Improvement Plans on Defect Consulting Report in an Apartment Building through Analyzing on Formal Index and Quantitative Index

형식 및 질적요소 체계분석을 통한 공동주택 하자감정서의 개선방안

The main issue of defect dispute is consulting, reviewing, and finally judging as an arbiter. A defect consulting is represented a defect consulting report, but a business custom and a standard of judgment are different each consultants, and have many problems. This study reviews literature studies and institutional researches, set up a research structure. it has 7 indexes that 5 indexes are formal indexes, and the other are qualitative indexed. As a result of case study, formal indexes are respect on the whole. However, each appraiser has different ideas, and, is expected to delay on fixing a construction lawsuit practice. This study suggests to improve a defect consulting report, it is followed. In formal part, suggested to change configuration is adjusted and integrated similar items. In qualitative part, an evaluation system for appraiser and an education program for engineers is suggested.

공동주택의 하자감정과 관련된 다양한 문제점에 대한 개선을 하기 위하여, 본 연구에서는 선행연구와 관련기준 등을 분석하여 하자감정서의 분석체계를 마련하였다. 이를 활용하여 하자감정서 24건을 분석하였고 형식 요소와 질적 요소를 검토한 결과, 형식 요소의 경우 구성을 다소 변경하는 수준으로 손쉬운 대안을 제안하였다. 질적 요소를 분석한 결과, 감정인에 대한 평가제도와 참여기술자에 대한 전문교육제도의 마련을 통해 하자감정의 내실화를 강화할 수 있을 것으로 기대된다.