DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Study on the Preparedness of Port State Control for the Enforcement of NIR

NIR의 도입에 따른 항만국통제 대응방안에 관한 소고

  • Kim, Chu-Hyong (Ministry of Oceans and Fisheries, Busan Regional Maritime affairs & Port Administration)
  • 김주형 (해양수산부, 부산지방해양항만청)
  • Received : 2014.02.10
  • Accepted : 2014.03.06
  • Published : 2014.04.30

Abstract

NIR(New Inspection Regime, hereinafter NIR) relating to the PSC(Port State Contorl, hereinafter PSC) has implemented in Asia-Pacific region under Tokyo-MOU from last January 2014. The most noticable difference between NIR and existing TF(Target Factor, hereinafter TF) is to evaluate company performance and to conduct PSC with flexible inspection interval on the basis of Ship Risk Profile; High Risk Ship, Standard Risk Ship and Low Risk Ship. Particularly deficiencies related to ISM Code, more than 5 deficiencies and detention record have a serious effect on the evaluation of Ship Risk Profile. Therefore ship and company are requested to ensure proper implementation of Safety Management System for the changed PSC tendency. Also RO(Recognized Organization, hereinafter RO) and Administration respectively should take suitable actions different to previous measures, such as implementation of cooperation and support system between vessel and company, changing subject and object for avoiding Mannerism in SMS audit, strengthening supervision on RO by Administration and establishment of private-public Partnership network.

2014년 1월부터 아 태지역 Tokyo-MOU에서는 새로운 점검체제인 NIR를 도입하여 항만국통제(PSC)를 시행하고 있다. NIR의 가장 큰 특징은 기존 TF방식과 달리 회사의 안전관리수준까지 평가하여 선박의 위험도 수준을 고위험, 표준위험, 저위험 선박 등 3단계로 분류하고 그 수준에 따라 PSC 점검주기를 달리하는 것이다. 특히, 국제안전경영(ISM)코드의 안전관리체제(SMS)와 관련된 결함과 6개이상의 결함수, 출항정지이력 등은 선박의 위험도수준 평가에 큰 영향을 미치게 되었다. 이에 따라 선박과 회사들은 변화된 PSC환경에 대비하기 위하여 종전과는 다른 안전관리체제의 적절한 이행과 시스템 보장이 각별히 요구된다. 정부대행기관 및 주관청에서도 기존과는 다른 새로운 PSC 대응방안이 필요하다. 구체적으로는 선박과 회사간 유기적인 협력과 지원체제 강화, 심사주체와 객체의 변경을 통한 타성 극복, 정부대행기관에 대한 주관청의 관리감독 강화 그리고 민 관 협력체제 운영을 위한 네트워크 구축 등의 방안이 있다.

Keywords

References

  1. ClassNK(2013), Port State Control Annual Report.
  2. Jang, W. J(2010), "A Study on Target Factor Value of Port State Control Inspection Using Absolute Measurement", Journal of Navigation and Port Research, Vol. 34, No. 6, p. 472.
  3. Kim, H. Y(2013), "A Study on Development of Safety Management Evaluation Index for Shipping Company", Journal of the Korean Society of Marine Environment & Safety, Vol. 19, No. 6, p. 632. https://doi.org/10.7837/kosomes.2013.19.6.629
  4. Lee, S. I, Lee, Y. C(2011), "A Study on the Regional Codification of Port State Control", Maritime Law Review, Vol. 23, No. 3, p. 162.
  5. Ministry of Oceans & Fisheries(2013), Asia-Pacific Port State Control Manual(2013.2. revision).
  6. Paris MOU(2013), 2012 Annual Report on Port State Control.
  7. Park. Y. S.(2007), "A Study on the Remedial Measures Against Unreasonable Port State Control Orders", Ph.D. Thesis in KMOU, pp. 121-122.
  8. Tokyo MOU(2013), Annual Report on Port State Control in the Asia-Pacific Region 2012.

Cited by

  1. A Study on Ships of KRS Registered the analyses of Detentions for Port State Control vol.28, pp.1, 2016, https://doi.org/10.13000/JFMSE.2016.28.1.34
  2. Application of SPS Code and analysis on status of Port State Control in Korea fishery training ship vol.29, pp.3, 2017, https://doi.org/10.13000/JFMSE.2017.29.3.711