Enterprise Architecture for e-Government Monitoring and Evaluation Reporting System Based on Customer Satisfaction Perspective in Indonesia

  • Received : 2014.05.01
  • Accepted : 2014.06.15
  • Published : 2014.06.30

Abstract

Refining the monitoring and evaluation reporting is an important thing in e-Government. Indonesia which has had e-Government roadmap since 2000, has not had the systematic mechanism to monitor and evaluate e-Government in which the report can be easily accessed by the public and used to be the best practice to improve other e-Government implementation. Enterprise architecture (EA) has the major objective to straighten an enterprise to its necessary requirements. It can be used to propose the required system and that was the purpose of this paper. It was started by reviewing the literature about e-Government monitoring and evaluation, using quality of service as the means, and understanding TOGAF as one of EA framework. The second step was comparing EA and the evaluation of e-Government in Korea and Indonesia to get the best practices. And the last step was creating EA for the monitoring and evaluation reporting system based on Korea and the literature reviewed. It is expected that the formulized EA can be a tool to improve e-Government implementation in Indonesia.

Keywords

References

  1. Land, M. O. D., Proper, Erik, Waage, Maarten, Cloo, Jeroen, Steghuis, Claudia, "Enterprise Architecture - Creating Value by Informed Governance," Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg, 2009.
  2. Greefhorst, D., Proper, Erik, "Architecture Principles - The Cornerstones of Enterprise Architecture," Springer Heidelberg Dordrecht London New York, 2011.
  3. Lankhorst, M., et al., "Enterprise Architecture at Work - Modelling, Communication and Analysis," Springer Dordrecht Heidelberg London New York, 2009.
  4. Schekkerman, J., "How to Survive in the Jungle of Enterprise Architecture Frameworks - Creating or Choosing an Enterprise Architecture Framework," Trafford Publishing, 2004.
  5. Song, H. J., "E-Government in Developing Countries - Lessons Learned from Republic of Korea," Communication and Information (CI) in Asia - UNESCO, 2006.
  6. Sallard, O., Alyousuf, Nabil Ali, "Measuring and Evaluating E-Government in Arab Countries," Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, 2007.
  7. Kim, S., "A Case Study of Local e-Government Performance in South Korea: Do Leadership and Management for Results Matter," International Public Management Review, Vol. 10, No. 1, 2009.
  8. Lee, J., Kim, Hyun Joon, Ahn, Michael J., "The Willingness of e-Government Service Adoption by Business Users: The Role of Offline Service Quality and Trust in Technology," Government Information Quarterly, 2011.
  9. NIA, "Korea e-Gov't: Goverment (EA) Enterprise Architecture & e-Gov't Standard Framework," National Information Society Agency, 2011.
  10. MOPAS, "Smart Government Implementation Plan," Ministry of Public Administration and Security, 2011.
  11. Cho, J., "Case Study and Best Practices of e-Government Interoperability in Korea Costa Rica Gobierno Facil, 2010.
  12. NIPA, "An Overview of Korea's IT Industry & Policies," National IT Industry Promotion Agency, 2011.
  13. MOPAS, "e-Government in Korea," www.oecd.org, 2010.
  14. Oh, M., Larson, James F., "Digital Development in Korea - Building an information society," Routledge Advances in Korean Studies, 2011.
  15. MCIT Indonesia, "ICT Whitepaper Indonesia 2012," Ministry of Communication and Information Technology, 2012.
  16. President of Indonesia, "Presidential Instruction No. 3/2003 about the National Policy and Strategy of e-Government Development," President of Indonesia, 2003.
  17. MCIT Indonesia, "The Roles and Function of MCIT," www.kominfo.go.id, 2013.
  18. Aptika, G.D.o.I.A., "E-Government Directorate," www.aptika.kominfo.go.id, 2010.
  19. Harijadi, D. A., "Indonesia's Roadmap to e-Government: Opportunities and Challenges," APEC High-Level Symposium on e-Government, 2000.
  20. MCIT Indonesia, "ICT Whitepaper Indonesia 2010," Ministry of Communication and Information Technology, 2010.
  21. Pudjianto, B. W., "E-Government Assimilation in Indonesia: An Empirical Investigation on Single-stage and Multi-stage Assimilation Process," Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology, 2012.
  22. Arifiyanto, W. A., Surendro, Kridanto, "Enterprise Architecture for e-Government in Indonesia," International Conference on Electrical Engineering and Informatics, 2009.
  23. Yoganingrum, A., Sensuse, Dana Indra, Murni, Aniati, "A Taxonomy of Enterprise Architecture Framework for Indonesian SMEs," International Journal of Computer Science Issues, 2013.
  24. Imbar, R. V., Agustin, Rahayu, "Analysis and Modelling of Enterprise Architecture in PT. Indonesia Power UBP Kamojang Using Zachman Framework Method," Information System Journal of Maranatha Christian University, 2008.
  25. Yunis, R., Surendro, Krisdanto, Telaumbanua, Kristian, "Enterprise Business Architecture in Indonesia Higher Education: A Case Study," Annual International Conference on InfoComm Technologies in Competitive Strategies, 2010.
  26. Sembiring, J., Nuryatno, Edi Triono, Gondokaryono, Yudi Satria, "Analyzing the IT Value in Main Components of Enterprise Architecture Methodology Development using Grounded Theory in Qualitative Methods," ICT Conference for Indonesia, 2011.
  27. BPPT, "The Handover of the Enterprise Architecture Grand Design - Sisfohaneg - for Ministry of Defense," www.bppt.go.id, 2011.
  28. Bjorn, F., Wahid, Fathul, "E-government Challenges and the Role of Political Leadership in Indonesia: the Case of Sragen," Proceedings of the 41st Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 2008.
  29. Hermana, B., Silfianti, Widya, "Evaluating E-government Implementation by Local Government: Digital Divide in Internet Based Public Services in Indonesia," International Journal of Business and Social Science, Vol. 2, No. 3(Special), 2011.
  30. Syamsuddin, I., "Evaluation of e-Government Initiatives in Developing Countries: An ITPOSMO Approach," International Research Journal of Applied and Basic Sciences, Vol. 2, No. 12, 2011.
  31. President of Indonesia, "The Law No. 14/2008 about The Transparency of Public Information," President of Indonesia, 2008.
  32. The Open Group, "Open Group Standard TOGAF Version 9.1," pubs.opengroup.org, 2011.
  33. OGI, "About OGI," opengovindonesia.org, 2014.
  34. OGI, "About One Service," satulayanan.net.
  35. Lupeikiene, A., Miliauskaite, J., Caplinskas, A., "A View-based Approach to Quality of Service Modelling in Service-oriented Enterprise Systems," DOI, http://dx.doi.org/10.7250/bsc.2013.2
  36. Lahtela, A., Hotti, V., Salomaa, H., "Service Support in IT Governance, IT Management and Enterprise Architecture Context," Society of Digital Information and Wireless Communications, 2014.
  37. Mosincata A., Bindera W., Jazayeria M., "Achieving Runtime Adaptability through Automated Model Evolution and Variant Selection," Enterprise Information Systems Volume 8, Issue 1, 2014, pages 67-83, DOI:10.1080/17517575.2012.691182, http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/17517575.2012.691182#.U6LFA0Bxs7A