DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Comparing Efficiencies of R&D Projects Using DEA : Focused on Core Technology Development Project

DEA를 이용한 R&D 사업의 효율성 비교 : 원천기술개발사업을 중심으로

  • Kim, Heung-Kyu (School of Business Administration, Dankook University) ;
  • Kang, Won-Jin (Management of Technology Division, TECHNOVALUE) ;
  • Park, Jung-Hee (Division of Technology Commercialization, Korea Institute for Advancement of Technology) ;
  • Yeo, In-Kuk (Division of Technology Planning, Korea Institute for Advancement of Technology)
  • 김흥규 (단국대학교 경영학부) ;
  • 강원진 (기술과가치 MoT본부) ;
  • 박정희 (한국산업기술진흥원 기술사업화단) ;
  • 여인국 (한국산업기술진흥원 기술전략단)
  • Received : 2013.08.29
  • Accepted : 2013.09.06
  • Published : 2013.09.30

Abstract

In this paper, efficiencies of core technology development projects, conducted by Ministry of Trade, Industry and Energy, are compared. In the process, DEA (Data Envelopment Analysis) is utilized as a main technique for comparing efficiencies. For DEA, input oriented BCC Model is adopted with government grant, recipient expenditure, the number of participating institutions, and project duration as input factors, and the number of patents, the number of papers, and occurred sales as output factors. As a result, next generation mobile communication project turns out to be the most efficient project of all. Therefore, next generation mobile communication project should be benchmarked for the other projects to follow. However, these results should be used only for reference data since every project has a different objective and, of course, is run under a different environment.

Keywords

References

  1. Banker, R.D., Charnes A., and Cooper W.W., Some models for estimating technical and scale inefficiencies in data envelopment analysis. Management Science, 1984, Vol. 30, p 1078-1092. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.30.9.1078
  2. Charnes, A., Cooper W.W., and Rhodes E., Measuring the efficiency of decision making units. European Journal of Operational Research, 1979, Vol. 2, p 429-444.
  3. Cho, N.W. and Kim T.S., A Study for Establishing Key Performance Indicators of R&D Departments. Society of Korea Industrial and Systems Engineering, 2012, Vol. 35, p 48-54. https://doi.org/10.11627/jkise.2012.35.4.48
  4. Kim, H.K., Statistics for Dummies, Korea, Hakhyunsa, 2012.
  5. Fare, R., Grosskopf S., and Lovell C.A.K., The measurements of efficiency of production. Boston, USA, Kluwer- Nijhoff, 1985.
  6. Farris, J.A., Groesbk R.L., and Aken E.M.V., Letens G. Evaluating the relative performance of engineering design projects : A case study using data envelopment analysis. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 2006, Vol. 53, p 471-482. https://doi.org/10.1109/TEM.2006.878100
  7. Hsu, F.M. and Hsueh C.C., Measuring relative efficiency of government-sponsored R&D projects : A threestage approach. Evaluation and Program Planning, 2009, Vol. 32, p 178-186. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2008.10.005
  8. Hyon, M.S. and Yoo W.J., A Study on the Technology Transfer Efficiency for Public Institutes Using DEA Model. Society of Korea Industrial and Systems Engineering, 2008, Vol. 31, p 94-103.
  9. Mendenhall, W., Wackerly D., and Scheaffer R., Mathematical Statistics with Applications, 4th ed. California, USA, Duxbury, 1989.
  10. Park, S.M., Two-staged DEA/AR-I Performance Evaluation Model for R&D Projects Efficiency Correlation Analysis and Programs Positioning Investigation. Journal of the Korean Academic Association of Business Administration, 2010, Vol. 23, p 3285-3303.
  11. Yun, S.S., National R&D Project Management Review, Korea : National Assembly Budget Office, 2013.

Cited by

  1. 신재생에너지 원별 연구개발 효율성 분석 vol.24, pp.4, 2013, https://doi.org/10.5855/energy.2015.24.4.097
  2. An empirical study on factors affecting the survival period of re-startups vol.20, pp.6, 2013, https://doi.org/10.9728/dcs.2019.20.6.1243
  3. 국가 R&D 기술적 성과의 질적 효율성 분석에 관한 사례 연구 : 가축방역 분야를 중심으로 vol.42, pp.4, 2019, https://doi.org/10.11627/jkise.2019.42.4.008