Journal of the Korean Institute of Landscape Architecture (한국조경학회지)

The Korean Institute of Landscape Architecture (한국조경학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Study of Economic Assessment of Urban Park Management by Using Contingent Valuation Method - The Case of Busan APEC Memorial Park -

가상평가법(CVM)에 의한 도시공원의 관리운영에 대한 경제적 가치평가에 관한 연구 - 부산시 APEC기념공원을 대상으로 -

  • Received : 2014.01.22
  • Accepted : 2014.02.24
  • Published : 2014.04.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

This study evaluated economic value recognized by the residents for the pleasant urban park management using contingent valuation method(CVM) to APEC Memorial Park in Pusan in terms of private fund development for the management of the city park. As a result, the estimated amount payable by each household for the management of APEC Memorial Park in Busan was between 5,673 won and 8,358 won. If such amount is expanded to households in park hosting area, it was 2.2~2.3 times of the park management budget in 2012, which demonstrates the willingness to pay (WTP) of residents for pleasant park was higher than the management budget. Social factors of respondents affecting WTP for city park management operation included age, educational level and income level. Those with high age and high education level had higher WTP. And, WTP was much affected by the use of park and recognition of residents. In particular, those with high frequency in the use of parks had higher WTP, and the users with more than once per week had 1.1 times higher WTP than overall WTP. Then, the satisfaction of park rather than recognition of necessity of park had led to higher WTP. Accordingly, it is necessary to manage park facility management and use program operation to enhance park satisfaction and it is also required to develop a park culture distribution policy to link such recognition to donation.

본 연구는 도시공원의 관리운영을 위한 민간기금 조성측면에서 부산시 APEC기념공원을 대상으로 가상평가법(Contingent Valuation Method: CVM)을 이용하여, 쾌적한 도시공원 유지를 위한 거주민이 인식하는 경제적 가치를 평가했다. 그 결과, 부산시 APEC기념공원의 관리운영을 위해 월 가구당 지불 가능한 추정금액은 5,673원에서 8,358원으로 평가되었다. 추정금액을 공원 유치권역의 가구로 확대하여 살펴보면, 2012년 편성된 공원 관리예산의 2.2~3.3배 수준으로 분석되어, 지역 거주민들이 인식하는 쾌적한 공원 유지를 위해 지불의사금액이 편성된 관리예산보다 높은 것으로 나타났다. 그리고 도시공원의 관리운영을 위한 지불의사금액에 영향을 주는 응답자의 사회적 요인으로는 연령, 교육수준, 소득으로 분석되었으며, 연령대가 높고, 교육수준이 높은 응답자에서 지불의사가 높은 것으로 평가되었다. 또한, 거주민의 공원이용 및 인식에 따라 도시공원 관리운영을 위한 지불의사금액에 많은 영향을 미치고 있는 것으로 나타났다. 특히 공원이용 빈도가 높은 거주민이 지불의사가 높으며, 주1회 이상 공원이용자가 전체 지불의사금액보다 1.1배 높은 추정금액으로 평가되었다. 그리고 공원의 필요성을 인식하는 것보다 공원을 만족하는 것이 더 높은 지불의사금액으로 이어지는 것을 밝혀냈다. 따라서 공원 만족도 제고를 위한 공원시설관리 및 이용프로그램 운영이 필요하며, 공원에 대한 인식을 기부로 연결할 수 있는 공원문화 보급정책이 필요하다고 판단된다.

Keywords

References

  1. Aoyama, Yoshitaka, Ryaji Matsunaka and Hajime Nakagawa(2003) Economics of Urban Amenities -Measure the Value of the Environment-. Gakugei Publishing. 靑山吉隆, 松中亮治, 中川大(2003) 都市アメニの經濟學-環境の価値を 測る. 學藝出版社.
  2. Carson, R. T., R. C. Mitchell., W. M. Hanemann., R. J. Kopp., S. Presser and P. A. Ruud(1992) A contingent valuation study of lost passive use value resultin from the Exxon Valdez Oil Spill. Report to the Attorney General of the State of Alaska. Natural Resourse Damage Assessment, Inc., November.
  3. Choi, Y. M. and C. K. Park(1998) Evaluation of resource value on urban park -Using of contingent valuation method- Tourism Research 12: 421-436.
  4. Haeundae-gu(2007) 2007 Haeundaegu Annual Report. Haeundaegu.
  5. Han, S. Y., M. H. Lee., R. H. Yoo and J. J. Kim(2007) Estimating the stock value of Sobaeksan National Park -Application of turnbull distribution-free model-. Korean Institute of Forest Recreation 11(4): 37-45.
  6. Hanemann, W. M.(1984) Welfare evaluations in contingent valuation experiments with discrete response. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 66(3): 332-341. https://doi.org/10.2307/1240800
  7. Hanemann, W. M., J. Loomis and B. Kanninen(1991) Statistical efficiency of double-bounded dichotomous choice contingent valuation. American Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics 73(4): 1255-1263. https://doi.org/10.2307/1242453
  8. Hong, S. K.(1998) Economic valuation of Yeido Park -Application of double-bounded dichotomous choice contingent valuation method-. Journal of Korean Institute of Landscape Architecture 26(3): 90-103.
  9. Johansson, P. B., Kristrom and K. G. Maler(1989) Welfare evaluation in contingent valuation experiments with discrete response data - comment-. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 71: 1054-1055. https://doi.org/10.2307/1242684
  10. Kang, J. K. and S. K. Lee(2011) Valuation of natural resources for the National Seorak Park using a contingent valuation method: Value measuring on installation of cable cars. Journal of Tourism Sciences 35(4): 51-73.
  11. Kang, K. R., D. P. Kim and J. B. Baek(2012) Comparative study on monetary estimates of natural environment and cultural relics in Gyeongju National Park. Korean Journal of Environment and Ecology 26(2): 273-282.
  12. Kanninen, B. J.(1993) Optimal experimental design for double-bounded dichotomous choice contingent valuation. Land Economics 69(2): 138-146. https://doi.org/10.2307/3146514
  13. Kim, D. G., B. K. Yoo., J. G. Kim., H. K. Shin., H. S. Kim., K. S. Ahn and S. W. Jang(2012) Study on assessment of value of Yongdam Dam-wetland using contingent valuation method. Journal of Korean Wetlands Society 14(1): 147-158.
  14. Kim, H. B., J. H. Park and J. T. Park(2004) Impact analysis of the conversion of industrial sites to neighboring parks on a regional economy and regional welfare -The case of Seoul, Korea-. Journal of Korea Planners Association 39(3): 145-150.
  15. Kim, J. H.(2007) Valuing urban parks in Ulsan -Application of CVM with double-bounded dichotomous choice and test of inter-dependence of subsequent two answers-. Korean Policy Sciences Review 11(1): 151-177, 278.
  16. Kim, K. H. and K. H. Moon(2006) Vitality of the City, Greenways. Random House. 김기호, 문국현(2006) 도시의 생명력, 그린웨이. 랜덤하우스.
  17. Kim, Y. G., S. Y. Han and K. J. Zoh(2011) A study of urban park development and management through public-private partnership. Journal of Korean Institute of Landscape Architecture 39(3): 83-97.
  18. Kim, Y. H., Y. W. An and S. B. Park(2012) A study on the analysis of urban parks management in the Busan city -Focusing on the main agent of management-. Journal of Korean Institute of Landscape Architecture 40(6): 127-139. https://doi.org/10.9715/KILA.2012.40.6.127
  19. Ko, D. W., I. H. Yu and H. J. Kim(2009) An estimation of economic value on street plan for a walking tour -In the case of 'Welcome Avenue Project' in Gwacheon-. Journal of Korean Institute of Landscape Architecture 36(6): 12-21.
  20. Kuriyama, Koichi(1997) Value of the Environment and Public Works -CVM Guidebook-. Tsukijishokan. 栗山浩-(1997) 公共事業と環境の価値-CVMガイドブック-
  21. Kwak, S. J., S. K. Cho and S. H. Yoo(2002) The economic value of preserving Hallyue Marine National Park. -A case study of CVM-. Korean Economic Review 50(2): 85-104.
  22. Lee, Y. H., D. W. Kim and Y. S. Kim(2011) Evaluation on the economic value of the national assembly's fence opening using contingent valuation method(CVM). Journal of Social Science 18(1): 211-245.
  23. Lee, Y. H., S. H. Song and J. D. Kim(2008) Strategies for Overcoming the Provincial Revenue Crisis. Gyeonggi Research Institute.
  24. Lee, Z. M., K. Y. Cho and H. S. Park(1999) A study on measuring the consumer surplus of urban ecological park. Journal of Korea Planners Association 34(3): 159-168.
  25. Leem, Y. T. and J. Y. Lee(2005) An estimation of the value of urban ecological riverside park. Journal of the Korean Regional Development Association 17(3): 95-110. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1435-5597.1966.tb01343.x
  26. Minomo, Toshitaro(1989) City to Change of Parks and Open Space Problem. Reader Lively Park: 2-8. 蓑茂寿太郎(1989) 変動する都市の公園緑地問題. 公園いきいき読本: 2-8.
  27. Nam-gu(2007) 2007 Namgu Annual Report. Namgu.
  28. Noh, J. M. and I. S. Lee(2012) Differences due to the Distance in the Economic Valuation of Urban Parks and in the Factors that Influence the Evaluation. Journal of the Urban Design Institute of Korea 13(1): 143-154.
  29. Ohno, Eiji(2000) Practice of Environmental Economic Valuation. Keisoshobo. 大野栄治(2000) 環境経済評価の実務. 勁草書房.
  30. Park, C. K.(2006) Evaluation of resource value on urban park -Using contingent valuation method-. Journal of the Economic Geographical Society of Korea 9(2): 211-224.
  31. Roh, H. J.(2007) Multivariate Statistical Analysis of the Data by SPSS. Hyosan. 노형진(2007) Spss에 의한 다변량 데이터의 통계분석. 효산.
  32. Shim, J. W. and J. H. Koo(2006) Estimating the value of the classified school park project by contingent valuation method(CVM). Seoul Studies 7(3): 51-64.
  33. Sim, K. W.(2012) Estimating the economic value of environmental resources for systematic national park management -A case of Jirisan National Park-. Korean Institute of Forest Recreation 16(1): 121-126.
  34. Son, H. G. and K. H. Kim(1998) An estimation of conservation value in outdoor recreation resources -Application of CVM for the Kyongju Hwangsong Park-. Korean Journal of Tourism Research 11: 127-139.