DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

농어업유산의 경관가치를 측정하기 위한 평가항목 분석

An Analysis on the Measurement Items to Assess the Landscape Value of Agriculture and Fisheries Heritage

  • 최우영 (경희대학교 일반대학원 환경조경학과) ;
  • 민병욱 (계명대학교 생태조경학과)
  • 투고 : 2014.11.03
  • 심사 : 2014.11.27
  • 발행 : 2014.12.30

초록

The purpose of this research is first, to define what measurement items in terms of subjective consideration and preference can be used to assess the landscape values of agriculture and fisheries heritage, and second, to understand the perceptive patterns particularly how landscape experts weigh up the importance of the each measurement item. In order to extract the measurement items, extensive literature review was performed including research documents as well as domestic and international policy reports. A survey targeting the experts was conducted to ask their opinions on the importance of the selected items. For the analysis, SPSS 20.0 for Windows was used to carry out reliability analysis, descriptive statistics such as arithmetic mean and frequency distribution, factor analysis, and multiple linear regression modeling. The results are: the importance value of the landscape values in agriculture and fisheries heritage was 4.1494; the ratio value that the experts perceived the importance was 87.2%; and the average of the importance value of the analyzed items was 3.71. All the items have more than 3.00. Ten factor groups were summarized and defined whose total explanation power was 67.86%. The factor groups were named as lyricism, authenticity, environmentally-friendliness, durability, recognizability, regionality, visibility, value of sightseeing, social image, and universality. The factors influencing the landscape values are, in order of importance, recognizability, authenticity, visibility, universality, durability, and nativeness. According to the analysis, however, environmentally-friendliness, regionality, value of sightseeing, and social image were not as important.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Ban, Y. U., J. I. Baek, M. A. Kim, and J. O. Yoon, 2008, Classifying Rural Landscape Types and Developing Rural Landscape Evaluation Indicators Using Expert Delphi Survey Method. Rural Planning 14(3): 53-61.
  2. Chae, H. S. and H. M. Kim, 2005, A Study on the Classification of Landscape Elements for Effective Management of Agricultural Landscape. Rural Planning 11(3): 1-9.
  3. Cho, J. H. and J. H. Kwon, 2005, The Evaluation of Expectation Level/Actual Satisfaction Level of European Attraction Attribute and its Relationship to Re-visitation/Recommendation. Tourism Research 19(2): 19-34.
  4. Chun, M. S., 2006, A Study on the Characteristic Points of the Tourism Resources on the Historical Sites. Journal of the Korea Contents Association 6(1): 93-101.
  5. Frochot and Hughes, 2000, HISTOQUAL: The Development of a Historic Houses Assessment Scale. Tourism Management 21: 161.
  6. Han, M. Y., 2010, A Comparative Study on the Attributes of Cultural Heritage for Tourism between Korea and China: Focused on Korean and Chinese Tourists of Gyeong-bokgung and the Palace Museum. Hanyang University, Seoul.
  7. Jang, K. S., 2002, A study on the assessment scale of service quality in cultural and heritage tourist destination. Ph.D. Dissertation. Daegu University, Daegu.
  8. Jang, S. G., 2013, The Agricluture Heritage, Heritage Tourism, and Ecomuseum: A Study on Application of Ecomuseum for Linking Agriculture Heritage to Regional Revitalization. Journal of Agricultural Extension and Community Development 20(4): 989-1021. https://doi.org/10.12653/jecd.2013.20.4.0989
  9. Kang, Y. E., 2008, A Study on the Indicators for Visual Landscape Planning of Landscape Agricultural Region, MS Thesis. Seoul University, Seoul.
  10. Kim, D. C. and W. Y. Choi, 2014, IPA study of landscape potentiality of agricultural and fishery heritages. Journal of the Korean Institute of Landscape Architecture 42(4): 76-88. https://doi.org/10.9715/KILA.2014.42.4.076
  11. Kim, E. J., 2007, A Study on the Development of Evaluation Criteria for Rural Amenity. Ph. D. Dissertation. Seoul University, Seoul.
  12. Kim, H. M. and B. H. Kang, 2006, An Analysis of the Landscape Character in Environment Friendly Cultivated Land based on Rural Amenity. Korean J. Community Living Science 17(1): 11-21.
  13. Kim, J. S. and H. Lee, 2009, An Evaluation of the Quality and Level of Satisfaction on Royal Palace Tourism: Focusing on Authentic Experience and HISTOQUAL. Journal of Tourism Science 33(6): 33-54.
  14. Kim, K. Y., Y. H. Park, J. Y. Choi, J. G. Park and S. H. Park, 2005, Estimation of Agricultural Landscape Value and Management Policy: Esthetic- Economic Value and Environmental Policy. Research Report to Korean Environment Institute.
  15. Kim, S. B., 2009, A Study on the Rural Landscape Evaluation Indicators for Preservation and Management. Research Report to Rural Development Administration.
  16. Kim, S. B., B. H. Kang and H. M. Kim, 2006, Analysis of rural landscape's characteristics by using OECD agriculture landscape indicator. Research Report to Rural Development Administration.
  17. Koohafkan, Parviz, 2011, Conservation and adaptive management of GIAHS. Journal of Resources and Ecology 2(1): 22-28.
  18. Koohafkan, Parviz and Miguel Altieri, 2011a, GIAHS-A Legacy for the Future. Research Report to FAO.
  19. Koohafkan, Parviz and Miguel Altieri, 2011b, A methodological framewok for the dynamic conservation of GIAHS. Research Report to FAO.
  20. Lee, D. G. and S. H. Yun, 2002, Meanings and Measurement Scale Development on Rurality. Proceedings of the 51th Symposium on The Tourism Sciences Society of Korea.
  21. Lee, M. S. and D. B. Park, 2007, Typology of Urban People by Rurality Perception and Its Socio-demographic Characteristics. Rural Economic 30(3) 27-50.
  22. Lee, S. Y. and S. C. Kim, 2008, The Effects Relationships of Educational Factors between Festival Satisfaction and Behavioral Intentions on Culture Tourism Festival : The Case of Iksan Seodong Festival 2006. Journal of Tourism Science 32(1): 119-139.
  23. Park, M. E., 1998, A Study on the agri-environmental indicators. Research Report to Rural Development Administration.
  24. Park, J. Y. and K. S. Jang, 2000, The study in Buddhist temple visitor's satisfaction and revisit intention. Journal of Tourism & Hotel Management 2(1): 126-147.
  25. Shin, J. E., 2005, Educational effect on visitors of Heritage site: In case of Changduk Palace. Kyonggi University, Suwon.
  26. Park, J. J., S. B. Kim, and E. C. Lee, 2013, Adoption and Future Tasks of Nationally Important Agricultural Heritage System for Agricultural and Rural Resources Conservation. Rural Planning 19(4): 161-175. https://doi.org/10.7851/ksrp.2013.19.4.161
  27. Park, Y. H., 2012, A Study on the Establishment of Designation Criteria for Agricultural Heritage and Management System. Research Report to EKR.
  28. Poria, Y., R. Butler and D. Airey, 2003, The core of heritage tourism. Annuals of Tourism Research 30(1): 238-254. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0160-7383(02)00064-6
  29. Ramakrishnan, P. S., 2007, GIAHS: An Eco-Cultural Landscape Perspective.
  30. Ruy, C. B., 1995,. A Study on the Attitude in Relation to Choice Behavior of Travel Destination. MS Thesis. Sejong University, Seoul.
  31. Son, H. G., S. B. Kim, and Y. G. Shin, 2012, A overseas case study for institutionalization of the agricultural and rural heritage in Korea. Korean Journal of Agricultural Management and Policy 39(4):841-869.
  32. Willits, Fern K., Bealer, Robert C. and Timbers, Vincent L., 1990, Popular Images of Rurality. Rural Sociology 55(4): 559-578.
  33. Yang, B. S., 2006,. Relations of Tourist Experience, Authenticity and Tourist Satisfaction towards Cultural Tourism Sites. Ph. D. Dissertation. Donga University, Busan.
  34. Yoon, W. K. and S. I. Choi, 2012, Establishment of the agriculture and fisheries heritage system in Korea. Journal of Korean Society of Agricultural Extension 19(2): 465-495. https://doi.org/10.12653/jecd.2012.19.2.465
  35. http://news.mk.co.kr/newsRead.php?year=2014&no=634797.
  36. http://www.fao.com/GIAHS.
  37. http://www.unesco.or.kr/heritage/.