한국과학교육학회지 (Journal of The Korean Association For Science Education)

  • 제34권3호
  • /
  • Pages.221-233
  • /
  • 2014
  • /
  • 1226-5187(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2288-8489(eISSN)
한국과학교육학회 (The Korean Association for Science Education)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

중학생의 집단주의 성향에 따른 과학 협동학습에서 언어적 상호작용 양상의 비교

A Comparison of Verbal Interaction Patterns in Science Cooperative Learning Based on Grouping by Middle School Students' Collectivism

  • 투고 : 2014.01.30
  • 심사 : 2014.04.04
  • 발행 : 2014.05.30
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

이 연구에서는 중학교 1학년 32명을 대상으로 과학 협동학습 과정에서 학생들 사이의 언어적 상호작용을 개별 진술, 상호작용 단위 및 갈등행동 단위 수준에서 분석하고, 집단주의 성향에 따른 이질 집단과 동질 집단에서의 언어적 상호작용을 비교하였다. 또한, 학업 성취도 및 학업 성취도의 향상과 언어적 상호작용 사이의 관계를 조사하였다. 개별 진술 수준의 분석 결과, 과제 관련 진술의 하위 영역의 분포는 이질 집단과 동질 집단에서 비슷한 것으로 나타났고, 두 집단 모두 설명하기의 빈도가 가장 높았다. 상호작용 단위의 유발 빈도는 이질집단보다 동질 집단에서 높게 나타났고, 대칭적 상호작용의 유발 빈도가 가장 높았다. 이질 집단에서 HC 학생의 개별 진술의 빈도 및 상호작용 단위의 유발 빈도가 LC 학생보다 높게 나타났다. 갈등행동 단위의 유발 빈도는 전체적으로 낮은 편이었으나 집단별로 비율이 비슷했다. 특히, LC 동질 집단에서는 회피와 경쟁, HC 동질 집단에서는 협력의 유발 빈도가 높았다. 또한, 상호작용 단위 및 갈등행동 단위 수준에서 이질 집단과 동질 집단 간의 질적인 차이가 있었다. 학업 성취도 및 학업 성취도의 향상은 과제관련 진술의 합계와 유의미한 상관을 나타냈다.

In this study, we analyzed verbal interactions among 32 students in 7th graders' science cooperative learning at the levels of turns, interaction units, and conflict behavior units, and compared their verbal interaction patterns between the heterogeneous and homogeneous groups by students' collectivism. The relationships of verbal interactions with the achievement test scores and the increase of the achievement test scores were also investigated. In the analyses of turns, the distributions of the subcategories of the statements related to the task were found to be similar in both groups, and the frequency of 'explain' was highest. The frequencies of interaction units were higher in the homogeneous groups than the heterogeneous groups, and the frequency of 'symmetric interaction' was highest. In the heterogeneous groups, the frequencies of turns and interaction units for the students of high collectivism were higher than those of low collectivism. The frequencies of conflict behavior units were generally low, but the rates were similar in both groups. In the case of the homogeneous groups, the frequencies of 'avoiding' and 'competing' for the students of low collectivism were high, and the frequency of 'cooperating' for the students of high collectivism was high. In addition, the qualitative differences between the two groups were found in the interaction units and conflict behavior units. The achievement test scores and the increase of the achievement test scores were positively related with the sum of the frequencies of the statements related to the task.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Abram, P., Scarloss, B., Holthuis, N., Cohen, E., Lotan, R., & Schultz, S. E. (2002). The use of evaluation criteria to improve academic discussion in cooperative groups. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 22(1), 16-27. https://doi.org/10.1080/0218879020220103
  2. Earley, P. C. (1989). Social loafing and collectivism: A comparison of the United States and the People's Republic of China. Administrative Science Quarterly, 34(4), 565-581. https://doi.org/10.2307/2393567
  3. Eichinger, D. C., Anderson, C. W., Palinscar, A. S., & David, Y. M. (1991). An illustration of the roles of content knowledge, scientific argument, and social norms in collaborative problem solving. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association.
  4. Gillies, R. M. (2008). The effects of cooperative learning on junior high school students' behaviors, discourse and learning during a science-based learning activity. School Psychology International, 29(3), 328-347. https://doi.org/10.1177/0143034308093673
  5. Gundlach, M., Zivnuska, S., & Stoner, J. (2006). Understanding the relationship between individualism-collectivism and team performance through an integration of social identity theory and the social relations model. Human Relations, 59(12), 1603-1632. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726706073193
  6. Han, G., & Oh, J. (1993). An analysis of children's social interaction: Application of the theory of individualism/collectivism. Korean Journal of Social Psychology, 7(1), 185-197.
  7. Han, J. (2003). Instructional effect of grouping by agreeableness and students' verbal interactions in small group science learning (Doctoral dissertation). Seoul National University.
  8. Jeong, J., & Park, M. (2009). The differences of reflective inquiry according to students' characteristics and interaction modes of small group in an inquiry-based high school earth science. Journal of the Korean Earth Science Society, 30(3), 366-380. https://doi.org/10.5467/JKESS.2009.30.3.366
  9. Joo, Y., Kim, K., & Noh, T. (2012). The effects of grouping by middle school students' collectivism in science cooperative learning and their perceptions. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 32(10), 1551-1566.
  10. Jung, W., Lee, J., Park, E., Kim, C., & Lee, S. (2009). Interaction patterns in dialogic inquiry of middle school students in small groups in the natural history gallery. Journal of the Korean Earth Science Society, 30(7), 909-920. https://doi.org/10.5467/JKESS.2009.30.7.909
  11. Kang, S. (2000). Concept learning strategy emphasizing social consensus during discussion: Instructional effect and verbal interaction in small group discussion (Doctoral dissertation). Seoul National University.
  12. Kim, K. (2005). The effects of cooperative CAI and reciprocal peer tutoring CAI in chemistry concept learning: Conceptual understanding and verbal interactions (Doctoral dissertation). Seoul National University.
  13. Koh, H., Lee, E., & Kang, S. (2013). The effects of a cooperative learning strategy by level of students' collectivism. Journal of the Korean Chemical Society, 57(3), 389-397. https://doi.org/10.5012/jkcs.2013.57.3.389
  14. Kwak, Y. (2001). Theoretical background of constructivist epistemology. Journal of the Korean Earth Science Society, 22(5), 427-447.
  15. Lee, H., Chang, S., Seong, S., Lee, S., Kang, S., & Choi, B. (2002). Analysis of student-student interaction in interactive science inquiry experiment. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 22(3), 660-670.
  16. Lim, H., Cha, J., & Noh, T. (1999). The relationships of verbal behaviors with learning variables in cooperative learning environments, and middle school students' perceptions of cooperative learning. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 21(3), 487-496.
  17. Lim, H., Park, S., & Noh, T. (1999). The relationships between verbal behaviors and academic achievement in cooperative learning. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 19(3), 367-376.
  18. Ministry of Education, Science and Technology (2011). Science curriculum. Ministry of Education, Science and Technology report 2011-361.
  19. Nadler, L. B., Keeshan-Nadler, M., & Broome, B. J. (1985). Culture and the management of conflict situations. In W. Gudykunst, L. Stewart, & S. Ting-Toomey (Eds.), Communication, culture, and organizational processes, (pp. 87-113). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
  20. Oetzel, J. G. (1998a). Culturally homogeneous and heterogeneous groups: Explaining communication processes through individualism-collectivism and self-construal. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 22(2), 135-161. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0147-1767(98)00002-9
  21. Oetzel, J. G. (1998b). Explaining individual communication processes in homogeneous and heterogeneous groups through individualism-collectivism and self-construal. Human Communication Research, 25(2), 202-224. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.1998.tb00443.x
  22. Oliveira, A. W., & Sadler, T. D. (2008). Interactive patterns and conceptual convergence during student collaborations in science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 45(5), 634-658. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20211
  23. Park, J., Seong, S., & Choi, B. (2010). The influence of the inclusive leader on group interactions in science inquiry experiments. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 30(1), 124-139.
  24. Putnam, J. (1997). Cooperative learning in diverse classrooms (pp. 135-139). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill, Prentice-Hall.
  25. Schulz-Hardt, S., Jochims, M., & Frey, D. (2002). Productive conflict in group decision making: Genuine and contrived dissent as strategies to counteract biased information seeking. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 88(2), 563-586. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0749-5978(02)00001-8
  26. Sung, Y. (2006). Task conflict and relation conflict in teams (Master's thesis). Seoul National University.
  27. Tao, P. K., & Gunstone, R. F. (1999). Conceptional change in science through collaborative learning at the computer. International Journal of Science Education, 21(1), 39-57. https://doi.org/10.1080/095006999290822
  28. Ting-Toomey S. (1994). Managing intercultural conflicts effectively. In L. Samovar, & R. Porter (Eds.), Intercultural communication: A reader, (pp. 360-372). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Pub.
  29. Triandis, H. C. (1995). Individualism and collectivism (pp. 43-80). Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
  30. You, J., & Noh, T. (2012). An analysis of verbal interaction among science-gifted students in inquiry learning based on analogical experimental design strategy emphasizing understanding and checking stages. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 32(4), 671-685.
  31. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes (pp. 79-91). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  32. Wagner, J. A., III. (1995). Studies of individualism-collectivism: Effects on cooperation in groups. Academy of Management Journal, 38(1), 152-172. https://doi.org/10.2307/256731
  33. Webb, N. M. (1985). Student interaction and learning in small groups: A research summary. In R. Slavin, S. Sharan, S. Kagan, R. Hertz- Lazarowitz, C. Webb, & R. Schmuck (Eds.), Learning to cooperate, cooperating to learn (pp. 147-172). New York, NY: Plenum Press.
  34. Webb, N. M., & Farivar, S.(1994). Promoting helping behavior in cooperative small group in middle school mathematics. American Educational Research Journal, 31(3), 369-395. https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312031002369

피인용 문헌

  1. An Analysis for Gender-Role Stereotyping of Texts and Illustrations in Elementary Science Textbooks developed under 2009 Revised National Curriculum vol.35, pp.4, 2016, https://doi.org/10.15267/keses.2016.35.4.454
  2. 스마트 기기를 활용한 소집단 과학 학습에서 학생의 언어적 상호작용 분석 vol.61, pp.3, 2014, https://doi.org/10.5012/jkcs.2017.61.3.104
  3. 네트워크 분석을 통한 국내 과학교육 질적 연구동향 분석 vol.10, pp.3, 2014, https://doi.org/10.15523/jksese.2017.10.3.290
  4. 중등 예비 화학교사의 해결자·청취자 활동을 통한 지필평가 문항 제작 과정에서 언어적 행동 및 상호작용 vol.38, pp.5, 2014, https://doi.org/10.14697/jkase.2018.38.5.611
  5. 고등학생의 증강현실을 활용한 협력적 과학 개념학습에서 나타나는 언어적·물리적 상호작용 vol.40, pp.2, 2020, https://doi.org/10.14697/jkase.2020.40.2.191
  6. 키워드 네트워크 분석을 통해 살펴본 초등학생이 인식하는 과학 학습 참여의 의미 vol.39, pp.2, 2020, https://doi.org/10.15267/keses.2020.39.2.255