DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Grounded Theory Analysis on the Role of Intermediary Organizations for Rural Tourism : A Comparison between the Nadri of Yangpyeong-gun and Icheon-si in Gyeonggi-do

농촌체험관광 중간지원조직 역할에 관한 근거이론적 분석 - 양평군·이천시 농촌나드리 비교를 중심으로 -

  • Lee, Cha-Hee (Program in Landscape Architecture, Graduate School, Seoul National University) ;
  • Tak, Young-Ran (Program in Landscape Architecture, Graduate School, Seoul National University) ;
  • Kim, Min-Seo (Dept. of Landscape Architecture, Graduate School, Seoul National University) ;
  • Son, Yong-Hoon (Graduate School, Seoul National University)
  • 이차희 (서울대학교 환경대학원 협동과정 조경학) ;
  • 탁영란 (서울대학교 환경대학원 협동과정 조경학) ;
  • 김민서 (서울대학교 환경대학원 환경조경학과) ;
  • 손용훈 (서울대학교 환경대학원)
  • Received : 2014.08.04
  • Accepted : 2014.09.04
  • Published : 2014.09.30

Abstract

The purpose of the present study is to examine the characteristics of intermediary organizations for rural tourism by analyzing how they are run, especially in Yangpyeong-gun and Icheon-si Nadri groups, and to further look for the desirable role they should play. Since the activities of these intermediary groups have not been accumulated enough to be able to be used for a study, grounded theory was adopted as deemed appropriate among other qualitative research approaches for this paper. Three main findings of the current research are as follows. First, the rural tourism intermediary organizations have characteristics that are leaning towards local villages more than visitors, although they are in the middle of a spectrum stretching between 'visitors to the green villages' on one end and the 'green villages' on the other end. Second, the intermediary groups work not just as a bridge among different green villages but also as a mediator, facilitator and a guide, noting that such roles can vary significantly depending on the level of competence of the groups themselves and the extent to which the government steps in. Third, the tourism intermediary organizations can contribute to local community-building, going beyond the boundaries of green village. They help to improve the quality of tour experience which leads to revitalization of local economy, and during the course of operating the intermediary groups, the community in the village can set up rules and resolve disputes and conflicts. Thus, the activities of the groups have the potential to create a local community by affecting not just at a village level but to a broader area where their operation is based on. Implications of this study are suggested in three ways. First, the paper looked at the interaction between rural tourism intermediary organizations and stakeholder in a comprehensive way with a qualitative research approach taken. Second, it identified the role and tasks of rural tourism intermediary organizations. Third, it is important to ensure that the tourism intermediary organizations play the local community-oriented role.

Keywords

References

  1. Corbin, J. M. and Strauss, A. L., 1990, Grounded Theory Research: Procedures, Conons, and Evaluative Criteria. Qualitative Sociology 13(1): 3-21. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00988593
  2. D. H., Kim et al., 2013, The Way of Voluntourism Development for the Rural Area Revitalization-Grounded theory analysis on the Activities of WWOOF Korea-. Korean Society of Rural Planning 19(2).
  3. D. J., Lee et al., 2008, Participation Intention of Activity-oriented Program of Local Residents of Rural and Mountain Villages-Policy Implication for the Eco-Mountain Village Project-. The Korean Institute of Landsape Architecture 36(1).
  4. D. S., Lee and Y. C., Kim, 2012, An Inquiry on the Philosophical Backgrounds and Methodological Characteristics of Grounded Theory as Qualitative Research Method. The Korea Association of Yeolin Education 20(2).
  5. E. J., Kang et al., 2010, Analyzing the Rural Tourism Research Trends via Review of the Thesis Subjects. Korean Rural Tourism Association 17: 163-202.
  6. I. C., Jeon et al., 2007, The Evaluation of the Green Tourists' Cognition of Function for Public Benefits -The Survey of Visitors' Cognition n Yangsuri and Jurokri, Snnonri-. The Korean Institute of Landsape Architecture 35(2).
  7. J. K., Lee et al., 2010, Effects of Visitors' Personality on Green-Tourism Activities. Korean Rural Tourism Association 17(4).
  8. J. K., Koh et al., 2012, A Study on Strengthening Intermediary Organizations for Low-Carbon Green Communities in Gyeonggi-Do. Gyeonggi Reasearch Institute.
  9. J. W., Park et al., 2012, Research Paper : Estimation of Willingness to Pay of Rural Tourism. Korean Society of Rural Planning 18(2).
  10. K. R., Doh and D. B., Park, 2012, Entrepreneurial Environments and Entrepreneurships of Rural Tourism Business Operators. Korea Academic Society of Tourism Management 27(5).
  11. Morse, J. M., 2001, Situating grounded theory within qualitative inquiry. In Schreiber, R. S. & Stern, P. N. Using grounded theory in nursing(eds.).
  12. S. J. Nam et al., 2011, A Study on Resident Participation in Community Work through Grounded Theory. Korean Academy of Social Welfare(39).
  13. Strauss, A. L. and Corbin, J. M., 1998, Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory(2nd ed.).
  14. T. B., Im, 2009, Qualitative Methodology: Approach and Application. Journal of Governmental Studies 15(1).
  15. Y. H., Cho and Y. G., Kim, 2008, Grounded Theoric Interpretation of Residents' Conflict Occurred in Process of Promoting a Rural Community Development Project : Focused on the Case of the Agricultural Experience Villages. Korean Society of Rural Planning 14(2).
  16. Y. L., Kim and S. H. Park., 2012, Analyzing and Forecasting the Demand and Supply of Rural Tourism and Finding Development Strategies. Korea Rural Economic Institute 47.
  17. Y. S., Cho et al., 2009, A Study on Rural Interpreters' Experience in Rural Tourism Village. The Korean Journal of Community Living Science 2009(2).
  18. W. H., Cho, 2013, A Study on the Discretionary Behavior of Police Officers: A Grounded Theory Approach. Korean Public Administration Review 47(3).
  19. 강동규 등, 2010, 전라북도 농촌관광체험 지역네트워크 운영방안 매뉴얼개발 연구, 전라북도 농업기술원
  20. 김재현 등, 2011, 커뮤니티비즈니스 중간지원조직운영매뉴얼, 커뮤니티비즈니스센터
  21. 김정섭 등, 2011, 농촌 지역 활성화 정책의 평가와 발전방안, 한국농촌경제연구원
  22. 김정섭, 2013, 중간지원조직, 지시/동원 조직이 되지않아야, KREI논단
  23. 국토연구원 도시재생지원센터, 2013, 마을만들기 중간지원:마을만들기지원센터의 전국적 현황과 전망
  24. 농식품부, 2013, 농촌 마을 살리는 광역중간지원조직 만든다, 보도자료
  25. 박시현 등, 2012, 농촌관광의 새로운방향과 정책과제, 한국농촌경제연구원
  26. 박시현, 2013, 농촌 6차산업화를 위한 농촌관광의 발전 방향, 한국농촌경제연구원
  27. 사토 시게루 등, 2011, 마을만들기 시민사업, 국토연구원 번역본
  28. 송두범, 2011, 충남사회적경제 중간지원조직의 역할과 과제, 충남발전연구원
  29. 엄형식.마상진, 2011, 유럽의 사회적기업 중간지원조직 현황과 시사점, 한국농촌경제연구원
  30. 최종혁, 2011, 질적연구방법론 : 근거이론과 수정근거이론의 실제, 서울 신정

Cited by

  1. 근린 생활권 공원에서의 자발적 공동체 활동의 활성화 요인에 관한 연구 - 세종시 '참샘을 사랑하는 모임'을 대상으로 - vol.46, pp.2, 2014, https://doi.org/10.9715/kila.2018.46.2.037