Journal of the Korea Academia-Industrial cooperation Society (한국산학기술학회논문지)

The Korea Academia-Industrial cooperation Society (한국산학기술학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

The Study on Development Factor Establishing According to SBCD's Conceptual Change

SBCD(School Based Curriculum Development)의 개념변화에 따른 개발요인 설정에 관한 연구

  • Received : 2013.12.19
  • Accepted : 2014.04.10
  • Published : 2014.04.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to discuss the factors according to SBCD conceptual change by literature analysis and FGI(focus group interview). It's to identify the problem of SBCD centered around world-wide and research trends. Also this study briefly surveys the current factors considered in SBCD. The results were as follows First, SBCD is able to be classified according to national curriculum level's acceptance degree. Second, each nation and school had a different understanding to the SBCD. Third, this study developed three domains(human, content, and environment) and nine factors(principals, teachers, students, parents, community people, regular curriculum, after school curriculum, other special programs, and school environment) based on literature analysis and FGI to develop SBCD. As observed by the above results, it will provide schools with the groundwork for discussion of increasing chances for successful curriculum development with continuous extending of SBCD.

본 연구는 학교중심교육과정개발(School Based Curriculum Development이하 SBCD)의 개념변화에 따라 개발상에 고려되어야 할 요인들이 무엇인지에 대해 알아보고자 문헌분석과 전문가협의회를 통해 고찰하였다. 전 세계적인 추세와 국내외의 연구동향을 중심으로 현재 SBCD가 안고 있는 문제점들을 진단하고 비중있게 고려되어야 할 개발요인들을 폭넓게 조망하였다. 연구의 결과 첫째, SBCD는 국가수준 교육과정의 수용정도에 따라 폭넓게 구분될 수 있다. 둘째, SBCD에 대한 국가와 단위학교의 이해가 상이했다. 셋째, 개발요인은 3가지 영역(인적 내용 환경영역)의 9가지 요인(직 간접 기타 참여요인, 정규 방과후 특별 교육과정, 지원체계, 교육환경, 분위기)으로 세분화할 수 있다. 효과적인 SBCD를 시도하려는 이해당사자들을 위해 SBCD의 개념변화에 따른 개발요인들을 다각적으로 고찰한 본 논문은 향후 지속적인 SBCD의 갱신과 실증연구를 위한 토대를 제공할 수 있을 것으로 기대한다.

Keywords

References

  1. Beattie. M, Thiessen. D, "School-based reconstructing and curriculum change", Curriculum Journal, 8, pp. 411-440, 1997. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0958517970080306
  2. Brady. L, "Curriculum development", New York: Prentice Hall, 1987.
  3. S. Y. Hong, Y. M. Kim, "A Study on Primary School Teacher's Attitute & Perception about SBCD", Korea Educational Problem Researc, 12, pp. 1-21, 1997.
  4. H. S. Choi, " A Teacher Ability Model Development to SBCD", Korea National university Education Graduate School of Management Doctorate Thesis, 2011.
  5. Skilbeck. M, "School-based curriculum development", London: Harper & Row, 1984.
  6. Bezzina. M, "Teachers' perceptions of their participation in SBCD", Curriculum Perspectives, 11(2), pp. 39-47, 1991.
  7. Sabar. N, "School-based curriculum development" Oxford: Pergamon Press, 1991.
  8. B. S. Gwak, "Curriculum explanation", Seoul: Kyoyookgwahaksa, 1987.
  9. J. C. Kim, "Curriculum And Evaluation", Seoul: Kyoyookgwahaksa, 2000.
  10. N. W. Kweon, "SBCD theory", Seoul: Hakgisa, 2008.
  11. The Joint Committee on Standards for Educational Evaluation, "The program evaluation standards(3rd ed.).", Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage publications, 2011.
  12. D. J. Kim, "SBCD Conceps & Management Factors" Journal of Research Education, 26(2), pp. 171-200, 2005.
  13. C. G. Son, "A Study on SBCD Model", Educational Research, 19, pp. 195-217. 2000.
  14. Chen. L, "Analysis on the effective development system of curriculum resources", US-China Education Review, 3(5), pp. 1-10, 2006.
  15. Fuquan. H, "Curriculum reform in contemporary China: Seven goals and six strategies", Journal of Curriculum Studies, 36(1), pp. 101-115, 2004. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/002202703200004742000174126
  16. Gopinathan. S, Deng. Z, "Fostering school-based curriculum development in the context of new educational initiatives", The Journal of Planning & Changing, 37, pp. 93-110. 2006.
  17. OECD, "School-based curriculum development", Paris: CEM/OECD, 2006.
  18. Lauridsen. D. A, "What are teachers' perception of the curriculum development process?", Doctorial dissertation, Ohio State University, 2003.
  19. G. H. Hwang, "Curriculum's Development & Management", Curriculum Research, 13, pp. 25-38, 1995.
  20. Kesson. K, Oyler. C, "Integrated curriculum and service learning: Linking school-based knowledge and social action", English Education, 31, pp. 135-149, 1999.
  21. Lo. Y, "SBCD: The Hong Kong experience", The Curriculum Journal, 10(3), pp. 419-442, 1999. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0958517990100307
  22. Hui. L, "SBCD: An interview study of chinese kindergartens" Early Childhood Education Journal, 33, 223-229. 2006. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10643-006-0061-7
  23. Shkedi. A, "SBCD workshops for teacher participation in curriculum development" Journal of curriculum studies, 28(6), pp. 699-712, 1996. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0022027980280605
  24. Rungnapa. N, "SBCD decision-making: A study of the Thailand reform experiment", Doctorial Dissertation, Indiana University, 2002.
  25. Law. E. H, Galton. M, Sally. Wai-Yan. Wan, "Developing curriculum leadership in schools: Hong Kong perspectives", Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 35, pp. 143-159, 2007. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13598660701268569
  26. Glatthorn. A. A, "Developing a quality curriculum", Alexandria, Virginia: ASCD, 1994.
  27. Marsh. C, & Willis. G, "Curriculum alternatives, ongoing issues(2nd ed.)", NJ: Prentice Hall, 1999.
  28. Doll. R. C, "Curriculum improvement", Boston: Allyn & Bacon, 2008.
  29. Tyler. R. W, "Basic principles of curriculum and instruction", Chicago, IL: The University Chicago Press, 1949.
  30. Schwab. J. J, "The Practical: A language for curriculum", School review, 78, pp. 1-23, 1969. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/442881
  31. Hogan, R, L. (2007). The historical development of program evaluation: Exploring the past and present. Online Journal of Workforce Education and Development, 2(4), 1-14.