DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Nested-PCR and a New ELISA-Based NovaLisa Test Kit for Malaria Diagnosis in an Endemic Area of Thailand

  • Thongdee, Pimwan (Graduate Program in Bioclinical Sciences, Chulabhorn International College of Medicine, Thammasat University) ;
  • Chaijaroenkul, Wanna (Graduate Program in Bioclinical Sciences, Chulabhorn International College of Medicine, Thammasat University) ;
  • Kuesap, Jiraporn (Graduate Program in Bioclinical Sciences, Chulabhorn International College of Medicine, Thammasat University) ;
  • Na-Bangchang, Kesara (Graduate Program in Bioclinical Sciences, Chulabhorn International College of Medicine, Thammasat University)
  • Received : 2014.04.21
  • Accepted : 2014.06.24
  • Published : 2014.08.31

Abstract

Microscopy is considered as the gold standard for malaria diagnosis although its wide application is limited by the requirement of highly experienced microscopists. PCR and serological tests provide efficient diagnostic performance and have been applied for malaria diagnosis and research. The aim of this study was to investigate the diagnostic performance of nested PCR and a recently developed an ELISA-based new rapid diagnosis test (RDT), NovaLisa test kit, for diagnosis of malaria infection, using microscopic method as the gold standard. The performance of nested-PCR as a malaria diagnostic tool is excellent with respect to its high accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, and ability to discriminate Plasmodium species. The sensitivity and specificity of nested-PCR compared with the microscopic method for detection of Plasmodium falciparum, Plasmodium vivax, and P. falciparum/P. vivax mixed infection were 71.4 vs 100%, 100 vs 98.7%, and 100 vs 95.0%, respectively. The sensitivity and specificity of the ELISA-based NovaLisa test kit compared with the microscopic method for detection of Plasmodium genus were 89.0 vs 91.6%, respectively. NovaLisa test kit provided comparable diagnostic performance. Its relatively low cost, simplicity, and rapidity enables large scale field application.

Keywords

References

  1. Na-Bangchang K, Ruengweerayut R, Mahamad P, Ruengweerayut K, Chaijaroenkul W. Declining in efficacy of a three-day combination regimen of mefloquine-artesunate in a multi-drug resistance area along the Thai-Myanmar border. Malar J 2010; 9: 273. https://doi.org/10.1186/1475-2875-9-273
  2. Tangpukdee N, Duangdee C, Wilairatana P, Krudsood S. Malaria diagnosis: a brief review. Korean J Parasitol 2009; 47: 93-102. https://doi.org/10.3347/kjp.2009.47.2.93
  3. Yatsushiro S, Yamamura S, Yamaguchi Y, Shinohara Y, Tamiya E, Horii T, Baba Y, Kataoka M. Rapid and highly sensitive detection of malaria-infected erythrocytes using a cell microarray chip. PLoS One 2010; 5: e13179. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0013179
  4. She RC, Rawlins ML, Mohl R, Perkins SL, Hill HR, Litwin CM. Comparison of immunofluorescence antibody testing and two enzyme immunoassays in the serologic diagnosis of malaria. J Travel Med 2007; 14: 105-111. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1708-8305.2006.00087.x
  5. Reesink HW. European strategies against the parasite transfusion risk. Transfus Clin Biol 2005; 12: 1-4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tracli.2004.12.001
  6. Kamau E, Tolbert LS, Kortepeter L, Pratt M, Nyakoe N, Muringo L, Ogutu B, Waitumbi JN, Ockenhouse CF. Development of a highly sensitive genus-specific quantitative reverse transcriptase real-time PCR assay for detection and quantitation of plasmodium by amplifying RNA and DNA of the 18S rRNA genes. J Clin Microbiol 2011; 49: 2946-2953. https://doi.org/10.1128/JCM.00276-11
  7. Bureau of Epidemiology, Department of Disease Control, Ministry of Public Health, Thailand. Annual epidemiological surveillance report 2011. Available from. http://www.boe.moph.go.th/Annual/AESR2011/index.html. Accessed 8 July 2013.
  8. Wooden J, Kyes S, Sibley CH. PCR and strain identification in Plasmodium falciparum. Parasitol Today 1993; 9: 303-305. https://doi.org/10.1016/0169-4758(93)90131-X
  9. Singh B, Bobogare A, Cox-Singh J, Snounou G, Abdullah MS, Rahman HA. A genus- and species-specific nested polymerase chain reaction malaria detection assay for epidemiologic studies. Am J Trop Med Hyg 1999; 60: 687-692.
  10. Chaijaroenkul W, Wongchai T, Ruangweerayut R, Na-Bangchang K. Evaluation of rapid diagnostics for Plasmodium falciparum and P. vivax in Mae Sot malaria endemic area, Thailand. Korean J Parasitol 2011; 49: 33-38. https://doi.org/10.3347/kjp.2011.49.1.33
  11. Phimpraphi W, Paul RE, Yimsamran S, Puangsa-art S, Thanyavanich N, Maneeboonyang W, Prommongkol S, Sornklom S, Chaimungkun W, Chavez IF, Blanc H, Looareesuwan S, Sakuntabhai A, Singhasivanon P. Longitudinal study of Plasmodium falciparum and Plasmodium vivax in a Karen population in Thailand. Malar J 2008; 7: 99. https://doi.org/10.1186/1475-2875-7-99
  12. Dinko B, Oguike MC, Larbi JA, Bousema T, Sutherland CJ. Persistent detection of Plasmodium falciparum, P. malariae, P. ovale curtisi and P. ovale wallikeri after ACT treatment of asymptomatic Ghanaian school-children. Int J Parasitol Drugs Drug Resist 2013; 3: 45-50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpddr.2013.01.001
  13. Na-Bangchang K, Congpuong K. Current malaria status and distribution of drug resistance in East and Southeast Asia with special focus to Thailand. Tohoku J Exp Med 2007; 211: 99-113. https://doi.org/10.1620/tjem.211.99
  14. Doderer C, Heschung A, Guntz P, Cazenave JP, Hansmann Y, Senegas A, Pfaff AW, Abdelrahman T, Candolfi E. A new ELISA kit which uses a combination of Plasmodium falciparum extract and recombinant Plasmodium vivax antigens as an alternative to IFAT for detection of malaria antibodies. Malar J 2007; 6: 19. https://doi.org/10.1186/1475-2875-6-19
  15. Moges B, Amare B, Belyhun Y, Tekeste Z, Gizachew M, Workineh M, Gebrehiwot A, Woldeyohannes D, Mulu A, Kassu A. Comparison of CareStart HRP2/pLDH COMBO rapid malaria test with light microscopy in north-west Ethiopia. Malar J 2012; 11: 234. https://doi.org/10.1186/1475-2875-11-234
  16. Noedl H, Yingyuen K, Laoboonchai A, Fukuda M, Sirichaisinthop J, Miller RS. Sensitivity and specificity of an antigen detection ELISA for malaria diagnosis. Am J Trop Med Hyg 2006; 75: 1205-1208.
  17. Choudhury N, Jolly JG, Mahajan RC, Ganguly NK, Dubey ML, Agnihotri SK. Malaria screening to prevent transmission by transfusion: an evaluation of techniques. Med Lab Sci 1991; 4: 206-211.

Cited by

  1. Development and performance evaluation of a novel immunofluorescence chromatographic assay for histidine-rich protein 2 of Plasmodium falciparum vol.14, pp.None, 2014, https://doi.org/10.1186/s12936-015-0740-1
  2. Novel molecular diagnostic tools for malaria elimination: a review of options from the point of view of high-throughput and applicability in resource limited settings vol.15, pp.None, 2014, https://doi.org/10.1186/s12936-016-1158-0
  3. Current and cumulative malaria infections in a setting embarking on elimination: Amhara, Ethiopia vol.16, pp.None, 2014, https://doi.org/10.1186/s12936-017-1884-y
  4. Comparative evaluation of a rapid diagnostic test, an antibody ELISA, and a pLDH ELISA in detecting asymptomatic malaria parasitaemia in blood donors in Buea, Cameroon vol.6, pp.1, 2014, https://doi.org/10.1186/s40249-017-0314-2
  5. Identification of the Plasmodium species in clinical samples from children residing in five epidemiological strata of malaria in Cameroon vol.45, pp.1, 2014, https://doi.org/10.1186/s41182-017-0058-5
  6. Prevalence of Plasmodium parasitaemia in blood donors and a survey of the knowledge, attitude and practices of transfusion malaria among health workers in a hospital in Kumasi, Ghana vol.13, pp.11, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0206303
  7. Systematic Evolution of Ligands by Exponential Enrichment Technologies and Aptamer-Based Applications: Recent Progress and Challenges in Precision Medicine of Infectious Diseases vol.9, pp.None, 2014, https://doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2021.704077