DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Assembly and Catalytic Properties of a 3D (4,6)-connected Cobalt-organic Framework with fsh Topology

  • Ming, Chun-Lun (College of Chemical Engineering, Hebei United University) ;
  • Zhang, Hao (College of Chemical Engineering, Hebei United University) ;
  • Li, Guang-Yue (College of Chemical Engineering, Hebei United University) ;
  • Cui, Guang-Hua (College of Chemical Engineering, Hebei United University)
  • Received : 2013.11.02
  • Accepted : 2013.11.25
  • Published : 2014.02.20

Abstract

Keywords

Experimental Section

Materials and Characterization Methods. All the reagents and solvents for synthesis were commercially available and used as received except for bbbm, which was synthesized according to the literature.23 The elemental analyses (C, H, and N) were performed on a Perkin-Elmer 240C analyzer. Thermal analysis was performed on a Netzsch TG 209 thermal analyzer from room temperature to 800 ℃ under N2 at a heating rate of 10 ℃/min. FT-IR spectrum was recorded from KBr pellets in the range of 4000-400 cm−1 on an Avatar 360 (Nicolet) spectrophotometer. The luminescence spectra for the powdered solid samples were measured at room temperature on a Hitachi F-4500 fluorescence spectrophoto-meter. The X-ray powder diffraction (XRPD) pattern was recorded on a Rigaku D/Max-2500 diffractometer at 40 kV, 100 mA for a Cu-target tube and a graphite monochromator.

Synthesis of [Co(btec)0.5(bbbm)0.5]n. A mixture of Co(OAc)2 (0.1 mmol, 17.7 mg), bbbm (0.1 mmol, 29.0 mg), H4btec (0.1 mmol, 25.0 mg), and NaOH (0.4 mmol, 16.0 mg) in 15 mL of distilled H2O was sealed in a 25 mL Teflon-lined stainless steel container and heated at 140 ℃ for 3 days. After the mixture cooled to room temperature at a rate of 5 ℃/h, pink crystals of the complex were obtained with a yield of 46% (based on Co). Anal. Calcd for C14H10CoN2O4 (%): C, 51.06; H, 3.06; N, 8.51%. Found: C, 51.12; H, 3.18; N, 8.62%. IR (KBr, cm−1): 3434m, 3136w, 2985w, 1743m, 1607s, 1571s, 1420m, 1373s, 1324w, 1289w, 1221w, 1131w, 919m, 822m, 759m, 581w.

Crystallography. The crystal data for title complex was collected on a Bruker Smart 1000 CCD diffractometer with Mo-Kα radiation (λ = 0.71073 Å) and ω-2θ scan mode at 293 K. A semi-empirical absorption correction was applied using the SADABS program.24 The structure was solved by direct methods and refined on F2 by full-matrix least-squares technique using the SHELXL-97 program package.25 All nonhydrogen atoms were located in difference Fourier maps and refined anisotropically. The H-atoms of organic ligands were generated theoretically onto the specific atoms and refined isotropically. CCDC-967936 contains the supplementary crystallographic data. The crystallographic data is summarized in Table S1 (Supporting Information), and the selected bond lengths and angles are listed in Table S2 for the complex.

Catalytic Experiment. The complex was used as hetero-geneous catalyst (20 mg) for the degradation of the thermo-statted dye (congo red solution 50 mL with 20 mg/L), and H2O2 (0.5 mL, 30%, w/w) in the aqueous solution. At preset time intervals, samples were taken by a glass syringe and filtered through 0.45 μm membrane filter. The dye concentrations of congo red was measured using a TU-1901 UV-vis spectrophotometer at λmax = 496 nm. The degradation effici-ency of congo red was represented as follows:26

Where C0 (mg/L) is the initial concentration of congo red, and Ct (mg/L) is the concentration of congo red remaining in solution, t (min).

 

Results and Discussion

Single-crystal X-ray diffraction analysis reveals that the complex crystallizes in the triclinic Pī space group. The asymmetric unit consists of one crystallographically distin-guishing Co(II) cation, a half btec4− anion, and a half bbbm ligand. As shown in Figure 1(a), each Co(II) atom exhibits a distorted octahedral environment, the equatorial plane of which comprises four carboxylate oxygen (O1A, O2, O3, O4, A = −x+2, −y, −z+2) atoms from three distinct gbtec4− anions, one nitrogen atom (N1) belonging to the bbbm ligand and one carboxylate oxygen (O4B, B = −x+1, −y, −z+2) of btec4− inhabiting the apical site. The Co—N bond distance is 2.053(1) Å and the Co—O bond lengths are in the range of 2.027(1)—273(1) Å, which are in the normal range of those observed in cobalt complexes.27

Each fully deprotonated btec4− bridge acts as a μ6-bridge linking six cobalt centers, in which two carboxylate groups adopt a μ2-ƞ1:ƞ1-bis-monodentate coordination mode, while the other two carboxylate groups reveal a μ2-ƞ2:ƞ1-chelating coordination mode connecting two Co(II) atoms, respective-ly (Figure 1(b)). Two Co atoms are bridged by two carboxylate groups to form a [Co2(btec)2]4− unit with a Co—Co distance of 8.3129 Å. Such resulting binuclear units make up infinite [Co2(btec)2]n 4− 2D slightly distorted brick wall archi-tecture (Figure 1(c)). Furthermore, the bbbm adopts a bis-monodetate fashion coordinating to the Co centers in the trans-configuration and the two benzimidazole rings of one bbbm ligand are parallel to each other. To know more about the network, the topology provides a convenient tool in self-assembling and understanding the complicated crystal struc-tures of coordination polymers. Such structures can usually be reduced to simple topological networks with different connectivity of the components. As can be seen Figure 1(d), the flexible bbbm ligands link the adjacent layers to feature a 3D noninterpenetrating network. Thus, the 3D structure of the complex can be simplified as a unique mixed nodes, 4,6- connected fsh network with the topology notation of (43.63)2(46.66.83) analyzed by TOPOS 4.0 program.28 In the topological network, bbbm ligand can be simplified to be linear connectors; each btec4− ligand can be viewed as 6-connected node, which is linked with six Co atoms; each Co center bridges one bbbm and three distinct btec4− ligands, viewed as 4-connected nodes in tetrahedral sphere (Figure 1(e)).

Figure 1.(a) Local coordination geometry of the central Co(II) cation in the complex (all H atoms are omitted for clarity). (b) Coordination mode of the H4btec ligand in the complex. (c) 2D slightly distorted brick wall architecture consisting of infinite [Co2(btec)2]4−. (d) Perspective view of the 3D framework. (e) 3D framework with binodal (4,6)-connected fsh topology.

IR Spectrum and XRPD Pattern. The main features in the IR spectrum of the complex concern the carboxylates and N-containing benzimidazole ligands. There is no absorp-tion peak between 1730 and 1649 cm−1, indicating that all carboxyl groups of the organic moieties are deprotonated.29 The strong bands at around 1571 cm−1 can be attributed to the v(C=N) absorption of the benzimidazole rings. The weak absorption peaks of -CH2- groups in the complexes appear at around 2985 cm−1. The characteristic peaks of the carboxyl groups appear at ca. 1607 cm−1 for asymmetric vibrations and at 1373 cm−1 for symmetric vibrations in the complex.

The simulated and experimental XRPD patterns of compound, obtained at room temperature, are shown in Figure S1. Their peak positions are in good consistency with each other, indicating the phase purity of the as-synthesized samples.

Thermal Analysis. The thermogravimetric analysis of powder sample of the complex was carried out from 18 to 800 ℃ under a nitrogen atmosphere at a heating rate of 10 ℃ min−1, as shown in Figure S2. The TGA curve for the compound shows that chemical decomposition starts at 448 ℃ and ends at 595 ℃ with the weight loss of 77.10%, equivalent to the removal of coordinated bbbm and 1,2,4,5- benzenetetracarboxylate ligands (calcd. 77.24%); the remain-ing weight corresponds to CoO.

Fluminescence Property. Luminescent metal-organic frameworks have received remarkable attention owing to their higher thermal stability than the pure organic ligand and the ability to affect the emission wavelength and inten-sity of the organic material by metal coordination.

The emission spectra of complex along with the free bbbm ligand have been investigated in the solid state at room temperature. The emission peaks are shown in Figure 3. The maximum of emission band is at about 400 nm (λex = 323 nm) for the bbbm ligand, which may be ascribed to the π → π* electronic transition of the bbbm.30 Comparing with the free bbbm ligand, the emission maximum of the complex (λem = 355 nm, λex = 290 nm) undergoes blue-shifted 45 nm, which could be derived from the reduced conjugation of the bbbm ligand upon coordination. The emission band of the complex can be tentatively attributed to the intraligand charge transfer transitions.31

Catalyetic Degradation Expriment. Although CPs still cannot completely replace inorganic materials, such as the classical molecular sieves and zeolites in catalysis, CPs can be regarded as the good candidates for fine organic synthesis and enantioselective catalysis under mild conditions. Generally, the CPs catalytic activity may originate from the open metal sites, reactive functional groups and host matrices or nano-metric reaction cavities.32 Congo red (sodium salt of benzidinediazo-bis-1-naphtylamine-4 sulfonic acid) is one of the important azo dyes, used for textiles, printing and dyeing, paper, rubber, plastics industries, etc. Due to its structural stability, congo red is difficult to biodegrade. Recently, much attention has been focused on the hetero-geneous Fenton and Fenton-like reactions to oxidize con-taminants of concern such as azo dyes, which largely depend on transition metal-based catalysts.33 Moreover, hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) is a precursor of hydroxyl radicals, which can degrade and mineralization azo dye molecules in water.34

The degradation experiments of congo red by hydrogen peroxide activated with the complex were investigated. As shown in Figure 4, in the control experiment, the dye and H2O2 mixture is stable without any distinct change in the absorbance of dye, which indicates that there is no reaction takes place between the dye and H2O2, and the degradation efficiency was very low with only 9.70 % after 110 min. The reaction system is setup by adding the catalyst and H2O2 into the dye solution. Addition of 20 mg catalyst in the reaction system, the rate of the catalytic reaction increases quickly in first 10 min (up to 81.00%), then the congo red oxidation proceeded in a gradual manner, in which degradation efficiencies were up to 99.11% after 110 min, indicating the complex is a highly active for the Fenton-like reaction to decompose congo red. Compared with the similar catalyst, the Complex has a remarkable performance on degradation of congo red.35

Based on the experimental observations, the mode of action of the catalysis was suggested utilizing the redox properties of H2O2 in Fenton process.36

The Fenton’s reagent involves reaction of Co(II) ion with hydrogen peroxide to produce hydroxyl radicals, which are strong oxidizing reagents that react with the dye solution (congo red) causing its degradation.

H2O2 + Co(II)-MOF → ·OH + OH− + Co(III)-MOF H2O2 + Co(III)-MOF → Co(II)-MOF + ·OOH + H+ Azo dye + ·OH → oxidation products

The hydroxyl radical propagates the reaction by reacting with CR dye to produce further radicals, which can then react in many different steps.

Figure 2.The emission spectra of the complex and the free bbbm ligand.

Figure 3.Kinetic profile for catalytic degradation of congo red with H2O2 in the presence of heterogeneous catalyst: the black line reveals the degradation efficiency with catalyst, the red line represents the degradation efficiency without catalyst.

·OH + CR → ·CR + H2O ·CR + H2O2 → CR-OH + ·OH

In summary, we have synthesized and topologically charac-terized a cobalt(II) metal-organic framework with a unique (4,6)-connected fsh topology. Furthermore, the complex displays the high catalytic activity on Fenton-like process to degrade congo red azo dye.

References

  1. Furukawa, H.; Cordova, K. E.; O'Keeffe, M.; Yaghi, Omar, M. Science 2013, 341, 1230444. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1230444
  2. Ma, Z. B.; Moulton, B. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2011, 255, 1623. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ccr.2011.01.031
  3. Xu, W. J.; Zhang, L. Y.; Tang, J, N.; Wang, D. Y.; Pan, G. H.; Fang, Y. Bull. Korean Chem. Soc. 2013, 34, 2375. https://doi.org/10.5012/bkcs.2013.34.8.2375
  4. Lin, Z. J.; Tong, M. L. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2011, 255, 421. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ccr.2010.10.006
  5. Chen, S. S.; Zhao, Y.; Fan, J.; Okamura, T. A.; Bai, Z. S.; Chen, Z. H.; Sun, W. Y. CrystEngComm. 2012, 14, 3564. https://doi.org/10.1039/c2ce06632g
  6. Xia, C. K.; Lu, C. Z.; Yuan, D. Q.; Zhang, Q. Z.; Wu, X. Y.; Xiang, S. C.; Zhang, J. J.; Wu, D. M. CrystEngComm. 2006, 8, 281. https://doi.org/10.1039/b600741d
  7. Du, M.; Li, C. P.; Liu, C. S.; Fang, S. M. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2013, 257, 1282. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ccr.2012.10.002
  8. Li, Y. W.; Ma, H.; Chen, Y. Q.; He, K. H.; Li, Z. X.; Bu, X. H. Cryst. Growth Des. 2012, 12, 189. https://doi.org/10.1021/cg200926z
  9. Li, Z. X.; Xu, Y.; Zuo, Y.; Li, L.; Pan, Q. H.; Hu, T. L.; Bu, X. H. Cryst. Growth Des. 2009, 9, 3904. https://doi.org/10.1021/cg801250g
  10. Rao, C. N. R.; Natarajan, S.; Vaidhyanathan, R. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2004, 43, 1466. https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.200300588
  11. Qin, L.; Zheng, J.; Xiao, S. L.; Zheng, X. H.; Cui, G. H. Inorg. Chem. Commun. 2013, 34, 71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.inoche.2013.05.011
  12. Xiao, S. L.; Cui, G. H.; Blatov, V. B.; Geng, J. C.; Li, G. Y. Bull. Korean Chem. Soc. 2013, 34, 1891. https://doi.org/10.5012/bkcs.2013.34.6.1891
  13. Sumida, K.; Rogow, D. L.; Mason, J. A.; McDonald, T. M.; Bloch, E. D.; Herm, Z. R.; Bae, T. H.; Long, J. R. Chem. Rev. 2012, 112, 724. https://doi.org/10.1021/cr2003272
  14. Wang, X. W.; Chen, J. Z.; Liu, J. H. Cryst. Growth Des. 2007, 7, 1227. https://doi.org/10.1021/cg070330w
  15. Han, L.; Zhou, Y. Inorg. Chem. Commun. 2008, 11, 385. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.inoche.2007.11.016
  16. Qin, Y. L.; Liu, J.; Hou, J. J.; Yao, R. X.; Zhang, X. M. Cryst. Growth Des. 2012, 12, 6068. https://doi.org/10.1021/cg301192y
  17. Bisht, K. K.; Suresh, E. Cryst. Growth Des. 2013, 13, 664. https://doi.org/10.1021/cg301329c
  18. Zhou, Y.; Han, L.; Pan, J. G.; Li, X.; Zheng, Y. Q. Inorg. Chem. Commun. 2008, 11, 1107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.inoche.2008.06.008
  19. He, C. H.; Jiao, C. H.; Geng, J. C.; Cui, G. H. J. Coord. Chem. 2012, 65, 2294. https://doi.org/10.1080/00958972.2012.692783
  20. Geng, J. C.; Qin, L.; Du, X.; Xiao, S. L.; Cui, G. H. Z. Anorg. Allg. Chem. 2012, 638, 1233. https://doi.org/10.1002/zaac.201100560
  21. Yang, G. P.; Hou, L.; Wang, Y. Y.; Zhang, Y. N.; Shi, Q. Z.; Batten, S. R. Cryst. Growth Des. 2011, 11, 936. https://doi.org/10.1021/cg101663a
  22. Guo, F.; Wang, F.; Yang, H.; Zhang, X. L.; Zhang, J. Inorg. Chem. 2012, 51, 9677. https://doi.org/10.1021/ic3008969
  23. Xie, X. J.; Yang, G. S.; Cheng, L.; Wang, F. Huaxue Shiji (Chin. Ed.) 2000, 22, 222.
  24. Sheldrick, G. M.; SADABS (version 2.03), Program for Empirical Absorption Correction of Area Detector Data, University of Gottingen, Gottingen (Germany) 1996.
  25. Sheldrick, G. M. Acta Crystallogr. 2008, A64, 112.
  26. Fan, J.; Guo, Y. H.; Wang, J. J.; Fan, M. H. J. Hazard. Mater. 2009, 166, 904. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2008.11.091
  27. Liu, G. C.; Y, S.; Wang, X. L.; Lin, H. Y.; Tian, A. X.; Zhang, J. W. Russ. J. Coord. Chem. 2009, 35, 25. https://doi.org/10.1134/S1070328409010060
  28. Blatov, V. A. Struct. Chem. 2012, 23, 955. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11224-012-0013-3
  29. Tao, B.; Lei, W.; Cheng, F. R.; Xia, H. Bull. Korean Chem. Soc. 2012, 33, 1929. https://doi.org/10.5012/bkcs.2012.33.6.1929
  30. Bai, H. Y.; Wang, S. M.; Fan, W. Q.; Liu, C. B.; Che, G. B. Polyhedron. 2013, 50, 193. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.poly.2012.10.047
  31. Jin, S. W.; Wang, D. Q.; Chen, W. Z. Inorg. Chem. Commun. 2007, 10, 685. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.inoche.2007.02.024
  32. Isaeva, V. I.; Kustov, L. M. Petrol. Chem. 2010, 50, 167. https://doi.org/10.1134/S0965544110030011
  33. Mane, V. S.; Vijay Babu, P. V. J. Taiwan. Inst. Chem. Eng. 2013, 44, 81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtice.2012.09.013
  34. Ramirez, J. H.; Duarte, F. M.; Martins, F. G.; Costa, C. A.; Madeira, L. M. Chem. Eng. J. 2009, 148, 394. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2008.09.012
  35. Etaiw, S. E. H.; Badr El-din, A. S.; El-bendary, M. M. Z. Anorg. Allg. Chem. 2013, 639, 810. https://doi.org/10.1002/zaac.201200507
  36. Schrank, S. G.; Santos, J. N. R.; Souza, D. S.; Souza, E. E. S. J. Photochem. Photobiol., A 2007, 186, 125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jphotochem.2006.08.001

Cited by

  1. Self-assembly of two 2D cobalt(II) coordination polymers constructed from 5-tert-butyl isophthalic acid and flexible bis(benzimidazole)-based ligands vol.39, pp.6, 2014, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11243-014-9846-5
  2. Syntheses, Structures, and Luminescence Properties of Two Copper(II) Complexes Constructed by Rigid Bis(triazole) and Nitrogen-containing Carboxylic Acid Ligands vol.36, pp.7, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1002/bkcs.10360
  3. Construction of 0D, 1D and 2D cobalt(II) complexes containing flexible bis(benzimidazole) and dicarboxylic acid ligands vol.40, pp.1, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11243-014-9894-x
  4. Syntheses, Structures, and Catalytic Properties of Two 2D Manganese(II) Coordination Polymers Containing Flexible Bis(benzimidazole) Ligands vol.641, pp.11, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1002/zaac.201500260
  5. Copper(I) and Silver(I) Coordination Polymers Based on Rigid Bis(triazole) Ligand: Syntheses, Structures, and Catalytic Properties vol.642, pp.1, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1002/zaac.201500686
  6. A High-connected Cobalt(II) Pyromellitate MOF Displaying An Uncommon Decadentate Coordination Mode vol.35, pp.11, 2014, https://doi.org/10.5012/bkcs.2014.35.11.3349
  7. 1H-3-(2-pyridyl)-5-(3-pyridyl)-1,2,4-triazole (2,3′-Hbpt) as ligand in Cd(II) complexes: synthesis, crystal structures, and fluorescence vol.68, pp.11, 2014, https://doi.org/10.1080/00958972.2015.1040401