한국과학교육학회지 (Journal of The Korean Association For Science Education)

  • 제34권3호
  • /
  • Pages.197-206
  • /
  • 2014
  • /
  • 1226-5187(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2288-8489(eISSN)
한국과학교육학회 (The Korean Association for Science Education)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

중학교 1학년 상태변화 실험수행과정에서 나타난 예비과학교사의 논증구조 및 이에 영향을 미치는 요인과 예비교사교육에 대한 인식 분석

An Analysis of Pre-Service Science Teachers' Argument Structures, the Factors Affecting the Practice of State Change Experiment in 7th Grade and Cognition of Pre-Service Education

  • 투고 : 2013.11.15
  • 심사 : 2014.02.26
  • 발행 : 2014.05.30
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

이 연구에서는 중등 교육과정의 실험을 수행하는 과정에서 예비과학교사의 논증구조를 분석함으로써 예비과학교사의 탐구 능력과 탐구에 대한 인식을 조사하고자 한다. 사범대학교 4학년에 재학 중인 예비과학교사 9명을 대상으로 하였으며, 중학교 1학년 과학교과서의 상태변화에 관한 실험을 수행하였다. 예비교사들의 실험 보고서는 Toulmin의 논증구조를 분석틀로 분석되었다. 또한 설문지를 통해 과학과 실험에 대한 인식조사를 하였으며, 반구조화된 면담을 실시하였다. 연구결과, 예비교사들의 논증에는 과학지식의 결핍, 탐구 능력 미흡, 오차에 대한 신념, 추가 근거자료가 영향을 미쳤다. 이러한 연구결과를 통해 예비교사들의 실험 탐구능력 수준은 미흡하며, 예비교사 교육과정을 재구성하여 교사교육 프로그램을 통해 탐구 실험을 경험할 수 있는 기회를 제공할 필요가 있다고 주장하였다.

The purpose of this study is to research pre-service chemistry teachers' inquiry ability and perception on inquiry by analyzing their argument structure. Nine graduating senior students have participated in this study. They have experimented with mass change during state change, which is included in 7th grade science textbook. We have analyzed pre-service teachers' experimental reports using Toulmin's argument model. Also, we have researched their views on science and experiments through questionnaires and semi-structured interviews. As results show, various factors have affected pre-services' argument structures; lack of science knowledge and inquiry ability, belief about error, and additive data. This study shows that pre-service teachers' inquiry abilities is insufficient, and it is necessary to review rearrangement of pre-service science teacher curriculum in order to offer inquiry experiments in teacher education program.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Abd-El-Khalick, F., & Lederman, N. G. (2000). Improving science teacher's conceptions of science: A critical review of the literature. International Journal of Science Education, 22(7), 665-701. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690050044044
  2. An, Y. L., & Kim, H. J. (2011). Recognition of the nature of science by preservice science teachers on the basis of the atomic model. Journal of the Korean Association for Research in Science Education, 31(4), 539-556.
  3. Bang, E. J., & Paik, S. H. (2010). An analysis of middle school teachers' orientations toward teaching science (OST) and factors affecting OTS. Journal of the Korean Association for Research in Science Education, 30(6), 719-738.
  4. Bufflera, A., Lubbenb, F., & Ibrahima, B. (2009). The relationship between students' views of the nature of science and their views of the nature of scientific measurement. International Journal of Science Education, 31(9), 1137-1156. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690802189807
  5. Chang, H. (2012). Can historical experiments improve scientific education. 2012 First IHPST Asian Regional Conference. Seoul National University (SNU), Seoul, South Korea, 18-20 October, 2012.
  6. Choi, B. S. (2009). Research of chemistry textbooks and teaching. Seoul: Free Academy.
  7. Choi, J., & Seo, H. Y. (2012). Effect of Inquiry-based biology program on pre-service science teachers' perceptions on the nature of science and affective domain of science. Journal of the Korean Association for Research in Science Education, 32(5), 879-889.
  8. Dodick, J., Argan, S., & Chase, P. (2009). Understanding scientific methodology in the historical classrooms. Science Education, 84(3), 287-312.
  9. Fairbrother, R., & Hackling, M. (1997). Is this the right answer? International Journal of Science Education, 19(8), 887-894. https://doi.org/10.1080/0950069970190802
  10. Gess-Newsome, J. (1999). Pedagogical content knowledge: An introduction and orientation. In J, Gess-Newsome & N. Lederman (Eds). Examining pedagogical content knowledge. MA: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
  11. Gray, R., & Kang, N., H. (2014) The structure of science arguments by secondary science teachers: Comparison of experimental and historical science topics. International Journal of Science Education, 36(1), 46-65. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2012.715779
  12. Han, G. B., Min, H. J., & Paik, S. H. (2012). The teachers' and students' perceptions on lectures and experiments of law of definite proportion in middle school science classes. Journal of the Korean Chemical Society, 56(1), 144-158. https://doi.org/10.5012/jkcs.2012.56.1.144
  13. Han, Y. H. (2012). Development of classroom inquiry model to improve scientific communication ability (Doctoral dissertation). Korea National University of Education, Chungbuk.
  14. Hyun, N. S. (2010). Use of Toulmin's argumentation in humanities writing. Thinking and Representation, 3(2), 63-97.
  15. Jho, H. K., & Song, J. W. (2011). The observation type of primary students and the effect of their views of science on observation activity in anomalous situation. Elementary Science Education, 30(4), 405-414.
  16. Kim, H. H. (2011). Secondary science teacher's views about the nature of science and relationship to their pedagogical content knowledge (Master's thesis). Korea National University of Education, Chungbuk.
  17. Kim, H. K., & Song, J. W. (2003). Middle school students' idea about the purposes of laboratory work. Journal of the Korean Association for Research in Science Education, 23(3), 254-264.
  18. Kim, J., Jeon, E., & Paik, S. (2007). The analysis of the nature of science views of science textbook, science teacher and high school students. Journal of the Korean Association for Research in Science Education, 27(9), 809-817.
  19. Kim, J. N., & Kwon, J. S. (2005). The types of students' responses to anomalous situations in physics - Observation, perception about observation, belief change about preconception, contents and types of suggested experiments, cognitive conflict level by the belief change. Journal of the Korean Association for Research in Science Education, 25(2), 162-172.
  20. Kim, J. Y., Han, J. E., & Park, J. S. (2012). The analysis of inquiry activities in high school chemistry II textbooks on the revised 2009 curriculum. Journal of the Korean Association for Research in Science Education, 32(5), 928-937.
  21. Kim, Y., Park J., Park, J., Kim, Y., & Lee, H. (2008). A research of setting new subject education course and teaching contents development to seek substantiality of science teacher training. Seoul: Education Ministry.
  22. Kim, Y. K. (2006). Analysis of science teachers' philosophical views on science(Doctoral thesis). Korea National University of Education, Chungbuk.
  23. Lederman, N. G. (1992). Students' and teachers' conceptions of the nature of science: A review of the research. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 20(4), 331-359.
  24. Lee, E. M., & Kim, B. K. (2012). A study on secondary school students' reasoning types about measurement. Journal of the Korean Association for Research in Science Education, 32(2), 293-305.
  25. Lee, S. K., Lee, G. H., Choi, C. I., & Sin, M. K. (2012). Analyzing Coordination of Theory and Evidence Presented in Pre-service Elementary Teachers' Science Writing for Inquiry Activities, Journal of the Korean Association for Research in Science Education, 32(2), 201-209.
  26. Marriam, S. B. (1998). Qualitative research and case study application in education. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
  27. Nam, J. H., Mayer, V. J., Choi, J. H., & Lim, J. H. (2007). Pre-service science teachers' understanding of the nature of science. Journal of the Korean Association for Research in Science Education, 27(3), 253-262.
  28. Noh, T. H., Lim, H. Y., & Kang, S. J. (2000). Types of students' responses to anomalous data. Journal of the Korean Association for Research in Science Education, 20(2), 288-296.
  29. Paik, S. H., & Kim, S. K. (2002). A survey of secondary school science teachers' thinking on classifying phenomena related to dissolution of ionic compound and acid into physical and chemical change. Journal of the Korean Chemical Society, 46(6), 561-568. https://doi.org/10.5012/jkcs.2002.46.6.561
  30. Park, K. W. (2011). A comparative analysis on the science experiment lesson thinking process between elementary school beginning teachers and experienced teachers. The Journal of Elementary Education, 24(3), 273-296.
  31. Toulmin, S. E. (2003). The uses of argument. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
  32. Tsai, C. C. (1999). Laboratory exercises help me memorize the scientific truths: A study of eight graders scientific epistemological views and learning in laboratory activities. Science Education, 83(6), 654-674. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-237X(199911)83:6<654::AID-SCE2>3.0.CO;2-Y
  33. Windschitl, M., Thompson, J., & Braaten, M.(2008). Beyond the scientific method model-based inquiry as a new paradigm of preference for school science investigations. Science Education, 92(5), 941-967. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20259
  34. Yoon, H. G. (2011). Pre-service elementary teachers' inquiry on a model of magnetism and changes in their views of scientific models. Elementary Science Education, 30(3), 353-366.
  35. Yoon, H. G., Jung, Y. J., Kim, M. J., Park, Y. S., & Kim, B. S. (2012). Examing pre-service elementary teachers' views on science inquiry teaching during peer teaching practice, Elementary Science Education, 31(3), 334-346.

피인용 문헌

  1. An Investigation on Pre-service Chemistry Teachers’ Difficulties in Practice of Inquiry-based Experiment vol.59, pp.5, 2015, https://doi.org/10.5012/jkcs.2015.59.5.434
  2. 생물실험수업에서 나타난 예비교사와 경력교사의 반성적 사고에 관한 사례연구 vol.45, pp.2, 2017, https://doi.org/10.15717/bioedu.2017.45.2.305
  3. Analysis of Argument Structure presented in Pre-service Biology Teachers’ Writing on Socio-Scientific Issue vol.46, pp.1, 2014, https://doi.org/10.15717/bioedu.2018.46.1.55
  4. 머신 러닝을 활용한 과학 논변 구성 요소 코딩 자동화 가능성 탐색 연구 vol.38, pp.2, 2018, https://doi.org/10.14697/jkase.2018.38.2.219
  5. 예비 지구과학 교사의 교수학습지도안에 나타난 논증 수준 분석 vol.14, pp.2, 2021, https://doi.org/10.15523/jksese.2021.14.2.123