1. Introduction
Solar power is a renewable energy source that might replace fossil fuel dependent energy sources. However, for that to happen, solar power cost per kilowatt-hour has to be competitive with fossil fuel energy sources. Currently, solar panels are not very efficient it has 12-20% efficiency to convert sunlight to electrical power. The efficiency can drop further due to other factors such as solar panel temperature and load conditions. In order to maximize the power derived from the solar panel, it is important to operate the panel at its optimal power point. To achieve this, a type of charge controller called a Maximum Power Point Tracker will be designed and implemented.
The MATLAB / PSPICE model of the PV module is developed [1-4] to study the effect of temperature and insolation on the performance of the PV module. MATLABbased modelling and simulation scheme suitable for studying the I-V and P-V characteristics of a PV array under a non-uniform insolation due to partial shading [5] was proposed. The mathematical model of solar PV module is useful for the computer simulation. The power electronics interface is connected between a solar panel and a load or battery bus, is a pulse width modulated (PWM) DC-DC converter or their derived circuits is used to extract maximum power from solar PV panel [6]. I-V characteristic curve of photovoltaic (PV) generators based on various DC-DC converters [7-10] was proposed and concluded that SEPIC converter is the best alternative to track maximum power from PV panel.
Shagar et al. [11] described the closed loop mechanism of the SEPIC converter and the simulated results are presented. The inherent nature of SEPIC converter is that additional input filters are not necessary to filter out high frequency harmonics. The SEPIC (Single Ended Primary Inductor Converter) topology is an excellent choice for a maximum power point tracking (MPPT) converter in small solar energy systems. Simulation and experimental validation are given by Kashyap et al. [12]
The maximum power tracking for PV panel using DCDC converter is developed [13] without using micro controller. The nominal duty cycle of the main switch in the SEPIC converter is adjusted to a value, so that the input resistance of the converter is equal to the equivalent output resistance of the solar panel at the MPP. This approach ensures maximum power transfer under all atmospheric conditions. The analogue chaotic PWM is used to reduce the EMI in boost converter. The conversion efficiency is increased when CPWM is uses as a control technique [14- 15]. The chua’s diode and chua’s oscillator was used to generate chaotic PWM. The spectral performance has been improved in induction drives when CPWM is used [16].
This paper proposes to implement Chaotic PWM as a control method to improve the steady state performance of the DC-DC SEPIC converter based MPPT system for solar PV module. The nominal duty cycle of the main switch of DC-DC SEPIC converter is adjusted, so that the solar panel output impedance is equal to the input resistance of the dcdc converter which results better spectral performance in the tracked voltages when compared to conventional PWM control. The conversion efficiency of the proposed MPPT system is increased when CPWM is used.
2. MATLAB Model of L1235-37W Solar PV Module
A solar cell is a kind of p-n junction semiconductor device and converts light energy into electrical energy. The output characteristics of the solar PV module depend on the irradiance and the operating temperature of the cell. The equivalent circuit of PV module is shown in Fig. 1(a).
Fig. 1.(a) Equivalent circuit of solar PV module
Fig. 1.(b) MATLAB model for PV module
From the Fig. 1(a), the current equation is given by
where diode current is,
Based on the electrical Eqs. (1) and (2), the solar PV module is modelled in MATLAB as shown in Fig. 1(b). Which is used to enhance the understanding, predict the V-I characteristics to analyze the effect of temperature and irradiation variation. If irradiance increases, the fluctuation of the open circuit voltage is very small. But the short circuit current has sharp fluctuations with respect to irradiance. However, for a rising operating temperature, the open-circuit voltage is decreased in a Non-linear fashion [1].
The V-I characteristics are validated experimentally in the L1235-37Wp solar module shown in Fig. 2(a). The Table 1 shows the technical specifications of L1235-37W solar module under test. The Fig. 2(b) shows the V-I characteristics is based on the experimental results under irradiation (G) =1000W/m2, temperature =25°C.
Table 1.Specifications of l1235-37W solar PV panel
Fig. 2.(a) L1235-37W solar module under test
Fig. 2.(b) V-I characteristics of L 1235-37W solar panel
2.1 Modelling of SEPIC converter
The relation between input and output currents and voltage are given by
The Table 2 shows the components used in simulation and hardware setup for the power circuit. The duty cycle of the SEPIC converter under continuous conduction mode is given by
Table 2:Specification of SEPIC converter
VD is the forward voltage drop across the diode (D), The maximum duty cycle is
The value of the inductor is selected based on the below equations
ΔILis the peak-to-peak ripple current at the minimum input voltage and fs is the switching frequency. The value of C1 depends on RMS current, which is given by
The voltage rating of capacitor C1 must be greater than the input voltage. The ripple voltage on C1 is given by
The parameters governing the selection of the MOSFET are the minimum threshold voltage Vth(min), the onresistance RDS(ON), gate-drain charge QGD, and the maximum drain to source voltage VDS(max). The peak switch voltage is equal to Vin + Vout. The peak switch current is given by
I Q1(Peak) = IL1(PEAK) + IL2(PEAK)
The RMS current is given by
The total power dissipation for MOSFETs includes conduction loss (as shown in the first term of the above equation) and switching loss as shown in the second term. IG is the gate drive current. The RDS(ON) value should be selected at maximum operating junction temperature and is typically given in the MOSFET datasheet. Pswitch = (IQ1(rms) * RDS (ON) *Dmax) +(Vin(min))+Vout)*I Q1(Peak * (QGD * fS )/ IG
The output diode must be selected to handle the peak current and the reverse voltage. In a SEPIC converter, the diode peak current is the same as the switch peak current IQ1(peak). The minimum peak reverse voltage the diode must withstand is, VRD = Vin(max) + Vout (max)
2.2 Dynamic input characteristics of a SEPIC converter at MPP
The input voltage and the equivalent input resistance of the converter are Vs and Ri respectively. As the input power ρi to the converter is equal to the output power ρo of the solar PV module
The rate of change ρi with respect to VS and Ri can be shown below
At the MPP, the rate of change of pi equals zero and Ri= rg
The equation gives the required dynamic resistance characteristics of the tracker at MPP.
3. Generation of Chaotic PWM
In order to improve the steady state performance of Solar PV powered system, direct control Chaotic Pulse width modulated (CPWM) SEPIC converter is proposed to track maximum power from solar PV module. Therefore, in order to get chaotic frequency fΔ or chaotic amplitude AΔ, chaos-based PWM (CPWM), as shown in Figs. 3 (a) and (b) is analyzed to generate chaotic PWM. The analogue chaotic PWM has its advantages over the digital in its low costs and easy-to-design, making it suitable for highfrequency operation and situations when design flexibility, high converter conversion efficiency and low cost. In order to generate chaotic pulse width modulation chua’s diode is used to trigger the main switch of SEPIC converter, and to be used for reducing spectral peaks in tracked converter voltage.
Fig. 3. (a)Chua’s diode
Fig. 3. (b)Chua’s oscillator
The CPWM adopts sawtooth to modulate, but its carrier period TΔ′ changes according to
Where TΔ is invariant period, Xi, I = 1,2,….N, a chaotic sequence, x=(x1,x2…xN), and Mean(x), average of the sequence, defined as
Similarly the CPWM also adopts sawtooth to modulate, but its carrier amplitude changes according to Where AΔ is the invariant amplitude, Xi, i= 1,2,….N, a chaotic sequence
x= ( x 1,x2…xN ), and Mean (x), average of the sequence, and K is the modulation factor of the amplitude which can be set required in practice. The value of K is selected as low so that the ripple in the output voltage of the SEPIC converter is low. Also the ripple in the output voltage controlled by Chaotic PWM is low.
The analog chaotic carrier is generated based on the circuit shown in Fig. 3(a). The resistances (Rd1 … Rd6) are used to realise linear resistor called Chua diode. The parameters for Chua’s diode are designed and chosen as Rd1 = 2.4 kΩ, Rd2 = 3.3 kΩ, Rd3 = Rd4 = 220Ω, and Rd5 = Rd6 = 20 kΩ. The other parameters of Chua’s oscillator used in the experiment areL1 = 2.2 mH, C1 = 4.7 nF, C2 = 500 pF, and R = 1.75 KΩ.
4. Simulation Result
The block diagram of the hardware setup is shown in Fig. 4. The closed loop simulink model of SEPIC DC-DC converter based maximum power tracking using Chaotic PWM is shown in Fig. 5.
Fig. 4.Block diagram of the proposed MPPT system
Fig. 5.Closed loop simulation of MPPT system using CPWM for solar PV module
The generated chaotic carrier and Chaotic PWM are shown in Figs. 6 and 7. The conventional PWM is shown in Fig. 8.
Fig. 6.Chaotic carrier
Fig.7.Chaotic PWM
Fig. 8.Conventional PWM
The Fig. 9 shows the tracked power from the solar PV module is 36.5W corresponds to 1000W/m^2 and 13W corresponds to 500W/m^2. The tracking efficiency is 98.6% without considering the efficiency of the solar PV module and the converter. The duty cycle of the main switch of the SEPIC converter is 45%. The converter conversion efficiency is increased from 86% to 92% because of the lower average switching frequency in CPWM.
Fig. 9.Tracked power using DC-DC SEPIC converter
5. Experimental Setup
Fig. 10 shows of experimental setup of the proposed SEPIC converter-based MPPT for solar PV module, which is constituted by a power stage and a control circuit. The power stage includes an inductor L1, L2, capacitor C1, C2, a switch S, a load resistance, a solar PV module (L1235- 37Wp).
Fig. 10.Hardware setup
The generated chaotic carrier and periodic carrier are shown in Figs. 11 and 12. The corresponding conventional PWM and chaotic PWM are shown in Figs. 13 and 14.
Fig. 11.Chaotic carrier
Fig. 12.Periodic carrier
Fig. 13.PWM
Fig. 14.Chaotic PWM
The tracked input and output voltage from the solar PV module is shown in Figs. 15 and Fig. 16. The ripple voltage of the converter output voltage is analyzed using FFT. Fig 17 shows the ripple voltage in the output voltage is 200 m V. The spectrum of output voltage using conventional PWM is shown in Fig. 18. It implies that the db magnitude corresponds to fundamental frequency (25KhZ) is -10db Vrms when convention PWM is used as control method.
Fig. 15.Tracked input voltage from solar PV module
Fig. 16.SEPIC converter output voltage (multiplier=5)
Fig. 17.Output Voltage Ripple (PWM)
Fig. 18.Spectral analysis of output voltage using FFT
The SEPIC converter output voltage ripple using CPWM control method is shown in Fig. 19. The ripple voltage is only 80mV. The db magnitude corresponds to fundamental frequency is -40db Vrms. Hence high frequency harmonic peaks are eliminated to great extent.
Fig. 19.Output voltage ripple and its spectrum analysis using FFT (Y-axis: 20 db)
6. Conclusion
The analogue chaotic PWM is generated and used as a control scheme to track the maximum power from PV module in order to improve the conversion efficiency of the MPPT system. The tracking efficiency is 98.6% without considering the efficiency of the solar PV panel and converter. The converter conversion efficiency is increased from 86% to 92% because of the lower average switching frequency in CPWM. The nominal duty cycle of the main switch of DC-DC SEPIC converter is adjusted so that the solar panel output impedance is equal to the input resistance of the SEPIC converter which results better spectral performance in the tracked voltages when compared to conventional PWM control.
References
- Walker, G, "Evaluating MPPT converter topologies using a MATLAB PV Model", J. Electr. Electron. Eng. Aust.,2001 vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 49-56
- Hiren Patel and Vivek Agarwa, "MATLAB-Based Modeling to Study the Effects of Partial Shading on PV Array Characteristics", IEEE transactions on energy conversion vol. 23, no. 1, March 2008, pp. 302-310. https://doi.org/10.1109/TEC.2007.914308
- Gow, J.A., and Manning, C.D, "Development of a photovoltaic array model for use in power Electronics simulation studies", IEE Proc. -Electr. Power Appl., vol. 146, No. 2, March 1999, pp. 193-200 https://doi.org/10.1049/ip-epa:19990116
- Marcelo Gradella Villalva, Jonas Rafael Gazoli, and Ernesto Ruppert Filho, "Comprehensive Approach to Modeling and Simulation of Photovoltaic Arrays", IEEE transactions on power electronics, vol. 24, no. 5, May 2009, pp. 1198-1208
- Trishan Esram, Patrick L. Chapman, "Comparison of photovoltaic array maximum power point tracking techniques", IEEE transactions on energy conversion, vol. 22, no. 2, June 2007, pp. 439-449 https://doi.org/10.1109/TEC.2006.874230
- Duran, E J., Galan, M., Sidrach-de-Cardona, Andujar J. M, "Measuring the I-V Curve of Photovoltaic generators-analyzing different dc-dc converter topologies", IEEE industrial electronics magazine, September 2009, pp. 4-14
- Tse, K.K., Ho, M.T., Henry S.-H., Chung., Ron Hui, S.Y, "A Novel Maximum Power Point Tracker for PV Panels Using Switching Frequency Modulation", IEEE transactions on power electronics, vol. 17, no. 6, November 2002 pp. 980-989 https://doi.org/10.1109/TPEL.2002.805594
- Henry Shu-Hung Chung., Tse, K.K., Ron Hui, S.Y., Mok, C.M., Ho, M.T, "A Novel Maximum Power Point Tracking Technique for Solar Panels Using a SEPIC or Cuk Converter", IEEE transactions on power electronics, vol. 18, no. 3, may 2003, pp. 717-724 https://doi.org/10.1109/TPEL.2003.810841
- Mummadi Veerachary, "Power Tracking for Nonlinear PV Sources with Coupled Inductor SEPIC Converter", IEEE transactions on aerospace and electronic systems vol. 41, no. 3 July 2005, pp. 1019-1028 https://doi.org/10.1109/TAES.2005.1541446
- Tse, K.K., Billy, M. T., Ho, Henry Shu-Hung Chung, Ron Hui, S.Y, "A Comparative Study of Maximum-Power-Point Trackers for Photovoltaic Panels Using Switching-Frequency Modulation Scheme", IEEE transactions on industrial electronics, vol. 51, no. 2, April 2004, pp. 410-418. https://doi.org/10.1109/TIE.2004.825226
- Shagar, B.M.; Vinod, S.; Lakshmi, S. "Design of DC - DC converter for hybrid wind solarenergy system" International Conference on Computing, Electronics and Electrical Technologies (ICCEET), Page(s): 429-435 2012
- Kashyap, A.R.; Ahmadi, R.; Kimball, J.W. "Input voltage control of SEPIC for maximum power point tracking", IEEE Power and Energy Conference at Illinois (PECI), Page(s): 30-35, 2013.
- Azadeh Safari and Saad Mekhilef, "Simulation and Hardware Implementation of Incremental Conductance MPPT With Direct Control Method Using Cuk Converter", IEEE transactions on industrial electronics, vol. 58, no. 4, April 2011, pp. 1154-1161 https://doi.org/10.1109/TIE.2010.2048834
- Hong li,zhong li, Bo Zhang, Fenglan Wang, Nanlin Tan and wolfgang A. Halang, "Design of analogue chaotic PWM for EMI suppression" IEEE transactions on electromagnetic compatibility, Vol. 52, No. 4, November 2010.
- Li,H., Tang, W.K.S., Li, Z., and Halang, W.A., "A chaotic peak current mode boost converter for EMI reduction and ripple suppression", IEEE transactions on circuits and systems-II, Vol. 55, No. 8, pp. 763-767, August 2008. https://doi.org/10.1109/TCSII.2008.922379
- Wang, Z., Chau, K.T., Liu.C, "Improvement of electromagnetic compatibility of motor drives using chaotic PWM", IEEE transaction of electromagnetic compatibility, Vol. 43, No. 6, pp. 2612-2614, 2007.
Cited by
- Solar fed DC-DC single ended primary inductance converter for low power applications vol.263, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/263/5/052009