KSCE Journal of Civil and Environmental Engineering Research (대한토목학회논문집)

Korean Society of Civil Engeneers (대한토목학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Eco-river Restoration and River Management in Response to Climate Change

기후변화를 고려한 생태하천 복원 및 관리방향에 관한 연구

  • 강형식 (한국환경정책평가연구원 정책연구본부 물환경연구실)
  • Received : 2013.01.14
  • Accepted : 2013.09.27
  • Published : 2014.02.01
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

In this study, using a complex of physical, chemical, and biological evaluation factors, the ecological vulnerability to climate change were evaluated at each river in the Nakdong river basin. First, runoff, sediment rate, and low flow discharge changes according to AIB climate change scenario using the SWAT model were simulated. Also, for the assessment of chemical and biological factors, 48 points that water quality monitoring sites and ecological health measurement points are matched with each other was selected. The water quality data of BOD and T-P and the biological data of IBI and KSI in each point were reflected in the assessment. Also, the future rise in water temperature of the rivers in Nakdong river basin was predicted, and the impact of water temperature rise on the fish habitat was evaluated. The top 10 most vulnerable points was presented through a summary of each evaluation factor. This study has a contribution to river restoration or management plan according to the characteristics of each river.

본 연구에서는 낙동강 유역을 대상으로 물리, 화학, 생물학적의 복합적인 평가요소를 이용하여 수생태 관련 기후변화 취약구간을 선정하였다. 먼저 SWAT 모형을 이용하여 A1B 기후변화 시나리오에 따라 각 소유역별로 유출량, 유사량, 갈수량 변화를 모의하였다. 또한 환경부의 수질 측정망과 수생태 건강성 측정 지점이 서로 일치하는 48개 지점을 대상으로, BOD 및 TP 등의 수질 데이터와 IBI, KSI의 수생물 데이터를 평가에 반영하였다. 한편, 미래 기온 상승에 따른 낙동강 유역 하천에서의 수온 상승 폭을 예측하였고, 이로 인한 수생물 서식처 영향을 분석하여 평가에 반영하였다. 각 평가요소를 종합하여 가장 취약한 상위 10개 지점을 제시하였다. 본 연구는 하천 생태복원을 위한 취약구간 평가 및 종합적인 평가 결과를 토대로 각 하천 특성에 맞는 하천 관리 계획을 수립하는데 있어 효과적일 것으로 사료된다.

Keywords

References

  1. Ahn, C. H., Joo, J. C., Kwon, J. H. and Song, H. M. (2011). "Evaluation on functional assessment for fish habitat of underground type eco-artificial fish reef using the index of biological and qualitative habitat evaluation index." J. of Korea Society Civil Engrg, KSCE, Vol. 31, No. 6B. pp. 565-575 (in Korean).
  2. ASCE (1993). "ASCE Task committee on definition of criteria for evaluation of watershed models." Irrigation Drainage Engineering, Vol. 119, No. 3, pp. 429-442. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9437(1993)119:3(429)
  3. Cho, Y. H. (1997). Development of evaluation method of naturality for ecological restoration in mid-small streams. Ph.D. Thesis, Seoul National University (in Korean).
  4. Donigian, Jr., A. S. (2000). HSPF training workshop handbook and CD. Lecture #19: Calibration and Verification Issues, EPA Headquarters, Washington Information Center, Washington, DC.
  5. Eaton, J. G., McCormick, J. H., Goodno, B. E., O'Brien, D. G., Stefany, H. G., Hondzo, M. and Scheller, R. M. (1995). "A field information based system for estimating fish temperature tolerances." Fisheries, Vol. 20, No. 4, pp. 10-18.
  6. Gyeonggi Research Institute (2008). Strategy of stream restoration in Gyeonggi province through an assessment of stream naturality and ecological health (in Korean).
  7. Han River Watershed Management Committe (2010). Effects of climate change of aquatic ecosystem and control measures (in Korean).
  8. Han, D. H. (2011). Temporal and spatial analysis of water temperature and water quality assessment of streams and reservoirs in Korea. Ph.D. Thesis, Seoul National University (in Korean).
  9. Jang, J. H. and Ahn, J. H. (2012). "Hydrologic and water quality response to precipitation extremes in Nakdong river basin." J. of Korea Water Resources Association, KWRA, Vol. 45, No. 11, pp. 1081-1091 (in Korean). https://doi.org/10.3741/JKWRA.2012.45.11.1081
  10. Jung, N. I., Park, B. K. and Kim, K. H. (2011). "Potential effect of increased water temperature on fish habitats in Han river watershed." J. of Korea Society on Water Quality, Vol. 27, No. 3, pp. 314-321 (in Korean).
  11. Kang H., Jang J. H., Ahn, J. H. and Kim, I. J. (2011). "Numerical estimations of nakdong river flows through linking of watershed and river flow models." J. of Korea Water Resources Association, KWRA, Vol. 44, No. 7, pp. 577-590 (in Korean). https://doi.org/10.3741/JKWRA.2011.44.7.577
  12. Kang, H., Park, M. Y. and Jang J. H. (2013). "Effect of climate change on fish habitat in nakdong river watershed." J. of Korea Water Resources Association, KWRA, Vol. 46, No. 1, pp. 1-12 (in Korean). https://doi.org/10.3741/JKWRA.2013.46.1.1
  13. Kim, S. K. (2006). A study on the evaluation method of close-tonature stream improvement works. Ph.D. Thesis, Honam University (in Korean).
  14. Korea Environment Institute (2011). Water quality management strategy in the context of climate change I. Green Growth Report (in Korean).
  15. Korea Environment Institute (2011). Water quality management strategy in the context of climate changeII. Green Growth Report (in Korean).
  16. Lee, J. H., Kang, T. H., Sung, Y. D. and Yoon, S. Y. (2003). "Applicability of a stream evaluation method for stream restoration." Applicability of A Stream Evaluation Method for Stream Restoration, Vol. 3, No. 4, pp. 131-143 (in Korean).
  17. Ministry of Environment (2010). Hydroecological Health investigation and assessment - Nakdong river watershed (in Korean).
  18. Ministry of Environment (2011). Ecological stream restoration technique guide (in Korean).
  19. Ministry of land, Transport, and Marine (2012). Water resources long term comprehensive plan (2011-2020). pp. 129-153 (in Korean).
  20. National Institute of Meteorological Research (2012). Climate change scenario report to cope with IPCC 5 report. pp. 79-111 (in Korean).
  21. USDA (2009). Stream visual assessment protocol version 2. 190-VI -NBH, National Biology Handbook. Part 614. pp. 1-41.
  22. Van Lynden, G. W. J. and Lane, M. (2004). "Soil and water protection using conservation tillage in northen and central europe." ISCO 2004 - 13th International Soil Conservation Organization Conference. Paper No. 418.