Journal of Korean Elementary Science Education (한국초등과학교육학회지:초등과학교육)

The Korean Elementary Science Education Society (한국초등과학교육학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

The Effect of Elementary Science Class with Name Card Method on Learning Motivation and Academic Achievement of Elementary Students

Name Card 기법을 적용한 초등과학 수업이 초등학생의 과학 학습 동기 및 학업성취도에 미치는 영향

  • Received : 2014.01.17
  • Accepted : 2014.02.26
  • Published : 2014.02.28
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

This study was conducted to examine the effect of elementary science class using name card method on scientific learning motivation and academic achievement of elementary students. Two sixth grade classes were divided into experimental group and comparison group to treat the experimental group with elementary science class using name card method. General class according to teacher manual was implemented for the comparison group. Elementary science class applying name card method was conducted for 10 sessions throughout the experimental period of 8 weeks. The results of this study were as follows. First, elementary science class with name card method was effective in improving scientific learning motivation. Second, elementary science class with name card method had significant effect on improvement of scientific learning academic achievement. The study results showed that elementary science class with name card method was effective for scientific learning motivation and academic achievement of elementary students.

Keywords

References

  1. Alexopoulou, E. & Driver, R. (1996). Small-group discussion in physics: Peer interaction modes in pairs and fours. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 33(1), 1099-1114. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-2736(199612)33:10<1099::AID-TEA4>3.0.CO;2-N
  2. Basili, P. A. & Sanford, J. P. (1991). Conceptual change strategies and cooperative group work in chemistry. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 28(4), 293-304. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.3660280403
  3. Bianchini, J. A. (1995). Groupwork in middle school science: A case study of scientific knowledge and social process construction. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco.
  4. Chung, Y. & Son, D. (2000). Effects of cooperative learning strategy on achievement and science learning attitudes in middle school biology. Journal of the Korean Association for Research in Science Education, 20(4), 611-623.
  5. Han, J. & Noh, T. (2002). Students' perceptions on small group activities in science classes and the relationship with personality. Journal of the Korean Association for Research in Science Education, 22(3), 449-507.
  6. Han, S. (2002). The effect of cooperative small group discussion in science concept learning. A master's thesis from the Graduate School of Seoul National University.
  7. Jang, I. (2003). A study on application state of "discussion learning" as a science teaching method to secondary school. A master's thesis from the Graduate School of Education Sookmyung Women's University.
  8. Jeong, J. (2005). The effects of the scheduling of smallgroup discussion sessions on the children's science inquiry abilities and verbal interactions in elementary science labworks. A doctoral thesis from the Graduate School of Education Korea National University of Education.
  9. Kang, S. & Noh, T. (2000). Effect of concept learning strategy emphasizing social consensus during discussion. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 20(2), 250-261.
  10. Kang, S., Han, S. & Noh, T. (2002). The effect of cooperative small group discussion in science concept learning. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 22(1), 93-101.
  11. Kang, S., Han, S., Jeong, Y. & Noh, T. (2001). Comparison of verbal interaction patterns in small-group discussion by learning strategies. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 21(2), 279-288.
  12. Kang, S., Kim, Y. & Noh, T. (2004). The influence of small group discussion using the history of science upon students' understanding about the nature of science. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 24(5), 996-1007.
  13. Kang, S., Lim, J., Kong, Y., Nam, J. & Choi, B. (2004). The development of students argumentation in science context. Journal of the Korean Chemical Society, 48(1), 85-93. https://doi.org/10.5012/jkcs.2004.48.1.085
  14. Keller, J. M. (1983). Motivational design of instruction. In C. M. Reigeluth (ED). Instructional design theories and models: An overview of their current status. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  15. Keller, J. M. (1987). Development and use of the ARCS model of motivational design. Journal of Instructional Development, 10(3), 2-10. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02905967
  16. Kwon, M. (2009). The effect of small group-cooperation learning for middle school student in earth science. A master's thesis from the Graduate School of Education Korea National University of Education.
  17. Lee, H., Nam, K., Moon, S., Kim, Y. & Lee, S. (2005). The effects of science instruction using argumentation on elementary school students' learning motivation and scientific attitude. Journal of Korean Elementary Science Education, 24(2), 183-191.
  18. Lemke, J. L. (1990). Talking science: Language, learning, and values. Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing Corporation.
  19. Lim, H. & Noh, T. (2001). Verbal interactions in heterogeneous small - group cooperative learning. Journal of the Korean Association for Research in Science Education, 21(4), 668-676.
  20. Meyer, K. & Woodruff, E. (1997). Consensually driven explanation in science teaching. Science Education, 81(2), 173-192. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-237X(199704)81:2<173::AID-SCE4>3.0.CO;2-C
  21. Ministry of Education Human Resources Development. (2007). Science Curriculum. Ministry of Education Human Resources Development notice 2007-79.
  22. Nam, J., Kim, S., Kang, S., Park, J. & Choi, B. (2002). A study on classroom interactions by student's cognitive level in the performance of controlling variable tasks. Journal of the Korean Association for Research in Science Education, 22(1), 110-121.
  23. Oh, J. (2004). The effects of science instruction using ARCS model on learning motive and academic achieve ment. A master's thesis from the Graduate School of Education Busan National University of Education.
  24. Park, S. & Kim, Y. (2006). An inquiry on the relationships among learning-flow factors, flow level, achievement under on-line learning environment. The Journal of Yeolin Education, 14(1), 93-115.
  25. Richmond, G. & Striley, J. (1996). Making meaning in classrooms: Social processes in small-group discourse and scientific knowledge building. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 33(8), 839-858. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-2736(199610)33:8<839::AID-TEA2>3.0.CO;2-X
  26. Sprod, T. (1998). "I can change your opinion on that": Socail constructivist whole class discussions and their effect on scientific reasoning. Research in Science Education, 28(4), 463-480. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02461510
  27. Stodolsky, S. l., Ferguson, T. & Wimpelberg, K. (1981). The recitation persists, but what does it look like? Journal of Curriculum Studies, 13, 121-130. https://doi.org/10.1080/0022027810130206
  28. Theberge, C. L. (1994). Small-group ws. whole class discussion:Gaining the floor in science lessons. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA.
  29. Tobin, K. & Garnett, P. (1987). Gender related differences in science activities. Science Education, 71(1), 91-103. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.3730710112
  30. Winebrenner, S. & Brulles, D. (2008). The cluster grouping handbook; How to challenge gifted students and improve achievement for all. Free Spirit publishing.

Cited by

  1. The Effect of Elementary Free Inquiry Lessons Utilizing Flipped Learning with Smart Devices on the Elementary Students' Digital Literacy, 21st Century Skills and Scientific Attitude vol.34, pp.4, 2015, https://doi.org/10.15267/keses.2015.34.4.476
  2. 과학과의 핵심성취기준에 근거한 단위시간 수업전략 효과 vol.7, pp.2, 2014, https://doi.org/10.15523/jksese.2014.7.2.169
  3. 게임을 활용한 과학수업이 초등학생의 과학 학습 동기 및 학업성취도에 미치는 영향 vol.40, pp.2, 2014, https://doi.org/10.21796/jse.2016.40.2.103
  4. 라운드 로빈 기법을 적용한 과학수업이 초등학생의 과학적 의사소통능력, 과학 학습동기 및 학업성취도에 미치는 영향 vol.36, pp.4, 2014, https://doi.org/10.15267/keses.2017.36.4.394