Physical Therapy Rehabilitation Science

  • 제3권2호
  • /
  • Pages.134-141
  • /
  • 2014
  • /
  • 2287-7576(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2287-7584(eISSN)
물리치료재활과학회 (korean Academy of Physical Therapy Rehabilitation Science)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

The grading of cognitive state comparisons with different distances across three conditions in stroke survivors

  • Kim, Yumi (Department of Physical Therapy, Kangwon National University) ;
  • Park, Yuhyung (Department of Physical Therapy, Rehabilitation Medicine Center, Bobath Memorial Hospital)
  • 투고 : 2014.08.20
  • 심사 : 2014.10.31
  • 발행 : 2014.10.26
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

Objective: The purpose of this study was to compare with different distance across three conditions in stroke survivors with the grading of cognitive state. Design: Cross-sectional study. Methods: Twelve stroke patients who agreed to active participation were included. Participants were allotted to normal cognitive (CN) group (n=7) and cognitive impairment (CI) group (n=5) and then walked on a self-paced walkway at three conditions on the Time Up and Go (TUG) test and the 6 minute walk test (6MWT): 1) walking with your comfortable speed, 2) walking while carrying a tray with glasses, 3) walking with a verbal cognitive task. The TUG test was repeated three successful times on each condition. For the 6MWT, participants were tested one time. Results: The CI group walked slower than the CN group at the three conditions on the TUG test. However, there was no significant difference between two groups to each condition. A significant effect of dual tasking was found only in error of verbal cognitive task condition for the TUG test (p<0.05). On the 6MWT, the participants in the CI group walked short distance rather than the CN group (p<0.05). There were significant differences between two groups not only at all conditions but also at error of verbal cognitive task condition as well (p<0.05). Conclusions: To consider the results of different distances such as the TUG test and the 6MWT, we think that exercises in long distance would be more effective to patients with CI. Those would be improved patient's endurance in cognitive problem.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Hausdorff JM, Yogev G. Cognitive function may be important for fall injury prevention trials. J Am Geriatr So 2006;54:865; author reply 865-6.
  2. Hausdorff JM, Yogev G, Springer S, Simon ES, Giladi N. Walking is more like catching than tapping: gait in the elderly as a complex cognitive task. Exp Brain Res 2005;164:541-8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-005-2280-3
  3. Plummer-D'Amato P, Altmann LJ, Saracino D, Fox E, Behrman AL, Marsiske M. Interactions between cognitive tasks and gait after stroke: a dual task study. Gait Posture 2008;27:683-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gaitpost.2007.09.001
  4. Hauer K, Pfisterer M, Weber C, Wezler N, Kliegel M, Oster P. Cognitive impairment decreases postural control during dual tasks in geriatric patients with a history of severe falls. J Am Geriatr Soc 2003;51:1638-44. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1532-5415.2003.51517.x
  5. Yogev-Seligmann G, Rotem-Galili Y, Mirelman A, Dickstein R, Giladi N, Hausdorff JM. How does explicit prioritization alter walking during dual-task performance? Effects of age and sex on gait speed and variability. Phys Ther 2010;90:177-86. https://doi.org/10.2522/ptj.20090043
  6. Hyndman D, Ashburn A, Yardley L, Stack E. Interference between balance, gait and cognitive task performance among people with stroke living in the community. Disabil Rehabil 2006;28:849-56. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638280500534994
  7. Yang YR, Chen YC, Lee CS, Cheng SJ, Wang RY. Dual-task-related gait changes in individuals with stroke. Gait Posture 2007;25:185-90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gaitpost.2006.03.007
  8. Canning CG, Ada L, Paul SS. Is automaticity of walking regained after stroke? Disabil Rehabil 2006;28:97-102. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638280500167712
  9. Bowen A, Wenman R, Mickelborough J, Foster J, Hill E, Tallis R. Dual-task effects of talking while walking on velocity and balance following a stroke. Age Ageing 2001;30:319-23. https://doi.org/10.1093/ageing/30.4.319
  10. Cockburn J, Haggard P, Cock J, Fordham C. Changing patterns of cognitive-motor interference (CMI) over time during recovery from stroke. Clin Rehabil 2003;17:167-73. https://doi.org/10.1191/0269215503cr597oa
  11. Naco D, Dobi D, Zekja I, Mijo S, Kapisyzi M, Kruja J. Factors influencing mini-mental state (MMSE) score in stroke patients. Med Arch 2013;67:171-3. https://doi.org/10.5455/medarh.2013.67.171-173
  12. Diamond PT, Felsenthal G, Macciocchi SN, Butler DH, Lally-Cassady D. Effect of cognitive impairment on rehabilitation outcome. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 1996;75:40-3. https://doi.org/10.1097/00002060-199601000-00011
  13. Stephens S, Kenny RA, Rowan E, Kalaria RN, Bradbury M, Pearce R, et al. Association between mild vascular cognitive impairment and impaired activities of daily living in older stroke survivors without dementia. J Am Geriatr Soc 2005;53:103-7. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-5415.2005.53019.x
  14. Tatemichi TK, Desmond DW, Stern Y, Paik M, Sano M, Bagiella E. Cognitive impairment after stroke: frequency, patterns, and relationship to functional abilities. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1994;57:202-7. https://doi.org/10.1136/jnnp.57.2.202
  15. Lord SE, Rochester L. Measurement of community ambulation after stroke: current status and future developments. Stroke 2005;36:1457-61. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.STR.0000170698.20376.2e
  16. Regnaux JP, David D, Daniel O, Smail DB, Combeaud M, Bussel B. Evidence for cognitive processes involved in the control of steady state of walking in healthy subjects and after cerebral damage. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2005;19:125-32. https://doi.org/10.1177/1545968305275612
  17. Folstein MF, Folstein SE, McHugh PR. "Mini-mental state". A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. J Psychiatr Res 1975;12:189-98. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3956(75)90026-6
  18. Shumway-Cook A, Brauer S, Woollacott M. Predicting the probability for falls in community-dwelling older adults using the Timed Up & Go Test. Phys Ther 2000;80:896-903.
  19. Paker N, Bugdayci D, Tekdos D, Kaya B, Dere C. Impact of cognitive impairment on functional outcome in stroke. Stroke Res Treat 2010;2010.
  20. Manaf H, Justine M, Omar M. Functional balance and motor impairment correlations with gait parameters during Timed Up and Go test across three attentional loading conditions in stroke survivors. Stroke Res Treat 2014;2014:439304.
  21. Iosa M, Morone G, Fusco A, Pratesi L, Bragoni M, Coiro P, et al. Effects of walking endurance reduction on gait stability in patients with stroke. Stroke Res Treat 2012;2012:810415.
  22. Zinn S, Dudley TK, Bosworth HB, Hoenig HM, Duncan PW, Horner RD. The effect of poststroke cognitive impairment on rehabilitation process and functional outcome. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2004;85:1084-90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2003.10.022
  23. Gray DS. Slow-to-recover severe traumatic brain injury: a review of outcomes and rehabilitation effectiveness. Brain Inj 2000;14:1003-14. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699050050191940
  24. Robertson IH, Ridgeway V, Greenfield E, Parr A. Motor recovery after stroke depends on intact sustained attention: a 2-year follow-up study. Neuropsychology 1997;11:290-5. https://doi.org/10.1037/0894-4105.11.2.290
  25. Mysiw WJ, Beegan JG, Gatens PF. Prospective cognitive assessment of stroke patients before inpatient rehabilitation. The relationship of the Neurobehavioral Cognitive Status Examination to functional improvement. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 1989;68:168-71. https://doi.org/10.1097/00002060-198908000-00003
  26. Rose L, Bakal DA, Fung TS, Farn P, Weaver LE. Tactile extinction and functional status after stroke. A preliminary investigation. Stroke 1994;25:1973-6. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.STR.25.10.1973
  27. Beauchet O, Dubost V, Gonthier R, Kressig RW. Dual-task-related gait changes in transitionally frail older adults: the type of the walking-associated cognitive task matters. Gerontology 2005;51:48-52. https://doi.org/10.1159/000081435
  28. Chung E, Lee BH, Hwang S. Core stabilization exercise with real-time feedback for chronic hemiparetic stroke: a pilot randomized controlled trials. Restor Neurol Neurosci 2014;32:313-21.
  29. Kim JH, Lee BH. Action observation training for functional activities after stroke: a pilot randomized controlled trial. NeuroRehabilitation 2013;33:565-74.
  30. Shin SH, Lee MY. Effect of gait training with additional weight on balance and gait in stroke patients. Phys Ther Rehabil Sci 2014;1:55-62.
  31. Chung EJ, Lee BH. The effects of treadmill training on dynamic balance and gait function in stroke patients: a pilot randomized controlled trial. Phys Ther Rehabil Sci 2013;1:39-43.
  32. Noha D, Lee SG, Yang YJ. Effects of elastic band orthosis (aider) on balance and gait in chronic stroke patients. Phys Ther Rehabil Sci 2013;2:81-6. https://doi.org/10.14474/ptrs.2013.2.2.81
  33. Lee GC, Choi WJ. The effects of dual-task training on ambulatory abilities of stroke patients: Review of the latest trend. Phys Ther Rehabil Sci 2012;1:1-5.
  34. Yang YR, Chen YC, Lee CS, Cheng SJ, Wang RY. Dual-task-related gait changes in individuals with stroke. Gait Posture 2007;25:185-90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gaitpost.2006.03.007

피인용 문헌

  1. 3D 모션입력장치를 이용한 거울치료가 뇌졸중 환자의 상지 운동 기능, 삶의 질, 우울감에 미치는 영향 vol.4, pp.4, 2014, https://doi.org/10.15268/ksim.2016.4.4.041