DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

국내 조경용 철쭉류의 가격 및 종수 추이분석

Trend Analysis of the Prices and Numbers of Azalea Cultivars for Landscaping in Korea

  • 최재진 (순천대학교 대학원 조경학과) ;
  • 박석곤 (순천대학교 조경학과)
  • Choi, Jae-Jin (Dept. of Landscape Architecture, Graduate School, Sunchon National University) ;
  • Park, Seok-Gon (Dept. of Landscape Architecture, Sunchon National University)
  • 투고 : 2014.06.07
  • 심사 : 2014.07.30
  • 발행 : 2014.08.31

초록

본 연구는 식재설계시 주요 참고자료인 조달청, (사)한국물가협회, (사)한국조경수협회(이하, 고시기관 및 단체)의 자료를 바탕으로 과거 25년 동안 고시된 철쭉류 가격 및 종수의 추이변동을 분석하였다. 고시기관 및 단체에서 고시한 철쭉류의 가격변동은 25년 동안 유사한 패턴으로 움직였다. 이는 (사)한국조경수협회에서 고시한 철쭉류 가격을 다른 고시기관 및 단체에서 참고해 가격을 책정하기 때문이었다. 조달청은 다른 고시기관 및 단체에 비해 철쭉류 고시가격을 낮게 책정했는데, 이는 정부의 물가억제 정책으로 인해 조경수목 가격 상승을 억제하기 위함으로 판단된다. 철쭉류는 다른 조경수목에 비해 생산기간이 짧아 소비자물가 변동률의 영향보다 철쭉류의 수급량의 불균형에 따라 가격이 급변하는 것으로 보인다. 고시기관 및 단체의 철쭉류 고시가격은 실거래 가격보다 높게 책정되었다. 이는 식재공사의 하도급 관행으로 인해 하자비용 충당 및 하도급 시공업체의 이익 발생을 위한 것으로 판단된다. 고시기관 및 단체에서 고시한 철쭉류는 5~8가지로 과거부터 주로 이용된 철쭉류만을 단순하게 고시하였다. 철쭉류의 재배품종명 및 분류기준이 확실하지 않아, 관행처럼 설계자는 명확한 재배품종명을 식재도면에 기재하지 않고, 시공자도 구하기 쉬운 철쭉류를 심었다. 이로 인해 새로운 철쭉류의 수요가 없어 생산농가에서는 신품종 개발 의욕이 저하되고, 과거부터 주로 이용된 철쭉류만이 생산 고시되는 악순환이 반복된 것으로 추정된다.

This study was conducted to determine the causes of unreasonable prices and small numbers of azalea cultivars by analyzing the price trends and the number of azalea cultivars announced over the last 25 years based on data from the Public Procurement Service(PPS), Korea Price Research Center and the Landscaping Tree Association(LTA)(hereinafter, officially announcing agencies and organizations) which are major references used when landscape planting is decided. The prices of azalea cultivars announced by the official announcing agencies and organizations have moved in similar patterns over the past 25 years because the prices of azalea cultivars announced by the LTA were referred to by other official announcing agencies and organizations when they officially announced the prices of azalea cultivars. The PPS set lower officially fixed prices of azalea cultivars compared to other official announcing agencies and organizations, and the reason for this is considered to be the intention of the PPS to suppress landscape tree price increases because of the government's policies to suppress price increases. The prices of azalea cultivars seem to change rapidly due to the imbalance between the demand and supply of azalea cultivars rather than the effects of consumer price fluctuation rates because the production periods of azalea cultivars are shorter when compared to other landscape trees. The prices of azalea cultivars from the official announcing agencies and organizations have been set higher than the prices in actual transactions. The reason for this is considered to be the intention of the official announcing agencies and organizations to allow landscaping companies to cover defect costs resulting from the practice of subcontracting planting work and secure profits of subcontractors for planting work. The official announcing agencies and organizations have simply announced prices of 5~8 main azalea cultivars that have been used in the past. The names of azalea cultivars being cultivated and criteria for classification have not been clear; thus, landscape designers have not written clear names of azalea cultivars to be cultivated on planting drawings as practice and landscapers planted those azalea cultivars which could be easily obtained. Therefore, it is assumed that there has been no demand for new azalea cultivars. Thus, the vicious circle in which the prices of only those azalea cultivars that were produced in the past have been announced is repeated.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Choi, J. J. and S. G. Park(2014a) Morphological characteristics of and classification criteria for azalea cultivars for landscaping in Korea. Journal of Korean Institute of Landscape Architecture 42(2): 77-85. https://doi.org/10.9715/KILA.2014.42.2.077
  2. Choi, J. J. and S. G. Park(2014b) Analysis of confusion of azalea cultivars and its actual state of use in landscaping businesses. Journal of Korean Institute of Landscape Architecture 42(2): 86-90. https://doi.org/10.9715/KILA.2014.42.2.086
  3. Kim, J. S.(2001) A study on the policy direction for agricultural price stability. Journal of Agriculture & Life Sciences 35: 15-29.
  4. Korea Rural Economic Institute(2013) 2013 Forestry Prospect. Munwonsa. 257(2): 1-7. 한국농촌경제연구원(2013) 3013임업관측. 문원사. 257(2): 1-7.
  5. Landscaping Tree Association(2007) The 40-year History of Landscaping Tree. Landscaping Tree Association. pp.789. 한국조경수협회(2007) 조경수 40년사. 한국조경수협회. pp. 789.
  6. Lee, K. C. and K. Y. Ahn(1991) A study on the diversifying of plant species for the landscape construction in Korea. College of Agriculture Seoul National University 16(1): 67-80.
  7. Lee, H. J.(2012) Comparative Analysis of Ecological Stream Restoration Projects. Master's thesis, Ewha Womans University. Seoul. Korea.
  8. Lee, J. B. and K. K. Shim(1995) A study on the prices trends of landscape woody plants (1985-1994) in Korea. Journal of Korean Institute of Landscape Architecture 23(3): 113-131.
  9. Lee, J. S.(2009) Azalea. World Science Publisher. pp.242. 이정식(2009) 철쭉. 월드사이언스. pp.242.
  10. Lee, S. G.(1991) Price rationalization method of landscaping tree. Landscaping Tree 1(3): 14-21. 이수길(1991) 조경수의 가격 적정화 방안. 조경수 1(3): 14-21.
  11. Lim, H. T.(2010) Studies on Circulation Status and Prospects of Shrub Landscape Plants. Master's thesis, Konkuk University. Seoul. Korea.
  12. Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry(2007) Reasonable improvement plan on creation.care, production and distribution of landscape trees. Research Report to Korea Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry. 산림청(2007) 합리적인조경수조성․관리및생산․유통개선방안. 산림청 연구보고서.
  13. Oide, E.(2008) The Azalea's history as a traditional Japanese garden plant. Memoirs of Mejiro University College 44: 47-60.
  14. Park, W. K.(2013) An analysis of the price fluctuation of landscaping plants. The Korea Society for Environmental Restoration and Revegetation Technology 16(6): 63-75. https://doi.org/10.13087/kosert.2013.16.6.063
  15. Shim, K. K., J. B. Lee and J. H. Ha(1998) A study on the price change trends of landscape shrubs(1986-1995) in Korea. Korea Association for Flower Industry Development 7(2): 39-53.
  16. http://www.index.go.kr/
  17. http://www.klta.or.kr/
  18. http://www.krei.re.kr/web/www/70
  19. http://www.lafent.com/
  20. http://www.treedb.co.kr/
  21. https://www.web-ken.jp/