DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Housing Adjustment Behaviors of Korean Elderly Immigrants Living in Affordable Housing

Affordable housing에 거주하는 한인 노인 이민자의 주거적응행태

  • Jorn, Myounghee (School of Architecture & Urban Planning, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee)
  • Received : 2013.12.27
  • Accepted : 2014.05.02
  • Published : 2014.06.25

Abstract

This study explores the daily life patterns and housing adjustment behaviors of low-income Korean elderly immigrants residing in affordable housing in the Chicago metropolitan area. Utilizing an intercultural perspective, the study focuses on identifying the immigrants' their cultural attributes of daily living and coping responses to residential misfits. These housing adjustment behaviors are classified into five modes consisting of residential mobility, structural adaptation, residential alteration, normative adaptation, and behavioral adaptation. Two-hour in-depth interviews with open-ended questions were conducted with 138 participants from 15 affordable housing complexes. Collected information includes demographic data, immigration experiences and cultural identity, daily life patterns, as well as housing evaluation and housing adjustment behaviors. The study results indicate that many research participants maintained their cultural attributes of daily living accumulated from past experiences (i.e. mostly based upon Korean cultural contexts), but also made adjustments as they complied with their aging body and new living conditions. This also reflects that immigrants' cultural needs are not limited to the use of language and ethnic goods, but are also embedded deeply in their daily life patterns to influence one's uses of the dwellings in a broader sense. All five modes of housing adjustment behaviors were observed with research participants within their residential settings. More importantly, normative and behavioral adaptations along with residential alterations occurred more simultaneously rather than sequentially when the respondents perceived discrepancy between oneself (i.e. including one's attributes, needs, and preferences) and his/her dwelling.

Keywords

References

  1. Banks, J., & McGee Banks, C. (1989). Multicultural education: issues and Perspectives. NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
  2. Berry, J.W. (1997). Immigration, acculturation, and adaptation. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 46(1), 5-68.
  3. Bourdieu, P. (1980). The logic of practice. CA: Stanford University Press.
  4. Csordas, T.J. (1990). Embodiment as a paradigm for anthropology. Ethos, 18(1), 5-47. https://doi.org/10.1525/eth.1990.18.1.02a00010
  5. Day, K. & Cohen, U. (2000). Incorporating cultural heritage in the design of dementia care environments. Paper presented to the Archstone Foundation.
  6. Giddens, A. (1991). Structuration theory: past, present and future. In C. Bryant & D. Jary (Eds.), Giddens' theory of structuration: a critical appreciation (pp. 201-221). London: Routledge.
  7. He, W., Sengupta, M., Velkoff, V. A., & DeBarros, K. A. U.S. Department of Commerce, U.S. Census Bureau. (2005). 65+ in the United States: 2005. Retrieved from website: https://www.census.gov/prod/2006pubs/p23-209.pdf
  8. Kim, J. & Lauderdale, D.S. (2002). The role of community context in immigrant elderly living arrangements: Korean American elderly. Research on Aging, 24(6), 630-653. https://doi.org/10.1177/016402702237185
  9. Kim, Y. (1995). The creation of an ethnic neighborhood: a case study of "Koreatown" in Chicago. 史學志, 28, 819-853.
  10. Kim, Y.Y. & Ruben, B.D. (1988). Intercultural transformation: A systems theory. In Y.Y. Kim, & W.B. Gudykunst (Eds.), Theories in Intercultural Communication (pp. 299-321). CA: Sage Publications.
  11. Kroeber, A.L., & Kluckhohn, C. (1952). Culture: A critical review of concepts and definitions. Harvard University Peabody Museum of American Archeology and Ethnology Papers 47.
  12. Lederach, J. (1995). Preparing for peace: conflict transformation across cultures. NY: Syracuse University Press.
  13. Morris, E. & Winter, M. (1978). Housing, family, and society. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
  14. Parsons, T. (1949). Essays in sociological theory. Glencoe: Free Press.
  15. Pred, A. (1981). Social reproduction and the timegeography of everyday life. Geografiska Annaler. Series B, Human Geography, 63(1), 5-22. https://doi.org/10.2307/490994
  16. Rapoport, A. (1969). House, form and culture. New Jersey: Englewood Cliffs.
  17. Rapoport, A. (1980). Cross-cultural aspects of environmental design. In I. Altman, A. Rapoport & J. Wohlwill (Eds.), Environment and culture. New York: Pelnum.
  18. Rapoport, A. (2001). Theory, Culture and Housing. Housing, Theory and Society, 17, 145-165.
  19. Rapoport, A. (2008). Some further thoughts on culture and environment. International Journal of Architectural Research, 2(1), 16-39.
  20. Schwartz, S.H. (2006). Basic human values: Theory, measurement, and applications. Revue francaise de sociologie.
  21. Shim, Y.R. & Schwartz, R.C. (2007). The relationship between degree of acculturation and adjustment difficulties among Korean immigrants living in a Western society. British Journal of Guidance & Counseling, 35(4), 409-426. https://doi.org/10.1080/03069880701593516
  22. Stephenson, M. (2000). Development and validation of the Stephenson Multigroup Acculturation Scale (SMAS). Psychological Assessment, 12(1), 77-88. https://doi.org/10.1037/1040-3590.12.1.77
  23. Vincent, G. K., & Velkoff, V. A. U.S. Census Bureau, (2010). The next four decades, the older population in the United States: 2010 to 2050.
  24. Weisman, G. (2001). The place of people in architectural design. In A. Pressman (Eds.), Architectural design portable handbook: A guide to excellent practices (pp. 158-170). New York: McGraw-Hill.
  25. Yee, D. (2002). Recognizing diversity, moving toward cultural competence. Generations, 26(3), 5-7.
  26. Yoon, I. (1991). The changing significance of ethnic and class resources in immigrant businesses: the case of Korean immigrant business in Chicago. International Migration Review, 25(2), 303-332. https://doi.org/10.2307/2546290