontal guided tissue regeneration with a new resorbable polylactic acid membrane. J Periodontol 1994;65:414-22. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.1994.65.5.414
  12. Chvapil M. Reconstituted collagen. In: Viidik A, Vuust J. Biology of collagen. London: Academic Press; 1980. p.313-25.
  13. Rao KP, Joseph T. Collagen graft copolymers and their biomedical applications. In: Nimni ME. Collagen, vol. III. Biotechnology. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press Inc.; 1988. p.63-86.
  14. Quteish D, Dolby AE. The use of irradiated-crosslinked human collagen membrane in guided tissue regeneration. J Clin Periodontol 1992;19:476-84. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-051X.1992.tb01160.x
  15. Olde Damink LH, Dijkstra PJ, Van Luyn MJ, Van Wachem PB, Nieuwenhuis P, Feijen J. Glutaraldehyde as a crosslinking agent for collagen-based biomaterials. J Mater Sci Mater Med 1995;6:460-72. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00123371
  16. Rothamel D, Schwarz F, Sculean A, Herten M, Scherbaum W, Becker J. Biocompatibility of various collagen membranes in cultures of human PDL fibroblasts and human osteoblast-like cells. Clin Oral Implants Res 2004;15:443-9. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2004.01039.x
  17. Lee CK, Koo KT, Kim TI, Seol YJ, Lee YM, Rhyu IC, et al. Biological effects of a porcine-derived collagen membrane on intrabony defects. J Periodontal Implant Sci 2010;40:232-8. https://doi.org/10.5051/jpis.2010.40.5.232
  18. Camelo M, Nevins ML, Schenk RK, Simion M, Rasperini G, Lynch SE, et al. Clinical, radiographic, and histologic evaluation of human periodontal defects treated with Bio-Oss and Bio-Gide. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 1998;18:321-31.
  19. Camelo M, Nevins ML, Lynch SE, Schenk RK, Simion M, Nevins M. Periodontal regeneration with an autogenous bone-Bio-Oss composite graft and a Bio-Gide membrane. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2001;21:109-19.
  20. Loe H. The gingival index, the plaque index and the retention index systems. J Periodontol 1967;38:610-6. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.1967.38.6_part2.610
  21. Magnusson I, Batich C, Collins BR. New attachment formation following controlled tissue regeneration using biodegradable membranes. J Periodontol 1988;59:1-6. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.1988.59.1.1
  22. Zahedi S, Legrand R, Brunel G, Albert A, Dewe W, Coumans B, et al. Evaluation of a diphenylphosphorylazide-crosslinked collagen membrane for guided bone regeneration in mandibular defects in rats. J Periodontol 1998;69:1238-46. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.1998.69.11.1238
  23. Hammerle CH, Lang NP. Single stage surgery combining transmucosal implant placement with guided bone regeneration and bioresorbable materials. Clin Oral Implants Res 2001;12:9-18. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.2001.012001009.x
  24. Zitzmann NU, Naef R, Scharer P. Resorbable versus nonresorbable membranes in combination with Bio-Oss for guided bone regeneration. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1997;12:844-52.
  25. Trombelli L, Heitz-Mayfield LJ, Needleman I, Moles D, Scabbia A. A systematic review of graft materials and biological agents for periodontal intraosseous defects. J Clin Periodontol 2002;29 Suppl 3:117-35. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-051X.29.s3.7.x
  26. Hugoson A, Ravald N, Fornell J, Johard G, Teiwik A, Gottlow J. Treatment of class II furcation involvements in humans with bioresorbable and nonresorbable guided tissue regeneration barriers. A randomized multi-center study. J Periodontol 1995;66: 624-34. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.1995.66.7.624
  27. Sanz M, Tonetti MS, Zabalegui I, Sicilia A, Blanco J, Rebelo H, et al. Treatment of intrabony defects with enamel matrix proteins or barrier membranes: results from a multicenter practice-based clinical trial. J Periodontol 2004;75:726-33. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.2004.75.5.726
  28. Nevins M, Giannobile WV, McGuire MK, Kao RT, Mellonig JT, Hinrichs JE, et al. Platelet-derived growth factor stimulates bone fill and rate of attachment level gain: results of a large multicenter randomized controlled trial. J Periodontol 2005;76:2205-15. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.2005.76.12.2205
  29. Sculean A, Windisch P, Chiantella GC, Donos N, Brecx M, Reich E. Treatment of intrabony defects with enamel matrix proteins and guided tissue regeneration. A prospective controlled clinical study. J Clin Periodontol 2001;28:397-403. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-051x.2001.028005397.x
  30. Trombelli L, Kim CK, Zimmerman GJ, Wikesjo UM. Retrospective analysis of factors related to clinical outcome of guided tissue regeneration procedures in intrabony defects. J Clin Periodontol 1997;24:366-71. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-051X.1997.tb00199.x

Cited by

  1. Test in canine extraction site preservations by using mineralized collagen plug with or without membrane vol.30, pp.9, 2014, https://doi.org/10.1177/0885328215625429
  2. Dehydrothermally Cross-Linked Collagen Membrane with a Bone Graft Improves Bone Regeneration in a Rat Calvarial Defect Model vol.10, pp.8, 2014, https://doi.org/10.3390/ma10080927