디지털융복합연구 (Journal of Digital Convergence)

  • 제12권6호
  • /
  • Pages.181-192
  • /
  • 2014
  • /
  • 2713-6434(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2713-6442(eISSN)
한국디지털정책학회 (The Society of Digital Policy and Management)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

비영리민간단체의 공익활동 지원사업 효율성분석

An Efficiency Analysis for the Public Activities Support Projects of Non-Profit Private Organizations using DEA

  • 최홍근 (한성대학교 지식서비스&컨설팅학과) ;
  • 유연우 (한성대학교 지식서비스&컨설팅학과)
  • Choi, Hong-Geun (Dept. Of Knowledge Service & Consulting, Hansung University) ;
  • You, Yen-Yoo (Dept. Of Knowledge Service & Consulting, Hansung University)
  • 투고 : 2014.04.11
  • 심사 : 2014.06.20
  • 발행 : 2014.06.28
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

본 논문은 정부에서 시행하는 비영리민간단체 공익활동지원사업의 성과에 대한 효율성분석을 통하여 효율성이 낮게(비효율적) 나타난 단체에 대한 컨설팅방향을 제시하였다. 공익활동지원사업의7가지유형에 대하여 분산분석을 실시하여 유형별로 차이가 있음을 확인하였으며, 7개 유형별로 자료포락분석(DEA)중 CCB-I, BCC-I, 초효율성(Super Efficiency) 모형을 적용하여 성과에 대한 효율성을 분석하였다. 4개 입력요소(업력, 지원 금액, 회원수, 직원수)와 3개 출력요소(사업점수, 회계점수, 종합점수)를 분석한 결과, 7개 유형에서 사업성과에 대한 효율성이 높게 나타난 단체를 벤치마킹대상으로 도출하였고 초효율성분석을 통하여 벤치마킹 대상을 단기, 중기, 장기로 구분하였다. 이를 통해 각 단체에 맞는 사례를 배우고 개선함으로써 최선의 성과를 찾아낼 수 있는 정보를 제공하였다.

This study suggests consulting directions for non-profit private organizations which were found to be inefficient in the efficiency analysis for the public activities support projects on those organizations performed by the Korean government. An ANOVA analysis on seven types of public activities support projects showed that there were differences among those types. By applying CCB-I, BCC-I, Super efficiency models among DEA, performance efficiencies were analyzed. Four input elements (age of the organization, supported amount, number of members, and the number of workers) and three output elements (project scores, financial scores, and comprehensive scores) were analyzed, and high efficient organizations were found as benchmarking objects, and, through super efficiency analysis, those objects were classified into short, mid, and long-term objects. Through such methods, this research provided organizations with the best information on other organizations to learn from and improve themselves.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Sisasangsik Sajeon, Jisik engine Research Center,Bakmungak, 2013
  2. Charnes A., Cooper W.W, Golany, B, Seiford, L. Stutz, J., "Foundation of Data Envelopment Analysis for Pareto-Koopmans Efficient Empirical Production Functions", Journal of Econometrics, Vol. 30, pp. 91-107. 1985 https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-4076(85)90133-2
  3. Etzioni, Amitai. (1973). The Third Sector and Domestic Missions. Public Administration Review. Jily/Aug
  4. Levitt T. The Third Sector: New Tactics for A Responsive Society (Nwe York Amacom Press), 1973
  5. Salamon, L. M.. "The rise of the nonprofit sector: A Global 'Associational Revolution'."Foreign Affairs, 73(4):109-122, 1999.
  6. The Government Performance Evaluation Basic Law, Article 2-6 (enforced in April 2006)
  7. The office of Prime Minister, Civil Society support project evaluation report, 2011
  8. Gazley, B. and Brudney, J., "The Purpose (and Perils) of Government on profit Partnership." Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 36(3): pp. 389-415, 2007 https://doi.org/10.1177/0899764006295997
  9. Korea NPO Joint Conference, White Paper of Private Non-profit Organizations and government, 2010
  10. The Department of Security and Public Administration, Evaluation Report of Non-Profit Private OrganizationsPublicActivityProjects, 2012
  11. The office of Prime Minister, 2011 Government Affairs Assessment Plan, 2011
  12. Poister, T. H. Performance Monitoring, Lexington: Health. 1983
  13. Whole, J. S. & H. P. Hatry. (). "The Case for Performance Monitoring," Public Administration Review, 52: pp. 604_610, 1992 https://doi.org/10.2307/977173
  14. Kim, Myeong-Su, Public Policy evaluation , Bakmungak 2000
  15. Choi, Chang-Su and Tae-Yeong Kim, Private non-profit Organizations, business evaluation and application of the model building,, Korea Research Administration, 14(1), pp. 3-33. 2005
  16. The Board of Audit and Inspection of Korea, Policy for the assessment of business operating Performance audit manual 2005
  17. Kettle, F. Donald, The Global Public Management Revolution: A Report on the Transformation of Governance. Washington D.C.: Brookings Institution Press, 2000
  18. Anderson,P, N, and Pertesen, N.C, "A Procedure for Ranking Efficent Units in Data Envelopment Analysis", Management Science, 39(10), pp. 1261-1264, 1993. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.39.10.1261
  19. Lee, Un-Guk, The theory and practice of Local government productivity measurement Seoul: jipmundang, 2003
  20. Charmes, A., Cooper, W.W and Rhodes, E, "Evaluating Program and managerial Efficency: An Applicaiton of Data Envelopment Analysis to Program Follow through", Management Science, 27(6), pp. 668-697, 1978.
  21. Kim, Jin-Han and Jae-Hyeong Min, "A Study on Selection of Input and Output Elements of the DEA model, Using Partial Efficiency Information," Korean Management Association Journal, Vol. 23, No. 1.: 201-217, 1998.
  22. Yang, Dong-Heon & Y. Y, You, 'An Empirical Study on Competitive Analysis Using DEA" Society for e-Business Studies Vol, 17(4), 117-140, 2012.
  23. Boussofiane, A., Dyson, R.G., Thanassoulis,E., Applied Data Envelopment Analysis, European Journal of operational Research, 52(1), pp. 1-15, 1991. https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-2217(91)90331-O
  24. Yu, Geum-Rok, "Treatment method and its Application of Negative Number Materials of Input and Output Elements in DEA Analysis for Efficiency Evaluation," Policy Analysis Association Journal, Vol. 15, No. 4: 173-197, 2007.