한국산학기술학회논문지 (Journal of the Korea Academia-Industrial cooperation Society)

  • 제15권6호
  • /
  • Pages.3499-3511
  • /
  • 2014
  • /
  • 1975-4701(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2288-4688(eISSN)
한국산학기술학회 (The Korea Academia-Industrial cooperation Society)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

왜 트위터러들은 리트윗하는가? 내외적 동기와 사회적 자본의 역할 탐색

What Makes Twitterers Retweet on Twitter? Exploring the Roles of Intrinsic/Extrinsic Motivation and Social Capital

  • 이성준 (청주대학교 신문방송학과)
  • Lee, Sungjoon (Department of Journalism and Communication Studies, Cheongju University)
  • 투고 : 2014.02.07
  • 심사 : 2014.06.12
  • 발행 : 2014.06.30
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

본 논문의 주 목적은 동기와 사회적 심리 관점에서 리트윗 행위의도에 영향을 미치는 요소를 살펴보는 것이다. 주요 이론적 근거로는 합리적 행위 이론, 동기 이론 및 사회적 자본 이론을 사용하였다. 온라인 서베이를 통하여 자료를 수집하였으며, 구조 방정식 모델을 이용하여 수집된 자료를 분석하였다. 본 연구의 결과는 리트윗 행위에 대한 태도와 주관적 규범이 리트윗 의도에 유의미한 영향을 미치고 있음을 보여준다. 또한 리트윗 태도는 개인의 내적 동기와 호혜성 규범에 영향을 받고 있음을 보여준다. 더불어 사회적 신뢰는 리트윗 행위 의도에 유의미한 영향을 미치고 있음을 나타낸다. 연구의 결과가 지닌 함의들에 대해서도 토의해본다.

This study examined what determinants affect the intention of retweeting on Twitter from the perspectives of motivations and social psychology. The primary theoretical foundations are the theory of reasoned action (TRA), motivation theory and social capital theory. An online survey was administrated to collect the data. The data collected was analyzed using the structural equation model (SEM). The findings showed that both the attitude toward the retweeting behavior and subjective norm have significant effects on the intention to retweet. The results also showed that the attitude toward the retweeting behaviors was influenced by the individual intrinsic motivation and the norm of reciprocity. Social trust also had a significant influence on the intention to retweet. This study discusses the implications of these findings.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. d. boyd and N. Ellison, "Social Network Sites: Definition, History, and Scholarship," Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 13, pp. 210-230, 2007. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2007.00393.x
  2. B. Jansen, M. Zhang, K. Sobel and A. Chowdury, "Twitter Power: Tweeters as Electronic World of Mouth," Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 60, 11, pp.2169-2188, 2009. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/asi.21149
  3. S. Lee, "A Study on Determinants Affecting the Usage of Social Commerce," Korean Journal of Broadcasting and Telecommunication Studies, 26, 3, pp.495-629, 2012.
  4. Telegraph[Internet], Twitter to Hit 500 Million registered users. Available from Http://www.telegraph.co.uk/technology/twitter/9098557/T witter-to-hit-500-million-registered-users.html (accessed Oct, 11, 2013).
  5. S. Cottle, "Media and the Arab Uprising of 2011: Research Notes," Journalism, 12, 5, pp. 647-659, 2011. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1464884911410017
  6. H. Kwak, C. Lee, H. Park and S. Moon, "What is Twitter, a Social Network or A News Media?", Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on World Wide Web, pp. 591-600, 2010. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/1772690.1772751
  7. L. K. Hanse, A. Arvidsson, F. Nielsen, E. A., Colleoni, and M. Etter, "Good Friens, Bad News- Affect and Virality in Tiwtter," Future Information Technology, 185, pp.34-43, 2011. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-22309-9_5
  8. B. A. Huberman, D. M. Romero and F. Wu, "Social Network that Matters: Twitter under the Micro-scope," First Monday, 14, 1, 2009.
  9. d. boyd, S. Golder and G. Lotan, "Tweet, Tweet, Retreet: Conversational Aspects of Retweeting on Twitter," Proceedings of the 43th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, pp.1-10, 2010.
  10. B. Suh, L. Hong, P. Pirolli and E. H. Chi, "Want to Be Retweeted? Large Scale Analytics on Factors Impacting Retweet in Twitter Network," IEEE International Conference on Social Computing, pp.177-184, 2010. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/SocialCom.2010.33
  11. J. Y. Lee and S. S. Sundar, "To Tweet or to Retweet? That is the Question for Health Professional on Twitter," Health Communication, 28, 5, pp.509-524, 2012. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2012.700391
  12. A. Java, X. Song, T. Finin and B. Tseng, "Why We Twitter: Understanding microblogging usage and communities," Proceedings of the 9th WebKDD and 1st SNA-KDD 2007 Workshop on Web Mining and Social Network Analysis, pp.55-65, 2007. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/1348549.1348556
  13. C. Honeycutt and S. Herring, "Beyond microblogging: Conversation and Collaboration via Twitter," Proceedings of the 42th Hawaii International Conference System Science, pp.1-10, 2009.
  14. Z. Liu, L. Liu and Hong. Li, "Determinants of Information Retweeting in Microblogging," Internet Research, 22, 4, pp.443-466, 2012. https://doi.org/10.1108/10662241211250980
  15. All Twitter [Internet]. Twitter Use Down in South Korea. Available from http://www.mediabistro.com/alltwitter /twitter-south-korea_b54693 (Accessed April, 11, 2014).
  16. Trendmonitor [Internet]. Twitter Is a Window for Getting News of Ohters. Available from http://www.trendmonitor. co.kr/html/01_trend/01_korea_view.asp?idx=598 (Accessed April, 12, 2014).
  17. M. Lee, H. Seo and Y. Kim, "Why Do People Post the Mentions with Their Picture of Voting on Twitter," Korean Journal of Journalism and Communication Studies, 56, 6, pp.246-277, 2012.
  18. H. Shim and Y. S. Hwang, "Micro-blogging on Uses and Gratification Perspectives," Korean Journal of Broadcasting and Telecommunication Studies, 24, 2, pp. 192-234, 2010 .
  19. N. W. Nho, "Korea's Popular Celebrity Twitter Users and Celebrity Culture", Korean Journal of Cybercommunication Academic Society, 29, 4, pp. 95-143, 2012.
  20. D. Chang, and G. H. Ghim, "The Structure and Dynamics of the Korean Twitter Network", Korean Journal of Communication Research, 48, 1, pp. 59-86, 2011.
  21. M. Fishbein and I. Ajzen. Belief, Attitude, Intention, and Behavior: An Introduction to the Theory and Research. Addison-Wesley Reading, MA, 1975.
  22. J. Cha, "Predictors of Television and Online Video Platform Use: A Coexistence Model of Old and New Video Platforms," Telematics and Informatics, 30, 4, pp.296-310, 2013. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2013.01.001
  23. G. W. Bock and Y. G. Kim, "Breaking the Myths of Rewards: An Exploratory Study of Attitude about Knowledge Sharing," Information Resources Management Journal, 15, 2, pp. 14-21, 2002. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.4018/irmj.2002040102
  24. W. S Chow and L. S. Chan, "Social Network, Social Trust, and Shared Goal in Organizational Knowledge Sharing," Information & Management, 45, 7, pp.458-465, 2008. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2008.06.007
  25. K. Y. Lin and H. P. Lu, "Why People Use Social Networking Sites: An Empirical Study Integrating Network Externalities and Motivation Theory," Computers in Human Behavior, 27, 3, pp. 443-466, 2011. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2010.12.009
  26. R. M. Ryan and E. L. Deci, "Self-determination Theory and the Facilitation of Intrinsic Motivation, Social Development, and Well-Being," American Psychologist, 55, 1, 68-78, 2000. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.68
  27. F. D. Davis, R. P. Bagozzi and P. R Warshaw, "Extrinsic and Intrinsic Motivation to Use Computers in the Workplace," Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 22, pp. 1111-1132, 1992. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.1992.tb00945.x
  28. J. M. George and A. P. Brief, "Motivational Agendas in the Workplace: The Effect of Feelings on Attention and Work Motivation," Research in Organizational Behavior, 18, pp.75-109, 1996.
  29. M. Urista, Q. Dong and K. D. Day, "Exploring Why Young Adults Use Myspace and Facebook through Use and Gratification Theory," Health Communication, 12, 2, pp.215-229.
  30. S. Y. Hung, A. Durcikova, H. M. Lai and W. Lin, "The Influence of Intrinsic and Extrinsic Motivation on Individual Knowledge Sharing Behavior," International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 69, 6, pp.415-427, 2011. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2011.02.004
  31. C. M. Chiu, M. Hsu and E. T. Wang, "Understanding Knowledge Sharing in Virtual Communities: An Integration of Social Capital and Social Cognitive Theories," Decision Support Systems, 42, 3, pp.1872-1888, 2006. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.2006.04.001
  32. N. Lin. Social Capital: A Theory of Social Structure and Action. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2001. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511815447
  33. R. D. Putnam. Bowling Alone. New York: Simon & Schuster, 2000.
  34. M. M. Wakaso and S. Faraj, "Why Should I Share? Examining Social Capital and Knowledge Contribution in Electronic Networks of Practices," MIS Quarterly, 29, pp.35-57, 2005. https://doi.org/10.2307/25148667
  35. H. H. Chang and S. S. Chuang, "Social Capital and Individual Motivations on Knowledge Sharing: Participants Involvement as a Moderator," Information & Management, 48, 1, pp.9-18, 2011. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2010.11.001
  36. D. Chung and C. S. Nam, "An analysis of the Variables Predicting Instant Messenger User," New Media & Society, 9, 2, pp.212-234, 2007. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1461444807072217
  37. A. Bandura. Social Foundations of Thought and Action: A Social Cognitive Theory. Prentice-Hall Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1986.
  38. M. Y. Yi and Y. Hwang, "Predicting the Use of Web-based Information Systems: Self-efficacy, Enjoyment, Learning Goal Orientation, and the Technology Acceptance Model," International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 59, 4, pp. 431-449, 2003. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1071-5819(03)00114-9
  39. M. J. Lin, S. W. Hung and C. J. Chen, "Fostering the Determinants of Knowledge Sharing in Professional Virtual Communities," Computers in Human Behavior, 25, 4, pp.924-939, 2009. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2009.03.008
  40. P. L. Teh, C. S., Chong, C. C. Yong and S. Y. Yew, "Internet Self-Efficacy, Computer Self-Efficacy and Cultural Factors on Knowledge Sharing Behavior", African Journal of Business Management, 4, 18, pp.4086-4095, 2010.
  41. P. M. Blau. Exchanges and Power in Social Life. John Wiley and Sons, New York, 1964.
  42. S. Y. Choi, Y. S. Kang and H. Lee, "The Effects of Socio-technical Enablers on Knowledge Sharing: An Exploratory Examination," Journal of Information System, 34, 5, pp.742-754, 2008.
  43. J. Nahapiet and S. Ghosal, "Social Capital, Intellectual Capital, and Organizational Advantages," Academy of Management Review, 23, 2, pp.242-266, 1998. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/259373
  44. T. H. Daveport and L. Prusak. Working Knowledge: How Organizations Manage What They Know. Havard Business School Press, Boston, 1998.
  45. Korea Information Society Development Institute(KISDI) [Internet]. The Current SNS Usage Patterns in South Korea. Available fromHttp://m.kisdi.re.kr/mobile /news/news.view.m?seq=28102 (accessed Oct, 13, 2013).
  46. Embrain. [Internet]. Micromillembrain Power. Available from Http://www.embrain.com/eng/company/power.asp
  47. M. W. Browne and R. Cudeck, "Alternative Ways of Assessing Model Fit," Sociology Methods & Assessing Model Fit, 21, 2, pp.230-258, 1992.
  48. R. Bagozzi and Yi. "On the Evaluation of Structural Equation Models," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 16, 1, pp.74-94, 1988. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF02723327
  49. J. F. Hair, R. E. Anderson, R. L. Tatham and W. C. Black. Multivariate Data Analysis. Prentice-Hall, New Jersey, 1988.
  50. C. Fornell and D. F. Larker, "Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobserved Variables and Measurement Error," Journal of Marketing, 18, 1, pp.39-50, 1981. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3151312
  51. A. Peslak, W. Ceccuci and P. Sendell, "An Empirical Study of Social Networking Behavior Using Theory of Reasoned Action," Journal of Information Systems Applied Research, 5, 3, pp.12-23, 2012.
  52. T. Postmes, R. Spears and M. Lea, "Breaching or Building Social Boundaries? SIDE-effects of Computer-Mediated Communication Research," Communication Research, 25, 6, pp.689-715, 1998. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/009365098025006006
  53. G. Hofstede, G. J. Hofstede and M. Minkov. Cultures and Organizations: Software of the Mind. Mcgraw Hill Professional, NY, 2010.
  54. W. Tsai and S. Ghoshal, "Social Capital and Value Creation: The Role of Intrafirm Network," Academy of Management Journal, 41, pp.464-478, 1998. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/257085
  55. D. B. Hindman and M. Yamamoto, "Social Capital in a Community Context: A Multilevel Analysis of Individual-and Community Level Predictors of Social Trust," Mass Communication and Society, 14, pp.838-856, 2011. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/15205436.2011.611608
  56. C. J. Chen and S. W. Hung, "To Give or To Receive? Factors Influencing Members' Knowledge Sharing and Community Promotion in Professional Virtual Communities," Information & Management, 47, 4, pp. 226-236, 2010. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2010.03.001