한국수정란이식학회지 (Journal of Embryo Transfer)

  • 제29권2호
  • /
  • Pages.119-125
  • /
  • 2014
  • /
  • 2508-755X(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2288-0178(eISSN)
한국수정란이식학회 (The Korean Society of Embryo Transfer)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Endocrine Profiles and Blood Chemistry Patterns of Cloned Miniature Pigs in the Post-Puberty Period

  • Lee, Sung-Lim (College of Veterinary Medicine, Gyeongsang National University)
  • 투고 : 2014.04.13
  • 심사 : 2014.05.07
  • 발행 : 2014.06.30
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

Although the majority of surviving pigs cloned by somatic cell nuclear transfer (SCNT) appear to be physiologically normal, there is a general lack of detailed hemato-physiologic studies for the period of early adulthood to substantiate this claim. In the present study, we investigated variation in blood chemistry and endocrinological parameters between mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) derived from cloned and normal age-matched female and male miniature pigs. Cloned females and males showed normal ranges for complete blood count assessments. Biochemical assessments showed that ${\gamma}$-GGT, ALT and cholesterol levels of male and female clones were significantly (P<0.05 or P<0.01, respectively) higher than that of age-matched control miniature pigs. Variations in insulin and IGF-1 were higher in female clones than in male clones and controls. Thus, although female and male cloned miniature pigs may be physiologically similar to normal animals, or at least within normal ranges, a greater degree of physiological and endocrinological variation was found in cloned pigs. The above variation must be taken into account before considering cloned female or male miniature pigs for various biomedical applications.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Archer GS, Friend p, Piedrahita J, Nevill CH and Walker S. 2003. Behavioral variation among cloned pigs. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 82: 151-161. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-1591(03)00065-0
  2. Chavatte-Palmer P, Heyman Y, Richard C, Monget P, LeBourhis D, Kann G, Chilliard Y, Vignon X and Renard JP. 2002. Clinical, hormonal, and hematologic characteristics of bovine calves derived from nuclei from somatic cells. Biol. Reprod. 66: 1596-1603. https://doi.org/10.1095/biolreprod66.6.1596
  3. Cibelli JB, Campbell KH, Seidel GE, West MD and Lanza RP. 2002. The health profile of cloned animals. Nat. Biotechnol. 20: 13-14. https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt0102-13
  4. Dindot SV, Farin PW, Farin CE, Romano J, Walker S, Long C and Piedrahita JA. 2004. Epigenetic and genomic imprinting analysis in nuclear transfer derived Bos gaurus/Bos taurus hybrid fetuses. Biol. Reprod. 71: 470-478. https://doi.org/10.1095/biolreprod.103.025775
  5. Garry FB, Adams R, McCann JP and Odde KG. 1996. Postnatal characteristics of calves produced by nuclear transfer cloning. Theriogenology 45: 141-152. https://doi.org/10.1016/0093-691X(95)00363-D
  6. Heyman Y, Zhou Q, Lebourhis D, Chavatte-Palmer P, Renard JP and Vignon X. 2002. Novel approaches and hurdles to somatic cloning in cattle. Cloning Stem Cells 4: 47-55. https://doi.org/10.1089/153623002753632048
  7. Humpherys D, Eggan K, Akutsu H, Friedman A, Hochedlinger K, Yanagimachi R, Lender ES, Golub TR and Jaenisch R. 2002. Abnormal gene expression in cloned mice derived from embryonic stem cell and cumulus cell nuclei. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 99: 2889-2894.
  8. Kyle WB, Collins MG and Landry AM, 2002. Growth and endocrine patterns of cloned and noncloned Brangus heifers. Theriogenology 57: 426 (abst.).
  9. Lanza RP, Cibelli JB, Faber D, Sweeney RW, Henderson B, Nevala W, West MD and Wettstein PJ. 2001. Cloned cattle can be healthy and normal. Science 294: 1893-1894. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1063440
  10. Landry AM, Landry DJ, Gentry LR, Green HL, Reggio B, Koonce KL, Echelard Y and Godke RA. 2005 Endocrine profiles and growth patterns of cloned goats. Cloning and Stem Cells 7: 214-225. https://doi.org/10.1089/clo.2005.7.214
  11. Larsen MO and Rolin B. 2004. Use of the Gottingen minipig as a model of diabetes, with special focus on type 1 diabetes research. ILAR. J. 45: 303-313. https://doi.org/10.1093/ilar.45.3.303
  12. Lee SL, Kang EJ, Maeng GH, Kim MJ, Park JK, Kim TS, Hyun SH, Lee ES and Rho GJ. 2010. Developmental ability of miniature pig embryos cloned with mesenchymal stem cells. J. Reprod. Dev. 56 :256-262. https://doi.org/10.1262/jrd.09-196A
  13. Lee SL, Maeng GH, Lee WJ, Chon RH and Rho GJ. 2011. Physiological status of male and female miniature pigs cloned with mesenchymal stem cells. Reprod. Fertil. Dev. 23: 129 (abst.).
  14. Logan JS. 2000. Prospects for xenotransplantation. Curr. Opin. Immunol. 12: 563-568. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0952-7915(00)00139-4
  15. Mir B, Zaunbrecher G, Archer GS, Friend p and Piedrahita JA. 2005. Progeny of somatic cell nuclear transfer (SCNT) pig clones are phenotypically similar to non-cloned pigs. Cloning and Stem Cells 7: 119-125. https://doi.org/10.1089/clo.2005.7.119
  16. Ohgane J, Wakayama T, Kogo Y, Senda S, Hattori N, Tanaka S, Yanagimachi R and Shiota K. 2001. DNA methylation variation in cloned mice. Genesis 30: 45-50. https://doi.org/10.1002/gene.1031
  17. Polejaeva IA, Chen SH, Vaught TD, Page RL, Mullins J, Ball S, Dai Y, Boone J, Walker S, Ayares DL, Colman A and Campbell KH. 2000. Cloned pigs produced by nuclear transfer from adult somatic cells. Nature 407: 86-90. https://doi.org/10.1038/35024082
  18. Renard JP, Chastant S, Chesne P, Richard C, Marchal J, Cordonnier N, Chavatte P and Vignon X. 1999. Lymphoid hypoplasia and somatic cloning. Lancet 353: 1489-1491. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(98)12173-6
  19. Watanabe S and Nagai T. 2008. Health status and productive performance of somatic cell cloned cattle and their offspring produced in Japan. J. Reprod. Dev. 54: 6-17. https://doi.org/10.1262/jrd.19090
  20. Xu Q, Yu D, Qiu Y, Zhang H and Ding Y. 2003. Function of a new internal bioartificial liver: an in vitro study. Ann. Clin. Lab. Sci. 33: 306-312.