DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Performance Modeling of a Pyrotechnically Actuated Pin Puller

  • Jang, Seung-Gyo (Advanced Propulsion Technology Center, Agency for Defense Development) ;
  • Lee, Hyo-Nam (Advanced Propulsion Technology Center, Agency for Defense Development) ;
  • Oh, Jong-Yun (Advanced Propulsion Technology Center, Agency for Defense Development)
  • Received : 2013.12.19
  • Accepted : 2014.03.04
  • Published : 2014.03.30

Abstract

An analytical model was developed to understand the physics and predict the functional performance of a pin puller. The formulated model is based on one-dimensional gas dynamics for an ideal gas. Resistive forces against pin shaft movement were measured in quasi-static mechanical tests, the results of which were incorporated into the model. The expansion chamber pressure and the pin shaft displacement were measured from an actual firing test and compared to the model prediction. The gas generation rate was adjusted by a correction factor, and the heat transfer rate was obtained through parametric analysis. The validity of the model is assessed for additional firing tests with different amounts of pyrotechnic charge. This model can provide knowledge on how the pin puller functions, and on which design parameters contribute the most to the actuation of the pin puller. Using this model, we estimate the functional safety factor by comparing the energy generated by the pyrotechnic charge to the energy required to accomplish the function.

Keywords

References

  1. O. Brauer, Handbook of Pyrotechnics, Chemical Publishing Co. Inc., New York, 1974,
  2. D. J. Finney, Probit Analysis a Statistical Treatment of the Sigmoid Response Curve, Cambridge Univ. Press, London, 1952.
  3. J. W. Dixon, and A. M. Mood, "A Method for Obtaining and Analyzing Sensitivity data," Journal of the American Statistical Association, Vol. 43, No. 241, 1948, pp. 109-126. https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.1948.10483254
  4. H. J. Langlie, A Reliability Test Method for One-Shot Items, Technical Report U-1792, Aeronutronic Division of Ford Motor Company, Newport Beach, California, 1965.
  5. Barry T. Neyer, "A D-Optimality-Based Sensitivity Test," Technometrics, Vol. 36, No. 1, 1994, pp. 61-70.
  6. Hobin S. Lee, "Modeling of a Hydraulically Damped Pyrotechnic Actuators", 47th AIAA Aerospace Science Meeting including the New Horizons Forum and Aerospace Exposition, AIAA, Orland, FL, 2009, pp. 761.
  7. Adam M. Braud, Keith A. Gonthier, and Michele E. Decroix, "System Modeling of Explosively Actuated Valves", Journal of Propulsion and Power, Vol. 23, No. 5, 2007, pp.1080-1095. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.27414
  8. S. B. Shmuel, "Performance Analysis of a Normally Closed Pyrovalve", 46th AIAA/ASME/SAE/ASEE Joint Propulsion Conference and Exhibition, AIAA, Indianapolis, IN, 2002, pp. 3552.
  9. J. D. Kutschka, "Pyrotechnically Actuated Mechanism Performance Prediction and Test Correlation", 36th AIAA/ ASME/SAE/ASEE Joint Propulsion Conference and Exhibition, AIAA, Huntsville, AL, 2000, pp. 3513.
  10. P. G. Amand, and J. A. Tiemon, "Mathematical Model of the Ballistic and Mechanical Behavior of Ordnance Systems", 31st AIAA/ASME/SAE/ASEE Joint Propulsion Conference and Exhibition, AIAA, San Diego, CA, 1995, pp. 2853.
  11. K. A. Gonthier, and J. M. Powers, "Formulation, Prediction, and Sensitivity Analysis of a Pyrotechnically Actuated Pin Puller Model", Journal of Propulsion and Power, Vol. 10, No. 4, 1994, pp. 501-507. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.23800
  12. C. A. LaJeunesse, and M. F. Hardwick, "Design Methodology and Testing of an Electro-Explosive Valve", Proceedings of the 1994 ASME Pressure Vessels and Piping Conference, Honolulu, HI, 1994.
  13. J. H. Kuo, and S. Goldstein, "Dynamic Analysis of NASA Standard Initiator Deriven Pin Puller", 29th AIAA/ASME/SAE/ ASEE Joint Propulsion Conference and Exhibition, AIAA, Monterey, CA, 1993, pp. 2066.
  14. Hobin S. Lee, "Unsteady Gas-dynamics Effects in Pyrotechnic Actuators," Journal of Spacecraft and Rockets, Vol. 41, No. 5, 2004, pp.877-886. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.2594
  15. Bonnie J. McBride, and Sanford Gordon, "Computer Program for Calculation of Complex Chemical Equilibrium Compositions and Applications", NASA Reference Publication 1311, Part II, 1996.
  16. Parker O-Ring Handbook 2001 Edition, Parker Hannifin Corporation, Cleveland, OH, 2001.
  17. N. Baldanzini, "A General Formulation for Designing Interface-fit Joints with Elastic-Plastic Components", Journal of Mechanical Design, Vol. 126, Issue 4, 2004, pp.737-743. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.1758247
  18. B. Parsons, and E.A. Wilson, "A Method for Determining the Surface Contact Stresses resulting from Interference Fits", Journal of manufacturing Science and Engineering, Vol. 92, No. 1, 1970, pp.208-218.
  19. Adreas Dibbern et al., "Implication of Dynamic Pressure Transducer Mounting Variations on Measurements in Pyrotechnic Test Apparatus", 45th AIAA/ASME/SAE/ASEE Joint Propulsion Conference & Exhibit, AIAA, Denver, Colorado, 2009, pp. 4992.
  20. "Criteria for Explosive Systems and Devices on Space and Launch Vehicles", AIAA S-113-2005 Standard, American Institute of Aeronautics and Astrinautics, AIAA, Reston, VA, 2005, p.16.

Cited by

  1. Numerical Analysis and Simplified Mathematical Modeling of Separation Mechanism for the Ball-type Separation Bolt vol.20, pp.3, 2016, https://doi.org/10.6108/KSPE.2016.20.3.063
  2. Reliability Evaluation of a Pin Puller via Monte Carlo Simulation vol.16, pp.4, 2015, https://doi.org/10.5139/IJASS.2015.16.4.537
  3. Simulation and experiment investigation on structural design and reinforcement of pyrotechnical sliding micro-actuators vol.88, pp.3, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10470-016-0783-4
  4. Confidence Interval of Bayesian Network and Global Sensitivity Analysis vol.55, pp.11, 2017, https://doi.org/10.2514/1.J055888
  5. Parametric Analysis and Design Optimization of a Pyrotechnically Actuated Device vol.17, pp.3, 2016, https://doi.org/10.5139/IJASS.2016.17.3.409
  6. Mathematical Model for the Separation Behavior of Low-Shock Separation Bolts vol.55, pp.5, 2018, https://doi.org/10.2514/1.A34090
  7. Prediction of Pyroshock-Reduced Separation Nut Behaviors vol.34, pp.5, 2018, https://doi.org/10.2514/1.B36906
  8. An Analysis of the Different Flow Characteristics of a Closed Bomb Test in Cylindrical and Spherical Closed Vessels pp.2093-2480, 2019, https://doi.org/10.1007/s42405-018-0116-1
  9. System Reliability-Based Design Optimization Under Tradeoff Between Reduction of Sampling Uncertainty and Design Shift vol.141, pp.4, 2019, https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4041859