The Journal of Advanced Prosthodontics

The Korean Academy of Prosthodonitics (대한치과보철학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Dental fiber-post resin base material: a review

  • Lamichhane, Aashwini (Department of Prosthodontics, Ninth People's Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine) ;
  • Xu, Chun (Department of Prosthodontics, Ninth People's Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine) ;
  • Zhang, Fu-Qiang (Department of Prosthodontics, Ninth People's Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine)
  • Received : 2013.08.10
  • Accepted : 2014.01.13
  • Published : 2014.02.28
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Teeth that have short clinical crown, which are not alone enough to support the definitive restoration can be best treated using the post and core system. The advantages of fiber post over conventional metallic post materials have led to its wide acceptance. In addition to that the combination of aesthetic and mechanical benefits of fiber post has provided it with a rise in the field of dentistry. Also the results obtained from some clinical trials have encouraged the clinicians to use the fiber posts confidently. Fiber posts are manufactured from pre-stretched fibers impregnated within a resin matrix. The fibers could that be of carbon, glass/silica, and quartz, whereas Epoxy and bis-GMA are the most widely used resin bases. But recently studies are also found to be going on for polyimide as possible material for the fiber post resin base as a substitute for the conventional materials.

Keywords

References

  1. Monticelli F, Goracci C, Ferrari M. Micromorphology of the fiber post-resin core unit: a scanning electron microscopy evaluation. Dent Mater 2004;20:176-83. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0109-5641(03)00089-7
  2. Ferrari M, Vichi A, García-Godoy F. Clinical evaluation of fiber- reinforced epoxy resin posts and cast post and cores. Am J Dent 2000;13:15B-18B.
  3. Glazer B. Restoration of endodontically treated teeth with carbon fibre posts-a prospective study. J Can Dent Assoc 2000;66:613-8.
  4. Goracci C, Ferrari M. Current perspectives on post systems: a literature review. Aust Dent J 2011;56:77-83. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1834-7819.2010.01298.x
  5. Duret B, Reynaud M, Duret F. New concept of coronoradicular reconstruction: the Composipost (1). Chir Dent Fr 1990; 60:131-41.
  6. Bateman G, Ricketts DN, Saunders WP. Fibre-based post systems: a review. Br Dent J 2003;195:43-8. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.4810278
  7. Soares CJ, Santana FR, Pereira JC, Araujo TS, Menezes MS. Influence of airborne-particle abrasion on mechanical properties and bond strength of carbon/epoxy and glass/bis- GMA fiber-reinforced resin posts. J Prosthet Dent 2008;99: 444-54. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(08)60106-7
  8. Lassila LV, Tanner J, Le Bell AM, Narva K, Vallittu PK. Flexural properties of fiber reinforced root canal posts. Dent Mater 2004;20:29-36. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0109-5641(03)00065-4
  9. Goldberg AJ, Burstone CJ. The use of continuous fiber reinforcement in dentistry. Dent Mater 1992;8:197-202. https://doi.org/10.1016/0109-5641(92)90083-O
  10. Novais VR, Quagliatto PS, Bona AD, Correr-Sobrinho L, Soares CJ. Flexural modulus, flexural strength, and stiffness of fiber-reinforced posts. Indian J Dent Res 2009;20:277-81. https://doi.org/10.4103/0970-9290.57357
  11. Cheung W. A review of the management of endodontically treated teeth. Post, core and the final restoration. J Am Dent Assoc 2005;136:611-9. https://doi.org/10.14219/jada.archive.2005.0232
  12. Akkayan B, Gülmez T. Resistance to fracture of endodontically treated teeth restored with different post systems. J Prosthet Dent 2002;87:431-7. https://doi.org/10.1067/mpr.2002.123227
  13. Seefeld F, Wenz HJ, Ludwig K, Kern M. Resistance to fracture and structural characteristics of different fiber reinforced post systems. Dent Mater 2007;23:265-71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2006.01.018
  14. Drummond JL, Bapna MS. Static and cyclic loading of fiberreinforced dental resin. Dent Mater 2003;19:226-31. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0109-5641(02)00034-9
  15. Hedlund SO, Johansson NG, Sjogren G. A retrospective study of pre-fabricated carbon fibre root canal posts. J Oral Rehabil 2003;30:1036-40. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2842.2003.01184.x
  16. Cagidiaco MC, Radovic I, Simonetti M, Tay F, Ferrari M. Clinical performance of fiber post restorations in endodontically treated teeth: 2-year results. Int J Prosthodont 2007;20:293-8.
  17. Asmussen E, Peutzfeldt A. Influence of UEDMA BisGMA and TEGDMA on selected mechanical properties of experimental resin composites. Dent Mater 1998;14:51-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0109-5641(98)00009-8
  18. Söderholm KJ, Mariotti A. BIS-GMA - based resins in dentistry: are they safe? J Am Dent Assoc 1999;130:201-9. https://doi.org/10.14219/jada.archive.1999.0169
  19. Ferrari M, Vichi A, Mannocci F, Mason PN. Retrospective study of the clinical performance of fiber posts. Am J Dent 2000;13:9B-13B.
  20. Lassila LV, Vallittu PK. The effect of fiber position and polymerization condition on the flexural properties of fiber-reinforced composite. J Contemp Dent Pract 2004;5:14-26.
  21. Eick JD, Smith RE, Pinzino CS, Kotha SP, Kostoryz EL, Chappelow CC. Photopolymerization of developmental monomers for dental cationically initiated matrix resins. Dent Mater 2005;21:384-90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2004.07.001
  22. Grandini S, Balleri P, Ferrari M. Scanning electron microscopic investigation of the surface of fiber posts after cutting. J Endod 2002;28:610-2. https://doi.org/10.1097/00004770-200208000-00012
  23. Baran G, Boberick K, McCool J. Fatigue of restorative materials. Crit Rev Oral Biol Med 2001;12:350-60. https://doi.org/10.1177/10454411010120040501
  24. Asmussen E, Peutzfeldt A, Heitmann T. Stiffness, elastic limit, and strength of newer types of endodontic posts. J Dent 1999;27:275-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0300-5712(98)00066-9
  25. Padmaja S. Biohazards associated with materials used in prosthodontics. Niger J Clin Pract 2013;16:139-44. https://doi.org/10.4103/1119-3077.110122
  26. Andersen M, Kiel P, Larsen H, Maxild J. Mutagenic action of aromatic epoxy resins. Nature 1978;276:391-2. https://doi.org/10.1038/276391a0
  27. Chen D, Liu T, Zhou X, Tjiu WC, Hou H. Electrospinning fabrication of high strength and toughness polyimide nanofiber membranes containing multiwalled carbon nanotubes. J Phys Chem B 2009;113:9741-8.
  28. Liaw DJ, Wang KL, Huang YC, Lee KR, Lai JY, Ha CS. Advanced polyimide materials: Syntheses, physical properties and applications. Prog Polym Sci 2012;37:907-74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2012.02.005
  29. Ratta V, Polymides: chemistry & structure-property relationships - literature review. PhD Thesis, Faculty of Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, 1999:3-28.
  30. Matsumoto T, Kurosaki T. Soluble and colorless polyimides with polyalicyclic structures. React Funct Polym 1996;30:55-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/1381-5148(96)00021-1
  31. Min U, Chang JH. Colorless and transparent polyimide nanocomposite films containing organoclay. J Nanosci Nanotechnol 2011;11:6404-9. https://doi.org/10.1166/jnn.2011.4380
  32. Gao H, Zhang ZT, Fan L, Wang DS, Zuo HJ, Sheng Y. Development of novel polyimide composite core materials reinforced with carbon fiber. Chinese J Prosthodont 2007;3:210-2.
  33. Richardson RR Jr, Miller JA, Reichert WM. Polyimides as biomaterials: preliminary biocompatibility testing. Biomaterials 1993;14:627-35. https://doi.org/10.1016/0142-9612(93)90183-3

Cited by

  1. Does the Moment of Fiber Post Cutting Influence on the Retention to Root Dentin? vol.26, pp.2, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1590/0103-6440201300242
  2. Acid Etching and Surface Coating of Glass-Fiber Posts: Bond Strength and Interface Analysis vol.27, pp.2, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1590/0103-6440201600722
  3. Relining effects on the push-out shear bond strength of glass fiber posts vol.45, pp.4, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1590/1807-2577.14815
  4. Effect of different adhesive systems and post surface treatments on the push-out bond strengths of fiber-reinforced post vol.54, pp.3, 2016, https://doi.org/10.4047/jkap.2016.54.3.218
  5. Bond strength of fiber posts and short fiber-reinforced composite to root canal dentin following cyclic loading vol.31, pp.13, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1080/01694243.2016.1257261
  6. Three-dimensional finite element analysis of glass fiber and cast metal posts with different alloys for reconstruction of teeth without ferrule vol.41, pp.8, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1080/03091902.2017.1385655
  7. Comparison of the Microtensile Bond Strength of a Polyetherketoneketone (PEKK) Tooth Post Cemented with Various Surface Treatments and Various Resin Cements vol.11, pp.6, 2018, https://doi.org/10.3390/ma11060916
  8. Indirect Restorations and Fixed Prosthodontics: Materials and Techniques Used by General Dentists of New Zealand vol.2019, pp.1687-8736, 2019, https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/5210162
  9. Post boşluğuna bağlayıcı uygulamalarının kendinden bağlanabilen rezin siman kullanılarak yapıştırılan fiber postların push-out bağlanma dayanımları vol.34, pp.1, 2014, https://doi.org/10.17214/gaziaot.277728
  10. Effect of using the New Glass Fiber Pin in Resin Composite Restorations vol.19, pp.5, 2014, https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10024-2296
  11. Enhanced mechanical properties and biosafety evaluation of surface-modified fiberglass-reinforced resin-based composite piles vol.30, pp.6, 2019, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10856-019-6269-z
  12. Enhanced mechanical properties and biosafety evaluation of surface-modified fiberglass-reinforced resin-based composite piles vol.30, pp.6, 2019, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10856-019-6269-z
  13. Effect of Glass Fiber Post Adaptation on Push-Out Bond Strength to Root Dentin vol.30, pp.4, 2014, https://doi.org/10.1590/0103-6440201902491
  14. Flexural Strength Evaluation of Dental Post Prototype Contain ZAS-PMMA Composite Fiber with Electrospinning Methods vol.829, pp.None, 2019, https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/kem.829.93
  15. Retention of Provisional Intraradicular Retainers Using Fiberglass Pins vol.10, pp.5, 2014, https://doi.org/10.4103/jispcd.jispcd_298_20
  16. Novel hollow fiber sandwich composite post system: mechanical characteristics vol.69, pp.2, 2020, https://doi.org/10.23736/s0026-4970.19.04235-3
  17. Influence of pyrolytic thermal history on olive pruning biochar and related epoxy composites mechanical properties vol.54, pp.14, 2014, https://doi.org/10.1177/0021998319888734
  18. State of the Art Contemporary Prefabricated Fiber-Reinforced Posts vol.14, pp.1, 2014, https://doi.org/10.2174/1874210602014010313
  19. Fracture Resistance of Three Post Types in the Restoration of Anterior Primary Teeth vol.14, pp.1, 2014, https://doi.org/10.2174/1874210602014010375
  20. Effect of Fiber Posts on Stress Distribution of Endodontically Treated Upper Premolars: Finite Element Analysis vol.10, pp.9, 2020, https://doi.org/10.3390/nano10091708
  21. Push-out Bond Strength of Two Types of Dental Post Luted with Two Types of Cement at Two Different Root Levels vol.54, pp.3, 2014, https://doi.org/10.15644/asc54/3/4
  22. Evaluation of composite resin core with prefabricated polyetheretherketone post on fracture resistance in the case of flared root canals vol.39, pp.6, 2014, https://doi.org/10.4012/dmj.2019-153
  23. Development of fibre-reinforced composite disk for computer-aided design-computer-aided manufacturing milled posts; Experimental composite disk using e-glass fibre in different fibre direction vol.21, pp.4, 2014, https://doi.org/10.4103/jips.jips_135_21
  24. Fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth restored with resin post reinforced with glass fiber vol.14, pp.1, 2014, https://doi.org/10.25122/jml-2020-0180
  25. Long-term hygroscopic dimensional changes of core buildup materials in deionized water and artificial saliva vol.40, pp.1, 2014, https://doi.org/10.4012/dmj.2019-340
  26. Laser Treatment of Fiber Post and Final Push-Out Bond Strength: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis vol.39, pp.5, 2021, https://doi.org/10.1089/photob.2020.4809
  27. Push Out Bond Strength of a Glass Fibre Post to Root Dentine Pretreated with Proanthocyanidin and Phytosphingosine – An In Vitro Study vol.6, pp.2, 2021, https://doi.org/10.14744/eej.2021.22931
  28. Better Glass-fiber Post Preservation in Teeth with Ferrule When Subjected to Chewing vol.46, pp.4, 2021, https://doi.org/10.2341/20-186-l
  29. A laboratory study to assess the physical, mechanical, and 3‐D structural properties of nano‐apatite grafted glass fibre‐based endodontic posts vol.54, pp.12, 2014, https://doi.org/10.1111/iej.13630
  30. Does Multi-Fiber-Reinforced Composite-Post Influence the Filling Ability and the Bond Strength in Root Canal? vol.8, pp.12, 2014, https://doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering8120195