구강회복응용과학지 (Journal of Dental Rehabilitation and Applied Science)

  • 제30권2호
  • /
  • Pages.121-130
  • /
  • 2014
  • /
  • 2384-4353(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2384-4272(eISSN)
대한턱관절교합학회 (Korean Academy of Stomatognathic Function and Occlusion)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

두 가지 다른 행정의 니켈 티타늄 파일의 성형 성상: 표면 성상, 상아질 삭편과 도말층에 대한 예비적 비교 연구

Shaping characteristics of two different motions nickel titanium file: a preliminary comparative study of surface profile and dentin chip

  • 박소라 (강릉원주대학교 치과대학 치과보존학교실) ;
  • 박세희 (강릉원주대학교 치과대학 치과보존학교실) ;
  • 조경모 (강릉원주대학교 치과대학 치과보존학교실) ;
  • 김진우 (강릉원주대학교 치과대학 치과보존학교실)
  • Park, So-Ra (Department of Conservative Dentistry, College of Dentistry, Gangneung-Wonju National University) ;
  • Park, Se-Hee (Department of Conservative Dentistry, College of Dentistry, Gangneung-Wonju National University) ;
  • Cho, Kyung-Mo (Department of Conservative Dentistry, College of Dentistry, Gangneung-Wonju National University) ;
  • Kim, Jin-Woo (Department of Conservative Dentistry, College of Dentistry, Gangneung-Wonju National University)
  • 투고 : 2014.02.13
  • 심사 : 2014.04.25
  • 발행 : 2014.06.30
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

목적: Reciprocating 파일인 WaveOne과 continuous rotary 파일인 ProTaper와 ProFile로 근관 형성시 상아질 벽의 표면성상과 상아질 삭편 크기와 도말층 제거 효과를 비교하였다. 연구 재료 및 방법: 60개 단근치를 ProFile, ProTaper, WaveOne으로 성형 후 근관이 보이도록 grinding 하였다. 근관 성형 동안 상아질 삭편을 모아 건조하였다. Scanning electron microscope으로 상아질 삭편 크기와 근관 표면의 불규칙성과 도말층을 관찰하였다. 결과: 표면 함요부의 범위는 ProFile, ProTaper 그리고 WaveOne에서 $150{\mu}m$, $70{\mu}m$, 그리고 $80{\mu}m$의 범위 내에서 관찰되었다. 상아질 삭편의 크기는 ProFile, ProTaper 그리고 WaveOne에서 $7{\mu}m$, $6.5{\mu}m$, 그리고$4{\mu}m$의 범위 내에서 관찰되었다. 도말층은 WaveOne의 중간 1/3과 근단 1/3에서 유의하게 더 많이 관찰되었다. 결론: WaveOne은 중간 1/3과 치근단 1/3의 도말층 제거 효과를 제외하고, ProFile과 ProTaper와 근관 표면 성상과 상아질 삭편에서 큰 차이가 없는 것으로 사료된다.

Purpose: To assess the surface profile of dentinal wall, dentin chips and smear layer during the canal shaping with rotary (ProTaper) and ProFile and reciprocating (WaveOne) nickel-titanium file. Materials and Methods: Sixty human extracted mandibular premolars and incisors with single canals were randomly selected. Three experimental groups (n = 20) were instrumented with ProTaper (F2), ProFile (25/.06), WaveOne (25/.08) with irrigation of 2.5% NaOCl. The dentin chips were collected from flute of file during each canal preparation. After canal preparation, roots were grinded and each group was divided into two subgroups (n = 10) for surface profile and smear layer of dentinal wall of shaped root canal. Each specimen was observed under scanning electron microscope for evaluating size of dentin chips, root canal surface recessions and smear layer. Scores of Smear layer were statistically analyzed using Kruskal Wallis test and Mann Whitney test at P = 0.05 level. Results: The size of dentin chips from ProFile, ProTaper and WaveOne was up to $7{\mu}m$, $6.5{\mu}m$, and$4{\mu}m$, respectively. In the surface profile, the width of surface irregularity was measured and Profile, ProTaper and WaveOne was up to $150{\mu}m$, $70{\mu}m$, and $80{\mu}m$, respectively. Completely cleaned root canals were not found. In the middle and apical third of the canals, WaveOne group showed higher smear layer score than ProFile and ProTaper groups (P < 0.05). Conclusion: Within limits of this study, reciprocating motion WaveOne group was not significant difference of shaping ability with the full-sequence ProFile and ProTaper systems except canal clearness of middle and apical third of root canal. When using WaveOne to shaping root canal, thorough root canal irrigation is recommended.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Schilder H. Cleaning and shaping the root canal. Dent Clin North Am 1974;18:269-96.
  2. Carrotte P. Endodontics: Part 7. Preparing the root canal. Br Dent J 2004;197:603-13. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.4811823
  3. Jeon IS, Kum KY, Park SH, Yoon TC. Scanning electron microscopic study on the efficacy of root canal wall debridement of rotary Ni-Ti instruments with different cutting angle. J Korean Acad Conserv Dent 2002;27:577-86. https://doi.org/10.5395/JKACD.2002.27.6.577
  4. Love RM, Jenkinson HF. Invasion of dentinal tubules by oral bacteria. Crit Rev Oral Biol Med 2002;13:171-83. https://doi.org/10.1177/154411130201300207
  5. Kennedy WA, Walker WA 3rd, Gough RW. Smear layer removal effects on apical leakage. J Endod 1986;12:21-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0099-2399(86)80277-1
  6. Yared G. Canal preparation using only one Ni-Ti rotary instrument: preliminary observations. Int Endod J 2008;41:339-44. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2591.2007.01351.x
  7. Shen Y, Cheung GS, Bian Z, Peng B. Comparison of defects in ProFile and ProTaper systems after clinical use. J Endod 2006;32:61-5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2005.10.017
  8. De-Deus G, Brandão MC, Barino B, Di Giorgi K, Fidel RA, Luna AS. Assessment of apically extruded debris produced by the single-file ProTaper F2 technique under reciprocating movement. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2010;110:390-4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tripleo.2010.04.020
  9. Varela-Patiño P, Ibañez-Párraga A, Rivas-Mundiña B, Cantatore G, Otero XL, Martin-Biedma B. Alternating versus continuous rotation: a comparative study of the effect on instrument life. J Endod 2010;36:157-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2009.09.023
  10. Burklein S, Tsotsis P, Schafer E. Incidence of dentinal defects after root canal preparation: reciprocating versus rotary instrumentation. J Endod 2013;39:501-4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2012.11.045
  11. Burklein S, Schafer E. Apically extruded debris with reciprocating single-file and full-sequence rotary instrumentation systems. J Endod 2012;38:850-2. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2012.02.017
  12. You SY, Kim HC, Bae KS, Baek SH, Kum KY, Lee W. Shaping ability of reciprocating motion in curved root canals: a comparative study with microcomputed tomography. J Endod 2011;37:1296-300. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2011.05.021
  13. Yoo YS, Cho YB. A comparison of the shaping ability of reciprocating NiTi instruments in simulated curved canals. Restor Dent Endod 2012;37:220-7. https://doi.org/10.5395/rde.2012.37.4.220
  14. Bürklein S, Hinschitza K, Dammaschke T, Schäfer E. Shaping ability and cleaning effectiveness of two single-file systems in severely curved root canals of extracted teeth: Reciproc and WaveOne versus Mtwo and ProTaper. Int Endod J 2012;45:449-61. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2591.2011.01996.x
  15. Hulsmann M, Rummelin C, Schafers F. Root canal cleanliness after preparation with different endodontic handpieces and hand instruments: a comparative SEM investigation. J Endod 1997;23:301-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0099-2399(97)80410-4
  16. Hülsmann M, Peters OA, Dummer PMH. Mechanical preparation of root canals: shaping goals, techniques and means. Endodontic topics 2005;10:30-76. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1601-1546.2005.00152.x
  17. Serper A, Calt S. The demineralizing effects of EDTA at different concentrations and pH. J Endod 2002;28:501-2. https://doi.org/10.1097/00004770-200207000-00002
  18. Garberoglio R, Becce C. Smear layer removal by root canal irrigants. A comparative scanning electron microscopic study. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1994;78:359-67. https://doi.org/10.1016/0030-4220(94)90069-8
  19. Takeda FH, Harashima T, Kimura Y, Matsumoto K. A comparative study of the removal of smear layer by three endodontic irrigants and two types of laser. Int Endod J 1999;32:32-9. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2591.1999.00182.x
  20. Prati C, Foschi F, Nucci C, Montebugnoli L, Marchionni S. Appearance of the root canal walls after preparation with NiTi rotary instruments: a comparative SEM investigation. Clin Oral Investig 2004;8:102-10.
  21. Bowman CJ, Baumgartner JC. Gutta-percha obturation of lateral grooves and depressions. J Endod 2002;28:220-3. https://doi.org/10.1097/00004770-200203000-00019
  22. Onnink PA, Davis RD, Wayman BE. An in vitro comparison of incomplete root fractures associated with three obturation techniques. J Endod 1994;20:32-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0099-2399(06)80024-5
  23. Wilcox LR, Roskelley C, Sutton T. The relationship of root canal enlargement to finger-spreader induced vertical root fracture. J Endod 1997;23:533-4. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0099-2399(97)80316-0
  24. Ashwinkumar V, Krithikadatta J, Surendran S, Velmurugan N. Effect of reciprocating file motion on microcrack formation in root canals: an SEM study. Int Endod J 2013 Sep 21. doi: 10.1111/iej.12197. [Epub ahead of print]
  25. Portenier I, Lutz F, Barbakow F. Preparation of the apical part of the root canal by the Lightspeed and step-back techniques. Int Endod J 1998;31:103-11. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2591.1998.00116.x
  26. Peters OA, Barbakow F. Effects of irrigation on debris and smear layer on canal walls prepared by two rotary techniques: a scanning electron microscopic study. J Endod 2000;26:6-10.
  27. Hulsmann M, Gressmann G, Schafers F. A comparative study of root canal preparation using FlexMaster and HERO 642 rotary Ni-Ti instruments. Int Endod J 2003;36:358-66. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2591.2003.00664.x
  28. Dietrich MA, Kirkpatrick TC, Yaccino JM. In vitro canal and isthmus debris removal of the self-adjusting file, K3, and WaveOne files in the mesial root of human mandibular molars. J Endod 2012;38:1140-4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2012.05.007
  29. Gambarini G, Laszkiewicz J. A scanning electron microscopic study of debris and smear layer remaining following use of GT rotary instruments. Int Endod J 2002;35:422-7. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2591.2002.00495.x
  30. Jeon IS, Spangberg LS, Yoon TC, Kazemi RB, Kum KY. Smear layer production by 3 rotary reamers with different cutting blade designs in straight root canals: a scanning electron microscopic study. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2003;96:601-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1079-2104(03)00303-2
  31. Al-Sudani D, Al-Shahrani S. A comparison of the canal centering ability of ProFile, K3, and RaCe Nickel Titanium rotary systems. J Endod 2006;32:1198-201. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2006.07.017
  32. Paque F, Musch U, Hulsmann M. Comparison of root canal preparation using RaCe and ProTaper rotary Ni-Ti instruments. Int Endod J 2005;38:8-16. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2591.2004.00889.x
  33. Tinoco JM, De-Deus G, Tinoco EM, Saavedra F, Fidel RA, Sassone LM. Apical extrusion of bacteria when using reciprocating single-file and rotary multifile instrumentation systems. Int Endod J 2014;47:560-6. https://doi.org/10.1111/iej.12187