Effect of Oyster Shell Calcium Powder on the Quality of Restructured Pork Ham

Abstract

This study was conducted to evaluate the effects of oyster shell calcium powder (OSCP) as a substitute for phosphates in curing agent, on the quality of restructured pork ham. Restructured pork ham was processed under six treatment conditions: T1 (no additives), T2 (0.3% sodium tripolyphosphate), T3 (1.5% NaCl+0.5% whey protein), T4 (1.5% NaCl+0.5% whey protein+0.15% OSCP), T5 (1.5% NaCl+0.5% whey protein+0.3% OSCP), and T6 (1.5% NaCl+0.5% whey protein+0.5% OSCP). Addition of OSCP significantly increased the ash content and pH of restructured pork ham (p<0.05), but did not affect the cooking loss and water holding capacity values of restructured pork ham. Addition of OSCP had no effect on Hunter a and b surface color values of restructured pork ham, but did decrease the Hunter L surface color value (p<0.05). The addition of 0.5% OSCP showed significantly higher chewiness and springiness values of restructured pork ham, compared with the addition of phosphates (p<0.05). In conclusion, the addition of OSCP combined with low NaCl and 0.5% whey protein can be considered a viable substitute for phosphates in the curing agent, when processing restructured pork ham.

Introduction

Meat products are one of the most popular foods in the world. In Korea, consumption of meat and meat products has not only increased, but also consumers expect better quality and healthy food products.

Phosphates, like many other curing agents, perform multiple functions when added to meat products. One of the most important functions of phosphates is to increase solubility of meat proteins and their ability to bind and retain water. Water retention capacity improves cooking yield, meat color, tenderness, juiciness and overall texture in terms of quality properties in meat (Song, 1993; Tompkin, 1984; Xiong, 2005). While many forms of phosphates are allowed for use in curing meat, there are no strict regulations that dictate the use of specific phosphates and phosphate blends. The only restriction placed is that the levels of phosphate can not exceed 0.5% based on the finished product weight when used to reduce moisture loss, protect flavor, or as a curing agent (USDAFSIS, 1982).

Although phosphorus is an essential mineral for maintenance of health, too much intake could inhibit Ca absorbtion and formation of bone (Virpi et al., 2006). Nowadays also concerns of consumers regarding the use of chemical curing agents like as phosphate, nitrite and preservatives to meat products have been increasing, as well as several studies have tried to substitute for chemical additives to meet the consumer's need in meat products. (Joseph and James, 2007; Manzoor et al., 2014; Park et al., 2012a, 2012b; Park et al., 2008). For these reasons, elimination of phosphates has been attempted in meat product industry currently.

Oyster shells contain calcium carbonate (CaCO3) as the main component and are good for source of calcium. Following heat treatment, CaCO3 in the shell is converted to calcium oxide (CaO), which is known to have antibacterial activity (Sawai et al., 2001). Oyster shell calcium powder has been used to improve in the shelf life of several foods, including noodles, fried chicken, sardine balls (Suhara, 1995), kimchi (Choi et al., 2006), tofu (Kim et al., 2007), and pork sausage (Lee et al., 2011). As CaO is classified as acidity regulator in the food additives database (MFDS, 2013), some studies showed that CaO solution resulted in strong alkaline range of pH 11.0-12.5 (Sawai et al., 2001; Yeon, 2006). However, the addition of oyster shell calcium powder and its effect on the functional properties of meat products has not yet been fully studied. Therefore, this study was conducted to evaluate the effects of oyster shell calcium powder (OSCP) as a substitute for phosphates in the curing agent on the properties of restructured pork ham added with the low NaCl and 0.5% whey protein.

 

Materials and Methods

Processing and sampling

Certified organic grade vacuum-packed, refrigerated lean pork was obtained from Goesan Doorae Food Inc. (Goesan, Korea). Basic formulation (Table 1) for restructured pork ham was as followed: lean pork (88.3%), water (8.8%), natural antibiotics (0.01%), fructo-oligosaccharide (0.7%), glutinous rice powder (1.8%), and seasoning (0.3%). Manufacturing process (Fig. 1) was as following: the mixed blends were placed in a retainer (18.0×6.0×4.5 cm3), dried for 25 min, cooked at 55℃ for 13 min using sawdust, and then cooked to an internal temperature of 72℃ in a smokehouse (Bastramat 1500; Bayha & Strackbein Gmbh, Germany). The cooked ham was cooled by spraying with water and kept at 4℃ for 12 h before packaging under vacuum. The samples were stored at 4℃, and quality properties were evaluated at the meat science laboratory of Chungbuk National University.

Table 1.*T1 (no additive), T2 (0.3% STPP), T3 (1.5% NaCl+0.5% whey protein), T4 (1.5% NaCl+0.5% whey protein+0.15% OSCP), T5 (1.5% NaCl+0.5% whey protein+0.3% OSCP), and T6 (1.5% NaCl+0.5% whey protein+0.5% OSCP); **Sodium tripolyphosphate; ***Oyster shell calcium powder

Fig. 1.Manufacturing process of restructured pork ham.

pH

Using a homogenizer (Nihonseiki, Japan), 10 g of sample was homogenized in 100 mL of distilled water for 30 s at 7000 rpm. The pH levels of the homogenate was determined using a pH meter (Mettler Delta 340; Mettler- Toledo, Ltd, UK).

Color

The L*, a*, b* values were determined on the surface of freshly cut of ham by using a Spectro Colormeter (Model JX-777; Color Techno. System Co., Japan) calibrated to the white plate (L*, 89.39; a*, 0.13; b*, -0.51). L*, a*, b* values describe the Hunter lab color system (L*=lightness, a*=redness, b*=yellowness) by using a white fluorescent light (D65) as light source. Each measurement was performed six times, and mean values were determined to represent the assay result.

Water-holding capacity (WHC)

The centrifugation method described by (Laakkonen et al., 1970) was used to measure water holding capacity (WHC). Restructured pork ham sample (0.5±0.05 g) from each treatment group was placed in a centrifugation tube with filter units, heated for 20 min at 80℃, and then cooled for 10 min. Samples were centrifuged at 2000 g for 10 min at 4℃, following which the WHC was calculated as the change in sample weight.

Proximal analysis

Moisture, protein, lipid, and ash were assayed according to the AOAC methods (1995).

Cooking loss

A 3-cm-thick slice (weight 100±5 g) cut from restructured pork ham was placed into a polypropylene bag, cooked for 40 min at 7℃ in a water-bath, and cooled down to room temperature. Cooking loss was calculated by the weight difference of samples before and after cooking.

Shear force test

A 3-cm-thick slice (weight 100±5 g) cut from restructured pork ham was placed into a polypropylene bag, cooked for 40 min at 70℃ in a water-bath, and then cooled for 30 min. Samples were cut into 1×2×1 cm (width × length × height), pieces and max weight were measured by a Shearing, Cutting Test using a Rheo meter (Model Compac-100; Sun Scientific Co., Japan) under the following operational conditions: table speed of 110 mm/min, graph interval of 20 ms, and load cell (max) of 10 kg, compression rate 80%, diameter of load cell 12.73 mm using the R.D.S (Rheology Data System) version 3.0.

Texture profile analysis (TPA)

A 3-cm-thick slice (weight 100±5 g) cut from restructured pork ham was placed into a polypropylene bag, cooked for 40 min at 70℃ in a water-bath, and then cooled for 30 min. Samples were cut into 1×1×1 cm (width × length × height), A double compression cycle test. Texture Profile Test using a Rheo meter (Model Compac- 100; Sun Scientific Co., Japan) under the following operational conditions: table speed of 60 mm/min, and load cell (max) of 4 kg, using the R.D.S (Rheology Data System) version 3.0.

Statistical analysis

Statistical analyses were carried out using the GLM (Generalized Linear Model) procedure of the SAS package (Statistical analysis system: The SAS system Release 9.01, 2002). Means were compared using the Duncan’s multiple range test at a level of significance of p<0.05.

 

Results and Discussion

Effect of OSCP addition on proximate analysis of restructured pork ham

The proximate analysis of the effect of oyster shell calcium powder (OSCP) addition on restructured pork ham is shown in Table 2. Significant differences were observed (p<0.05) in moisture, fat, and protein contents of restructured pork ham among the treatments. Because the moisture content of restructured pork hams can be affected by different concentration of ingredients such as phosphate, OSCP, and whey protein among treatments. And the change of moisture content in ham resulted in the change of fat and protein content ratio in ham. Furthermore, addition of OSCP significantly increased (p<0.05) ash content of restructured pork hams. In a previous report by Lee et al. (2011), the proximate analysis revealed significant differences (p<0.05) in ash content when OSCP was added to pork sausage.

Table 2.*Treatments are the same as in Table 1. a-dMeans±SD with different superscript letters indicate significant differences (p<0.05)

Effect of OSCP addition on quality of restructured pork ham

Table 3 shows pH, WHC and cooking loss values in restructured pork ham. The addition of OSCP significantly increased pH of restructured pork ham (p<0.05), but did not affect cooking loss values of restructured pork ham. Furthermore, addition of OSCP to the restructured pork ham showed similar water holding capacity compared to T2 group (added with phosphates) and T3 group (added with salt and whey protein). A previous study showed that addition of phosphates can increase the pH of ham products and addition of salt can decrease the pH of ham products. (Puolanne et al., 2001). Another study by Ruusunen et al. (2003) showed that addition of phosphates can increase water holding capacity. However, result of this study did not consensus with that of previous study.

Table 3.*Treatments are the same as in Table 1; **Water holding capacity. a-dMeans±SD with different superscript letters indicate significant differences (p<0.05)

In the meat processing, additives like as salt and phosphates can change the isoelectronic point (IEP) of meat. If pH of meat rises or falls from the isoelectric point, meat proteins have larger space due to increased repulsion forces. Therefore, more water can be retained (Feiner, 2006). In our study, main material of OSCP is CaO. It is determined that addition of OSCP increased the pH of meat because calcium oxide changed electronical properties of meat protein.

Effect of OSCP addition on hunter color of restructured pork hams

Table 4 shows the results of hunter color as addition of OSCP to restructured pork ham. The addition of OSCP to the restructured pork ham was significantly lower lightness value in the 0.3% and 0.5% groups than the others (p<0.05). Restructured pork ham added with 0.15% OSCP tended to show the highest redness value compared to the other groups. Also, T3 (1.5% salt + 0.5% whey protein) and T5 (1.5% salt + 0.5% whey protein + 0.3% OSCP) were resulted in significantly lower yellowness than the others (p<0.05). High pH can hold many water between the proteins, and white light reflection is minimized and color absorption is increased. Color of meat is very important factor to the consumer who purchase the meat product in market. Also, color of meat is impacted by myoglobin content and pH in meat. Nitrite is essential additives in the cured meat color (Bak et al., 2013; Feiner, 2006; Honikel, 2008; Mcclure et al., 2011). In this study, it is determined that there is no huge difference in meat color because nitrite was not used in the production of restructured pork ham.

Table 4.*Treatments are the same as in Table 1. a-cMeans±SD with different superscript letters indicate significant differences (p<0.05). 1) L*, lightness; a*, redness; b*, yellowness

Effect of OSCP addition on texture profile analysis of restructured pork ham

The comparison of texture profile analysis of restructured pork hams is shown in Table 5. No significant differences were observed in shear force and cohesiveness values of restructured pork hams among the treatments. The addition of 0.5% OSCP showed higher chewiness and springiness values of restructured pork ham compared with addition of phosphates, and the hardness values of T4 (0.15% OSCP) and T5 (0.3% OSCP) were similar with that of T3 (1.5% salt and 0.5% whey protein). According to Caceres et al. (2006) addition of calcium, a divalent cation, establishes bonds between meat proteins, mainly myosin, and favors the formation of a stronger network leading to a firmer meat. The hardness and chewiness of other proteins such as vegetable proteins and tofu has also been reported to be increased following the addition of OSCP (Kim et al., 2007).

Table 5.*Treatments are the same as in Table 1. a-cMeans±SD with different superscript letters indicate significant differences (p<0.05)

 

Conclusion

Commercially available oyster shell calcium powder (OSCP) was used as a substitute for phosphate in the production of restructured pork ham. The ash content of restructured pork ham was higher (p<0.05) in the samples formulated with OSCP than that in the other treatment groups. Moreover, the pH of restructured pork ham was increased by addition of OSCP, and springiness and chewiness values were higher than those of phosphate. The restructured pork ham treated with OSCP had overall properties similar to restructured pork ham cured with phosphate. Thus, the addition of OSCP combined with the low NaCl and 0.5% whey protein can be considered as a viable substitute for phosphate in curing agents while maintaining desirable quality characteristics.