DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Effects of Student Perceptions of Social Skills on their Perception of Smoking

  • Bektas, Murat (Department of Pediatric Nursing, Faculty of Nursing, Dokuz Eylul University) ;
  • Ozturk, Candan (Department of Nursing, Faculty of Health Science, Istanbul Sabahattin Zaim University) ;
  • Karatas, Hulya (Department of Pediatric Nursing, School of Health, Harran University) ;
  • Bektas, Ilknur (Department of Pediatric Nursing, Faculty of Nursing, Dokuz Eylul University)
  • Published : 2014.07.30

Abstract

Background: This study was conducted as a descriptive-correlational exercise with the aim of determining the effect of student perceptions of social skills on their pro and con perceptions of smoking. Materials and Methods: The study sample comprised 106 students at $6^{th}$, $7^{th}$ and $8^{th}$ grades in three primary schools. The data were collected through socio-demographic data collection form, Social Skill Perception Form and Child Decisional Balance Scale. Data were evaluated by percentage calculation, Student t test and correlation analysis. Results: While the point average of pro perception of smoking of the students with a high point average of social skill perception, was $8.6{\pm}3.1$, in those with a low social skill perception point average it was $10.7{\pm}4.2$, the difference being significant(p=0.012). The respective point averages of con perceptions were $26.8{\pm}3.7$ and $23.5{\pm}3.3$, again significant (p=0.000). While a positive medium level (r=0.410) relationship was determined between the point average of social skill perception and con perception of smoking, a negative low level (r=0.281) relationship was determined with the pro perception of smoking. Conclusions: As the social skill perception point average increases, children's con perceptions of smoking increase and their pro perceptions decrease.

Keywords

References

  1. Bandura A (1989). Social cognitive theory. In R. Vasta (Ed.). Annals of child development. Vol. 6. Six theories of child development, Greenwich, CT: JAI Press, 6, 1-60.
  2. Bandura A (1998). Health promotion from the perspective of social cognitive theory. Psychology and Hlth, 13, 623-49. https://doi.org/10.1080/08870449808407422
  3. Bektas M, Ozturk C, Armstrong M (2010a). An approach to children's smoking behavior using social cognitive learning theory. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev, 11, 1143-9.
  4. Bektas M, Ozturk C, Armstrong M (2010b). Psychometric properties of a translated decisional balance scale for assessing and predicting children's smoking status. Anadolu Psikiyatri Derg, 11, 327-34.
  5. Botvin GJ, Epstein JA, Schinke SP, Diaz T (1994). Predictors of cigarette smoking among inner-city minority youth. J Dev Behav Pediatr, 15, 67-73.
  6. Chen HS, Horner SD, Percy MS, et al (2008). Stages of smoking acquisition of young taiwanese adolescents: Self-Efficacy and decisional balance. Res Nurs Health, 31, 119-29. https://doi.org/10.1002/nur.20236
  7. Chen HS, Sheu JJ, Percy MS and ark (2006). The Chinese version of the decisional balance scale. Nurs Res, 55, 225-30. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006199-200607000-00002
  8. Cremers HP, Mercken L, Oenema A, de Vries H (2012). A webbased computer-tailored smoking prevention programme for primary school children: intervention design and study protocol. BMC public health, 12, 277. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-12-277
  9. De Jesus MC (2000). Comparison of smoking beliefs among columbus, Ohio third graders and their parents, Master Thesis, Graduate School of The Ohio State University, USA, 1-63.
  10. De Vries H, Mudde A, Kremers S, et al (2003). The european smoking prevention framework approach (ESFA): shortterm effects. Health Educ Res, 18, 649-63. https://doi.org/10.1093/her/cyg033
  11. Epstein JA, Bang H, Botvin GJ (2007). Which psychosocial factors moderate or directly affect substance use among inner-city adolescents? Addict Behav, 32, 700-13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addbeh.2006.06.011
  12. Epstein JA, Botvin GJ, Spoth R (2003). Predicting smoking among rural adolescents: Social and cognitive processes. Nicotine Tob Res, 5, 485-91. https://doi.org/10.1080/1462220031000118577
  13. Epstein JA, Griffin KW, Botvin GJ (2000). Competence skills help deter smoking among iner city adolescents. Tob Control, 9, 33-9 https://doi.org/10.1136/tc.9.1.33
  14. Global Youth Tobacco Survey (GYTS) (2003). Fact sheet. URL:http://apps.nccd.cdc.gov/GTSSData/Ancillary/ DataReports.aspx?Option=1#T retrived date 01/12/2013.
  15. Griffin KW, Botvin GJ, Scheier LM, Epstein JA, Doyle MM. (2002). Personal competence skills, distress, and well-being as determinants of substance use in a predominantly minority urban adolescent sample. Prev Sci, 3, 23-33. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1014667209130
  16. Griffin KW, Epstein JA, Botvin GJ, Spoth RL (2001). Social competence and substance use among rural youth: mediating role of social benefit expectancies of use. J Youth and Adolescence, 30, 485-98. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010449300990
  17. Hiemstra M, Ringlever L, Otten R, et al (2009). Efficacy of smoking prevention program “Smoke-free Kids”: study protocol of a randomized controlled trial. BMC Public Health, 9, 477. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-9-477
  18. Hover SJ, Gaffney LR (2002). Factors associated with smoking behavior in adolescent gilrs. Addict Behav, 13, 139-45.
  19. La Torre G, Chiaradia G, Monte L, et al. (2010). A randomised controlled trial of a school-based intervention to prevent tobacco use among children and adolescents in Italy. J Pub Health, 18, 533-42. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10389-010-0328-8
  20. Lamborn SD, Mounts NS, Steinberg L, et al (1991). Patterns of competence and adjustment among adolescents from authoritative, authoritarian, indulgent, and neglectful families. Child Development, 62, 1049-65. https://doi.org/10.2307/1131151
  21. Longlios MA, Petosa R, Halam JS (1999). Why do effective smoking prevention programs work? Studnet changes in social cognitive theory constructs. J School Health, 69, 326-31. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1746-1561.1999.tb06423.x
  22. Menrath I, Mueller-Godeffroy E, Pruessmann C, et al (2012). Evaluation of school-based life skills programmes in a highrisk sample: a controlled longitudinal multi-centre study. J Pub Health, 20, 159-70. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10389-011-0468-5
  23. Plummer BA, Velicer WF, Redding CA, et al (2001). Stage of change, decisional balance, and temptations for smoking measurement and validation in a large, school-based population of adolescents. Addict Behav, 26, 551-71. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0306-4603(00)00144-1
  24. Sarah E, Garrison MM, Chiristakis DA, et al (2005). A systemic review of school-based smoking prevention trails with longterm fallow-up. J Adolencent Health, 36, 162-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2004.12.003
  25. Scheier LM, Botvin GJ, Diaz T, Griffin KW (1999). Social skills, competence, and drug refusal efficacy as redictors of adolescent alcohol use. J Drug Education, 29, 251-78. https://doi.org/10.2190/M3CT-WWJM-5JAQ-WP15
  26. Spyratos DG, Pelagidou DT, Chloros D, et al (2012). Smoking among adolescents in Northern Greece: A large crosssectional study about risk and preventive factors. Subst Abuse Treat Prev Policy, 7, 38. https://doi.org/10.1186/1747-597X-7-38
  27. Ulgen H, Ozturk C, Armstrong M (2012). Effect of self-efficacy on Turkish children's perceptions of the advantages/ disadvantages of smoking. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev, 13, 795-98. https://doi.org/10.7314/APJCP.2012.13.3.795
  28. Velicer WF, DiClemente CC, Prochaska JO, et al (1985). Decisional balance measure for assessing and predicting smoking status. J Pers Soc Psychol, 48, 1279-89. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.48.5.1279
  29. WHO (2005). Healt professionals against tobacco. Edt. Tutun kontrolunde saglik profesyonellerinin Rolu. Ankara.
  30. WHO (2007). The European Tobacco Control Report 2007. Edt. Avrupa tutun kontrolu raporu 2007. WHO Turkiye Ofisi.
  31. WHO (2008). Report on The global tobacco epidemics 2008. Geneva.
  32. WHO (2012). World Health Statistic 2012. Geneva.

Cited by

  1. Effects of Perceived Smoking-Cancer Relationship and Cardiovascular Health Attitudes on Childrens' Views of Smoking vol.16, pp.7, 2015, https://doi.org/10.7314/APJCP.2015.16.7.2801
  2. Effects of adolescents’ self-efficacy and social anxiety on attitudes toward pros and cons of smoking pp.1475-9942, 2019, https://doi.org/10.1080/14659891.2018.1459899