DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Rod and Vesicular Structures of Cyclosophoraose-Based Ionic Self-assembly

  • Cho, Eunae (Department of Bioscience and Biotechnology, Bio/Molecular Informatics Center (BMIC) & Institute for Ubiquitous Information Technology and Applications (CBRU), Konkuk University) ;
  • Jeong, Daham (Department of Bioscience and Biotechnology, Bio/Molecular Informatics Center (BMIC) & Institute for Ubiquitous Information Technology and Applications (CBRU), Konkuk University) ;
  • Paik, Seung R. (Department of Chemical & Biological Engineering, Seoul National University) ;
  • Jung, Seunho (Department of Bioscience and Biotechnology, Bio/Molecular Informatics Center (BMIC) & Institute for Ubiquitous Information Technology and Applications (CBRU), Konkuk University)
  • Received : 2014.03.15
  • Accepted : 2014.04.05
  • Published : 2014.08.20

Abstract

Keywords

Experimental

Purification of Cys. The isolation and purification of Cys from Rhizobium trifolii TA-1 were carried out as previously described.26 Culture supernatants were concentrated fivefold by rotary evaporation, and the concentrated sample was precipitated by adding 3 volumes of ethanol. After centrifugation, the supernatant was concentrated by rotary evaporation and the product was collected by adding 7 volumes of ethanol. After decanting the supernatant, the precipitates were applied to Bio-Gel P-6 column. The fractions were assayed for carbohydrates using the phenol-sulfuric acid method. The fractions that contained Cys were pooled, concentrated, and desalted using Bio-Gel P-4 column. The desalted Cys were confirmed by NMR spectroscopy and MALDI-TOF MS.

Synthesis of QA–Cys. Cys (1 g) was dissolved in 7% NaOH aqueous solution for 30 min, and 2,3-epoxypropyltrimethylammonium chloride (3.1 g) was added. The mixture was reacted for 5 h at 65 °C, neutralized with HCl and evaporated to a viscous residue. After desalting on a Bio-gel P-2 column, the product was lyophilized, and the final structure was elucidated with EA (ThermoFinnigan, Flash2000) and NMR spectroscopy.

Synthesis of CM–Cys. CM–Cys was prepared as described in a previous report.6 Cys (500 mg) and NaOH (2.8 g) were mixed in distilled water (7.4 mL). Monochloroacetic acid solution (20%) was added. After reacting for 4 h at 50 °C, the mixture was neutralized with 6 M HCl. The mixture was precipitated with 5 vol MeOH and left overnight at 4 °C. The precipitate was dissolved in water and desalted on a Sephadex G-10 column. The product was confirmed using MALDI-TOF MS (Voyager-DETM STR Biospectrometry Workstation) and NMR spectroscopy.

Nuclear Magnetic Resonance (NMR) Spectroscopy. For the NMR spectroscopic analysis, a Bruker Avance 500 spectrometer was used to record the 1H–NMR, 1C-NMR, DEPT and HSQC spectra. The HSQC spectrum was measured with a spectral width of 3401 Hz in both dimensions and 256/2048 complex data points in t1 and t2, respectively. NMR analyses were performed in D2O at room temperature.

Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM). QA–Cys (3 mM) and CM–Cys (3 mM) were mixed in 100 μL of 20 mM phosphate buffer (pH 7). Hexane was added to a QA–Cys/ CM–Cys mixture in phosphate buffer (pH 7), and a turbid solution was obtained by vortexing for 5 min. After centrifugation, the precipitate was lyophilized. The lyophilized samples were mounted onto stubs using double-sided adhesive tape and then made electrically conductive by coating with a thin layer of gold. The surface morphologies of the materials were examined under a scanning electron microscope (Jeol, JSM 6380, Tokyo, Japan).

Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM). QA–Cys (3 mM) and DCA (3 mM; Sigma Aldrich) were mixed in 800 μL of 20 mM phosphate buffer (pH 7). After sonication for 30 s, the aqueous suspension (10 μL) containing the supramolecular aggregates formed by the QA–Cys/DCA mixture was adsorbed onto a carbon-coated copper grid (300-mesh) and air-dried for 1 min. For clear negative staining, the supernatant of 2% uranyl acetate following centrifugation at 13,200 rpm for 2 min was used. The aggregates were examined using a transmission electron microscope (JEOL, JEM 1010, Tokyo, Japan).

Dynamic Light Scattering (DLS). DLS measurements were carried out with a Wyatt Technology DynaPro Plate Reader at constant room temperature.

References

  1. Breedveld, M. W.; Miller, K. J. Microbiol. Rev. 1994, 58, 145.
  2. Andre', L.; Mazeau, K.; Taravel, F. R.; Tvaroska I. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 1995, 17, 189. https://doi.org/10.1016/0141-8130(95)92685-J
  3. Koizumi, K.; Okada, Y.; Horiyama, S.; Utamura, T.; Higashiura, T.; Ikeda, M. J. Incl. Phenom. 1984, 2, 891. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00662259
  4. Lee, S.; Seo, D.; Kim, H. W.; Jung, S. Carbohydr. Res. 2001, 334, 119. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0008-6215(01)00178-1
  5. Piao, J.; Jang, A.; Choi, Y.; Tahir, M. N.; Kim, Y.; Park, S.; Cho, E.; Jung, S. Carbohydr. Polym. 2014, 101, 733. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2013.09.104
  6. Lee, S.; Park, H.; Seo, D.; Choi, Y.; Jung, S. Carbohydr. Res. 2004, 339, 519. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carres.2003.11.011
  7. Sun, T.; Guo, Q.; Zhang, C.; Hao, J.; Xing, P.; Su, J.; Li, S.; Hao, A.; Liu, G. Langmuir 2012, 28, 8625. https://doi.org/10.1021/la301497t
  8. Zhang, H.; Liu, Z.; Xin, F.; An, W.; Hao, A.; Li, J.; Li, Y.; Sun, L.; Sun, T.; Zhao, W.; Li, Y.; Kong, L. Carbohydr. Res. 2011, 346, 294. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carres.2010.11.010
  9. Lehn, J. M. Science 2002, 295, 2400. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1071063
  10. Faul, C. F. J.; Antonietti, M. Adv. Mater. 2003, 15, 673. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.200300379
  11. Xu, J.; Bai, H.; Yi, C.; Luo, J.; Yang, C.; Xia, W.; Liu, X. Carbohydr. Polym. 2011, 86, 678. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2011.05.006
  12. Kujawa, P.; Moraille, P.; Sanchez, J.; Badia, A.; Winnik, F. M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 9224. https://doi.org/10.1021/ja044385n
  13. Costalat, M.; David, L.; Delair, T. Carbohydr. Polym. 2014, 102, 717. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2013.10.098
  14. Fan, L.; Cao, M.; Gao, S.; Wang, W.; Peng, K.; Tan, C.; Wen, F.; Tao, S.; Xie, W. Carbohydr. Polym. 2012, 88, 707. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2012.01.021
  15. Balasubramanian, D.; Raman, B.; Sundari, C. S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1993, 115, 74. https://doi.org/10.1021/ja00054a010
  16. Das, K.; Sarkar, N.; Das, S.; Bhattacharyya, K. Langmuir 1995, 11, 2410. https://doi.org/10.1021/la00007a016
  17. Steed, J. W.; Atwood, J. L. Supramolecular Chemistry; 2nd ed.; John Wiley & Sons, Inc.: New York, USA, 2009.
  18. Lee, J.; Bhak, G.; Lee, S.; Paik, S. R. Biophys. J. 2008, L16.
  19. Venneman, N. G.; van Kammen, M.; Renooij, W.; van Berge- Henegouwen, G. P.; van Erpecum, K. J. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2005, 1686, 209. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbalip.2004.10.004
  20. Sun, T.; Zhang, J.; Kong, L.; Qiao, H.; Li, Y.; Xin, F.; Hao, A. Carbohydr. Res. 2011, 346, 285. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carres.2010.11.003
  21. Kim, Y. H.; Gihm, S. H.; Park, C. R. Bioconjugate Chem. 2001, 12, 932. https://doi.org/10.1021/bc015510c
  22. Kanemaru, M.; Yamamoto, K.; Kadokawa, J. Carbohydr. Res. 2012, 357, 32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carres.2012.05.014
  23. Allen, T. M.; Cullis, P. R. Science 2004, 303, 1818. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1095833
  24. Christense, S. M.; Stamou, D. Soft Matter 2007, 3, 828. https://doi.org/10.1039/b702849k
  25. Li, J. H.; Wang, Y. F.; Ha, W.; Liu, Y.; Ding, L. S.; Li, B. J.; Zhang, S. Biomacromolecules 2013, 14, 2984-2988. https://doi.org/10.1021/bm400584h
  26. Jeon, Y.; Kwon, C.; Cho, E.; Jung, S. Carbohydr. Res. 2010, 345, 2408. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carres.2010.08.009

Cited by

  1. Properties and current applications of bacterial cyclic β-glucans and their derivatives vol.85, pp.3-4, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10847-016-0630-3