대한공간정보학회지 (Journal of Korean Society for Geospatial Information Science)

  • 제22권1호
  • /
  • Pages.89-99
  • /
  • 2014
  • /
  • 1598-2955(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2287-6693(eISSN)
대한공간정보학회 (Korea Spatial Information Society)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

기반시설부담구역 추출을 위한 용도지역지구 공간정보 적용방안 연구

A Method to Use the Land-Use Zoning Information to Extract the DIF Zones

  • 이용직 (홍익대학교 대학원 도시계획학과) ;
  • 최내영 (홍익대학교 공과대학 건설도시공학부 도시공학전공)
  • 투고 : 2014.02.24
  • 심사 : 2014.03.17
  • 발행 : 2014.03.31
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

현행 국토계획법 상의 기반시설부담구역제도는 그 주요 구역지정 기준으로서 법 제 개정으로 인하여 용도지역 등이 변경되거나 해제되어 행위제한이 완화되는 지역(법 제67조)을 기반시설부담구역으로 지정할 수 있도록 정하고 있으나 현실적으로 방대한 국토계획 관련 법령 모두의 제 개정 상황을 문헌조사를 통해 전수 확인하고 그에 따른 행위제한 완화지역을 공간적으로 지정하는 방법이 현실적으로 불가능하였기 때문에 지금까지 이러한 원론적 법령기준에 준거한 기반시설부담구역 지정사례는 사실상 전무한 실정이다. 이에 본 연구는 한국토지정보체계(KLIS)의 시계열 데이터베이스를 활용해 토지이용 상 용도상향(업조닝) 지역의 시차적 변화를 추적하고 이를 법령 제 개정에 따른 행위제한 완화의 결과와 동일하게 간주하여 기반시설부담구역을 추출할 수 있는 현실적 정책 툴을 발굴하고자 실험적 분석을 시도해 보았다. 대상지로는 동 제도에서 명시하는 인구증가율 및 건축허가건수 증가율 등의 주요 기준지표를 중심으로 수도권 내 개발압력이 가장 높은 지자체를 선별하여 용도지역지구 변화상황을 추적함으로써 실제 적용가능성을 타진하였고, 분석결과 이전에 불가능하였던 방대한 면적과 다수 개소의 기반시설부담구역 지정이 가능하다는 점을 확인하였다. 이러한 맥락에서 본 연구의 방법론은 제도시행 가능성 제고를 통해 궁극적으로 본 제도가 추구하는 국토의 난개발 방지 및 계획적 국토개발 정책실현의 잠재력을 크게 높일 수 있는 정책적 기대효과가 있을 것으로 사료된다.

The current Development Impact Fee (DIF) Zoning Law allows Korean localities to designate the DIF Zone for the areas where there have been up-zoning in land-uses due to any minute additions and/or amendments in the existing clauses or provisions in the National Territory Planning Law as well as all other laws related to urban and regional planning. In reality, however, it is almost impossible to trace the sporadic and infinitesimal changes that might occur in every corner of the statutory clauses of a great number of planning related laws. This study, in an effort to overcome such practical difficulties, tries to chase the time-series zoning alterations in especially the consecutive land-use information layers of the Korea Land Information System (KLIS) as comparable analogues of the outcomes of the amendments in various planning laws. A study locality is chosen among the entire localities in the Capital Region based on the selection criteria dictated by the DIF Zoning Law such as the population- and building permit increase rate. It has been verified that the methodology suggested herein is practically applicable and successfully capable of extracting a number of DIF zones with considerable areal sizes, which could not have otherwise been possible. The consequences of this study, in this context, are expected to contribute to prevent the uncontrolled developments as the DIF Zoning Law itself was originally intended to achieve.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Baden, M. and Coursey, D., 1998, An examination of the effects of impact fees on Chicago's suburbs, A discussion paper for the workshop in Economic Policy and Public Finance, University of Chicago Department of Economics.
  2. Burge, G. and Ihlanfeldt, K., 2006, Impact fees and single-family home construction, Journal of Urban Economics, Vol. 60, pp. 284-306. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jue.2006.03.002
  3. Choei, N.Y., 2009. A grid analysis to designate the zone to levy the impact fee for infrastructure provision; the case of the industrial localities, Journal of the Korean Urban Geographic Society, Vol. 12, No. 2, pp. 65-75.
  4. Choi, J.Y. and Choei, N.Y., 2008. The improvement of the land conversion factor coefficients in the Korean development impact fees estimation, Journal of the Korea Planners Association, Vol. 43, No. 2, pp. 73-85.
  5. Clarke, W. and Evans, J., 1999, Development impact fees and the acquisition of infrastructure, Journal of Urban Affairs, Vol. 21, No. 3, pp. 281-288. https://doi.org/10.1111/0735-2166.00017
  6. Comber, A., Carver, S., Fritz, S., McMorran, R., Washtell, J. and Fisher, P., 2010, Different methods, different wilds: Evaluating alternative mappings of wildness using fuzzy MCE and Dempster-Shafer MCE, Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, Vol. 34, pp. 142-152. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2009.10.006
  7. Drobne, S. and Lisec, A., 2009, Multi-attribute decision analysis in GIS: weighted linear combination and ordered weighted averaging, Informatica 33, pp.459-474.
  8. Jiang, H. and Eastman, R., 2000, Application of fuzzy measures in multi-criteria evaluation in GIS, International Journal of Geographical Information Science, Vol. 14, No. 2, PP. 173-184. https://doi.org/10.1080/136588100240903
  9. Kim, H.B. and Choei, N.Y., 2011, A case study on the infrastructure installation and cost allocation plans: on the basis of population growth rate criterion, Journal of the Korean Regional Development Association, Vol. 23, No. 5, pp. 19-38.
  10. KRIHS (Korean Research Institute for Human Settlement), 2010, A study to improve the DIF Zoning regulation for urban growth control, A research report of the KRIHS.
  11. Lee, H.Y., 2008. An analysis of the developmental capacity for the optimal urban growth control, Journal of the Korean Urban Geographic Society, Vol. 11, No. 1, pp. 1-18. https://doi.org/10.23841/egsk.2008.11.1.1
  12. Lee, K.Y. and Choei, N.Y., 2011, A study on the infrastructure installation cost on alternative site plans, Journal of the Korean Association for Local Government Studies, Vol. 23, No. 3, pp. 309-330.
  13. Lee, M.H. and Kim, C., 2002, A study on the actual status of cost sharing system of infrastructure in urban development project, Journal of the Korea Planners Association, Vol. 37, No. 1, pp. 219-29.
  14. Mahini, S. and Gholamalifard, M., 2006, Siting MSW landfills with a weighted linear combination methodology in a GIS environment, International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology, Vol. 3, No. 4, pp. 435-445. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03325953
  15. MLTM (Ministry of Land, Transport, and Maritime Affairs), 2008a, A study to promote the administration and manipulation of the Development Impact Fee Zoning provision, A research report of the MLTM.
  16. MLTM, 2008b, The administrative manual for DIF zoning.
  17. MLTM, 2008c, The guidebook for DIF zoning.
  18. MOCT (Ministry of Construction and Transportation), 1998, The unit cost estimation for the location of industrial compexes, A report prepared by the MOCT in conjuction with the Ministry of Industry & Resources, and LH Corporation.
  19. MOCT, 2004, A study to promote the administration of the Development Impact Fee Zoning regulation, A research report of the MOCT.
  20. MOCT, 2006. A study to prepare a legal provision for the Development Impact Fee estimation standards, A research report of the MOCT.
  21. MOLIT (Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport), 2013, A study to amend the DIF zoning law to vitalize its administration, A research report of the MOLIT.
  22. Moody, M. and Nelson, A., 2002, Impact fees: the grease that sustains local economic development, A discussion paper prepared for the Brookings Institution Center on Urban and Metropolitan Policy.
  23. Seo, H.S. and Choei, N.Y., 2007, Exploring the ways to estimate the non-spatial infrastructure installation cost based on the scale economies, The Proceedings of the 2007 Conference of the Korea Planners Association, pp. 1013-1020.
  24. Yousefi, H, Ehara, S., and Noorollahi, Y., 2007, Geothermal potential site selection using GIS in Iran, Proceedings of the 32nd Workshop on Geothermal Reservoir Engineering, Stanford University, SGPTR-183.

피인용 문헌

  1. 핫스팟 분석을 활용한 기반시설부담구역 지정방안에 관한 비교연구 vol.47, pp.1, 2017, https://doi.org/10.22640/lxsiri.2017.47.1.277