Journal of Korean Society of Transportation (대한교통학회지)

Korean Society of Transportation (대한교통학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Weights of Attributes in Creating Transit Malls

대중교통전용지구의 조성목적에 따른 계획요소별 중요도 평가

  • Park, Jong-Il (National Infrastructure Research Division, Korea Research Institute for Human Settlement) ;
  • Chang, Justin S. (Department of Environmental Planning, Seoul National University)
  • 박종일 (국토연구원 국토인프라연구본부) ;
  • 장수은 (서울대학교 환경계획학과)
  • Received : 2014.01.06
  • Accepted : 2014.03.14
  • Published : 2014.04.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

This paper assessed the weights of attributes in creating transit malls. The aim of the creation was classified as travel demand management and urban revitalization. The attributes were grouped into four aspects, or 4As: attraction, amenity, accessibility, and activity. These dimensions represented land-use, urban design, transport, and socio-cultural characteristics, respectively. The analytical hierarchy process was applied to explore the weights. Accessibility(52.7%), attraction(25.6%), amenity(13.7%), and activity(8.0%) were the order of magnitude in weights for the purpose of travel demand management, while attraction(36.1%), accessibility(30.6%), amenity(17.7%), and activity(15.6%) were that of urban revitalization. The multi criteria analysis also showed different size of weights in the sub planning attributes. These results indicate that the aimin implementingtransit malls should be differentiated and highlight that the combined land-use and transport plan is essential for the successful development. Car accessibility and socio-cultural characteristics are also understood as the important factors.

이 연구는 대중교통전용지구의 조성목적에 따른 계획요소별 중요도 평가에 관한 것이다. 대중교통전용지구의 조성목적은 교통수요관리형과 지역활성화추진형으로 구분하였다. 이를 바탕으로 계획요소를 토지이용, 도시설계, 교통, 사회문화 특성으로 분류하고 이를 4As(Attraction, Amenity, Accessibility, Activity)라 명명하였다. AHP(Analytical Hierarchy Process) 기법을 통해 각 조성목적별로 계획요소의 중요도를 평가한 결과, 교통수요관리형은 교통(52.7%), 토지이용(25.6%), 도시설계(13.7%), 사회문화(8.0%) 순으로, 지역활성화추진형은 토지이용(36.1%), 교통(30.6%), 도시 설계(17.7%), 사회문화(15.6%) 순으로 도출되었다. 또한, 조성목적별로 세부계획요소의 중요도에서도 차이가 나타났다. 이러한 결과는 대중교통전용지구의 조성목적을 구분할 필요가 있음을 뒷받침하며, 다양한 계획요소의 반영을 위해서는 교통부문 단독계획이 아닌 타 계획과의 연계가 필수적임을 시사한다. 또한 승용차 접근성이 배제요인이 아닌 선택요인이라는 것과 사회문화적 특성에 대한 고려도 필요함을 확인하였다.

Keywords

References

  1. Cervero R., Kockelman K. (1997), Travel Demand and the 3Ds; Density, Divesity, and Design, Transportation Research: D, 2(3), 119-219.
  2. Cho K. M., Cho Y. T. (2011), Analysis of Planning Factors for Transit-Oriented Development, J. Korean Urban Management Association, 24(3), 307-325.
  3. Ewing R., Cervero R. (2010), Travel and the Built Environment -A Meta-Analysis, Journal of the American Planning Association-, 76(3), 265-294 https://doi.org/10.1080/01944361003766766
  4. Han S. J., Park J. S., Jung Y. J. (2005), Prioritization of ASEAN Highway Development Using Analytic Hierarchy Process, J. Korean Soc. Transp., 23(1), Korean Society of Transportation, 55-66.
  5. Ko J. H., Yi C. (2012), Introducing Transit Malls in Seoul, Seoul Development Institute, 44-46.
  6. Ministry of Land, Transport and Maritime Affairs (2011a), 2nd Public Transport Master Plan(2012-2016), Gyeonggi-do, Korea.
  7. Ministry of Land, Transport and Maritime Affairs (2011b), Design and Operation Guideline of Transit Mall, Gyeonggi-do, Korea.
  8. Oh E. Y., Jeong B. H. (2012), A Study on the Relationship of Major Factors to Apply TOD using Structureal Equation Modeling (SEM), J. Korean Urban Management Association, 25(4), 31-56.
  9. Park S. H., Park E. G., Cho N. G., Lee W. G., Lee J. H. (2008), Integrative Approaches of Urban Planning and Transportation Planning towards Transit-oriented Urban Structure, Korea Research Institute for Human Settlements.
  10. Ryu Y. G., Lee S. Y. (2010), A Study on the Appraisal and Early Settlement of Joongang-ro Transit Mall, Daegu Gyeongbuk Development Institute, 37-85.
  11. Seo M. H., Kim S. Y. (2011), An Analysis on the Relationship between Planning Elements of urban Form and Travel Behavior Characteristics -Focus on Planning Policy for the Green City by Size and Locations-, J. Korea Planners Association, 46(4), 223-244.
  12. Shim A. R., Kang J. M. (2013), A Study on the Improvement measure for Transit Mall Plan Element by Applying the District Unit Plan Design Elements of Environment maintenance-type in Existing Commercial Area, 2013 Spring Conference Urban Design Institute of Korea, 335-342.
  13. Sung H. G., Park J. H., Kim D. J. (2007), Impact Analyses of Transit-Oriented Development and Revising Current Transportation and Urban Planning Laws for its Application in Korea, Korea Transportation Institute.

Cited by

  1. Analysis on Effectiveness of Transit Mall by Visitor Perception vol.34, pp.4, 2016, https://doi.org/10.7470/jkst.2016.34.4.330