Journal of The Korean Association of Information Education (정보교육학회논문지)

Korea Association of Information Education (한국정보교육학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Study on the Curriculum for Elementary and Middle School in Robot and Convergence Activity

초.중학교 로봇융합활동 교육과정에 관한 연구

  • Park, Jung-Ho (Doi Elementary School) ;
  • Kim, Chul (Dept. of Computer Education, Gwangju National University of Education)
  • 박정호 (도이초등학교) ;
  • 김철 (광주교육대학교 컴퓨터교육과)
  • Received : 2014.05.29
  • Accepted : 2014.06.12
  • Published : 2014.06.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Recently, research using robots as a learning tool has increasingly been conducted in K-12 education area. It has been known that hands-on robots give positive educational effect not only on science and mathematics, but on STEAM activity, and help improve the abilities necessary in the 21 century, such as critical thinking, creativity, communication skills, and team work. Despite many research achievements, there is still few research on robot based curriculum to improve the instrumental application of robots in the primary and secondary education fields. In other words, there is a lack of studies of systematic educational contents, educational methods and educational evaluation to increase the instrumental application according to schools and class years. Therefore, this study analyzed domestic and foreign robot based curriculums and relevant cases to develop 'robot' related educational programs in primary school and middle school, suggested the achievement objectives in the robot area as a sub category of the computer science curriculum which will be revised, and proposed teaching-learning method and evaluation method.

최근 K-12교육에선 교수학습도구로 로봇을 활용하는 연구가 꾸준히 증가하고 있다. 핸즈온 특성을 기반으로 하는 로봇은 과학, 수학 교과학습 뿐만 아니라 STEAM 융합활동에서도 긍정적 교육효과를 제공하며 비판적 사고력, 창의성, 의사소통능력, 협동심 등의 21세기에 필요한 능력 신장에도 도움을 주는 것으로 알려져 있다. 하지만 많은 연구 성과에 비해 초중등 교육현장에서 로봇의 도구적 활용을 향상시키기 위한 로봇교육과정 연구는 아직 부족한 실정이다. 즉, 학교급/학년별로 도구적 활용을 제고하기 위한 체제적인 교육내용, 교육방법, 그리고 교육평가에 대한 연구는 부족한 실정이다. 이에 본 연구에서는 초등학교와 중학교에서 '로봇'과 관련된 교육과정을 개발하고 운영할 수 있도록 국내외의 로봇교육과정 및 관련 사례를 분석한 후 개정될 컴퓨터과학 교육과정의 하위 영역으로써 로봇영역의 성취 목표를 제시하고, 교수학습 방법과 평가 방법의 고려사항을 제시하였다.

Keywords

References

  1. Bers, M. U. (2010). The TangibleK Robotics Program: Applied Computational Thinking for Young Children. Early Childhood Research & Practice. 12(2), n2.
  2. Bradley S. Baker, Gwen Nugent, Neal Gradgenett & Viacheslav I. Adamchuk(2012), Robotics in K-12 Education : a new technology for learning
  3. Cristy. M. (2000). Bee- Bot Lessons, Terrapin Tool for thinking. http//www.terrapinLOGO.com/pro-bot.php
  4. Dimitris, A(2009). Teacher Education on Robotics-Enhanced constructivist Pedagogical Methods. Published 2009 by school of Pedagogical and Technological Education(ASPETE) ISBN 978-960-6749-49-0(http://www.terecop.eu/)http://www.terecop.eu/
  5. Eguchi, A. (2007). Educational Robotics for Element ary School Classroom. In R. Carlsen et al. (Eds.), Proceedings of Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference 2007(pp. 2542-2549). Chesapeake. VA: AACE. Retrieved from http://www.editlib.org/p/24977.
  6. Feng, H.C., Lin, C.H. and Liu, E.Z.F(2011), Parents' perceptions of educational programmable bricks for kids, British Journal of Educational Technology. Vol 42 No 2. pp. 30-33. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2010.01158.x
  7. Heffernan. J. (2013). Elementary Robotics : Sustaining the Natural Engineering Instincts of Children, CreateSpace Independent Publishing Platform; 1 edition (November 16, 2013)
  8. Jo. H.G.(2011), A Study on the Development of Robotics Literacy Curriculum for Cultivating Robotics-Enhanced Learning Activities in K - 12 Classrooms, KERIS Report 2011-5
  9. Kim, K.H. (2011), The Effects of the Robot Based Instruction on Improving Immersion Learning, The Journal of Korean associalion of computer education, V.14 No.2, pp.1-12
  10. Kim, S.A. Ji, S.D. (2001), A Survey on Teacher's Cognition for the Improvement of Robotics Education in Public Education, The Journal of Korea Robotics Society. Vol. 6, No.4. pp. 365-372.
  11. LEGO Engineering(2014) : http://www.legoengineering.com/science-through-Iego-engineering/
  12. Lindh, J., Holgersson, T.(2007), Does lego training stimulate pupils' ability to solve logical problems?, Computers & Education. 49. pp. 1097 -111 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2005.12.008
  13. Lough, T. and Fett, C. (2004), "Trends in robotics education: How teacher observations of male and female robotics students are changing over time". TIES Magazine, pp. 22-33
  14. Miller, D.P., Nourbakhsh, I.R. and Sigwart, R.(2008), "Robots for education", New York, NY:Springer-Verlag. pp. 1283-1301
  15. Mitnik, R., Nussbaum, M., & Soto, A. (2008). An autonomous educational mobile robot mediator. Autonomous Robots. 26(4), 367-382.
  16. Resnick, M. (2007). Sowing for a More Seeds the Creative Society. Leaming & Leading with Technology. pp. 18-22.
  17. Resnick, M. (2008). Sowing the seeds for a more creative society. Learning & Leading with Technology, 35(4), 18-22.
  18. Singer. P. W. (2009). Wired for war : The robotics revolution and conflict in the 21st century[Kinedle version]. Retrieved from http://www.amazon.com

Cited by

  1. 로봇 교육과정 단계별 학습내용에 관한 연구 vol.18, pp.3, 2014, https://doi.org/10.14352/jkaie.2014.18.3.443
  2. 통합교육의 효과에 대한 메타분석 vol.35, pp.3, 2014, https://doi.org/10.14697/jkase.2015.35.3.0403
  3. 초등학생을 위한 융합활동-로봇분야 교육과정 모델 개발 vol.19, pp.4, 2014, https://doi.org/10.14352/jkaie.2015.19.4.481
  4. 교육대학교 로봇 활용 소프트웨어 교육 과정 개발을 위한 예비 교사의 인식 조사 연구 vol.21, pp.3, 2014, https://doi.org/10.14352/jkaie.2017.21.3.277
  5. 로봇기반 교과연계 SW교육 프로그램 개발 및 적용 vol.24, pp.1, 2014, https://doi.org/10.14352/jkaie.2020.24.1.87