DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Dietary Conjugated Linoleic Acid (CLA) increases milk yield without losing body weight in lactating sows

  • Lee, Sung-Hoon (Livestock Experiment Station, Gyeongsangnamdo Livestock Promotion Research Institute) ;
  • Joo, Young-Kuk (Livestock Experiment Station, Gyeongsangnamdo Livestock Promotion Research Institute) ;
  • Lee, Jin-Woo (Livestock Experiment Station, Gyeongsangnamdo Livestock Promotion Research Institute) ;
  • Ha, Young-Joo (Livestock Experiment Station, Gyeongsangnamdo Livestock Promotion Research Institute) ;
  • Yeo, Joon-Mo (Department of Beef & Dairy Science, Korea National College of Agriculture and Fisheries) ;
  • Kim, Wan-Young (Department of Beef & Dairy Science, Korea National College of Agriculture and Fisheries)
  • Received : 2014.05.15
  • Accepted : 2014.07.24
  • Published : 2014.07.31

Abstract

This study was conducted to evaluate the effects of dietary conjugated linoleic acid (CLA) on the performance of lactating sows and piglets as well as the immunity of piglets suckling from sows fed CLA. Eighteen multiparous Duroc sows with an average body weight (BW) of $232.0{\pm}6.38kg$ were randomly selected and assigned to two dietary treatments (n = 9 for each treatment), control (no CLA addition) and 1% CLA supplementation. For the control diet, CLA was replaced with soybean oil. Experimental diets were fed to sows during a 28-day lactation period. Litter size for each sow was standardized to nine piglets by cross-fostering within 24 hours after birth. Sow milk and blood samples were taken from sows and piglets after 21 and 27 days of lactation, respectively. Loss of BW was significantly (p < 0.05) higher in sows fed control diet compared to sows fed CLA diet. Piglet weights at weaning and weight gain during suckling were significantly (p < 0.05) higher in sows fed CLA compared to sows fed control diet. Serum non-esterified fatty acid (NEFA) and urea nitrogen concentrations were significantly (p < 0.05) lower in sows fed CLA than in sows fed soybean oil. IgG concentrations of the groups supplemented with CLA increased by 49% in sow serum (p < 0.0001), 23% in milk (p < 0.05), and 35% in piglet serum (p < 0.05) compared with the control group. Sows fed CLA showed an increase of 10% in milk yield compared with sows fed soybean oil (p < 0.05), even though there was no difference in daily feed intake between the treatments. Milk fat content was significantly (p < 0.05) lower in sows fed CLA than in sows fed soybean oil. Solid-not-fat yield was significantly (p < 0.05) higher in sows supplemented with CLA than in sows fed control diet and also protein-to-fat ratio in milk was significantly (p < 0.05) higher in sows fed CLA compared with the control group. The results show that CLA supplementation to sows increased milk yield without losing BW during lactation, whereas soybean oil supplementation resulted in severe BW loss.

Keywords

References

  1. Boyd RD, Kensinger RS. In Metabolic precursors for milk synthesis, Page 71 in The Lactating Sow. Edited by Verstegen MWA, Moughun PJ, Schrama JW. Wageningen, the Netherlands: Wageningen Press; 1998.
  2. Mahan DC, Lepine AJ: Effect of weaning weight and associated nursery feeding programs on subsequent performance to 105 kilograms of body weight. J Anim Sci 1991, 69:1370-1378. https://doi.org/10.2527/1991.6941370x
  3. Azain MJ: Nutrition of the young pig, use of liquid diets, Pages 1-14 in Proc. 13th Annu. Raleigh, NC: Canolina Swine Nutr. Conf. Raleigh, NC. Canolina Feed Ind. Assoc; 1997.
  4. King RH, Williams IH: The effect of nutrition on the reproductive performance of first-litter sows. 2. Protein and energy intakes during lactation. Anim Prod 1984, 38:249-256. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003356100002245
  5. King RH, Dunkin AC: The effect of nutrition on the reproductive performance of first-litter sows. 4. The relative effects of energy and protein intakes during lactation on the performance of sows and their piglets. Anim Prod 1986, 43:319-325. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003356100002506
  6. Noblet J, Etienne M: Estimation of sow milk nutrient output. J Anim Sci 1989, 67:3352-3359. https://doi.org/10.2527/jas1989.67123352x
  7. Quesnel H, Etienne M, Père M-C: Influence of litter size on metabolic status and reproductive axis in primiparous sows. J Anim Sci 2007, 85:118-128. https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2006-158
  8. Clowes EJ, Aherne FX, Foxcroft GR, Baracos VE: Selective protein loss in lactating sows is associated with reduced litter growth and ovarian function. J Anim Sci 2003, 81:753-764. https://doi.org/10.2527/2003.813753x
  9. Thaker MYC, Bilkei G: Lactation weight loss influences subsequent reproductive performance of sows. Anim Reprod Sci 2005, 88:309-318. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anireprosci.2004.10.001
  10. Kepler CR, Hirons KP, McNeill JJ, Tove SB: Intermediates and products of the biohydrogenation of linoleic acid by Butyrivibrio fibrisolvens. J Biol Chem 1966, 241:1350-1354.
  11. Belury MA: Dietary conjugated linoleic acid in health: Physiological effects and mechanisms of action. Annu Rev Nutr 2002, 22:505-524. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.nutr.22.021302.121842
  12. Pariza MW: Perspective on the safety and effectiveness of conjugated linoleic acid. Am J Clin Nutr 2004, 79:1132S-1136S.
  13. Corino C, Pastorelli G, Rosi F, Bontempo V, Rossi R: Effect of dietary conjugated linoleic acid supplementation in sows on performance and immunoglobulin concentration in piglets. J Anim Sci 2009, 87:2299-2305. https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2008-1232
  14. Cordero G, Isabel B, Morales J, Menoyo D, Pineiro C, Daza A, Lopez-Bote CJ: Conjugated linoleic acid (CLA) during last week of gestation and lactation alters colostrums and milk fat composition and performance of reproductive sows. Anim Feed Sci Technol 2011, 168:232-240. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2011.04.085
  15. Speer VC, Cox DF: Estimating milk yield of sows. J Anim Sci 1984, 59:1281-1285. https://doi.org/10.2527/jas1984.5951281x
  16. Harrell RJ, Phillips O, Boyd RD, Dwyer DA, Bauman DE: Effects of conjugated linoleic acid on milk composition and baby pig growth in lactating sows, Annu Swine Report 2002. USA: NC State University; 2002.
  17. Peng Y, Ren F, Yin JD, Fang Q, Li FN, Li DF: Transfer of conjugated linoleic acid from sows to their offspring and its impact on the fatty acid profiles of plasma, muscle, and subcutaneous fat in piglets. J Anim Sci 2010, 88:1741-1751. https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2009-2354
  18. Corino C, Bontempo V, Sciannimanico D: Effects of dietary conjugated linoleic acid on some aspecific immune parameters and acute phase protein in weaned piglets. Can J Anim Sci 2002, 82:115-117. https://doi.org/10.4141/A01-041
  19. NRC: Nutrient Requirements of Swine. 10 revth edition. Washington, DC: Natl. Acad. Press; 1998.
  20. AOAC: Official Methods of Analysis (18th Ed). Washington DC: Association of Official Analytical Chemists; 2005.
  21. Sukhija PS, Palmquist DL: Rapid method for determination of total fatty acid content and composition of feedstuffs and feces. J Agric Food Chem 1988, 36:1202-1206. https://doi.org/10.1021/jf00084a019
  22. Mancini G, Carbonara AO, Heremans JF: Immunological quantitation of antigens by single radial immunodiffusion. Immunochemistry 1965, 2:235-243. https://doi.org/10.1016/0019-2791(65)90004-2
  23. SAS Institute: Statistics. Cary, NC: SAS/STAT user's guide, SAS Institute; 2004.
  24. Bontempo V, Sciannimanico D, Pastorelli G, Rossi R, Rosi F, Corino C: Dietary conjugated linoleic acid positively affects immunologic variables in lactating sows and piglets. J Nutr 2004, 134:817-824. https://doi.org/10.1093/jn/134.4.817
  25. Sanz M, Lopez-Bote CJ, Menoyo D, Bautista JM: Abdominal fat deposition and fatty acid synthesis are lower and beta-oxidation is higher in broiler chickens fed diets containing unsaturated rather than saturated fat. J Nutr 2000, 130:3034-3037. https://doi.org/10.1093/jn/130.12.3034
  26. Shimomura Y, Tamura T, Suzuki M: Less body-fat accumulation in rats fed a safflower oil diet than in rats fed a beef tallow diet. J Nutr 1990, 120:1291-1296. https://doi.org/10.1093/jn/120.11.1291
  27. Vicente JG, Isabel B, Cordero G, Lopez-Bote CJ: Fatty acid profile of the sow diet alters fat metabolism and fatty acid composition in weanling pigs. Anim Feed Sci Technol 2013, 181:45-53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2013.02.002
  28. Park JC, Kim YH, Jung HJ, Moon HK, Kwon OS, Lee BD: Effects of dietary supplementation of conjugated linoleic acid (CLA) on piglets' growth and reproductive performance in sows. Asian Aust J Anim Sci 2005, 18:249-254. https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.2005.249
  29. Dugan MER, Alhus JL, Schaefer AL, Kramer JKG: The effect of linoleic conjugated acid on fat to lean repartitioning and feed conversion in pigs. Can J Anim Sci 1997, 77:723-725. https://doi.org/10.4141/A97-084
  30. Ostrowska E, Muralitharan M, Cross RF, Bauman DE, Dunshea FR: Dietary conjugated linoleic acids increase lean tissue and decrease fat deposition in growing pigs. J Nutr 1999, 129:2037-2042.
  31. Thiel-Cooper RL, Parrish FC Jr, Sparks JC, Wiegand BR, Ewan RC: Conjugated linoleic acid changes swine performance and carcass composition. J Anim Sci 2001, 79:1821-1828. https://doi.org/10.2527/2001.7971821x
  32. Wiegand BR, Sparks JC, Parrish FC Jr, Zimmerman DR: Duration of feeding conjugated linoleic acid influences growth performance, carcass traits, and meat quality of finishing barrows. J Anim Sci 2002, 80:637-643. https://doi.org/10.2527/2002.803637x
  33. Barnes KM, Winslow NR, Shelton AG, Hlusko KC, Azain MJ: Effect of dietary conjugated linoleic acid on marbling and intramuscular adipocytes in pork. J Anim Sci 2012, 90:1142-1149. https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2011-4642
  34. Reese DE, Peo ER Jr, Lewis AJ: Relationship of lactation energy intake and occurrence of postweaning estrus to body and backfat composition in sows. J Anim Sci 1984, 58:1236-1244. https://doi.org/10.2527/jas1984.5851236x
  35. Kirkden RD, Broom DM, Andersen IL: Piglet mortality: Management solutions. J Anim Sci 2013, 91:3361-3389. https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2012-5637
  36. McNamara JP, Pettigrew JE: Protein and fat utilization in lactating sows: I. Effects on milk production and body composition. J Anim Sci 2002, 80:2442-2451. https://doi.org/10.2527/2002.8092442x
  37. Cabrera RA, Boyd RD, Jungst SB, Wilson ER, Johnston ME, Vignes JL, Odle J: Impact of lactation length and piglet weaning weight on long-term growth and viability of progeny. J Anim Sci 2010, 88:2265-2276. https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2009-2121
  38. Bee G: Dietary conjugated linoleic acid consumption during pregnancy and lactation influences growth and tissue composition in weaned pigs. J Nutr 2000, 130:2981-2989. https://doi.org/10.1093/jn/130.12.2981
  39. West DB, Delany JP, Camet PM, Blohm F, Truett AA, Scimeca J: Effects of conjugated linoleic acid on body fat and energy metabolism in the mouse. Am J Physiol 1998, 44:R667-R672.
  40. Ostrowska E, Cross RF, Muralitharan M, Bauman DE, Dunshea FR: Effects of dietary fat and conjugated linoleic acid on plasma metabolite concentrations and metabolic responses to homeostatic signals in pigs. Br J Nutr 2002, 88:625-634. https://doi.org/10.1079/BJN2002726
  41. Gutgesell A, Ringseis R, Eder K: Dietary conjugated linoleic acid down-regulates fatty acid transporters in the mammary glands of lactating rats. J Dairy Sci 2009, 92:1169-1173. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2008-1640
  42. Stangl GI: High dietary levels of a conjugated linoleic acid mixture alter hepatic glycerophospholipid class profile and cholesterol-carrying serum lipoproteins of rats. J Nutr Biochem 2000, 11:184-191. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0955-2863(00)00063-2
  43. Stangl GI: Conjugated linoleic acids exhibit a strong fat-to-lean partitioning effect, reduce serum VLDL lipids and redistribute tissue lipids in food-restricted rats. J Nutr 2000, 130:1140-1146. https://doi.org/10.1093/jn/130.5.1140
  44. Ramsay TG, Evock-Clover CM, Steele NC, Azain MJ: Dietary conjugated linoleic acid alters fatty acid composition of pig skeletal muscle and fat. J Anim Sci 2001, 79:2152-2161. https://doi.org/10.2527/2001.7982152x
  45. Mele MC, Cannelli G, Carta G, Cordeddu L, Melis MP, Murru E, Stanton C, Banni S: Metabolism of c9, t11-conjugated linoleic acid (CLA) in humans. PLEFA 2013, 89:115-119.
  46. Stangl GI, Muller H, Kirchgessner M: Conjugated linoleic acid effects on circulating hormones, metabolites and lipoproteins, and its proportion in fasting serum and erythrocyte membranes of swine. Eur J Nutr 1999, 38:271-277. https://doi.org/10.1007/s003940050077
  47. Nunes EA, Bonatto SJ, de Oliveira HHP, Rivera NLM, Maiorka A, Krabbe EL, Tanhoffer RA, Fernandes LC: The effect of dietary supplementation with 9-cis:12-trans and 10-trans:12-cis conjugated linoleic acid (CLA) for nine months on serum cholesterol, lymphocyte proliferation and polymorphonuclear cells function in Beagle dogs. Res Vet Sci 2008, 84:62-67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rvsc.2007.03.010
  48. Tucker HA: Physiological control of mammary growth, lactogenesis, and lactation. J Dairy Sci 1981, 64:1403-1421. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(81)82711-7
  49. Beckett GJ, Nicol F, Rae PW, Beach S, Guo Y, Arthur JR: Effects of combined iodine and selenium deficiency on thyroid hormone metabolism in rats. Am J Clin Nutr Suppl 1993, 57:2405-2435.
  50. Bernal-Santos G, Perfield JW II, Barbano DM, Bauman DE, Overton TE: Production responses of dairy cows to dietary supplementation with conjugated linoleic acid (CLA) during the transition period and early lactation. J Dairy Sci 2003, 86:3218-3228. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(03)73925-3
  51. Lock AL, Teles BM, Perfield JW II, Bauman DE, Sinclair LA: A conjugated linoleic acid supplement containing trans-10, cis-12 reduces milk fat synthesis in lactating sheep. J Dairy Sci 2006, 89:1525-1532. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(06)72220-2
  52. Husveth F, Galamb E, Gaal T, Dublecz K, Wagner L, Pal L: Milk production, milk composition, liver lipid contents and C18 fatty acid composition of milk and liver lipids in Awassi ewes fed a diet supplemented with protected cis-9, trans-11 and trans-10, cis-12 conjugated linoleic acid (CLA) isomers. Small Rum Res 2010, 94:25-31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.smallrumres.2010.06.003
  53. Poulos SP, Azain MJ, Hausman GJ: Conjugated linoleic acid (CLA) during gestation and lactation does not alter sow performance or body weight gain and adiposity in progeny. Anim Res 2004, 53:275-288. https://doi.org/10.1051/animres:2004022
  54. Griinari JM, Chouinard PY, Bauman DE: Trans fatty acid hypothesis of milk fat depression revised. Ithaca, NY: Proc. Cornell Nutr. Conf; 1997:208-216.
  55. Nam DS, Aherne FX: The effects of lysine: energy ratio on the performance of weanling pigs. J Anim Sci 1994, 72:1247-1256. https://doi.org/10.2527/1994.7251247x

Cited by

  1. Effect of dietary conjugated linoleic acid supplementation during late gestation on colostrum yield, fatty acid composition, and IgG concentrations in primiparous sows vol.98, pp.4, 2014, https://doi.org/10.1139/cjas-2017-0202
  2. Feeding Conjugated Linoleic Acid without a Combination of Medium-Chain Fatty Acids during Late Gestation and Lactation Improves Pre-Weaning Survival Rates of Gilt and Sow Progeny vol.9, pp.2, 2019, https://doi.org/10.3390/ani9020062
  3. Efficacy of methyl ester of conjugated linoleic acid (t10,c12 isomer) for sows and cows for reproduction vol.17, pp.3, 2014, https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2019.5614
  4. The Effect of Dietary Oil Type and Energy Intake in Lactating Sows on the Fatty Acid Profile of Colostrum and Milk, and Piglet Growth to Weaning vol.9, pp.12, 2019, https://doi.org/10.3390/ani9121092
  5. Trans-10,cis-12 conjugated linoleic acid reduces milk fat content and lipogenic gene expression in the mammary gland of sows without altering litter performance vol.123, pp.6, 2014, https://doi.org/10.1017/s0007114519003325
  6. The Role of Dietary and Microbial Fatty Acids in the Control of Inflammation in Neonatal Piglets vol.11, pp.10, 2021, https://doi.org/10.3390/ani11102781
  7. The effects of precisely meeting estimated daily energy and lysine requirements for gestating sows over three consecutive pregnancies on sow reproductive and lactation performance vol.5, pp.4, 2014, https://doi.org/10.1093/tas/txab226