DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Comparative study on the characteristics of professionalization between interior design and architecture - Comparison of the body of knowledge shown in the accrediting criteria of interior design and architecture education in the United States -

실내디자인과 건축학의 프로페션화에 나타나는 특성 비교 - 미국 실내디자인과 건축학의 교육인증기준에 나타난 전문지식영역 비교 -

  • 이종희 (서일대학교 실내디자인학과) ;
  • 김덕수 (국립한밭대학교 건축학과)
  • Received : 2013.11.25
  • Accepted : 2014.01.10
  • Published : 2014.04.30

Abstract

Professionalization of Korean interior design is not completed, considering the fact that accreditation and registration systems cannot be found in it. This study, initiated with this concern, analyzed the knowledge area of interior design and architecture in the United States while utilizing accreditation standards of CIDA and NAAB. The purpose of this study is to provide reference to consult for the professionalization of Korean interior design by showing the effects of standardized professional knowledge on professionalization. The utilized research method is a multiple case study, analyzing cases of interior design and architecture in the United States. The unit of analysis is accrediting criteria, including present and revised versions. Content analysis was conducted to interpretate qualitative data collected. The research results include that knowledge differences between interior design and architecture are not clear. This study concludes that standardized professional knowledge emphasizes the technicality elements of knowledge to protect the health, safety and welfare of the public instead of indeterminacy elements. The research results imply that knowledge standardization concerning HSW can be a critical step to professionalization because it can show a jurisdictional boundary as a unique profession.

Keywords

References

  1. 김덕수, 갈등의 영역; 실내디자인의 지식체계와 건강, 안전, 복지에토스와의 갈등, 한국실내디자인학회논문집 제21권 6호, 2012
  2. 박찬일, 국내 실내디자인 관련학과 교과과정 현황과 특성에 관한 연구, 한국실내디자인학회논문집 제25권 5호, 2012
  3. 서수경, 한국 대학 실내디자인 관련 교육 현황 분석과 개선 방향 연구, 한국실내디자인학회논문집 제19권 6호, 2010
  4. 심은주, 박현수, 실내디자인학 연구에 대한 실무자들의 견해에 관한 고찰, 한국실내디자인학회논문집 제13권 4호, 2004
  5. 윤갑근, 김양지, 최승희, 실내건축 관련 자격검정의 개선방향에 관한 연구, 한국실내디자인학회논문집 제41호, 2003
  6. 이창노, 국내 실내디자인분야 관련법의 현황과 제도개선에 관한 연구, 한국실내디자인학회논문집 제22권 1호, 2013
  7. 임영숙, 21세기 한국실내디자인교육의 문제점 및 방향에 관한 연구, 한국실내디자인학회눈문집 제30호, 2002
  8. 장연화, 실내디자인 교과과정 표준화를 위한 기초연구; 미국 대학 사례를 중심으로, 한국실내디자인학회 학술발표대회논문집 제13권 2호, 2011
  9. Abbott, T.A., The System of Professions, The University of Chicago Press, 1988
  10. Begun, J.W., Economic and sociological approaches to professionalism. Work and Occupations, Vol.13 No.1, 1986
  11. Bogart, M.H., In search of a united front; American architectural sculpture at the turn of the century. Winterthur Portfolio, Vol.4 No.16, 1984
  12. Boreham, P., Indetermination; professional knowledge, organization and control, The Sociological Review, Vol.31 No.4, 1983
  13. Brown, J., Professional language; words that succeed. Radical History Review, Vol.34 1986
  14. Freidson, E., Professional Power; A Study of the Institutionalization of Formal Knowledge, The University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 1986
  15. Freidson, E., Professionalism Reborn; Theory, Prophecy and Policy, Polity, Cambridge, 1994
  16. Freidson, E., Professionalism; The Third Logic, The University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 2001
  17. Friedman, M. Capitalism and Freedom, The University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 1982
  18. Halliday, T.C., Knowledge mandate, The British Journal of Sociology, Vol.97 No.4, 1985
  19. Halpern, S.A., Dynamics of professional control; internal coalitions and crossprofessional boundaries. American Journal of Sociology, Vol.97 No.4, 1992
  20. Harwood, B., Comparing the standards in interior design and architecture to assess similarities and differences, Journal of Interior Design Education and Research, Vol.17 No.1, 1991
  21. Hogan, D.B., The effectiveness of licensing, Law and Human Behavior, Vol.7No.2/3, 1983
  22. amous, J.&Peloille, B., Changes in the French niversity-hospital ystem. In JA Jackson(Ed.), Professions nd Professionalization, Cambridge University Press, 1970
  23. Less-Maffei, G., Introduction; professionalization as a focus in interior design history, Journal of Design History, Vol.21 No.1, 2008
  24. Martin, C.S., Rebuttal of the report by the Institute of Justice entitled Designing Cartels; how industry insiders cut out competition, Journal of Interior Design, Vol.30 No.2, 2008
  25. May, B. Nancy Vincent McClelland (1877-1959); professionalizing interior decoration in the early twentieth century, Journal of Design History, Vol.21 No.1, 2008
  26. Moody, D.M., A Factor Analysis of the Health, Safety, and Welfare in the Built Environment Toward Interior Design as Perceived by Building Industry Professionals, Unpublished Doctor Dissertation, University of Tennessee, 2012
  27. Pable, J., Interior design identity in the crossfire; a call for renewed balance in subjective and objective way of knowing, Journal of Interior Design, No.34, No.2, 2009
  28. Patel, V.L., Arocha, J.F. & Kaufman, D.R., Expertise and tacit knowledge in medicine. In R.J. Sternberg and J.A. Horvath (Eds.), Tacit knowledge in professional practice; research and practitioner perspectives. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ, 1999
  29. Rammert, W., New rules of sociological method; rethinking technology studies. British Journal of Sociology, Vol.48 No.2, 1997
  30. Roenisch, R. & Conway, H., Interior Design, in H. Conway(Ed.), Design History; A Students' Handbook, Unwin Hyman Ltd., London, 1987
  31. Stephen, F.H., The market failure justification for regulation of professional service markets and the characteristics of consumers, European Competition Law Annual, 2004
  32. Woodham, J.M., Design promotion, profession, and management, In Twentieth-Century Design, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1997