Journal of Korean Society of Industrial and Systems Engineering (산업경영시스템학회지)

Society of Korea Industrial and System Engineering (한국산업경영시스템학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Study on the Technology Evaluation Index for Superior Product Selection in the Public Procurement System : Focusing SME Technological Innovation

중소기업의 기술혁신 촉진을 위한 우수조달물품 지정제도 평가항목 개선방안에 관한 연구

  • Cho, Daemyeong (Graduate School of Technology and Innovation Management, Hanyang University) ;
  • Lee, Saehun (Graduate School of Technology and Innovation Management, Hanyang University)
  • 조대명 (한양대학교 기술경영전문대학원) ;
  • 이세헌 (한양대학교 기술경영전문대학원)
  • Received : 2014.02.19
  • Accepted : 2014.04.15
  • Published : 2014.06.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

With the radical changes and advancements of industrial economy, it is required to secure product competitiveness through technological innovations to overcome uncertain environments and generate a driving force for sustainable growth. So the Korea government introduced the superior product selection system in 1996 and has granted such incentives as priority purchasing and contracts the products of SME whose technological capabilities have passed the screening criteria. After analyzing the ambiguity of the evaluation procurement used in designation of excellent product, this study proposed seven detailed indexes for evaluation.

Keywords

References

  1. Kim, D.-S., The way of a sound Private Participation in infrastructure(PPI) Project Corporation for the Regional Development. Journal of Government Contracting, 2011, Vol. 3, p 89-112.
  2. Hong, J.-M., An AHP Approach for the importance Weight of Renewable Energy Investment Criterion in the Private Sector. Korean Energy Economic Review, 2011, Vol. 10, No. 1, p 115-142.
  3. Keizer, J.A., Dijkstra, L., and Haman, J.I.M., Explaining innovation efforts of SMEs : An exploratory survey among SMEs in mechanical and electrical engineering sector in The Netherlands. Technavation, 2002, Vol. 22, No. 1, p 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0166-4972(00)00091-2
  4. Lawshe, C.H., A quantitative approach to content validity.personnel psychology, 1980, Vol. 28, p 563-575.
  5. Public Procurement service, www.pps.go.kr.
  6. Saaty, Thomas, The Analytic Hierarchy Process : Planing, Priorty Setting, Resource Allocaion, New York : McGraw-Hill.
  7. Schmidt, R.C., Lyytinen, K., Keil, M., and Cule, P., Identifying Software Project Risk : an International Delphi Study. Journal of Management Information Systems, 2001, Vol. 17, No. 4, p 5-36. https://doi.org/10.1080/07421222.2001.11045662
  8. Stock, G.N., Greis, N.P., and Fischer, W.A., Firm size and dynamic technological innovation. Technovation, 2002, Vol. 22, No. 9, p 537-549. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0166-4972(01)00061-X
  9. Choi, S.-B. and Ha, G.-R., A Study of Critical Factors for Technological Innovation of Korean Manufacturing Firms. Journal of Industrial Economics and Business, 2011, Vol. 24, p 1-24.
  10. Kim, Y.-K. and Park, S.-T., An Analysis of the Relative Importance of Patent Valuation : Focused on High Technology Industry. POSRI Business Review, 2012, Vol. 12, No. 2, p 230-259.
  11. Yang, C.-H. and Lee, J.-H., A case study on the development of performances indicators of industrial R&D Program. Journal of the Society of Korea Industrial and Systems Engineering, 2012, Vol. 35, No. 2, p 1-8. https://doi.org/10.11627/jkise.2012.35.4.1