References
- Appleton, K. (2006). Science pedagogical content knowledge and elementary school teachers. In K. Appleton (Ed.), Elementary science teacher education: International perspectives on contemporary issues and practice. Mahwah, NJ: Association for Science Teachers and Laurence Erlbaum.
- Bae, J. H., & Ok, S. K. (2009). The Effects of Elementary Science Lessons Emphasizing Social Interactions on the Metacognition, Learning Motive and Academic Achievement. Journal of Korean Elementary Science Education, 28(4), 519-527.
- Brophy, J. E. (1999). Perspectives of classroom management: Yesterday, today and tomorrow. In H. Freiberg (Ed.), Beyond behaviorism: changing the classroom management paradigm, 43-56. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
- Chan, M. T. (2002). The teaching of science process skills: primary teachers' self-perception. Department of Science the Hong Kong institute of Education, 5. 91-111.
- Cho, H. J., Yang, I. H., Jeong, J. H., Shin, A. K., & Sohn, J. J. (2008). Analysis of the Elementary School Students' Views about Lab-based Science learning . Journal of Korean Elementary Science Education, 27(2), 117-133.
- Colaizzi, P. E. (1978). Psychological research as the phenomenologist view it existential phenomenology, New york: Oxford University press.
- Creswell, J. W. (2007). Qualitative Inquiry & Research Design: Choosing Among Five Approaches(2nd ed.) Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
- Cuban, L. (1998). How schools chang reforms: redefining reform success and failure. Teachers College Record, 99(3), 453-477.
- Gagne', M., & Deci, E. L. (2005). Self-determination theory and work motivation. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 26, 331-362. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.322
- Gilbert, J. K. (2006). On the nature of 'context' in chemical education. International Journal of Science Education, 28, 957-976. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690600702470
- Gim, C. C., & Byeon, H. J. (2005). A Critical Analysis of the Meaning of 'Good Instruction'. Journal of the Korean Society for Fish & Marine Sciences Education, 17(3), 373-82.
- Giorgi, A. (1985). Sketch of a psychological phenomenological method. In A Giorgi (ed) Phenomenology and Psychological Research. Pittsburgh, PA: Duquesne University Press.
- Gowin, D. B. (1981). Educating. Ithaca, New York: Cornell University Press.
- Harwood, W.S. (2002). Mercury Breaks the Law! The Hoosier Science Teacher, 27(2), 50-54.
- Ha, S. W., Kim, S. J., & Park, J. W. (2008). A Study on the Effect of Educational Activities at Science Gifted Education Center on the Student's Science-related Career Choice . Journal of Gifted/Talented Education, 18(3), 497-518.
- Hofstein, A. and Lunetta, V. N. (1982). The role of the laboratory in science teaching: neglected aspects of research, Review of Educational Research, 52, 201-217. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543052002201
- Huberman, A. M., & Miles, M. (1994). Qualitative Data Analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
- Kang, H. K., & Choi, S. Y.(2004). The Professional Development Program for Teacher of Science Gifted Students. Science Eduction Center Inchon National University of Education, 16, 137-160.
- Kim, J. B. (2006). Learning strategies for scientifically gifted children. The Journal of the Korean Society for the Gifted and Talented, 5(2), 19-32.
- Klopfer, L. E. (1971). Evaluation of learning in science. In Bloom, B. S., Hastings J. T., & Madsus, G. F. (Eds.), Handbook on formative and summative evaluation of student learning. New York: McGraw-Hill.
- Kumpulainen, K. & Wray, D. (2002.) Classroom Interaction and Social Learning London: Routledge Falmer.
- Kwak, Y. S., & Kang, H. S (2005). Teacher assessment, Instruction assessment. Seoul: Wonmi Press.
- Kwak, Y. S., & Kim J. H.(2003). Qualitative research on common features of best practices in the secondary school science classroom. Journal of the Korean Association for Research in Science Education, 23(2), 144-154.
- Kwon, Y., & Lawson, A. E. (2000). Effect on development of proportional reasoning skill of physical experience and cognitive abilities associated with prefrontal lobe activity. Journal of Research in Science Teaching. 37(10), 1171-1182. https://doi.org/10.1002/1098-2736(200012)37:10<1171::AID-TEA8>3.0.CO;2-A
- Lee, M. S. (2002). Depth interview study. Journal of Elementary Education, 18(1), 215-241.
- Lim, J. K., & Yang, I. H. (2008). A study on the professional development process of elementary teacher. Journal of Korean Elementary Science Education, 27(2), 93-101.
- Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. A. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
- Maker, C. J., & Neilsen, A. B. (1995). Teaching models in education of the gifted (2nd ed.) Austin, TX: PRO-EDUCATION.
- Miedijensky, S., & Tali, T. (2009). Embedded assessment in project-based science courses for the gifted: insights to inform teaching all students. International Journal of Science Education, 1-25.
- Meyer, J.D., & Barufaldi, J. P. (2003). The role of sustained professional development in science teacher renewal and retention. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, Philadelphia, PA.
- Oh, P. S. (2011). Unfillable Cups: Meanings of science classes to elementary school teachers. Journal of the Korean Association for Research in Science Education, 31(2), 271-294.
- Osborne, J., & Collins, S. (2001). Students' views of the role and value of the science curriculum: a focus-group study. International Journal of Science Education, 23, 441-467. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690010006518
- Park, J. S., & Kim, J. Y. (2011). Perception of pre-service science teachers on the classes for the gifted in science. Journal of the Korean Association for Research in Science Education, 31(4), 609-620.
- Patton, M. Q. (1980). Qualitative evaluation methods, Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
- Pfeiffer, S. I., & Blei, S. (2008). Gifted identification beyond the IQ test: Rating scales and other assessment procedures. In S. I. Pfeiffer, Handbook of giftedness in children (pp. 177-198). NY: Springer Science+Business Media, LLC.
- Resnick, M., Berg, R., & Eisenberg, M. (2000). Beyond black boxes: Bringing transparency and aesthetics back to scientific investigation. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 9 (1), 7-30. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327809jls0901_3
- Seidman, I. (1998). Interviewing as qualitative research. NY: Teachers College Press.
- Seo, H. A., & Lee, S. K. (2004). Analysis of science teaching and learning for the gifted at elementary school level. Journal of Korean Elementary Science Education, 23(3), 219-227.
- Stake, R., & Easley, J. (1978). Case studies in science education. Urbana, IL: Center for Instructional Research and Evaluation.
- Subotnik, R., Kassan, L., Summers, E., & Wasser, A. (1993). Genius revisited: High IQ children grown up. Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing Corp.
- Van Tassel-Baska, J. (2003). What matters in curriculum for gifted learners: Reflections on theory, research and practice. In N. Colangelo & G. A. Davis (Eds.). Handbook of gifted education (3rd ed., pp. 174 -183). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
- Yin, R. K. (2003). Case study research: Design and methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
- Yu, H. W., Cha, H. J., Kim, M. S., Ham, D. C., Kim, H. B., Yoo, J. H., Park, H. J., Kim, C. J., & Choe, S. U. (2012). Relation between the personal and social factors and the interacting role of science gifted students in social co-construction of scientific model class. Journal of Gifted/Talented Education, 22(2), 265-290. https://doi.org/10.9722/JGTE.2012.22.2.265
Cited by
- '좋은 중등 과학 수업'에 대한 탐색: 대안학교 학생의 사례를 중심으로 vol.39, pp.2, 2014, https://doi.org/10.21796/jse.2015.39.2.180
- 초등교사의 과학수업에 대한 기대도와 실행도에 관한 학생의 인식 vol.36, pp.3, 2017, https://doi.org/10.15267/keses.2017.36.3.255
- 좋은 과학수업을 위한 예비교사의 도전 -수업 주제의 의미화 과정을 중심으로- vol.38, pp.4, 2014, https://doi.org/10.14697/jkase.2018.38.4.451
- 초등 과학영재 학생과 일반 학생의 과학 동시 특성 및 과학 동시 쓰기에 대한 인식 비교 vol.38, pp.1, 2014, https://doi.org/10.15267/keses.2019.38.1.130
- 초등 과학영재학생들의 자유탐구 산출물 특성 분석 vol.39, pp.2, 2014, https://doi.org/10.15267/keses.2020.39.2.243