Journal of the Korean Institute of Landscape Architecture (한국조경학회지)

The Korean Institute of Landscape Architecture (한국조경학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

An Analysis of the Behavior and the Preference of Roof Spaces Depending on Building Types - A Focus on the Case of Seoul, Korea -

건물용도별 옥상공간의 이용행태 및 선호도 분석 - 서울특별시의 사례를 중심으로 -

  • Kim, Eun-Jin (Dept. of Landscape Architecture, Graduate School, Kyungpook National University) ;
  • Jung, Tae-Yeol (Dept. of Landscape Architecture, Kyungpook National University)
  • 김은진 (경북대학교 대학원 조경학과) ;
  • 정태열 (경북대학교 조경학과)
  • Received : 2014.03.05
  • Accepted : 2014.10.25
  • Published : 2014.12.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Today, most roof spaces are being designed as places for resting. The use of the roof spaces needs to be raised otherwise, budgeting or costs involved can be wasteful. A well-made plan is needed to increase the use of the roof spaces. The behavior of and preference for roof spaces could differ depending on building usage because the users of these roof spaces can be different. Therefore, this study selected 4 building types depending on usage: public buildings, educational and research buildings, medical buildings, and commercial buildings. Two buildings that created roof spaces per building type were selected. A survey was undertaken of the user experience of roof spaces on the buildings. The behavior and preference of roof spaces depending on building types were analyzed and the results are as follows. The behavior of using roof spaces regarding purpose, motivation, frequency, and average length of stay were different depending on the building types. In terms of purpose, over all four building types, taking a rest was the primary reason for using roof spaces. However, talking and smoking in public buildings, smoking, taking a walk or stretching, and viewing the exterior landscape in educational and research buildings, taking a walk or stretching and talking in medical buildings, taking care of children and talking in commercial buildings were also important reasons for using roof spaces. The preference of roof space components such as plants, paving materials, and facilities were different depending on the building types. In terms of plants, the users of public buildings preferred herbaceous plants and vegetables/aquatic plants more than the users of other building types. The users of medical buildings preferred vegetables/aquatic plants, and the users of commercial buildings preferred arbores, herbaceous plants, and vegetables/aquatic plants more than the users of other building types. This study provides empirical data for the behavior and the preference of roof spaces depending on building types. These findings could provide new insights into how to increase the use of roof spaces.

오늘날 옥상공간은 대부분 휴식과 같은 이용을 목적으로 조성되고 있다. 하지만, 이러한 옥상공간의 이용이 적거나, 유지관리가 소홀하게 되면, 옥상공간이 방치되거나, 용도변경 등의 이유로 조성비용의 낭비를 초래할 수 있어, 이용을 활성화하기 위한 설계가 필요할 것으로 판단하였다. 한편, 국내의 경우, 옥상공간은 비교적 획일적이고 단순하게 조성되어 있다. 하지만, 건물용도에 따라 이용자 특성이 다르기 때문에 옥상공간의 이용행태와 선호도도 다를 것이며, 옥상공간의 이용을 활성화하기 위해서 이러한 점을 고려할 필요가 있다고 보았다. 이에 본 연구에서는 4개의 건물용도(공공건물, 교육연구건물, 의료건물, 판매건물)를 선정하여 연구대상지의 이용경험자를 대상으로 설문조사를 실시하였으며, 옥상공간의 이용행태와 선호도를 건물용도별로 비교분석하였다. 이때, 교차분석, 다중응답분석, 신뢰도분석, 일원배치 분산분석을 하였으며, 그 결과는 다음과 같다. 먼저 옥상공간의 이용행태에서 이용목적, 이용동기, 이용빈도, 평균체류시간이 건물용도별로 차이가 있는 것으로 나타났다. 특히, 이용목적의 경우, 모든 건물에서는 휴식을 위해서 옥상공간을 가장 많이 이용하는 것으로 나타났다. 한편, 공공건물에서는 대화와 흡연을, 교육연구건물에서는 흡연, 산책 및 스트레칭, 외부경관감상을, 의료건물에서는 산책 및 스트레칭과 대화를, 판매건물에서는 아이 돌보기와 대화를 목적으로 옥상공간을 많이 이용하는 것으로 나타났다. 또한, 옥상공간의 선호도에서도 식물유형, 포장재, 시설물 선호도가 건물용도별로 차이가 있는 것으로 나타났다. 특히, 식물유형의 경우, 공공건물 이용자들은 초본류와 채소류 및 수생식물을, 의료건물 이용자들은 채소류 및 수생식물을, 판매건물 이용자들은 모든 유형의 식물을 다른 용도의 건물 이용자들보다 더 선호하는 것으로 나타났다. 이러한 건물용도별 옥상공간의 이용행태와 선호도 차이를 고려하여 옥상공간을 조성함으로써 이용 활성화에 기여할 수 있을 것으로 기대한다.

Keywords

References

  1. Bae, J. M., H. J. Kwon, Y. S. Kim, and B. Y. You(2009) A case analysis apply the design elements to green roof site. Journal of the Korean Floral Art Research Association 13(4): 37-48.
  2. Belinda, Y. and N. H. Wong(2005) Resident perceptions and expectations of rooftop gardens in Singapore. Landscape and Urban Planning 73(4): 263-276. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2004.08.001
  3. Gil, S. H.(2007) A Study on the Post-construction Evaluation of Green Roof Projects Supported by Seoul Metropolitan Government. Mater's Thesis, Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea.
  4. Herrick, S. C.(2002) Grow a garden on your roof. Countryside and Small Stock Journal 86(5): 35.
  5. Huh, K. Y. and I. H. Kim(2004) Evaluating user's cognition and satisfaction in a hospital roofgarden environment: A case study of Asan Medical Center. Journal of the Korean Society for People, Plants and Environment 7(2): 62-73.
  6. Jang, S.W. and D. K. Lee(2008) Acomparative analysis of rooftop greening in Korea and Japan. Journal of the Korea Society of Environmental Restoration Technology 11(6): 143-152.
  7. Jeong, M. S. and D. S. Oh(2005) A study on characteristics of planning factors and improvement of a green roof system. Proceeding of the Regional Association of Architectural Institute of Korea Conference 1(1): 97-104.
  8. Kim, C. Y.(2003) AStudy on Enhanced Architectural Uses of the Building Rooftop Spaces. Master's Thesis, Yonsei University, Seoul, Korea.
  9. Kim, I. H., K. Y. Huh, A. H. Choi, and Y. I. Kim(2003a) The postoccupancy evaluation of roofgarden at hospital: A case study of Asan Medical Center. Journal of the Korean Institute of Landscape Architecture 31(5): 58-72.
  10. Kim, K. H.(2008) A Study on Actual Conditions and Improvements of Metropolitan Rooftop Landscape: Focused on Daegu Metropolitan City. Master's Thesis, Yeungnam University, Gyeongsan, Korea.
  11. Kim, S. B.(2012) A research of the residents' availability and health effectiveness based upon the types of green roof. Journal of the Korean Institute of Landscape Architecture 40(3): 60-68. https://doi.org/10.9715/KILA.2012.40.3.060
  12. Kim, S. B., K. J. Sim, H. D. Lee, and J. O. Kwon(2003b) A practical strategy for the use of the flat roof as a resource for greening of Daegu, Korea. Journal of the Korean Institute of Traditional Landscape Architecture 21(3): 54-62.
  13. Kim. H. S.(2013) A Study on the Revitalization Based on Visitors Satisfaction and Preference of the Hotel Roof Garden. Master's Thesis. Sangmyung University, Seoul, Korea.
  14. Kim. H.(2006) Level of Satisfaction and Preference of Afforestation of the Rooftop: Emphasis on Office Building of Seoul. Master's Thesis, Sangmyung University, Seoul, Korea.
  15. Lee, G. G.(2006) Visual preference in green roof sites. Journal of the Korean Institute of Landscape Architecture 34(5): 32-38.
  16. Lee, J. W.(2010) Citizen's Recognition on Use and Maintenance of Rooftop Gardens. Master's Thesis, Gyeongnam National University, Jinju, Korea.
  17. Na, H. Y. and H. S. Byun(2006) Research trend of rooftop afforestation. Journal of the Korean Association of Professional Geographers 40(1): 95-106.
  18. Park, E. J., K. Y. Kang, and M. A. Nam(2010) Green roof strategy for mitigating the urban heat Island effect. Gyeonggi Research Institute: Study of Policy 2010(10): 1-172.
  19. Song, H. M.(2010) The Study on the User Satisfaction Survey of Roof Garden on the Office Building and Department Store. Master's Thesis, Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea.
  20. The Korean Institute of Landscape Architecture(1999) Landscape Design. Seoul: Kimoondang.
  21. Yoon, J. Y., E. J. Kang, and H. K. Kang(2012) A study on the preference for green roof operators of Community Rehabilitation Center. Korean Journal of Environment and Ecology 26(3): 454-462.
  22. Yoon, S. W.(2005) The development and application of habitats environment evaluation model: Focused on local environmental assessment for determining priority areas for the implementation of green roof in Seoul. The Korea Society For Environmental Restoration and Revegetation Technology 8(3): 53-66.