한국전통조경학회지 (Journal of the Korean Institute of Traditional Landscape Architecture)

  • 제32권4호
  • /
  • Pages.105-119
  • /
  • 2014
  • /
  • 1738-236X(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2384-1478(eISSN)
한국전통조경학회 (Korean Institute of Traditional Landscape Architecture)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

문화재 현상변경허용기준 제도개선을 위한 기초연구

Basic Research on Improvement Schemes for the Limit of changing Current State of the Cultural Properties

  • 조홍석 ((재)에이치아이정책연구원 부설 역사문화연구센터) ;
  • 박현준 ((재)에이치아이정책연구원 부설 역사문화연구센터) ;
  • 박준선 ((재)에이치아이정책연구원 부설 역사문화연구센터)
  • Cho, Hong-Seok (Research Center of History and Culture affiliated with HIPI) ;
  • Park, Hyun-Joon (Research Center of History and Culture affiliated with HIPI) ;
  • Park, Jun-Sun (Research Center of History and Culture affiliated with HIPI)
  • 투고 : 2014.11.04
  • 심사 : 2014.12.15
  • 발행 : 2014.12.30
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

잇따른 세계문화유산 등재 등 우리 문화재의 위상이 날로 높아지는 한편, 국민 의식수준 향상으로 문화재 향유에 대한 관심도이 증가하고 있다. 이에 문화재청은 문화재를 보다 체계적으로 보존 관리 회복하고, 주변 역사문화환경의 경관적 쾌적성 확보를 위해 '현상변경허용기준 제도'를 적극 운영하고 있는데, 현재까지 1,834건의 국가지정문화재의 허용기준이 마련되었고, 전국적으로 시 도지정문화재의 허용기준 작성이 활발히 전개되고 있다. 그럼에도 불구하고, 일부 적용개념의 모호한 정의와 적용 시 지침의 포괄적 해석으로 인해 기준의 일관성확보 및 구체적 행위기준의 근거가 미약하여 행정 투명성 확보의 한계를 나타내고 있어 제도정착을 위한 종합적 개선대책 마련이 시급한 실정이다. 따라서, 본 연구에서는 제도의 전반적인 운용현황을 진단하고, 진단결과에서 나타나는 한계와 개선사항에 대해서 적극적인 대안을 모색함으로써 제도의 효율적인 운용을 위한 기초자료를 마련하였다. 이를 통해, 단기적으로는 제도의 안착과 더불어 문화재행정의 만족도 증진을 통한 역사문화환경 보존지역에 대한 적극적 경관조성정책의 추진을 도모함으로써 보다 쾌적한 역사문화환경의 전기가 마련되길 기대한다.

With its growing awareness by public today, along with our heritage gaining higher standing - such as being listed as World Heritage - the needs for managing cultural heritage that meet global standard is required, and public's interest towards national heritage growing higher, Cultural Heritage Administration is actively pursuing related projects for scenic amenity that include systematic preserve/manage/restore the heritage including surrounding environment, also propose harmonious landscape. 1,834 cases of allowance limit for state-designated cultural heritage change are prepared as part of the plan, and the standards are being expanded actively towards designated cultural heritage across the country, contributing towards administrative efficiency and living conditions of the locals significantly. However, some definitions are unclear and possible complaints might arise when applied due to choice of the law, this research prepares the base material for efficient management of the establishment by diagnosing overall operational status and proposing alternatives towards the limit and improvements after reviewing the result. Through this, we expect to see establishment of policies for better management of cultural heritage and its scenic amenity via maximizing administrative efficiency, whilst positively enhance resident satisfaction around the heritage area as well as settling the regulations in short term.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Cho, C. H. and Chung, S. C.(1995). A Study on the Layout System and its Principles in Korean Traditional Temples. Journal of the architectural institute of Korea. 11(7): 103-115.
  2. Cho, H. S., Oh, J. A. and Kim, C. D.(1999). A Study on Modern Architecture in the Local City -Focused on the Formation and the Transition Process of Modern Architecture in Kong-ju -. The Journal of Architectural and Urban Environmental Research. 7(-): 1-13.
  3. Cho, H. S.(2012). A Study on Securing the View Axis of Cultural Heritage using Landscape Simulation Analysis in Downtown. Journal of Architectural History. 21(3): 29-44. https://doi.org/10.7738/JAH.2012.21.3.029
  4. Chung, S. C.(1989). A Study on the Visual Qualities of Traditional Korean Architecture. Journal of the architectural institute of Korea,5(4): 91-101.
  5. Cho, H. S., Oh, S. K. and Kim, C. D.(2001). Analysis on Conservation Methods of the Historical and Cultural Environment in Kongju City, Korea. Journal of Korea Planners Association. 36(2): 225-239.
  6. Choi, H. S.(2001). Control of Building Height to Preserve Urban Historic Landscapes in Korea. Journal of Korea Planners Association. 36(1): 99-117.
  7. Cultural Heritage Administration(2004). Guide for Changing Current State of the Cultural Properties in Practice. Cultural Heritage Administration.
  8. Cultural Heritage Administration Directive 316(2014). Established Guidelines for the Allowance Limit for State-Designated Cultural Heritage Change. Cultural Heritage Administration.
  9. Cultural Heritage Administration-Conservation Policy Division(2009). Manual for Changing Current State of the Cultural Properties Works. Cultural Heritage Administration.
  10. Heo, D. Y.(1999). study on regulations of high-rise buildings in the areas near Korean traditional buddhist temples, Mastes's Thesis of Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea.
  11. Industry-University Cooperation Foundation Sungkyunkwan University(2006). Research on Preparation of the Manual for the Permission Criteria for Changing surroundings of the State-designated Cultural Heritage Properties. Cultural Heritage Administration.
  12. Ko, K. N.(2012). A Study on Improving the Allowable Standards for Changing the Status of Cultural Heritage. Mastes's Thesis of Mokwon University, Daejeon, Korea.
  13. Korea Institute of Traditional Landscape Architecture(2008). Study on Improvement of Impact Assessment Area around the Cultural Heritage properties. Cultural Heritage Administration.
  14. Korea Research Institute for Human Settlements(2012). Approaches for the Systematic Management of Historical and Cultural Preservation Area. Cultural Heritage Administration.
  15. Lee, H.(2000). Study on the Characteristics of Processional Space in Traditional Buddhist Temple, focused on the Gates. Mastes's Thesis of Chonnam National University, Gwangju, Korea.
  16. Oh, S. H., An, Y. J. and An, G. H.(2004). A Study on the Observer-oriented Building Height Regulation in Urban Area with a Historic Landmark. The Architectural Institute of Korea, 20(4):221-228.
  17. Park, E. H., Kim, T. H. and Lee, J. K.(2011). A Study on the Visibility Ratio Analysis Technique for Establishing the Cultural Property Protective Zone. Journal of Korean Institute of Traditional Landscape Architecture. 29(2): 108-117.
  18. Shin, W. J. and Lee, S. S.(2014). A Study on the Preservation Method of Modern Registered Architectural Cultural Properties. Journal of the Korean Institute of Rural Architecture. 16(1): 119-127. https://doi.org/10.14577/kirua.2014.16.1.119
  19. Yoon, C. S., Kim, D. I. and Cho, H. C.(1986). A Study on the Urban Development Criteria for Consideration of Architectural Heritages. Journal of the architectural institute of Korea. 2(2): 89-95.

피인용 문헌

  1. A Study on the Synecological Values of the Torreya nucifera Forest (Natural Monument No. 374) at Pyeongdae-ri in Jeju Island vol.33, pp.4, 2015, https://doi.org/10.14700/KITLA.2015.33.4.087
  2. A Study on Improvement Examination Standard for the Limit of changing Current State of the Cultural Properties vol.33, pp.4, 2015, https://doi.org/10.14700/KITLA.2015.33.4.148