References
- Weinberg M, Sadowsky C. Resolution of mandibular arch crowding in growing patients with Class I malocclusions treated nonextraction. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1996;110:359-64. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0889-5406(96)70035-5
- Fleming PS, DiBiase AT, Sarri G, Lee RT. Comparison of mandibular arch changes during alignment and leveling with 2 preadjusted edgewise appliances. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2009;136:340-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2007.08.030
- Burke SP, Silveira AM, Goldsmith LJ, Yancey JM, Van Stewart A, Scarfe WC. A meta-analysis of mandibular intercanine width in treatment and postretention. Angle Orthod 1998;68:53-60.
- Mills JR. The long-term results of the proclination of lower incisors. Br Dent J 1966;120:355-63.
- Little RM. Stability and relapse of mandibular anterior alignment: University of Washington studies. Semin Orthod 1999;5:191-204. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1073-8746(99)80010-3
- Harradine NW. Self-ligating brackets: where are we now? J Orthod 2003;30:262-73. https://doi.org/10.1093/ortho/30.3.262
- Eberting JJ, Straja SR, Tuncay OC. Treatment time, outcome, and patient satisfaction comparisons of Damon and conventional brackets. Clin Orthod Res 2001;4:228-34. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0544.2001.40407.x
- Harradine NW. Self-ligating brackets and treatment efficiency. Clin Orthod Res 2001;4:220-7.
- Kim H, Kim KY, Kang YG, Kim SH, Kook YA. Clinical considerations with self-ligating brackets. Korean J Orthod 2006;36:474-82.
- Pandis N, Polychronopoulou A, Makou M, Eliades T. Mandibular dental arch changes associated with treatment of crowding using self-ligating and conventional brackets. Eur J Orthod 2010;32:248-53. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejo/cjp123
- Damon DH. The rationale, evolution and clinical application of the self-ligating bracket. Clin Orthod Res 1998;1:52-61.
- Damon DH. The Damon low-friction bracket: a biologically compatible straight-wire system. J Clin Orthod 1998;32:670-80.
- Pandis N, Polychronopoulou A, Katsaros C, Eliades T. Comparative assessment of conventional and self-ligating appliances on the effect of mandibular intermolar distance in adolescent nonextraction patients: a single-center randomized controlled trial. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2011;140:e99-105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2011.03.019
- Cattaneo PM, Treccani M, Carlsson K, Thorgeirsson T, Myrda A, Cevidanes LH, et al. Transversal maxillary dento-alveolar changes in patients treated with active and passive self-ligating brackets: a randomized clinical trial using CBCT-scans and digital models. Orthod Craniofac Res 2011;14:222-33. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1601-6343.2011.01527.x
- Scott P, DiBiase AT, Sherriff M, Cobourne MT. Alignment efficiency of Damon3 self-ligating and conventional orthodontic bracket systems: a randomized clinical trial. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2008;134:470.e1-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2008.08.001
- Richmond S, Shaw WC, Roberts CT, Andrews M. The PAR Index (Peer Assessment Rating): methods to determine outcome of orthodontic treatment in terms of improvement and standards. Eur J Orthod 1992;14:180-7. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejo/14.3.180
- Birkeland K, Furevik J, Bøe OE, Wisth PJ. Evaluation of treatment and post-treatment changes by the PAR Index. Eur J Orthod 1997;19:279-88. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejo/19.3.279
- Stalpers MJ, Booij JW, Bronkhorst EM, Kuijpers- Jagtman AM, Katsaros C. Extraction of maxillary first permanent molars in patients with Class II Division 1 malocclusion. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2007;132:316-23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2006.01.034
- Freitas KM, Freitas DS, Valarelli FP, Freitas MR, Janson G. PAR evaluation of treated Class I extraction patients. Angle Orthod 2008;78:270-4. https://doi.org/10.2319/042307-206.1
- Tweed CH. The application of the principles of the edgewise arch in the treatment of class II, division 1, malocclusion. Angle Orthod 1936;6:198-208.
- Peck S. So what's new? Arch expansion, again. Angle Orthod 2008;78:574-5. https://doi.org/10.2319/0003-3219-78.3.574
- Pandis N, Polychronopoulou A, Eliades T. Selfligating vs conventional brackets in the treatment of mandibular crowding: a prospective clinical trial of treatment duration and dental effects. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2007;132:208-15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2006.01.030
- Kuijpers-Jagtman AM, Al Yami EA, van't Hof MA. Long-term stability of orthodontic treatment. Ned Tijdschr Tandheelkd 2000;107:178-81.
- Tecco S, Tetè S, Perillo L, Chimenti C, Festa F. Maxillary arch width changes during orthodontic treatment with fixed self-ligating and traditional straight-wire appliances. World J Orthod 2009;10:290-4.
- Yu YL, Tang GH, Gong FF, Chen LL, Qian YF. A comparison of rapid palatal expansion and Damon appliance on non-extraction correction of dental crowding. Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue 2008;17:237-42.
- DiBiase AT, Nasr IH, Scott P, Cobourne MT. Duration of treatment and occlusal outcome using Damon3 self-ligated and conventional orthodontic bracket systems in extraction patients: a prospective randomized clinical trial. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2011;139:e111-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2010.07.020
- Machibya FM, Bao X, Zhao L, Hu M. Treatment time, outcome, and anchorage loss comparisons of self-ligating and conventional brackets. Angle Orthod 2013;83:280-5. https://doi.org/10.2319/041912-326.1
- Poulton D, Vlaskalic V, Baumrind S. Treatment outcomes in 4 modes of orthodontic practice. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2005;127:351-4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2004.04.022
- Ileri Z, Basciftci FA, Malkoc S, Ramoglu SI. Comparison of the outcomes of the lower incisor extraction, premolar extraction and non-extraction treatments. Eur J Orthod 2012;34:681-5. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejo/cjr064
- Hess DR. Retrospective studies and chart reviews. Respir Care 2004;49:1171-4.
Cited by
- Premaxillary Distraction Osteogenesis Using an Intraoral Appliance for Unilateral Cleft Lip and Palate: Case Report vol.52, pp.4, 2014, https://doi.org/10.1597/14-105
- Cone Beam Computed Tomography-based Evaluation of the Anterior Teeth Position Changes obtained by Passive Self-ligating Brackets vol.17, pp.8, 2014, https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10024-1901
- Three-dimensional digital cast analysis of the effects produced by a passive self-ligating system vol.38, pp.6, 2014, https://doi.org/10.1093/ejo/cjv089
- Maxillary expansion in an animal model with light, continuous force vol.88, pp.3, 2014, https://doi.org/10.2319/070717-451.1
- Quantitative measures of gingival recession and the influence of gender, race, and attrition vol.19, pp.1, 2014, https://doi.org/10.1186/s40510-017-0199-4
- Comparison of wala ridge and dental arch dimensions changes after orthodontic treatment using a passive self-ligating system or conventional fixed appliance vol.30, pp.3, 2019, https://doi.org/10.4103/ijdr.ijdr_361_18
- Effect of Conventional Versus Passive Self-Ligating Vestibular Appliances on Torque, Tip and Transverse Dental Changes in Patients Affected by Class I Malocclusion: A Retrospective Study vol.21, pp.suppl1, 2021, https://doi.org/10.1590/pboci.2021.106
- Cephalometric predictors for optimal soft tissue profile outcome in adult Asian class I subjects treated via extraction and non-extraction. A retrospective study vol.19, pp.4, 2021, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ortho.2021.08.002