A Study on the Key Features of the Revision of Arbitration Rules for Major International Arbitration Institutions

주요 외국중재기관의 규칙 개정 현황에 대한 고찰

  • 김중년 (배화여자대학교 국제무역과)
  • Received : 2014.11.26
  • Accepted : 2014.12.23
  • Published : 2014.12.30

Abstract

Last year, Seoul International Dispute Resolution Center(SIDRC) was set up to facilitate and promote international arbitration in Korea. This study was focused on the revision of arbitration rules such as ICC, SIAC, HKIAC and JCAA. As a leading arbitration institution in the world, ICC has tried continuously to provide more efficient service to their client by adopting emergency arbitrator(EA) & multi party arbitration. Other three institutions also introduced almost same mechanism to compete each other. These two new system is very innovative in international arbitration. First of all, EA was designed to provide interim measure service to preserve or protect parties' right before the constitution of arbitral tribunal. Arbitration institutions and arbitral tribunals should be careful to decide these requests are legitimate or not because too hasty approval on joinder or consolidation without full consideration such as parties' intention or argument may issue another serious problem - setting aside an award rendered after joined or consolidated.

Keywords