Bulletin of the Korean Chemical Society

Korean Chemical Society (대한화학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Kinetic Study on SNAr Reaction of 1-Y-Substituted-phenoxy-2,4-dinitrobenzenes with Hydroxide Ion: Effect of Substituent Y on Reactivity and Reaction Mechanism

  • Kang, Tae-Ah (Department of Life Science, Ewha Womans University) ;
  • Cho, Hyo-Jin (Department of Chemistry, Duksung Women's University) ;
  • Um, Ik-Hwan (Department of Chemistry and Nano Science, Ewha Womans University)
  • Received : 2014.03.13
  • Accepted : 2014.03.28
  • Published : 2014.07.20
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

A kinetic study is reported for the SNAr reaction of 1-Y-substituted-phenoxy-2,4-dinitrobenzenes (1a-1h) with OH- in 80 mol % $H_2O$/20 mol % DMSO at $25.0{\pm}0.1^{\circ}C$. The second-order rate constant ($k_{OH^-}$) increases as the substituent Y in the leaving group changes from an electron-donating group (EDG) to an electronwithdrawing group (EWG). The Br${\o}$nsted-type plot for the reactions of 1a-1h is linear with ${\beta}_{lg}$ = -0.16, indicating that the reactivity of substrates 1a-1h is little affected by the leaving-group basicity. A linear Br${\o}$nsted-type plot with ${\beta}_{lg}=-0.3{\pm}0.1$ is typical for reactions reported previously to proceed through a stepwise mechanism in which formation of a Meisenheimer complex is the rate-determining step (RDS). The Hammett plot correlated with ${\sigma}_Y{^{\circ}}$ constants results in a much better correlation than that correlated with ${\sigma}_Y{^-}$constants, implyng that no negative charge is developing on the O atom of the leaving group (or expulsion of the leaving group is not advanced at all in the TS). This excludes a possibility that the $S_NAr$ reaction of 1a-1h with $OH^-$ proceeds through a concerted mechanism or via a stepwise pathway with expulsion of the leaving group being the RDS. Thus, the current reactions have been concluded to proceed through a stepwise mechanism in which expulsion of the leaving group occurs rapidly after the RDS.

Keywords

Introduction

Aromatic nucleophilic substitution (SNAr) reactions of activated aromatic or heteroaromatic compounds and their reaction mechanisms have intensively been investigated due to their importance in organic transformation.1-4 To give but a few examples, SNAr reactions have been found to be useful in synthesis including improved methods of stereoselective reactions,5-7 in derivatization to external analytical detection limits,8 in preparation of electrophilic derivatives of watersoluble polymers,9 and in some environmental remediation protocols.10-12

It is now firmly understood that SNAr reactions follow a two-step reaction mechanism as depicted in Scheme 1 with 1-L-2,4-dinitrobenzene and an anionic nucleophile Nu– (i.e., formation of a negatively charged σ-complex, commonly called as a Meisenheimer complex, and followed by elimination of the leaving group, L–). Experimental studies including Mass spectrometry experiments have shown that stable Meisenheimer complexes may be formed for SNAr reactions between strong nucleophiles and highly electrondeficient aromatic or heteroaromatic compounds.13,14 In contrast, some computational studies have suggested that Meisenheimer complexes may be formed as a transition state (TS) but not as an intermediate in a majority of reactions.15

Scheme 1

SNAr reactions have a similarity to nucleophilic substitution reactions of carboxylic esters. The apparent similarity is the nucleophilic addition step in SNAr reaction and the addition step to carbonyl group in ester. In both cases addition to the sp2 carbon leads to rehybridization to sp3 to produce a tetrahedral intermediate. Elimination of the leaving group in subsequent step(s) restores the sp2 carbon. A fundamental difference is that addition to a typical electrondeficient aromatic substrate in an SNAr reaction entails loss of aromaticity in the formation of the Meisenheimer complex. Accordingly, expulsion of the leaving group occurs rapidly after the RDS to regain the lost aromaticity in most cases.

We have carried out SNAr reactions of 1-L-2,4-dinitrobenzenes with a series of cyclic secondary amines in MeCN and found that the reaction proceeds with one or two intermediates depending on the nature of L (i.e., a zwitterionic tetrahedral intermediate T± and its deprotonated form T- when L = F but without the deprotonation process to form T- from T± when L = Cl, Br and I).16 In our previous study on the SNAr reactions, we applied Brønsted analysis to deduce the reaction mechanism.16 Although this tool has been used extensively for nucleophilic substitution reactions of esters with various nucleophiles,17-20 its application to SNAr reactions has been more modest.16

Our study has now been extended to the SNAr reactions of 1-(Y-substituted-phenoxy)-2,4-dinitrobenzenes with OH-ion in 80 mol % H2O/20 mol % DMSO (Scheme 2). Eight different substituents have been introduced to investigate the reaction mechanism, e.g., from an electron-donating substituent (e.g., 4-Me) to strong electron-withdrawing groups (e.g., 4-CN and 4-NO2). We wish to report that analysis of Brønsted-type plot and Hammett correlations with σ- and σo constants is highly effective in deduction of the reaction mechanism including the nature of the RDS.

Scheme 2

 

Results and Discussion

The kinetic study was carried out under pseudo-first-order conditions in which the NaOH concentration was kept in excess of the substrate concentration. All of the reactions in this study obeyed pseudo-first-order kinetics with quantitative liberation of 2,4-dinitrophenoxide ion. Pseudo-firstorder rate constants (kobsd) were calculated from the slope of the plots of ln (A∞ – At) vs. t, which were linear over 90% of the total reaction. The uncertainty in the kobsd values is estimated to be less than ± 3% from replicate runs. The plots of kobsd vs. [OH-] were linear and passed through the origin (e.g., Figure 1 for the reactions 1a-1c). The second-order rate constants (kOH-) were calculated from the slope of the linear plots and are summarized in Table 1 together with the ranges of the OH- concentrations and kobsd values.

Figure 1.Plots of kobsd vs. [NaOH] for the SNAr reactions of 1-Ysubstituted-phenoxy-2,4-dinitrobenzoates 1a (●), 1b (○) and 1c (■) with OH- in 80 mol % H2O/20 mol % DMSO at 25.0 ± 0.1 ℃.

Table 1.aThe pKa data were taken from ref.21.

Effect of Substituent Y on Reactivity. As shown in Table 1, the reactivity of 1a-1h increases as the substituent Y in the leaving group changes from an electron-donating group (EDG) to a strong electron-withdrawing group (EWG), e.g., kOH− increases from 3.62 × 10-3 M-1s-1 to 12.1 × 10-3 M-1s-1 as the substituent Y changes from 4-Me to Y = 4-NO2, respectively. The change in substituent Y from 4-Me to 4-NO2 increases the leaving-group basicity over 3 pKa units. Interestingly, the kOH- value increases only ca. 3 times upon increasing leaving-group basicity over 3 pKa units, indicating that the effect of leaving-group basicity on the reactivity is insignificant.

One might suggest that the effect of leaving-group basicity on reactivity is dependent on the nature of reaction mechanism. The reactivity would be strongly influenced by the leaving-group basicity for reactions in which expulsion of the leaving group occurs in the RDS either in a concerted mechanism or in a stepwise pathway. In contrast, the reactivity of substrates would be little affected by leaving-group basicity for reactions in which expulsion of the leaving group occurs after the rate-determining step (RDS). We have recently shown that the second-order rate constant decreases with decreasing leaving-group basicity for the SNAr reaction of 1-X-2,4-dinitrobenzene (X = F, Cl, Br, I) with amines (i.e., F- >> Cl- ≈ Br- > I-).16 This is a reversed reactivity order reported for SN2 reactions of alkyl halides R-X (i.e., F- << Cl- ≈ Br- < I-). However, the reactivity order found in the current study has often been found for SNAr reactions in which formation of a Meisenheimer complex is the RDS.2-4 Thus, the kinetic result that the reactivity of 1a-1h is little affected by the leaving-group basicity suggests that the current reactions proceed through a stepwise mechanism, in which formation of a Meisenheimer complex is the RDS.

Deduction of Reaction Mechanism. To examine the above idea, Brønsted-type plot for the reactions of 1a-1h has been constructed in Figure 2. The Brønsted-type plot is linear with a βlg value of –0.16, although the correlation coefficient is not excellent (i.e., R2 = 0.944). Such a small βlg value is consistent with the kinetic result that the kOH− value for the reactions of 1a-1h increases only ca. 3 times upon decreasing leaving-group basicity over 3 pKa units. A similar result has previously been reported for the SNAr reaction of 1-Y-substituted-phenoxy-2,4-dinitrobenzenes (Y = H, 2-NO2, 3-NO2, and 4-NO2) with OH- in H2O (i.e., a linear Brønsted-type plot with βlg = –0.215).22 However, the βlg value of –0.16 is much smaller than that reported for reactions of Ysubstituted- phenyl diphenylphosphinates with OH– (βlg = –0.49)23a and with ethoxide ion (βlg = –0.54),23b,c and for those of Y-substituted-phenyl benzenesulfonates with EtO– (βlg = –0.64).23d It is noted that these reactions were concluded to to proceed through a concerted mechanism on the basis of the linear Brønsted-type plot with βlg = –0.5 ± 0.1.23

Figure 2.Brønsted-type plot for the SNAr reactions of Y-substituted-phenoxy-2,4-dinitrobenzenes (1a-1h) with OH- in 80 mol % H2O/20 mol % DMSO at 25.0 ± 0.1 ℃. The identity of points is given in Table 1.

The βlg value of –0.16 obtained from the current reaction is typical for reactions reported previously to proceed through a stepwise mechanism in which formation of an addition intermediate is the RDS.17-20 In fact, we have previously reported that nucleophilic substitution reactions of Y-substituted-phenyl 2-methoxybenzoates with piperidine proceed through a stepwise mechanism with a change in the RDS on the basis of a nonlinear Brønsted-type plot (i.e., from breakdown of an intermediate to its formation as the leavinggroup basicity decreases).24a Similar results have been reported for piperidinolysis of Y-substituted-phenyl benzoates24b and 2-methylbenzoates,24c which were reported to proceed through a stepwise mechanism with a change in RDS. Thus, one can suggest that the current reactions of 1a-1h with OH- proceed through a stepwise mechanism in which expulsion of the leaving group occurs rapidly after the RDS. This idea can be further supported by the fact that the aromaticity of the benzene ring can be recovered through expulsion of the leaving group from the Meisenheimer complex.

To obtain more conclusive information on the reaction mechanism, Hammett plots have been constructed using σYo and σY- constants in Figure 3. If the current reaction proceeds through a stepwise mechanism in which expulsion of the leaving group occurs after the RDS, no negative charge would develop on the O atom of the leaving group in the TS. In this case, σYo constants should result in a better Hammett correlation than σY- constants. In contrast, if expulsion of the leaving group occurs in the RDS either in a concerted mechanism or in a stepwise reaction, a negative charge would develop partially on the O atom of the leaving group. Since such a negative charge can be delocalized on the substituent Y through resonance interactions, σY- constants should give a better Hammett correlation than σYo constants.

Figure 3.Hammett plots correlated with σYo (a) and σY- (b) constants for the SNAr reactions of Y-substituted-phenoxy-2,4-dinitrobenzenes (1a-1h) with OH- in 80 mol % H2O/20 mol % DMSO at 25.0 ± 0.1 ℃.

As shown in Figure 3, the Hammett plot correlated with σYo constants (a) exhibit a much better correlation than that correlated with σY- constants (b). This indicates that no negative charge is developing on the O atom of the Y-substituted-phenoxide (i.e., expulsion of the leaving group is not advanced at all in the TS). This is not possible for reactions which proceed through a concerted mechanism. Furthermore, if the current reaction proceeds through a stepwise mechanism, expulsion of the leaving group should occur rapidly after the RDS. Because OH– is significantly more basic and a poorer nucleofuge than Y-substituted-phenoxide ion. Thus, one can conclude that the current SNAr reaction proceeds through a stepwise mechanism in which expulsion of the leaving group occurs rapidly after the RDS. This idea is also consistent with the preceding proposal based on the linear Brønsted-type plot with βlg = –0.16.

 

Conclusions

The current study on the SNAr reactions of 1a-1h with OH- has led us to conclude the following: (1) The kOH- value increases as the leaving-group basicity decreases. However, the dependence of kOH- on the leaving-group basicity is not significant. (2) The Brønsted-type plot the reactions of 1a-1h is linear with a βlg value of –0.16, which is typical for reactions reported to proceed through a stepwise mechanism with formation of an addition intermediate being the RDS. (3) The Hammett plot correlated with σYo constants results in a much better correlation than that correlated with σY- constants, implying that no negative charge is developed on the O atom of the leaving group (or expulsion of the leaving group is not advanced) in the RDS. (4) The current reactions proceed through a stepwise mechanism in which expulsion of the leaving group occurs rapidly after the RDS.

 

Experimental Section

Materials. Y-Substituted-phenoxy-2,4-dinitrobenzenes (1a-1h) were readily prepared from the reaction of 1-fluoro-2,4-dinitrobenzene with Y-substituted-phenol in anhydrous ether under the presence of triethylamine. The crude product was purified by column chromatography and the purity was checked by the melting point and spectral data such as 1H and 13C NMR spectra. NaOH and other chemicals were of the highest quality available.

Kinetics. The kinetic study was carried out using a UV-Vis spectrophotometer equipped with a constant temperature circulating bath to maintain the reaction mixture at 25.0 ± 0.1 ℃. The reactions were followed by monitoring the appearance of 2,4-dinitrophenoxide ion at 400 nm. All of the reactions in this study were performed under pseudo-firstorder conditions, in which the concentration of NaOH was kept in excess of the substrate concentration.

Typically, the reaction was initiated by adding 5 μL of a 0.02 M solution of the substrate in acetonitrile to a 10-mm quartz UV cell containing 2.50 mL of the thermostated reaction mixture made up of the solvent and aliquot of the NaOH stock solution. All solutions were transferred by gastight syringes. Generally, the concentration of NaOH in the reaction mixtures was ca. (2–13) × 10-2 M, while the concentration of the substrate was ca. 4 × 10-5 M. Pseudo-firstorder rate constants (kobsd) were calculated from the equation, ln (A∞ – At) = – kobsdt + C. The plots of ln (A∞ – At) vs. time were linear over 90% of the total reaction.

Products Analysis. 2,4-Dinitrophenoxide ion was liberated quantitatively and identified as one of the products by comparison of the UV-Vis spectrum after completion of the reaction with that of authentic sample under the same reaction condition.

References

  1. Bunnett, J. F. J. Chem. Educ. 1974, 51, 312-315. https://doi.org/10.1021/ed051p312
  2. Miller, J. Nucleophilic Aromatic Substitution; Elsevier: Amsterdam, 1968.
  3. (a) Buncel, E.; Crampton, M. R.; Strauss, M. J.; Terrier, F. Electron Deficient Aromatic-and Heteroaromatic-Base Interactions; Elsevier: New York, 1984.
  4. (b) Buncel, E. The Chemistry of Functional Groups. Supplement F. The Chemistry of Amino, Nitro and Nitroso Compounds; Patai, S., Ed.; Wiley: London, 1982.
  5. Terrier, F. Nucleophilic Aromatic Displacement: The Influence of the Nitro Group; Feuer, H., Ed.; Organic Nitro Chem. Ser.; VCH: New York, 1991.
  6. Beugelmanns, R.; Singh, G. P.; Bois-Choussy, M.; Chastanet, J.; Zhu, J. J. Org. Chem. 1994, 59, 5535-5542. https://doi.org/10.1021/jo00098a010
  7. Khalafi-Nezhad, A.; Zare, A.; Parhami, A.; Rad, M. N. S.; Nejabat, G. R. Can. J. Chem. 2006, 84, 979-985. https://doi.org/10.1139/v06-119
  8. Snyder, S. E.; Carey, J. R.; Shvets, A. B.; Pirkle, W. H. J. Org. Chem. 2005, 70, 4073-4081. https://doi.org/10.1021/jo0502495
  9. Dust, J. M.; Harris, J. M. J. Polym. Sci. Chem. A 1990, 28, 1875-1886. https://doi.org/10.1002/pola.1990.080280719
  10. Dust, J. M.; Secord, M. D. J. Phys. Org. Chem. 1995, 8, 810-824. https://doi.org/10.1002/poc.610081208
  11. Fant, F.; De Sloovere, A.; Mathijsen, K.; Marle, C.; El Fantroussi, S.; Verstraete, W. Environ. Pollut. 2001, 111, 503-507. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0269-7491(00)00077-4
  12. Brunelle, D. J.; Singelton, D. A. Chemosphere 1985, 14, 173-181. https://doi.org/10.1016/0045-6535(85)90096-7
  13. Balakrishnan, V. K.; Dust, J. M.; VanLoon, G. W.; Buncel, E. Can. J. Chem. 2001, 79, 157-173.
  14. Boga, C.; Del Vecchio, E.; Forlani, L.; Mazzanti, A.; Todesco, P. E. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2005, 44, 3285-3289. https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.200500238
  15. (a) Chiavarino, B.; Crestoni, M. E.; Fornarini, S.; Lanucara, F.; Lemaire, J.; Maitre, P. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2007, 46, 1995-1998. https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.200604630
  16. (b) Chen, H.; Chen, H.; Cooks, R. G. J. Am. Soc. Mass. Spectrom. 2004, 15, 998-1004. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jasms.2004.03.006
  17. (c) Danikiewicz, W.; Bienkowski, T.; Poddebniak, D. J. Am. Soc. Mass. Spectrom. 2004, 15, 927-933. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jasms.2004.03.012
  18. (a) Fernandez, I.; Frenking, G.; Uggerud, E. J. Org. Chem. 2010, 75, 2971-2980. https://doi.org/10.1021/jo100195w
  19. (b) Giroldo, T.; Xavier, L. A.; Riveros, J. M. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2004, 43, 3588-3590. https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.200454230
  20. (a) Um, I. H.; Min, S. W.; Dust, J. M. J. Org. Chem. 2007, 72, 8797-8803. https://doi.org/10.1021/jo701549h
  21. (b) Um, I. H.; Im, L. R.; Kang, J. S.; Bursey, S. S.; Dust, J. M. J. Org. Chem. 2012, 77, 9738-9746. https://doi.org/10.1021/jo301862b
  22. (a) Castro, E. A. Pure Appl. Chem. 2009, 81, 685-696.
  23. (b) Castro, E. A. J. Sulfur Chem. 2007, 28, 401-429. https://doi.org/10.1080/17415990701415718
  24. (c) Castro, E. A. Chem. Rev. 1999, 99, 3505-3524. https://doi.org/10.1021/cr990001d
  25. (d) Jencks, W. P. Chem. Rev. 1985, 85, 511-527. https://doi.org/10.1021/cr00070a001
  26. (e) Jencks, W. P. Chem. Soc. Rev. 1981, 10, 345-375. https://doi.org/10.1039/cs9811000345
  27. (a) Pavez, P.; Millan, D.; Morales, J. I.; Castro, E. A. J. Org. Chem. 2013, 78, 9670-9676. https://doi.org/10.1021/jo401351v
  28. (b) Aguayo, R.; Arias, F.; Canete, A.; Zuniga, C.; Castro, E. A.; Pavez, P.; Santos, J. G. Int. J. Chem. Kinet. 2013, 45, 202-211. https://doi.org/10.1002/kin.20756
  29. (c) Castro, E. A.; Ramos, M.; Santos, J. G. J. Org. Chem. 2009, 74, 6374-6377. https://doi.org/10.1021/jo901137f
  30. (a) Um, I. H.; Han, J. Y.; Shin, Y. H. J. Org. Chem. 2009, 74, 3073-3078. https://doi.org/10.1021/jo900219t
  31. (b) Um, I. H.; Akhtar, K.; Shin, Y. H.; Han, J. Y. J. Org. Chem. 2007, 72, 3823-3829. https://doi.org/10.1021/jo070171n
  32. (c) Um, I. H.; Hwang, S. J.; Yoon, S. R.; Jeon, S. E.; Bae, S. K. J. Org. Chem. 2008, 73, 7671-7677. https://doi.org/10.1021/jo801539w
  33. (d) Um, I. H.; Seok, J. A.; Kim, H. T.; Bae, S. K. J. Org. Chem. 2003, 68, 7742-7746. https://doi.org/10.1021/jo034637n
  34. (a) Um, I. H.; Bae, A. R.; Um, T. I. J. Org. Chem. 2014, 79, 1206-1212. https://doi.org/10.1021/jo402629e
  35. (b) Um, I. H.; Bea, A. R. J. Org. Chem. 2012, 77, 5781-5787. https://doi.org/10.1021/jo300961y
  36. (c) Um, I. H.; Jeon, S. E.; Seok, J. A. Chem. Eur. J. 2006, 12, 1237-1243. https://doi.org/10.1002/chem.200500647
  37. (d) Um, I. H.; Kim, K. H.; Park, H. R.; Fujio, M.; Tsuno, Y. J. Org. Chem. 2004, 69, 3937-3942. https://doi.org/10.1021/jo049694a
  38. Jencks, W. P.; Regenstein, J. In Handbook of Biochemistry, 2nd ed.; Sober, H. A., Ed.; Chemical Rubber Publishing Co.: Cleveland, OH, 1970; p J-195.
  39. Murto, J.; Murto, M. L. Acta Chem. Scand. 1966, 20, 297-302. https://doi.org/10.3891/acta.chem.scand.20-0297
  40. (a) Um, I. H.; Han, J. Y.; Hwang, S. J. Chem. Eur. J. 2008, 14, 7324-7330. https://doi.org/10.1002/chem.200800553
  41. (b) Um, I. H.; Park, J. E.; Shin, Y. H. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2007, 5, 3539-3543. https://doi.org/10.1039/b712427a
  42. (c) Um, I. H.; Shin, Y. H.; Park, J. E.; Kang, J. S.; Buncel, E. Chem. Eur. J. 2012, 18, 961-968. https://doi.org/10.1002/chem.201102404
  43. (d) Um, I. H.; Kang, J. S.; Shin, Y. H.; Buncel, E. J. Org. Chem. 2013, 78, 490-497. https://doi.org/10.1021/jo302373y
  44. (a) Um, I. H.; Bea, A. R. J. Org. Chem. 2011, 76, 7510-7515. https://doi.org/10.1021/jo201387h
  45. (b) Um, I. H.; Lee, J. Y.; Ko, S. H.; Bae, S. K. J. Org. Chem. 2006, 71, 5800-5803. https://doi.org/10.1021/jo0606958
  46. (c) Um, I. H.; Lee, J. Y.; Lee, H. W.; Nagano, Y.; Fujio, M.; Tsuno, Y. J. Org. Chem. 2005, 70, 4980-4987. https://doi.org/10.1021/jo050172k

Cited by

  1. Ar Reactions of 1-(Y-Substituted-phenoxy)-2,4-dinitrobenzenes with Azide Ion: Effect of Changing Nucleophile from Hydroxide to Azide Ion on Reaction Mechanism and Reactivity vol.36, pp.7, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1002/bkcs.10333
  2. Ar reaction of 1-(4-nitrophenoxy)-2,4-dinitrobenzene with anionic nucleophiles: effects of solvation and polarizability on the α-effect vol.93, pp.10, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1139/cjc-2015-0073
  3. Nucleophilic aromatic substitution in chlorinated aromatic systems with a glutathione thiolate model vol.30, pp.7, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1002/poc.3640
  4. Electrogenerated Chemiluminescent Chemodosimeter Based on a Cyclometalated Iridium(III) Complex for Sensitive Detection of Thiophenol vol.91, pp.2, 2014, https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.analchem.8b03445