디지털융복합연구 (Journal of Digital Convergence)

  • 제12권2호
  • /
  • Pages.539-548
  • /
  • 2014
  • /
  • 2713-6434(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2713-6442(eISSN)
한국디지털정책학회 (The Society of Digital Policy and Management)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

자활사업 참여자의 정서적 자활과 사회적 자활의 영향요인 연구: 사회적응프로그램 참여자를 중심으로

Factors Affecting Emotional and Social Self-Sufficiency of Welfare-to-Work Recipients: Focused Social Adaptation Program

  • 이은정 (백석대학교 사회복지학부)
  • Lee, Eun Jung (Division of Social Welfare, Baekseok University)
  • 투고 : 2014.01.06
  • 심사 : 2014.02.20
  • 발행 : 2014.02.28
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

본 연구는 국민기초생활보장제도 자활사업의 탈수급 탈빈곤의 한계에도 불구하고 자활참여자의 복합적이고 다양한 근로장벽 특성상 자활 효과의 다차원적인 접근으로 정서적, 사회적 자활의 역할에 주목하고자 한다. 이를 위해 자활프로그램 중 심리사회적 어려움으로 가장 자활가능성이 취약한 사회적응프로그램 참여자의 정서적 자활과 사회적 자활의 효과 및 그 영향요인을 검증하고자 한다. 조사 대상은 전국의 사회적응프로그램 수행기관의 참여자를 대상으로 표집하였으며, 위계적 회귀분석(Hierarchical regression)이 검증에 활용되었다. 분석결과, 첫째, 사회적응프로그램 참여자의 정서적 자활 효과와 사회적 자활 효과는 보통 수준을 상회하는 것으로 나타났다. 둘째, 정서적 자활의 영향요인으로는 요보호가구원수(-)와 교육프로그램 만족도(+)가 유의미한 영향력이 있음이 밝혀졌고 사회적 자활에는 삶의 만족도(+), 조직유형, 교육프로그램 만족도(+), 건강서비스 만족도(+)가 긍정적 영향을 미치는 것으로 나타났다. 결론적으로 자활사업의 평가와 관련된 정서적, 사회적 측면의 자활효과 측정의 필요함을 밝히고 심리사회적 다양한 근로장벽을 지닌 자활참여자 특성에 적합한 통합사례관리 강화, 프로그램 개발 및 서비스 지원체계 등에 관한 정책적, 실천적 함의를 제시하였다.

This study aims to identify effects of welfare-to-work programs that helped welfare recipients promote emotional and social self-sufficiency, focused on social adaptation program for the hardest-to-employ poor with psychological and social work barriers. This study relied on data from mandatory social adaptation program participants among community self-sufficiency organizations in nationwide from December 2010 to January 2011 in South Korea. Hierarchical regression was used to analyze for this study. As a result, among participants, there were slightly than moderate level on emotional and social self-Sufficiency effects. The satisfaction of education program had positive effect both emotional and social self-sufficiency whereas that of health service only had positive effect on social self-sufficiency. Also, these emotional and social self-sufficiency effects differed between the number of needy family in household, type of organization and degree of satisfaction of life. This study suggests that discussion of implications for the development of welfare-to-work program and intervention that target psychological, emotional and social needs for recipients with work barriers.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. M. H. Shin, Characteristics of self-sufficiency program for welfare-to-work in Korea, Urbanity and Poverty, Vol. 84, pp. 69-92, 2007.
  2. Hawkins, R. L., From self-sufficiency to personal and family sustainability: A new paradigm for social policy, Journal of Sociology and Social Welfare, Vol. 32, No. 4, pp. 77-93, 2005.
  3. I. S. Kim, An exploration on the reconstruction of self-sufficiency concept : Focused on the self-sufficiency of the Prostitute, Korean Journal of Family Social Work, Vol. 22, pp. 95-129, 2008.
  4. D. M. Nor, The performance and issues of self-sufficiency program in Korea, Report of Self-Sufficiency, pp.157-178, 2006.
  5. H. H. Lee & W. T. Cho, Factors Influencing Self-Sufficiency Effect of Workfare in the Self-sufficiency Promotion Agency, Social Welfare Policy, Vol. 20, pp. 217-244, 2004.
  6. W. O. Jung & J. G. Kim, Subjective evaluation of public assistance recipients on the self-support programs and the future prospect on economic independency", Korean Journal of Social Welfare Studies, Vol. 28, pp. 35-67, 2005.
  7. Edwards, M. E., Plotnick, R., & Klawitter, M., Do attitudes and personal characteristics affect social economic outcomes? The case of welfare use by young women, Social Science Quartley, Vol. 82, No. 4, pp. 817-827, 2001.
  8. S. R. Lee & J. M. Jin, A study on the effects of the antipoverty policy in local community : focusing on the self-support system in Korea, Korean Journal of Social Welfare, Vol. 52, pp. 241-272. 2003.
  9. K. S. Park & N. H. Park, The Survey of Life of Poor Women and Self-Sufficiency Program, The Department of Women Policy, Gyeonggi-do, 2001.
  10. N. S. Kang, E. J. Shin & J. H. Sung, A study on the characteristics of women recipients and the factors related to their self-reliance in the national protection program", Korean Journal of Social Welfare Studies, Vol. 19. pp. 23-50, 2002.
  11. T. Y. Um, D. K. Kim & M. K. Heo, The study of relationship between satisfaction about staff at the community self-help center, support of colleagues and emotional self-support, and mediation effect of self-respect of female participants in self help program, Korean Journal of Social Welfare Research, Vol. 18, pp. 1-24, 2008.
  12. Philip, P. H., Vamadu, A. S., & Sandra, R. N., A bottom-up definition of self-sufficiency, Qaulitative Social Work, Vol. 8, No. 3, pp. 357-376.
  13. Johnson, T. R., & Stromsdorfer, E. W., Evaluating net program impact, In Evaluating Social Programs at the State and Local Level: The JTPA Evaluation Design Project, MI: W. E. Upjohn Institute for Employment Research, pp. 43-131, 1990.
  14. Amy, L. E. S., Situational and psychological predictors of successful transitions from welfare to work, Ph. D. Dissertation, University of Minnesota, 2000.
  15. K. S Kim & C. H. Kang, Study of labor entry of conditional welfare recipients: n exploration of the predictors", Korean Journal of Social Welfare, Vol. 52, pp. 5-32, 2003.
  16. Danziger, S. K., Ananat, E. O., & Browning, K. G., Childcare subsidies and the transition from welfare to work", Family Relations, Vol. 53, pp. 219-228, 2004.
  17. Corcoran, M., Danziger, S. K., & Tolman, R., Longterm employment of African American and White welfare recipients and the role of persistent health and mental health problems", Women & Health, Vol. 39, pp. 21-32.
  18. Lee, S. J. and Vinokur, A. D., Work barriers in the context of pathways to the employment of welfare-to-work clients", American Journal of Community Psychology, Vol. 4, pp.301-312, 2007.
  19. Hogan, S. R., Unick, G. J., Speiglman, R., & Norris, J. C., Gender-specific barriers to self-sufficiency among former supplemental security income drug addiction and alcoholism beneficiaries, Journal of Social Service Research, Vol. 37, pp. 320-337, 2011. https://doi.org/10.1080/01488376.2011.564071
  20. Danziger, S. K., Corcoran, M., Danziger, S., Heflin, C., Kalil, Levine, J., Rosen, D., Seefeldt, K., Siefert K., & Tolman, R., Barriers to the Employment of Welfare Recipients. New York, The Russell Sage Foundation, 2000.
  21. D. M. Nor, S. J. Lee, and S. H. Kim, Assessment and Strategies for Improving the Policy on Self-Reliance, Korea Institute for Health and Welfare Affairs, 2010.
  22. J. Y. Yeo, Study on gender poverty gap : Focusing on urban area, Ph. D. dissertation, Seoul National University, 2003.
  23. Danziger, S. K., Carlson, M. J., & Henly, J. R. Post-welfare employment and psychological well-bing, Women & Health, Vol. 32 pp. 47-49, 2001. https://doi.org/10.1300/J013v32n01_03
  24. Kalil A., Schweingruber, H. A., & Seefeldt, K. S., Correlates of employment among welfare recipients: Do psychological characteristics and attitudes matter? American Journal of Community Psychology, Vol. 29, pp. 701-723, 2001. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010413101010
  25. Greenberg, D., & Robins, P. K., Have welfareto- work programs improved over time in putting welfare recipients to work?, Industrial and Labor Relations Review, Vol. 64, No. 5, pp. 910-920, 2011. https://doi.org/10.1177/001979391106400504
  26. Precin, P., Challenges of welfare-to-work programs, Work, Vol. 38, pp. 39-56, 2011.